Synthesis and Structures of Homoleptic Methyl‐ and Phenylthiomethylaluminium Complexes [Al(CH2SR)3](R = Me,Ph) |
| |
Authors: | Tobias Rü ffer,Clemens Bruhn,Eduard Rusanov,Karsten Nordhoff,Dirk Steinborn |
| |
Abstract: | Sulfur‐substituted methylmercury compounds [Hg(CH2SR)2]( 1a, R = Me; 1b, R = Ph ) react with aluminium amalgam in refluxing toluene with transmetallation to give homoleptic tris(thiomethyl)aluminium complexes [Al(CH2SR)3]( 2a, R = Me; 2b, R = Ph ) (degree of conversion: >80%, isolated yields: 2a 63%, 2b 41%). Their identities were confirmed by NMR spectros‐copy (1H, 13C) and X‐ray crystal structure analyses. In crystals of compound 2a the aluminium atoms possess a trigonal‐bipyramidal arrangement with the coordination polyhedron defined by three carbon and two sulfur atoms. Two of the three CH2SMe ligands are bridging ligands (μ‐η2; 1kC:2kS), the third one is terminal bound (η1; kC). The structure is polymeric. Crystals are threaded by helical chains built up of six‐membered Al2C2S2 rings. Crystals of 2b are built up of centrosymmetrical dimers with six‐membered Al2C2S2 rings having bridging CH2SPh ligands (μ‐η2; 1kC:2kS). On each Al atom two terminal (η1; kC)CH2SPh ligands are bound. They exhibit quite different Al‐C‐S angles (116.7(4) and 106.5(3)?). Similar values (114.32115.7? and 109.52109.9?) were found in ab initio calculations of model compounds [{Al(CH2SR)3}2]( 3a, R=H; 3b, R=Me; 3c, R=CH=CH2 ). A conformational energy diagram for rotation of one of the terminal CH2SH ligand in the parent compound 3a around the Al‐C bond is discussed in terms of repulsive interactions of lone electron pairs of sulfur atoms. |
| |
Keywords: | Sulfur‐functionalized methyl ligands Organoaluminium compounds Crystal structures Ab initio calculations |
|
|