纵向数据下非参数带测量误差的部分线性变系数模型的估计

本文研究纵向数据下非参数部分带有测量误差的部分线性变系数模型的估计.利用B样条函数近似模型中的变系数函数,构造偏差修正的二次推断函数,得到模型中未知参数和变系数函数的估计.证明变系数函数估计量的相合性和参数估计量的渐近正态性.数值模拟和实例分析结果表明所提估计方法在有限样本下的有效性.     

Asymptotic expansion for vector-valued sequences of random variables with focus on Wiener chaos

We develop the asymptotic expansion theory for vector-valued sequences ${\left(F_N\right)}_{N\ge 1}$ of random variables in terms of the convergence of the Stein–Malliavin matrix associated with the sequence $F_N$. Our approach combines the classical Fourier approach and the recent Stein–Malliavin theory. We find the second order term of the asymptotic expansion of the density of $F_N$ and we illustrate our results by several examples.     

A priori bounds and multiplicity for fully nonlinear equations with quadratic growth in the gradient

We consider fully nonlinear uniformly elliptic equations with quadratic growth in the gradient, such as

$?F(x,u,Du,D^{2}u)=\lambda c(x)u+〈M(x)Du,Du〉+h(x)$

in a bounded domain with a Dirichlet boundary condition; here $\lambda \in \mathbb{R}$, $c,h\in L^p(\mathrm{\Omega })$, $p>n\ge 1$, $c?0$ and the matrix M satisfies $0<{\mu }_{1}I\le M\le {\mu }_{2}I$. Recently this problem was studied in the “coercive” case $\lambda c\le 0$, where uniqueness of solutions can be expected; and it was conjectured that the solution set is more complex for noncoercive equations. This conjecture was verified in 2015 by Arcoya, de Coster, Jeanjean and Tanaka for equations in divergence form, by exploiting the integral formulation of the problem. Here we show that similar phenomena occur for general, even fully nonlinear, equations in nondivergence form. We use different techniques based on the maximum principle.We develop a new method to obtain the crucial uniform a priori bounds, which permit to us to use degree theory. This method is based on basic regularity estimates such as half-Harnack inequalities, and on a Vázquez type strong maximum principle for our kind of equations.     

Multivariate optimization and comparison between conventional extraction (CE) and ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) of carotenoid extraction from cashew apple

Carotenoids are an essential component of cashew and can be used in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, natural pigment, food additives, among other applications. The present work focuses on optimizing and comparing conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction methods. Every optimization step took place with a 1:1 (w:w) mixture of yellow and red cashew apples lyophilized and ground in a cryogenic mill. A Simplex-centroid design was applied for both methods, and the solvents acetone, methanol, ethanol, and petroleum ether were evaluated. After choosing the extractor solvent, a central composite design was applied to optimize the sample mass (59–201 mg) and extraction time (6–34 min). The optimum conditions for the extractor solvent were 38% acetone, 30% ethanol, and 32% petroleum ether for CE and a mixture of 44% acetone and 56% methanol for UAE. The best experimental conditions for UAE were a sonication time of 19 min and a sample mass of 153 mg, while the CE was 23 min and 136 mg. Comparing red and yellow cashews, red cashews showed a higher carotenoid content in both methodologies. The UAE methodology was ca. 21% faster, presented a more straightforward composition of extracting solution, showed an average yield of superior carotenoid content in all samples compared to CE. Therefore, UAE has demonstrated a simple, efficient, fast, low-cost adjustment methodology and a reliable alternative for other applications involving these bioactive compounds in the studied or similar matrix.     

Evolving a three-world framework for solving algebraic equations in the light of what a student has met before

In this paper we consider data from a study in which students shift from linear to quadratic equations in ways that do not conform to established theoretical frameworks. In solving linear equations, the students did not exhibit the ‘didactic cut’ of Filloy and Rojano (1989) or the subtleties arising from conceiving an equation as a balance (Vlassis, 2002). Instead they used ‘procedural embodiments’, shifting terms around with added ‘rules’ to obtain the correct answer (Lima & Tall, 2008). Faced with quadratic equations, the students learn to apply the formula with little success. The interpretation of this data requires earlier theories to be seen within a more comprehensive framework that places them in an evolving context. We use the developing framework of three worlds of mathematics (Tall, 2004, Tall, 2013), based fundamentally on human perceptions and actions and their consequences, at each stage taking into account the experiences that students have ‘met-before’ (Lima and Tall, 2008, McGowen and Tall, 2010). These experiences may be supportive in new contexts, encouraging pleasurable generalization, or problematic, causing confusion and even mathematical anxiety. We consider how this framework explains and predicts the observed data, how it evolves from earlier theories, and how it gives insights that have both theoretical and practical consequences.