| Abstract: | The insight from, and conclusions of this paper motivate efficient and numerically robust ‘new’ variants of algorithms for solving the single response partial least squares regression (PLS1) problem. Prototype MATLAB code for these variants are included in the Appendix. The analysis of and conclusions regarding PLS1 modelling are based on a rich and nontrivial application of numerous key concepts from elementary linear algebra. The investigation starts with a simple analysis of the nonlinear iterative partial least squares (NIPALS) PLS1 algorithm variant computing orthonormal scores and weights. A rigorous interpretation of the squared P ‐loadings as the variable‐wise explained sum of squares is presented. We show that the orthonormal row‐subspace basis of W ‐weights can be found from a recurrence equation. Consequently, the NIPALS deflation steps of the centered predictor matrix can be replaced by a corresponding sequence of Gram–Schmidt steps that compute the orthonormal column‐subspace basis of T ‐scores from the associated non‐orthogonal scores. The transitions between the non‐orthogonal and orthonormal scores and weights (illustrated by an easy‐to‐grasp commutative diagram), respectively, are both given by QR factorizations of the non‐orthogonal matrices. The properties of singular value decomposition combined with the mappings between the alternative representations of the PLS1 ‘truncated’ X data (including P t W ) are taken to justify an invariance principle to distinguish between the PLS1 truncation alternatives. The fundamental orthogonal truncation of PLS1 is illustrated by a Lanczos bidiagonalization type of algorithm where the predictor matrix deflation is required to be different from the standard NIPALS deflation. A mathematical argument concluding the PLS1 inconsistency debate (published in 2009 in this journal) is also presented. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
