MODELS FOR BACTERIAL PHOTOSYNTHESIS: ELECTRON TRANSFER FROM PHOTOEXCITED SINGLET BACTERIOPHEOPHYTIN TO METHYL VIOLOGEN AND m-DINITROBENZENE |
| |
Authors: | Dewey Holten Maurice W Windsor William W Parson Martin Gouterman |
| |
Institution: | Department of Chemistry, Washington State University. Pullman, WA 99164, U.S.A.;*Departments of Biochemistry and Chemistry. University of Washington. Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A. |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract. As a model for the primary reactions of photosynthesis, we studied photochemical electron transfer from bacteriopheophytin (BPh) to methyl viologen (MVC12) and to m-dinitrobenzene (m-DNB) in solution. Both MVC12 and m-DNB cause reductions in the lifetime of the first excited singlet state of BPh (BPh*), in the fluorescence quantum yield, and in the quantum yield of the triplet state, BPh +. The quenching of BPh* probably results from electron transfer, which generates short-lived radical pairs involving the BPh radical cation (BPh+) and the reduced form of the quencher. Electron transfer from BPh* is thermodynamically favorable, but that from BPhT is not. From the magnitude of the quenching, we calculate rate constants for electron transfer in collision complexes formed between BPh* and MVC12 or m-DNB. Measurements of the quantum yield of the free BPh+ radical indicate that about 3/4 of the BPh+ MV+] radical pairs decay by reverse electron transfer, rather than dissociating to give the free radicals. Essentially all of the BPh+m-DNB +] radical pairs must decay by reverse electron transfer, because free BPh+ cannot be detected in this case. From these data, we estimate the rate constants for the reverse electron transfer reactions. The higher probability of dissociation in the BPh+ MV+] radical pair can be explained by coulombic repulsion. The rate of the primary electron transfer reaction in photosynthetic bacteria is comparable to that of forward electron transfer in the BPh* collision complexes. Reverse electron transfer, however, is at least 103-times slower in the radical pair formed in the bacterial reaction center than it is in BPh+m-DNB?], and more than 104-times slower than in BPh+ MV+]. The explanation for this dramatic and crucially important difference remains unclear, but several possibilities are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|