Comparative reactivity studies of dppf-containing CpRu and (C6Me6)Ru complexes towards different donor ligands (dppf=1,1-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene)

[CpRu(dppf)Cl] (Cp=η⁵-C₅H₅) (1) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)Cl]PF₆ ((HMB)=η⁶-C₆Me₆) (3) react with different donor ligands to give rise to N-, P- and S-bonded complexes. The stoichiometric reactions of 1 and 3 with NaNCS give the mononuclear complexes [CpRu(dppf)(NCS)] (2) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)(NCS)]PF₆ (4), respectively, in yields above 80%, while 3 also gives a dppf-bridged diruthenium complex [(HMB)Ru(NCS)₂]₂(μ-dppf) (5) in 67% yield from reaction with four molar equivalents of NaNCS. Compound 5 is also obtained in 70% yield from the reaction of 4 with excess NaNCS. With CH₃CN in the presence of salts, both 1 and 3 give their analogous solvento derivatives [CpRu(dppf)(CH₃CN)]BPh₄ (6) and [(HMB)Ru(dppf)(CH₃CN)] (PF₆)₂ (7). With phosphines, the reaction of 1 gives chloro-displaced complexes [(CpRu(dppf)L]PF₆ (L =PMe₃ (8), PMe₂Ph(9)), whereas the reaction of 3 with PMe₂Ph leads to substitution of dppf, giving [(HMB)Ru(PMe₂Ph)₂Cl] PF₆ (10). The reaction of 1 with NaS₂CNEt₂ gives a dinuclear dppf-bridged complex [{CpRu(S₂CNEt₂)}₂(μ-dppf)] (11), whereas that of 3 results in loss of the HMB ligand giving a mononuclear complex [Ru(dppf)(S₂CNEt₂)₂] (12). With elemental sulfur S₈, 1 is oxidized to give a dinuclear CpRu^III dppf-chelated complex [{CpRu(dppf)}₂(μ-S₂)](BPh₄)Cl (13), whereas 3 undergoes oxidation at the ligand, giving a dppf-displaced complex [(HMB)Ru(CH₃CN)₂Cl]PF₆ (14) and free dppfS₂. The structures of 1, 2, 5-9, 11, 13 and 14 were established by X-ray single crystal diffraction analyses. Of these, 5 and 11 both contain a dppf-bridge between Ru^II centers, while 13 is a dinuclear CpRu^III disulfide-bridged complex; all the others are mononuclear. All complexes obtained were also spectroscopically characterized.