Cyclometallated compounds. XV.

The title complex, tetra‐μ‐acetato‐O:O′‐bis{[μ‐1,4‐bis(2‐­pyridyl­oxy)­phenyl­ene‐N,C²:N′,C⁶]dipalladium(II)} bis­(tri­chloro­methane) dihydrate, [Pd₄(C₁₆H₁₀N₂O₂)₂(C₂H₃O₂)₄]·2CHCl₃·2H₂O, the product of the reaction of 1,4‐bis(2‐pyridyl­oxy)­benzene with palladium acetate, is shown to be a tetranuclear, rather than a polymeric, species. It crystallizes about a centre of inversion and has two doubly cyclo­palladated ligands bridged by four acetate groups. The cyclo­palladated ligand is far from planar in the complex and has the central benzene rings π‐stacked. The chelate rings exist in shallow boat conformations.     

Three complexes of bis(N‐methyl­benzo­hydro­xamato‐O,O′)copper(II)

The first single‐crystal studies of three bis‐transoid Cu–hydrox­amate salts, bis(3‐methoxy‐4,N‐dimethyl­benzo­hydrox­amato‐O,O′)copper(II), [Cu(C₁₀H₁₂NO₃)₂], bis(4‐chloro‐N‐methyl­benzo­hydro­xamato‐O,O′)copper(II), [Cu­(C₈­H₇­Cl­NO₂)₂], bis(N‐methyl‐3,5‐di­nitro­benzo­hydro­xamato‐O,O′)copper(II)–chloro­form (1/2), [Cu­(C₈­H₆­N₃O₆)₂]·­2CHCl₃, are presented. The Cu atom in each of the title compounds sits at a center of inversion and displays a nearly square‐planar geometry with the hydro­xamate‐O atoms connected to it in a syn configuration. The N atoms are in a transoid configuration. Each five‐membered Cu–hydro­xamate ring is planar, thus providing evidence that a planar N atom is present in each ring. The phenyl groups are twisted with respect to the hydro­xamate group by ～40–54°. The angular strain of the sp² carbonyl oxy­gen is significant (～10° from ideal).     

A novel Na–O–Ni–O–Ni bridging complex of Cl‐HXTA,where Cl‐HXTA is 2,6‐bis{[bis­(carboxyl­ato­methyl)­amino]­methyl}‐4‐chloro­phenolate

In the structure of the title compound, hepta­aqua‐1κ³O,2κ²O,3κ²O‐(μ₃‐2,6‐bis{[bis­(carboxyl­ato­methyl)­amino]methyl}‐4‐chloro­phenolato‐1κO;2κ⁴O,O′,N,O¹;3κ⁴O¹N′,O′′,O′′′)dinickel(II)­sodium(I) pentahydrate, [NaNi₂(C₁₆H₁₄ClN₂O₉)(H₂O)₇]·5H₂O or [Ni₂(Cl‐HXTA)(H₂O)₄{Na(H₂O)₃}]·5H₂O, the trinuclear complex unit consists of two distorted NiNO₅ octahedra bridged by a phenolate O atom and an NaO₄ tetrahedron bridged to one of the Ni octahedra by a carboxylate O atom. There are four intramolecular hydrogen bonds forming four six‐membered rings in the complex and the complex mol­ecules are connected to each other by a very complicated hydrogen‐bond network.     

A mixed‐valence diacetate‐bridged MnII–MnIII complex incorporating a bridging phenolate ligand

The synthesis and characterization of a new unsymmetrical dinucleating N,O‐donor ligand, 2‐[N,N‐bis­(2‐pyridyl­methyl)­amino­methyl]‐6‐[N‐(3,5‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐oxidobenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridyl­amino)­aminomethyl]‐4‐methyl­phenol (H₂Ldtb), as well as the X‐ray crystal structure of its corresponding mixed‐valence diacetate‐bridged manganese complex, di‐μ‐acetato‐μ‐{2‐[N,N‐bis­(2‐pyridylmethyl)amino­methyl]‐6‐[N‐(3,5‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐oxidobenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridyl­amino)­aminomethyl]‐4‐methylphenolato}dimanganese(II,III) tetra­phenyl­borate, [Mn^IIMn^III(C₄₂H₄₉N₅O₂)(C₂H₃O₂)₂](C₂₄H₂₀B), are reported. The complex may be regarded as an inter­esting structural model for the mixed‐valence Mn^II–Mn^III state of manganese catalase.     

[N,N′‐Bis(3‐aminopropyl)ethylenediamine‐κ4N,N′,N′′,N′′′](trithiocyanurato‐κ2N,S)zinc(II) ethanol solvate

In the crystal structure of the title compound, [N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine‐κ⁴N,N′,N′′,N′′′][1,3,5‐triazine‐2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)‐tri­thionato(2−)‐κ²N,S]­zinc(II) ethanol sol­vate, [Zn(C₈H₂₂N₄)₂(C₃HN₃S₃)]·C₂H₆O, the Zn^II atom is octa­hedrally coordinated by four N atoms [Zn—N = 2.104 (2)–2.203 (2) Å] of a tetradentate N‐donor N,N′‐bis(3‐­amino­propyl)­ethyl­enedi­amine (bapen) ligand and by two S and N atoms [Zn—S = 2.5700 (7) Å and Zn—N = 2.313 (2) Å] of a tri­thio­cyanurate(2−) (ttcH²⁻) dianion bonded as a bidentate ligand in a cis configuration. The crystal structure of the compound is stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonds.     

