通过价层电子密度分析展现分子电子结构（英文）

迄今已有众多实空间函数被提出用来揭示化学上感兴趣的分子电子结构特征,例如化学键、孤对电子和多中心电子共轭。在这些分析方法中,电子定域化函数(ELF)、电子密度的拉普拉斯(▽~2p)和变形密度(rdef)被广泛用于实际研究。众所周知,分析分子的总电子密度无法像以上提及的方法那样展现出与分子电子结构有关的丰富的信息。但是,在本文中,通过数个实例以及通过与ELF、▽~2p和rdef的对比,我们指出若只关注价层电子密度分布,分子电子结构特征也是可能被探究的。我们发现对大多数情况,对非常简单的价层电子密度的分析也可以给出与ELF、▽~2p和rdef分析类似的信息,并且这种分析具有计算复杂度更低的额外优点。我们希望本文的工作可以使得化学家们关注长期被忽视的价层电子密度所具有的重要价值。也值得注意的是,价层电子密度分析并非完全没有缺点,当这种方法无法提供丰富信息的时候,研究者仍需借助于其它类型的分析手段。     

通过价层电子密度分析展现分子电子结构

迄今已有众多实空间函数被提出用来揭示化学上感兴趣的分子电子结构特征,例如化学键、孤对电子和多中心电子共轭。在这些分析方法中,电子定域化函数(ELF)、电子密度的拉普拉斯(∇²ρ)和变形密度(ρ_def)被广泛用于实际研究。众所周知,分析分子的总电子密度无法像以上提及的方法那样展现出与分子电子结构有关的丰富的信息。但是,在本文中,通过数个实例以及通过与ELF、∇²ρ和ρ_def的对比,我们指出若只关注价层电子密度分布,分子电子结构特征也是可能被探究的。我们发现对大多数情况,对非常简单的价层电子密度的分析也可以给出与ELF、∇²ρ和ρ_def分析类似的信息,并且这种分析具有计算复杂度更低的额外优点。我们希望本文的工作可以使得化学家们关注长期被忽视的价层电子密度所具有的重要价值。也值得注意的是,价层电子密度分析并非完全没有缺点,当这种方法无法提供丰富信息的时候,研究者仍需借助于其它类型的分析手段。     

Accurate theoretical evaluation of strain energy of all-carboatomic ring (cyclo[2n]carbon), boron nitride ring,and cyclic polyacetylene

Cyclocarbon fully consists of sp-hybridized carbon atoms, which shows quite unusual electronic and geometric structures compared to common molecules. In this work, we systematically studied strain energy (SE) of cyclocarbons of different sizes using regression analysis method based on electronic energies evaluated at the very accurate DLPNO-CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ theoretical level. In addition, ring strain of two systems closely related to cyclocarbon, boron nitride (BN) ring, and cyclic polyacetylene (c-PA), is also explored. Very ideal relationships between SE and number of repeat units ($n)$ are built for cyclo[2$n$]carbon, B$_{n}$N$_{n}$, and [2$n$]c-PA as ${\rm SE} = 555.0\cdot n^{-1}$, 145.1$\cdot n^{-1}$, and 629.8$\cdot n^{-1}$ kcal$\cdot $mol$^{-1}$, respectively, and the underlying reasons of the difference and similarity in their SEs are discussed from electronic structure perspective. In addition, force constant of harmonic potential of C-C-C angles in cyclocarbon is derived based on SE values, the result is found to be 56.23 kcal$\cdot $mol$^{-1}\cdot $rad$^{-2}$. The possibility of constructing homodesmotic reactions to calculate SEs of cyclocarbons is also explored in this work, although this method is far less rigorous than the regression analysis method, its result is qualitatively correct and has the advantage of much lower computational cost. In addition, comparisons show that $\omega $B97XD/def2-TZVP is a good inexpensive alternative to the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/cc-pVTZ for evaluating energies used in deriving SE, while the popular and very cheap B3LYP/6-31G(d) level should be used with caution for systems with global electron conjugation such as c-PA.