Modeling the adsorption of U(VI) onto animal chitin using coupled mass transfer and surface complexation

This paper reports the development of a treatment system, using animal chitin as a passive biosorbent, for removing U(VI) from aqueous waste streams. An integral part of this system is a model that provides for the optimization of the treatment system through simulation of U(VI) removal efficiency based on the characteristics of the influent waste stream. The model accounts for changing solution matrix conditions through the coupling of surface complexation and mass transfer models. Complexation of U(VI) by chitin surface sites was modeled using FITEQL. Application of FITEQL in the “forward” mode provided the sorbed and aqueous phase concentrations needed for the mass transfer model. The mass transfer model was derived for both batch and continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR) configurations using Fick's Law, reactor mass balances and rate law expressions. The coupled model was successfully validated using CSTR data at pH 6.5 and rate constants determined from batch sorption experiments. The CSTR configuration yields a steady-state, eighty percent U(VI) removal for 1 μM influent U(VI) with a solution-phase pH of 6.5 and 3.9 g l⁻¹ chitin.     

Separation of dixanthogen and sulphur xanthates by H.P.L.C.: Disproportionation of Sulphur Dixanthates

High-performance liquid chromatography on C₁₃ reverse-phase or silica gel columns, with methanol—water (85:15) or n-hexane, respectively, as mobile phase, is used to separate dixanthogens and sulphur xanthates with different alkyl groups. Detection limits are as low as 1 ng (0.05 ppm) with u.v. detectors. When molecular emission cavity analysis is used for the detector, detection limits are reduced to ca. 0.25 ng (0.013 ppm). In aqueous methanol, alkyl sulphur dixanthates, (ROCS₂)₂S, disproportionate to yield mixtures of the corresponding dixanthogen, (ROCS₂)₂ , alkyl sulphur monoxanthates, (ROCS₂)₂S₂ , and dixanthates.     

1‐Bromo‐2,6‐bis­[(pyrazol‐1‐yl)­methyl]­benzene

The title compound, C₁₄H₁₃BrN₄, has a planar central unit, (C)₂C₆H₃Br, the pendant pyrazole rings forming dihedral angles of 83.8 (3) and 89.3 (3)° with this plane. The pyrazole rings are oriented such that there is an approximate twofold axis coincident with the C—Br bond.     

Alkali-metal-mediated zincation of anisole: synthesis and structures of three instructive ortho-zincated complexes

The new concept of alkali-metal-mediated zincation (AMMZ), formally a zinc-hydrogen exchange reaction but one that requires the participation of an alkali metal, is applied here to the alkyl aryl ether anisole, an important molecule for studying directed ortho-metalation (DoM) chemistry. Treating one molar equivalent of anisole with the lithium dialkyl-TMP zincate reagent [THF.Li(mu-TMP)(mu-tBu)Zn(tBu)] (1) in hexane solution affords the mono-ortho-zincated complex [THF.Li(mu-TMP)(mu-o-C6H4OMe)Zn(tBu)] (2), which establishes that 1 functions as an alkyl base although previously it was regarded as an amido (TMP) base in other DoM applications. Treating two molar equivalents of anisole with 1, and increasing the reaction time, affords the bis-ortho-zincated complex [THF.Li(mu-TMP)(mu-o-C6H4OMe)Zn(o-C6H4OMe)] (3), which establishes that 1 can also function as a dual alkyl base. Omitting THF and rerunning the reaction with one or two molar equivalents of anisole affords [Ph(Me)O.Li(mu-TMP)(mu-o-C6H4OMe)Zn(tBu)] (4), which remarkably contains a combination of neutral and ortho-deprotonated anisole ligands. On isolating crystalline 4 from solution and adding THF, it converts to 2 and then to 3 on further stirring of the solution, as determined by NMR studies. This fact, along with other observations, would suggest that a complex-induced proximity effect does not need to be invoked to explain the observed zincation of anisole. The crystal structures of 2-4 are presented, as are their 1H, 13C, and 7Li NMR spectra recorded in C6D6 solution.