Liquid–Liquid–Liquid Micro Extraction Combined with CE for the Determination of Rare Earth Elements in Water Samples

A simple method for determination of rare earth elements (REEs) by liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction (LLLME) coupled with capillary electrophoresis and ultraviolet technique was developed. In the LLLME system, 40 mmol L^?1 4-benzoyl-3-methy-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolinone (PMBP) acted as extractant and 4% (v/v) formic acid was used as back-extraction solution. The parameters influencing the LLLME, including the type of the organic solvent, sample pH, formic acid concentration, PMBP concentration, extraction time, volume of organic solvent, stirring rate and phase volume ratio, were investigated. Under the optimized conditions, the detection limits (S/N = 3) of REEs were in the range of 0.19–0.70 ng mL^?1. The developed method was successfully applied to the determination of trace amounts of REEs in water samples.     

Optimization of parameters for the alcoholic-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction of estrogens in water

Extraction and determination of estrogens in water samples were performed using alcoholic-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (AA-DLLME) and high-performance liquid chromatography (UV/Vis detection). A Plackett–Burman design and a central composite design were applied to evaluate the AA-DLLME procedure. The effect of six parameters on extraction efficiency was investigated. The factors studied were volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, extraction time, pH, amount of salt and agitation rate. According to Plackett–Burman design results, the effective parameters were volume of extraction solvent and pH. Next, a central composite design was applied to obtain optimal condition. The optimized conditions were obtained at 220 μL 1-octanol as extraction solvent, 700 μL ethanol as dispersive solvent, pH 6 and 200 μL sample volume. Linearity was observed in the range of 1–500 μg L^?1 for E2 and 0.1–100 μg L^?1 for E1. Limits of detection were 0.1 μg L^?1 for E2 and 0.01 μg L^?1 for E1. The enrichment factors and extraction recoveries were 42.2, 46.4 and 80.4, 86.7, respectively. The relative standard deviations for determination of estrogens in water were in the range of 3.9–7.2 % (n = 3). The developed method was successfully applied for the determination of estrogens in environmental water samples.     

Liquid–Liquid Microextraction of Nitrophenols Using Supramolecular Solvent and Their Determination by HPLC with UV Detection

A novel, efficient, and environmentally friendly method—supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction (SMS-LLME) combined with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)—was first established for the determination of p-nitrophenol and o-nitrophenol in water samples. Several important parameters influencing extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction solvent, pH of sample, temperature, salt effect, extraction time, and stirring rate, were optimized in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the enrichment factor was 166 for p-nitrophenol and 160 for o-nitrophenol, and the limits of detection by HPLC were 0.26 and 0.58 μg L^?1, respectively. Excellent linearity with coefficients of correlation from 0.9996 to 0.9997 was observed in the concentration range of 2–1,000 μg L^?1. The ranges of intra- and interday precision (n = 5) at 100 μg L^?1 of nitrophenols were 5.85–7.76 and 10.2–11.9 %, respectively. The SMS-LLME method was successfully applied for preconcentration of nitrophenols in environmental water samples.     

Trace determination of cadmium in rice samples using solidified floating organic drop microextraction based on vesicular supramolecular solvent followed by flow-injection analysis–flame atomic absorption spectrometry

In this work, a solidified floating organic drop microextraction was developed based on a vesicular supramolecular solvent consisting of decanoic acid and quaternary ammonium. The method was used for preconcentration of trace amount of cadmium in different rice samples followed by flow-injection analysis–flame atomic absorption spectrometry. Several parameters affecting the extraction efficiency including pH, concentration of 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol as the chelating agent, sample and extraction solvent volume, stirring rate, extraction time, salt effect, and interfering ions were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, a preconcentration factor of 84 was achieved. LOD and LOQ were found to be 0.09 and 0.31 µg L^?1, respectively. The calibration curve was linear within the range of 5.0–700 µg L^?1 (r²?>?0.9978). Intra- and inter-day precisions (RSD% n?=?3) were estimated 2.7 and 3.9% at the concentration of 20 µg L^?1, respectively. The accuracy of the method was successfully validated by analysis of an SRM-1643f standard reference material. Relative recoveries were achieved within the range of 93–107% elucidating suitability of the method for determination of cadmium in rice samples.     

Magnetic Stirring-Assisted Dispersive Suspended Microextraction with Solidification of a Floating Organic Droplet for the Determination of Trace Fungicides in Water and Wine

For the first time, a simple method for magnetic stirring-assisted dispersive suspended microextraction has been developed for the determination of three fungicides (azoxystrobin, diethofencarb, and pyrimethanil) in water and wine samples. The method is based on the solidification of a floating organic droplet coupled with high performance liquid chromatography. In the proposed method, the low toxicity solvent 1-dodecanol was used as the extractant. Both the extraction and phase separation process were performed with magnetic stirring. No centrifugation step was involved. After separating the two phases, the extraction solvent droplet was easily collected through solidification at lower temperature. Important parameters such as the kind and volume of organic extraction solvent, extraction and restoration speed, extraction and restoration time, and salt concentration were optimized. Under the optimal conditions, the limits of detection for the analytes varied from 0.14 to 0.26 µg L^?1. The enrichment factors ranged from 125–200. The linearity ranges were 1–2000 µg L^?1, yielding correlation coefficients (r) higher than 0.9990. The relative standard deviation (n = 6) at two spiked level of 0.2 µg mL^?1 and 4 µg L^?1 varied between 2.2% and 7.8%. Finally, the developed technique was successfully applied to determine target fungicides in real water and wine samples, where the obtained recoveries ranged from 83.8–105.3%     

Ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the separation and preconcentration of lead in water samples prior to FAAS determination without chelating agent

In the present study, an environment-friendly sample preparation method termed ionic liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with flame atomic absorption spectrometry has been developed for the determination of Pb(II) ion in water samples prior to flame atomic absorption spectrometry determination. In this method, ionic liquid was used as an extraction solvent instead of the organic solvent used in the conventional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) assay, and there is no need for a chelating agent. Several variables that may affect extraction efficiencies, including pH, the volume of ionic liquid, the type and volume of disperser solvent, salt addition, and the time for centrifugation and extraction were studied and optimised. Under the optimised conditions, the calibration curve exhibited linearity over the range of 20.0–1000.0 μg L^?1. The enrichment factor and the limit of detection based on 3S_b/m were 35.0 and 5.9 μg L^?1, respectively. Seven replicate determination of a solution containing of 100.0 μg L^?1 Pb(II) ions gave a relative standard deviation of ±2.1%. Finally, the feasibility of the proposed method for Pb(II) determination was assessed by the analysis of certi?ed reference material and various water samples and the satisfactory results were obtained.     

Analysis of eight pyrethroids in water samples by liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplet combined with gas chromatography

A novel method was developed for the determination of eight pyrethroids in water samples by liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic droplets followed by gas chromatography with electron capture detection. The type and volume of the extraction solvents, extraction time, sample solution temperature, stirring rate and ionic strength were studied and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, enrichment factors ranged from 824 to 1,432, and the limit of detection range from 2.0 to 50 ng?L^?1. The calibration graph is linear from 0.15 to 80 μg?L^?1 for cyfluthrin, fenvalerate, fluvalinate and deltamethrin, 0.09 to 80 μg?L^?1 for fenpropathrin, 0.006 to 80 μg?L^?1 for lambda-cyhalothrin, 0.026 to 80 μg?L^?1 for permethrin, 0.01 to 80 μg?L^?1 for cypermethrin. The correlation coefficients (r) varied from 0.9961 to 0.9988. The method was successfully applied to the determination of pyrethroid pesticide residues in tap water, well water, reservoir water, and river water. Recoveries ranged from 79.0% to 113.6%, and relative standard deviations are between 4.1% and 8.7%.     

Liquid-phase microextraction and gas-chromatographic determination of selenium(IV) in aqueous samples

A liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) method was employed for preconcentration of selenium as piazselenol complex in aqueous samples. The samples reacted with o-phenylenediamine in 0.1?M HCl at 90°C for 15?min, and then LPME was performed. A microdrop of carbon tetrachloride was applied as the extracting solvent. After extraction, the microdrop was introduced directly into the injection port of gas chromatography for analysis. Several important extraction parameters such as the type of organic solvent, sample and organic drop volumes, salt concentration, stirring rate, and exposure time were controlled and optimized. In the proposed LPME, the extraction was achieved by suspending a 3?µL carbon tetrachloride drop from the tip of a microsyringe immersed in 12.5?mL of aqueous solution. Under optimized conditions, a dynamic linear range was obtained in the range of 20–1000?µg?L^?1. The preconcentration factor and the limit of detection of selenium in this method were 91 and 0.9?µg?L^?1, respectively. The optimized procedure was successfully applied to the extraction and determination of selenium in different types of real samples. The relative standard deviations for the spiking levels of 50–100?µg?L^?1 in the real samples were in the range of 3.2–6.1%, and the relative errors were located in the range of ?5.4 to 5%.     

