Implementation of proficiency testing schemes for a limited number of participants |
| |
Authors: | Maria Belli Stephen L. R. Ellison Ales Fajgelj Ilya Kuselman Umberto Sansone Wolfhard Wegscheider |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) National Agency for Environmental Protection and Technical Services (APAT), Via di Castel Romano, 100, 00128 Rome, Italy;(2) LGC Limited, Queens Road, Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LY, UK;(3) Agency’s Laboratories, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Seibersdorf, Wagramer Strasse 5, 1400 Vienna, Austria;(4) The National Physical Laboratory of Israel (INPL), Danciger “A” Bldg., Givat Ram, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel;(5) University of Leoben, Franz-Josef Strasse 18, 8700 Leoben, Austria |
| |
Abstract: | ![]() A metrological background for the selection and use of proficiency testing (PT) schemes for a limited number N of laboratories-participants (less than 20–30) is discussed. The following basic scenarios are taken into account: (1) adequate matrix certified reference materials (CRM) or in-house reference materials (IHRM) with traceable property values are available for PT use as test items; (2) no appropriate matrix CRM is available, but a CRM or IHRM with traceable property values can be applied as a spike or similar; (3) only an IHRM with limited traceability is available. The discussion also considers the effect of a limited population of PT participants N p on statistical assessment of the PT results for a given sample of N responses from this population. When N p is finite and the sample fraction N/N p is not negligible, a correction to the statistical parameters may be necessary. Scores suitable for laboratory performance assessment in such PT schemes are compared. Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Metrology, November 2006, Tel Aviv, Israel. |
| |
Keywords: | Proficiency testing Sample size Population Traceability Measurement uncertainty |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|