Comparison of quantitative methods for analysis of polyphasic pharmaceuticals |
| |
Authors: | Danielle Giron S Monnier M Mutz P Piechon T Buser F Stowasser K Schulze M Bellus |
| |
Institution: | (1) Novartis Pharma, Chemical and Analytical Research and Development, Basel, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | Adequate very sensitive quantification methods are needed for the development and are also now required for the monitoring
of undesirable solid form(s) as routine tests. The pre-requisite for quantitation are selectivity, sensitivity and most important
the purity of standards and their proper storage, what is a challenge for metastable forms.
Several analytical techniques are available such as X-ray diffraction, spectroscopy, thermal analysis and microcalorimetry.
The different steps of the validation of the analytical methods and problems to be solved are discussed. Examples illustrate
the different techniques and compare their possible advantages and limits. The relative standard deviation of measurements
should allow for checking the homogenization procedure of mixtures for calibration. The validation should be carried out following
ICH guidelines for validation of analytical methods. Comparison of different techniques in adequate concentration range add
confidence in the analytical results. |
| |
Keywords: | amorphous content of drug substances crystalline drug products FTIR FT-Raman microcalorimetry phase changes polymorphism pseudopolymorphism quantitative analysis solution calorimetry thermal analysis X-ray diffraction |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |