首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Formulating and solving production planning problems
Institution:1. AIR LIQUIDE Forschung und Entwicklung GmbH, Frankfurt Innovation Campus, Gwinnerstrasse 27-33, Frankfurt am Main 60388, Germany;2. AIR LIQUIDE Large Industries, 57 avenue Carnot BP 313, Champigny-Sur-Marne 94503, France;3. AIR LIQUIDE Global Management Services GmbH, Olof-Palme-Strasse 35, Frankfurt am Main 60439, Germany;1. FedEx Europe, Middle East, Indian Subcontinent & Africa, Brussels, Belgium;2. Faculty of Economics and Business, ORSTAT, KU Leuven, Belgium;3. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Tsinghua University, China;1. School of Mathematics, Southeast University, Nanjing, China;2. School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China;3. Delft Center for Systems and Control, TU Delft, The Netherlands;4. Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
Abstract:Production planning problems frequently involve the assignment of jobs or operations to machines. The simplest model of this problem is the well known assignment problem (AP). However, due to simplifying assumptions this model does not provide implementable solutions for many actual production planning problems. Extensions of the simple assignment model known as the generalized assignment problem (GAP) and the multi-resource generalized assignment problem (MRGAP) have been developed to overcome this difficulty. This paper presents an extension of the (MRGAP) to allow splitting individual batches across multiple machines, while considering the effect of setup times and setup costs. The extension is important for many actual production planning problems, including ones in the injection molding industry and in the metal cutting industry. We formulate models which are logical extensions of previous models which ignored batch splitting for the problem we address. We then give different formulations and suggest adaptations of a genetic algorithm (GA) and simulated annealing (SA). A systematic evaluation of these algorithms, as well as a Lagrangian relaxation (LR) approach, is presented.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号