Analysis of Paraben Preservatives in Cosmetic Samples: Comparison of Three Different Dynamic Hollow Fiber Liquid-Phase Microextraction Methods

This study focused on a comparison of three different dynamic hollow fiber-based liquid-phase microextraction (DHF-LPME) methods for extraction and preconcentration of parabens from wastewater, toothpaste, cream, and shampoo samples. The first method is two-phase DHF-LPME, in which n-octanol was used as the extraction solvent. The second is three-phase DHF-LPME, in which n-octanol and basic aqueous solution were used as the extraction solvent and acceptor phase, respectively. High-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC–UV) was applied for determination of the parabens in both methods. The third method is a recently introduced method; three-phase DHF-LPME based on two immiscible organic solvents (n-dodecane as organic solvent and acetonitrile as an acceptor phase). The quantitative analyses were performed by the use of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) after injection port derivatization. The effect of different extraction conditions (i.e., extraction solvent, pH, ionic strength, stirring rate, and dynamic and extraction times) on the extraction efficiency of the parabens was investigated and optimized. All the three procedures provide similar working parameters characterized by high repeatability (3.9–6.3 %) and good linearity (correlation coefficient ranging from 0.989 to 0.998). Results of real sample analyses obtained by these three methods were highly correlated. Although all methods provide compatible alternatives for paraben analysis, the three-phase DHF-LPME based on two immiscible organic solvents may be a more appropriate technique due to its higher extraction efficiency and thus lower limits of detection (LODs). LODs for all the parabens ranged from 0.2 to 5.0 μg L^?1 using the two first methods combined with HPLC–UV. An improvement in sensitivity of several orders of magnitude was achieved using three-phase DHF-LPME based on two immiscible organic solvents followed by single-ion monitoring GC–MS analyses (0.01–0.2 μg L^?1) due to compatibility of this technique with GC instrument.     

Simultaneous separation and preconcentration of ultra-trace of Cu(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) in water samples by air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction prior to determination by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry

A simple, rapid and efficient method has been developed for the extraction, preconcentration and determination of copper, lead and zinc ions in water samples by air-assisted liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS). In the proposed method, much less volume of an organic solvent (in the order of some µL) was used as the extraction solvent in the absence of disperser solvent. Fine organic droplets were formed by sucking and injecting of the mixture of aqueous sample solution and extraction solvent with a syringe for several times in a conical test tube. After extraction, phase separation was achieved by centrifugation and the enriched analytes in the sedimented phase were determined by GFAAS. Several variables potentially affecting the extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized. Calibration graphs were linear in the concentration range of 45.0–1100 ng L^?1. Detection limits were in the range of 18.0–26.0 ng L^?1. The accuracy of the developed procedure was checked by analyzing NRCC-SLRS4 Riverine water as a certified reference material. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to determine the selected heavy metals in tap, surface and river water samples.     

Determination of Six Organophosphorus Pesticides in Water by Single-Drop Microextraction Coupled with GC-NPD

A single-drop microextraction (SDME) procedure with a modified microsyringe was developed for the analysis of six organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in water. Microsyringe was modified by attaching a 2-mm cone onto the needle tip end. The conditions affecting SDME performance including microextraction solvent, stirring speed, extraction time, ionic strength and sample pH were optimized. Under the optimized conditions, the linear ranges of the SDME with ethion as internal standard were 0.05–50 μg L^?1 (except for dimethoate 5–5,000 μg L^?1) and limits of detection (LOD) were 0.012–0.020 μg L^?1 (except for dimethoate 0.45 μg L^?1). Recoveries of six pesticides were in the range of 70.6–107.5 % with relative standard deviation lower than 6.0 %. The modified method is simple, rapid and sensitive, and acceptable in the analysis of OPPs pesticides in water samples.     

Homogeneous Liquid–Liquid Microextraction for Determination of Organochlorine Pesticides in Water and Fruit Samples

A fast and effective preconcentration method for extraction of organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) was developed using a homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction based on phase separation phenomenon in a ternary solvent (water/methanol/chloroform) system. The phase separation phenomenon occurred by salt addition. After centrifugation, the extraction solvent was sedimented in the bottom of the conical test tube. The OCPs were transferred into the sedimented phase during the phase separation step. The extracted OCPs were determined using gas chromatography–electron capture detector. Several factors influencing the extraction efficiency were investigated and optimized. Optimal results were obtained at the following conditions: volume of the consolute solvent (methanol), 1.0 mL; volume of the extraction solvent (chloroform), 55 μL; volume of the sample, 5 mL; and concentration of NaCl, 5 % (w/v). Under optimal conditions, the preconcentration factors in the range of 486–1,090, the dynamic linear range of 0.01–100 μg L^?1, and the limits of detection of 0.001–0.03 μg L^?1 were obtained for the OCPs. Using internal standard, the relative standard deviations for 1 μg L^?1 of the OCPs in the water samples were obtained in the range of 4.9–8.6 % (n = 5). Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied for extraction and determination of the OCPs in water and fruit samples.     

