Investigation of the radical copolymerization and terpolymerization of maleic anhydride and norbornenes by an in situ 1H NMR analysis of kinetics and by the mercury method: Evidence for the lack of charge‐transfer‐complex propagation

The radical copolymerization of electron‐deficient maleic anhydride (MA) and electron‐rich norbornene (NB) derivatives with 2,2′‐azobis(isobutyronitrile) (AIBN) in dioxane‐d₈ has been monitored in situ by ¹H NMR spectroscopy with free induction decays recorded every 30 min at 60, 70, or 84 °C. The ratios of the monomer pairs were varied in some cases. The NB derivatives employed in this study included bicyclo2.2.1]hept‐2‐ene (NB), t‐butyl 5‐norbornene‐2‐carboxylate, methyl 5‐norbornene‐2‐methyl‐2‐carboxylate, and ethyl tetracyclo4.4.0.1^2,5.1^7,10]dodec‐3‐ene‐8‐carboxylate. Decomposition of AIBN, consumption of the monomers, feed ratios, endo/exo ratios, copolymer compositions, and copolymer yields were studied as a function of polymerization time. Furthermore, a homopolymerizable third monomer (t‐butyl methacrylate, methacrylic acid, t‐butyl acrylate, or acrylic acid) was added to the NB/MA 1/1 system, revealing that the methacrylic monomer polymerizes rapidly in the early stage and that the ratio of MA to NB in the terpolymer strongly deviates from 1/1. In contrast, however, the acrylic monomers are more uniformly incorporated into the polymer. Nevertheless, these studies indicate that MA and NB do not always behave as a pair in radical polymerization and disproves the commonly believed charge‐transfer mechanism. Electron‐deficient fumaronitrile was also included in the kinetics study. To further understand the copolymerization mechanism, MA and NB were competitively reacted with a cyclohexyl radical generated by the treatment of cyclohexylmercuric chloride with sodium borohydride (mercury method). A gas chromatographic analysis of the reaction mixtures has revealed that a cyclohexyl radical reacts with MA almost exclusively in competition and that the cyclohexyl adduct of MA essentially accounts for all the products in a mass balance experiment, eliminating a possibility of the formation of an adduct involving the MA–NB charge‐transfer complex. Thus, the participation of a charge‐transfer complex in the copolymerization of MA and NB cannot be important. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 38: 3521–3542, 2000