排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 4 毫秒
1
1.
Gary J. Weisel 《Physics in Perspective (PIP)》2008,10(4):396-437
I review the changing conceptions of basic physics that the U.S. plasma-physics community put forward in postwar America.
I give special attention to the tense relationship between fusion research and the more general study of plasmas in astrophysics,
space science, and industry.Although fusion research often led to results that were regarded as basic plasma physics, its
dominating influence tended to weaken other plasma work, as becomes evident when I compare the public statements and professional
fortunes of plasma scientists during the 1960s, when fusion research experienced a downturn, with those of the 1970s, when
fusion research flourished. I also show that the plasmaphysics community’s conceptions of basic physics were not highly regarded
or easily understood by science administrators and the general physics community. To make this point, I contrast two general
ideas of basic physics: the Big Questions conception and the Properties and Phenomena conception.
Gary J.Weisel; Gary J.Weisel is Associate Professor of Physics at Penn State Altoona in Altoona, Pennsylvania. His historical
research focuses on the development of subdisciplines in twentieth-century physics. He also carries out research in nuclear
physics and materials science. 相似文献
1