Selenium analysis in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on piazselenol formation and GC–ECD

The application of the recently introduced dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) for the separation and determination of an inorganic selenite [Se(IV)] derivative by means of a gas chromatography–electron-capture detection system has been studied. The selenium derivative was extracted with the DLLME technique using a mixture of ethanol (disperser solvent) and chlorobenzene (extraction solvent). The influences of the various analytical parameters on the derivatization reaction and microextraction procedure have been evaluated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, an enrichment factor of 122 was obtained for only 5.00 mL of the water sample. The calibration graph was linear in the range of 0.015–10 μg L^?1 with a detection limit of 0.005 μg L^?1. The relative standard deviation for ten replicate measurements of 2 μg L^?1 of selenium was 4.1%. The method was applied to the determination of selenium in environmental surface water samples with satisfactory recovery.     

Hollow fiber membrane supported thin liquid film extraction for determination of trace phenoxy acid herbicides and phenols in environmental water samples

Traces of phenoxy acid herbicides and phenols were determined in environmental water samples by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to thin liquid film extraction (TLFE). A TLFE sampling device was prepared by dipping pieces of a polypropylene microporous hollow fiber membrane into dihexyl ether (containing 10% tri-n-octylphosphine oxide as carrier) for a few minutes to impregnate the pores of the hollow fiber wall. Extraction of analytes takes place from the outer aqueous phase into the immobilized solvent. After extraction the removal of the organic solvent was accomplished with a few µl of methanol which was used for HPLC analysis. Enrichment factors as high as 446 were obtained for the target compounds. The method provided detection limits as low as 0.4–1.2 µg L^?1, good repeatability (the RSD ranging from 2.1 to 6.3%, n?=?5) and a linear range from 2 to 200 µg L^?1 for the target compounds. Real sample analysis showed recoveries between 84.6% and 112% for all compounds investigated.     

Determination of Chlorophenoxy Acid Herbicides in Water Samples by Suspended Liquid-Phase Microextraction�CLiquid Chromatography

In this study, directly suspended liquid-phase microextraction was investigated for the extraction and determination of five chlorophenoxy acid herbicides in water samples. The optimized parameters for extraction of chlorophenoxy acid herbicides were 1 M HCl concentration in sample solution, solution temperature 20 °C, 45-min extraction time, 1,000 rpm stirring rate, 25 ??L extracting solvent volume and without NaCl addition. Under the optimum conditions, the enrichment factor ranged from 192 to 390. Calibration curves yielded good linearity (R ² > 0.999) and the linear range was 5.0?C500.0 ??g L^?1, limit of detection was 0.3?C0.4 ??g L^?1 and limit of quantification was 1?C2 ??g L^?1 for analytes and the relative standard deviations were in the range of 3?C10% (n = 3). Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the quantification of five chlorophenoxy acid herbicides in water samples and recovery was in the range of 74?C110%.     

Analysis of PAHs in Water and Fruit Juice Samples by DLLME Combined with LC-Fluorescence Detection

A simple, rapid and efficient method termed dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection, has been developed for the extraction and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water and fruit juice samples. Parameters such as the kind and volume of extraction solvent and dispersive solvent, extraction time and salt effect were optimized. Under optimum conditions, the enrichment factors ranged from 296 to 462. The linear range was 0.01–100 μg L^?1 and limits of detection were 0.001–0.01 μg L^?1. The relative standard deviations (RSDs, for 5 μg L^?1 of PAHs) varied from 1.0 to 11.5% (n = 3). The relative recoveries of PAHs from tap, river, well and sea water samples at spiking level of 5 μg L^?1 were 82.6–117.1, 74.9–113.9, 77.0–122.4 and 86.1–119.3%, respectively. The relative recoveries of PAHs from grape and apple juice samples at spiking levels of 2.5 and 5 μg L^?1 were 80.8–114.7 and 88.9–123.0%, respectively. It is concluded that the proposed method can be successfully applied for determination of PAHs in water and fruit juice samples.     

