We analyzed two “home made” contaminated fat samples, displaying both the same WHO–toxic equivalent quantities (WHO–TEQ) concentration (12 pg WHO–TEQ g−1). They were spiked with either a low or a high amount of DL-PCBs. In both cases, the DR-CALUX® measured concentration (picogram 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) eq. g−1) corresponded to the PCDD/Fs WHO–TEQ concentration only. A good agreement was nevertheless found between the DR-CALUX® measurements and the recalculated DR-CALUX®-TEQ contents (using DR-CALUX®-REP instead of WHO–TEF), demonstrating that the observed response was due, in both cases, to the addition of the responses of the standards added to the fat. By contrast, in real contaminated samples (feed or cod liver samples), DR-CALUX® measured concentrations were similar to WHO–TEQ GC–HRMS measured concentrations. But, depending on the PCDD/Fs and DL-PCBs congener content, the DR-CALUX® measured concentrations were either lower or higher than calculated DR-CALUX®-TEQ contents, demonstrating that possible co-extracted contaminants contributed to the CALUX response.
Owing to these divergences, the quantitative determination of dioxin-like content in food and feed using CALUX as screening method is questionable, except for samples displaying constant congener patterns, in which cases, correction factors could be applied. 相似文献