Analysis of 28 insecticides in curry leaves (Murraya koenigii L.) by gas chromatography and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry

A simple and efficient method was developed for analysis of 28 insecticides (organochlorines, organophosphates and synthetic pyrethroids) in curry leaves (Murraya koenigii L.). The extraction of the analytes was carried out with acidified acetonitrile and purification with magnesium sulphate, primary secondary amine along with graphitised carbon black to remove excess chlorophyll content in curry leaves. Acetonitrile extracts were changed into hexane + acetone (9 + 1) and hexane + toluene (9 + 1) in the final step. In another method ethyl acetate was used for extraction and purification was carried out as above. The analytes in the samples were determined by gas chromatography (GC) and confirmed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Use of ethyl acetate increased the recovery of the analytes, but co-extractive interference led to higher GC maintenance. Acidified acetonitrile was found to be a better extraction solvent compared with ethyl acetate. The use of hexane:toluene (9:1) as exchange solvent increased the recovery of organochlorine insecticides compared with hexane:acetone (9:1). The limit of quantification (LOQ) of the method was 0.01 mg kg^?1 for organochlorine insecticides and 0.05 mg kg^?1 for organophosphates and synthetic pyrethroids. The recoveries of organochlorines were within 70.36–82.45%; organophosphates, 82.54–90.93% and synthetic pyrethroids, 88.45–90.71% at the LOQ level. The method developed was found suitable for analysis of real samples of curry leaves. The pesticides detected in curry leaves collected from the retail market were mainly organophosphates and synthetic pyrethroids.     

Dissipation kinetics and risk assessment of fluopyram and tebuconazole in mango (Mangifera indica)

The combination formulation of fluopyram and tebuconazole is used for control of fungal diseases and post-harvest disease management of mango. Dissipation study of the fungicides on mango was carried out after giving applications of fluopyram +tebuconazole at the standard and double doses of 150 + 150 and 300 + 300 g active ingredient hectare^?1 (g a.i. ha^?1), respectively. Fluopyram residues on mango were 0.8 and 0.9 mg kg^?1 and tebuconazole residues, 0.308 and 0.4 mg kg^?1 after three and four applications at the standard dose. At double dose treatment the residue levels for fluopyram were 1.266 and 1.453 mg kg^?1 and tebuconazole, 0.681 and 0.853 mg kg^?1, respectively. Residue dissipation in mango fruits followed first order rate kinetics and the half-life (DT₅₀) were 4.3–5.4 days for fluopyram and 3–3.8 days for tebuconazole. Faster dissipation of the fungicides was observed after the fourth treatment which directly correlated to higher rainfall during that period. The combined residues of fluopyram+tebuconazole reduced to below their maximum residue limits (MRLs) within 36–38 days. Dietary risk assessment on human health indicated that fluopyram and tebuconazole application to mango is unlikely to pose risk to human beings. This study gives valuable information on the judicious use of this combination formulation on mango, especially towards harvest.     

Development and Validation of Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Cefetamet in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

Two simple and sensitive spectrophotometric methods for the determination of cefetamet in either pure form or in its pharmaceutical formulations were described. The method Ⅰ is based on the interaction of 3-methylbenzo[d]- thiazolin-2-one hydrazone （MBTH） with cefetamet in the presence of freshly prepared ferric chloride in a neutral medium. The resulting blue colored product has λmax at 628 nm. The method Ⅱ describes the reduction of ferric ion by the drug to ferrous ion followed by a complex formation reaction with 1,10-phenanthroline （1,10-phen） to form an orange red colored chromogen exhibiting 2max at 510 nm. The products are stable for more than 5 and 8 h respectively. Common excipients used as additives in pharmaceutical preparations do not interfere in the proposed methods. Both methods are highly reproducible and have been applied to a wide variety of pharmaceutical preparations and the results are comparable with those of official methods.