Amine-Functionalized Metal–Organic Framework as a New Sorbent for Vortex-Assisted Dispersive Micro-Solid Phase Extraction of Phenol Residues in Water Samples Prior to HPLC Analysis: Experimental and Computational Studies

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a new class of hybrid inorganic–organic microporous crystalline materials, which possess unique properties such as high surface area, tunable pore size, and good thermal stability. These unique characteristics make MOFs interesting targets for sample pretreatment. In this work, MIL-53 material based on aluminum and containing amine functional groups (NH₂-MIL-53(Al)) was synthesized and applied as an efficient sorbent for development of vortex-assisted dispersive micro-solid phase extraction for eight United States Environmental Protection Agency’s priority phenols from aqueous samples prior to analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with photodiode-array detection. A simple extraction process was designed. The parameters affecting the extraction efficiency, such as amount of sorbent, extraction time, type of desorption solvent and its volume were investigated. The good linearity in the concentration range of 0.0015–10.0000 μg mL^?1 with the coefficients of determination of greater than 0.9929, low limits of detection (0.0004–0.0133 μg mL^?1) and relative standard deviations of lower than 10% were obtained. The proposed method has been successfully applied to the determination of phenol compounds in different water sample matrices including treated water, waste water, river water, sea water, lake water, drinking water and tap water. In addition, computational simulation was performed to predict the adsorption ability of NH₂-MIL-53(Al) towards the studied phenolic compounds. The computational results were in agreement with the experimental studies and it has been proved that NH₂-MIL-53(Al) is promising for enrichment of phenolic pollutants.     

Application of vortex-assisted supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction for trace determination of nitroaniline isomers

A novel, fast and efficient method for the analysis of nitroaniline isomers as model compounds was developed using vortex-assisted supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction (VA-SMS-LLME). A vortex mixer was used as the mixer in supramolecular solvent liquid–liquid microextraction, and it decreased the extraction time greatly. Several important parameters influencing extraction efficiency, such as the type and volume of extraction solvent, pH of sample, salt effect and extraction time, were optimised in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the enrichment factor was 133 for p-nitroaniline, 98 for m-nitroaniline and 115 for o-nitroaniline, and the limits of detection by HPLC were 0.3, 1.0 and 0.5 μg L^?1, respectively. Linearity with determination coefficient from 0.9981 to 0.9993 was evaluated using water samples spiked with the nitroanilines at fourteen different concentration ranging from 4 to 1000 μg L^?1. The ranges of intra-day and inter-day precision (n = 5) at 10 μg L^?1 of nitroanilines were 1.67–7.05% and 9.4–11.6%, respectively. The VA-SMS-LLME method was successfully applied for preconcentration of nitroanilines in environmental water samples.     

LC Determination of Trace Amounts of Phenoxyacetic Acid Herbicides in Water after Dispersive Liquid–Liquid Microextraction

Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) for extraction and preconcentration of phenoxyacetic acid herbicides in water samples is described. After adjusting the pH to 1.5, the sample was extracted in the presence of 10% w/v sodium chloride by injecting 1 mL acetone as disperser solvent containing 25 μL of chlorobenzene as extraction solvent. The effect of parameters, such as the nature and amount of extraction and disperser solvents, ionic strength of the sample, pH, temperature and extraction time were optimized. DLLME was followed by LC for the determination of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid. The method had good linearity and a wide linear dynamic range (0.5–750 μg L^?1) with a detection limit of 0.16 μg L^?1 for both the PAAs, making it suitable for their determination in water samples.     

Polypropylene-Based Microextraction Method for Determination of Fluoxetine in Human Urine Samples

A polypropylene (PP) sheet was successfully applied as an extracting medium for trace enrichment of fluoxetine (FLX) from urine samples, followed by high performance liquid chromatography-fluorescence detection (HPLC-FD). The extraction medium was a square, 1 × 1 cm² piece of polypropylene membrane sheet that was conditioned in methanol. The extraction process was conveniently carried out using a 5 mL urine sample. After extraction, the PP sheet was withdrawn and transferred to a glass vial for performing the desorption process using 210 µL organic solvent. After complete drying, the residue was dissolved in 50 µL of methanol and an aliquot of 20 µL was, finally, injected into the HPLC system. Some important extraction parameters such as desorption solvent, pH, ionic strength, desorption, and extraction time were investigated and optimized. The linearity was studied by preconcentration of 5 mL of urine sample spiked with a standard solution of fluoxetine at the concentration range of 10–100 µg L^?1. The coefficient of determination was satisfactory (r² > 0.99). The relative standard deviations (RSD %) value under the optimized condition was found to be 10.3%. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 1.9 and 6.4 µg L^?1, respectively. The developed method showed to be simple, sensitive, and adequate for the trace determination of fluoxetine in urine media.