PHOTOREVERSION VON VIER GRUPPEN UV-INDUZIERTER MUTATIONEN ZUR GIFTRESISTENZ IM NICHTPHOTOREAKTIVIERBAREN E. COLI

Abstract— In the non-photoreaclivable bacterial strain E. coli B/phr^-/MC2 the photoreversion of four groups of u.v.-induced mutations were investigated. They lead to resistance to Chloramphenicol (2 mg/l; "C"), Penicillin (13 or 16 mg/l; "P13" and "P16") or Streptomycin (3 mg/l; "S"). The u.v.-dose curve is concave for the C-mutations (two to three hits), about linear for P13 and S, and they reach peaks and decrease at high u.v.-doses. Though no photoreactivation of killing (PR) is present there is photoreversion of all four types of mutations (PRM). At u.v.-doses below the peaks in average about 43 per cent mutations are photoreversible. At high u.v.-doses the curves with light-post treatment (L) cross the darkcurves (D). In the photoreactivable strain B/r (by the spontaneous mutation MC2 to Mitomycin-resistance strain B/phr^- was made about as u.v.-resistant as B/r is) the photoreversion of the mutation groups C, P13 and P16 (S was not investigated here) was much higher, in average about 77 per cent at low doses. It is assumed that the difference in PRM of about 34 per cent between both strains is due to a PRM-mechanism present in B/r but not in B/phr^-/MC2; this mechanism may be the photoreactivating enzyme that opens thymine-dimers. The PRM in B/phr-/MC2 must then be due to a second mechanism which is probably not the dimer opening enzyme. It may be the same mechanism as in the case of mutations of phage kappa which are induced by u.v. and reversed partially by light, both extra cellularly. The premutations giving this second type of PRM may perhaps be cytosine-hydrate in the DNA. Tn average about 23 per cent mutations of B/r are photostable. Since this ratio decreases with low u.v.-doses in the C-mutations and increases in P13 and in P16 probably two types of photostable premutations seem to exist.     

Estimating entropies from molecular dynamics simulations

While the determination of free-energy differences by MD simulation has become a standard procedure for which many techniques have been developed, total entropies and entropy differences are still hardly ever computed. An overview of techniques to determine entropy differences is given, and the accuracy and convergence behavior of five methods based on thermodynamic integration and perturbation techniques was evaluated using liquid water as a test system. Reasonably accurate entropy differences are obtained through thermodynamic integration in which many copies of a solute are desolvated. When only one solute molecule is involved, only two methods seem to yield useful results, the calculation of solute-solvent entropy through thermodynamic integration, and the calculation of solvation entropy through the temperature derivative of the corresponding free-energy difference. One-step perturbation methods seem unsuitable to obtain entropy estimates.