首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparison of two solid-phase microextraction methods for the quantitative analysis of VOCs in indoor air
Authors:Virginie Larroque  Valérie Desauziers  Pierre Mocho
Institution:(1) Laboratoire Génie de l’Environnement Industriel, Ecole des Mines d’Alès, Hélioparc, 2 avenue Pierre Angot, 64053 Pau Cedex 9, France;(2) Laboratoire de Thermique Energétique et Procédés, Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, B.P. 1155, 64000 Pau, France
Abstract:Competitive adsorption on adsorptive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibres implies careful determination of operating conditions for reliable quantitative analysis of VOCs in indoor air. With this objective, two analytical approaches, involving non-equilibrium and equilibrium extraction, were compared. The average detection limit obtained for GC-MS analysis of nine VOCs by the equilibrium method is 0.2 μg m−3, compared with 1.9 μg m−3 with the non-equilibrium method. The effect of the relative humidity of the air on the calibration plots was studied, and shown to affect acetone adsorption only. Hence, the concentrations that can be accurately determined are up to 9 μmol m−3. The methods were then applied to indoor air containing different concentrations of VOCs. The non-equilibrium method, involving short extraction time, can be used for detection of pollution peaks whereas equilibrium extraction is preferable for measurement of sub-μg m−3 ground concentration levels. MediaObjects/216_2006_714_Figa_HTML.jpg
Keywords:Solid-phase microextraction  PDMS-Carboxen  Indoor air  Volatile organic compounds  Humidity
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号