Abstract: | It is shown that AC(ℝ), the axiom of choice for families of non‐empty subsets of the real line ℝ, does not imply the statement PW(ℝ), the powerset of ℝ can be well ordered. It is also shown that (1) the statement “the set of all denumerable subsets of ℝ has size 2 ” is strictly weaker than AC(ℝ) and (2) each of the statements (i) “if every member of an infinite set of cardinality 2 has power 2 , then the union has power 2 ” and (ii) “ℵ(2 ) ≠ ℵω” (ℵ(2 ) is Hartogs' aleph, the least ℵ not ≤ 2 ), is strictly weaker than the full axiom of choice AC. |