Investigation of the electronic, photosubstitution, redox, and surface properties of new ruthenium(II)-containing amphiphiles

A series of pyridine- and phenol-based ruthenium(II)-containing amphiphiles with bidentate ligands of the following types are reported: (L(PyI))Ru(II)(bpy)(2)](PF(6))(2) (1), (L(PyA))Ru(II)(bpy)(2)](PF(6))(2) (2), (L(PhBuI))Ru(II)(bpy)(2)](PF(6)) (3), and (L(PhClI))Ru(II)(bpy)(2)](PF(6)) (4). Species 1 and 2 are obtained by treatment of Ru(bpy)(2)Cl(2)] with the ligands L(PyI) (N-(pyridine-2-ylmethylene)octadecan-1-amine) and L(PyA) (N-(pyridine-2-ylmethyl)octadecan-1-amine). The imine species 3 and 4 are synthesized by reaction of Ru(bpy)(2)(CF(3)SO(3))(2)] with the amine ligands HL(PhBuA) (2,4-di-tert-butyl-6-((octadecylamino)methyl)phenol), and HL(PhClA) (2,4-dichloro-6-((octadecylamino)methyl)phenol). Compounds 1-4 are characterized by means of electrospray ionization (ESI(+)) mass spectrometry, elemental analyses, as well as electrochemical methods, infrared and UV-visible absorption and emission spectroscopies. The cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of 1-2 are marked by two successive processes around -1.78 and -2.27 V versus Fc(+)/Fc attributed to bipyridine reduction. A further ligand-centered reductive process is seen for 1. The Ru(II)/Ru(III) couple appears at 0.93 V versus Fc(+)/Fc. The phenolato-containing 3 and 4 species present relatively lower reduction potentials and more reversible redox behavior, along with Ru(II/III) and phenolate/phenoxyl oxidations. The interpretation of observed redox behavior is supported by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Complexes 1-4 are surface-active as characterized by compression isotherms and Brewster angle microscopy. Species 1 and 2 show collapse pressures of about 29-32 mN·m(-1), and are strong candidates for the formation of redox-responsive monolayer films.