Magnetic properties of a mononuclear iron(II) complex with a typical FeN6 coordination octahedron

A mononuclear iron(II) complex with the tripodal ligand bis(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl)(quinolin‐2‐ylmethyl)amine (dpqa) has been synthesized and structurally characterized, namely [bis(pyridin‐2‐ylmethyl)(quinolin‐2‐ylmethyl)amine‐κ⁴N,N′,N′′,N′′′]bis(thiocyanato‐κS)iron(II), [Fe(NCS)₂(C₂₂H₂₀N₄)], exhibits a three‐dimensional supramolecular network viaπ–π interactions and S...H—C hydrogen‐bonding interactions between adjacent Fe^II centres. Temperature‐dependent magnetic measurements under different external pressures and X‐ray diffraction measurements indicate that all the Fe^II centres in this complex retain a high‐spin state upon cooling from 300 to 2 K. The surprising absence of spin‐crossover behaviour for this mononuclear iron(II) complex is attributed to the steric hindrance originating from the substituted quinoline ring in the dpqa ligand.     

Chlorobis[N′‐ethoxycarbonyl‐N‐(4‐methylphenyl)thiourea‐κS]copper(I)

The title complex, chloro­bis{ethyl N‐[(4‐methyl­anilino)­thio­carbonyl]­carbamate‐κS}copper(I), [CuCl(C₁₁H₁₄N₂O₂S)₂], was synthesized by the reaction of cupric chloride with the corresponding thio­urea derivative. The complex has imposed crystallographic m symmetry and the Cu^I coordination environment is trigonal planar, formed by two S atoms and one Cl atom. The formation of intramolecular hydrogen bonds promotes the stability of the complex.     

A new chain‐like cadmium(II) coordination polymer containing chains of water mol­ecules

The title cadmium(II) polymer, catena‐poly[[[bis­(4‐amino­pyridine‐κN)­aqua­cadmium(II)]‐μ‐1,4‐phenyl­enediacetato‐κ⁴O,O′:O′′,O′′′] dihydrate], {[Cd(C₁₀H₈O₄)(C₅H₆N₂)₂(H₂O)]·2H₂O}_n, comprises one‐dimensional wave‐like chains, in which the Cd atom is coordinated by 1,4‐phenyl­enediacetate and 4‐amino­pyridine molecules. The 1,4‐phenylenediacetate ligands lie about inversion centres. Extensive hydrogen‐bonding inter­actions between the chains lead to a three‐dimensional structure. Free water mol­ecules form chains in the structure.     

New palladium complexes with phosphino‐ and phosphinitopyridine ligands

Three new palladium complexes containing a difunctional P,N‐chelate, namely tris­(chloro­{[1‐methyl‐1‐(6‐methyl‐2‐pyridyl)ethoxy]diphenylphospine‐κ²N,P}methyl­palladium(II)chloro­form solvate, 3[Pd(CH₃)Cl(C₂₁H₂₂NOP)]·CHCl₃, (III), dichloro­[2‐(2,6‐dimethyl­phen­yl)‐6‐(diphenyl­phosphinometh­yl)­pyridine‐κ²N,P]palladium(II), [PdCl₂(C₂₆H₂₄NP)], (IV), and chloro­[2‐(2,6‐dimethyl­phen­yl)‐6‐(diphenyl­phos­phino­meth­yl)pyridine‐κ²N,P]methyl­palladium(II), [Pd(CH₃)Cl(C₂₆H₂₄NP)], (V), are reported. Geometric data and the conformations of the ligands around the metal centers, as well as slight distortions of the Pd coordination environments from idealized square‐planar geometry, are discussed and compared with the situations in related compounds. Non‐conventional hydrogen‐bond inter­actions (C—H⋯Cl) have been found in all three complexes. Compound (III) is the first six‐membered chloro–meth­yl–phosphinite P,N‐type Pd^II complex to be structurally characterized.     

Complexes of mixed silicon halides with 4‐picoline

The reaction products of an addition reaction of five different silicon tetrahalides with the aromatic nitro­gen base 4‐methyl­pyridine are presented. The following five structures are isomorphous: (I) tetra­chloro­bis(4‐methyl­pyridine)­silicon, C₁₂H₁₄­Cl₄­N₂Si, (II) bromo­tri­chloro­bis(4‐methyl­pyridine)­silicon, C₁₂H₁₄­Br­Cl₃N₂Si, (III) di­bromo­di­chloro­bis(4‐methyl­pyridine)­silicon, C₁₂H₁₄­Br₂­Cl₂N₂Si, (IV) tri­bromo­chloro­bis(4‐methyl­pyridine)­silicon, C₁₂H₁₄Br₃­Cl­N₂Si, and (V) tetra­bromo­bis(4‐methyl­pyridine)­silicon, C₁₂H₁₄Br₄N₂Si. The mol­ecules of (I) and (V), with D_2h symmetry, have crystallographic C_2h symmetry, while the molecules of (II), (III) and (IV) have a lower molecular symmetry, but as a result of the disorder of the halogen ligands, they appear to be of the same crystallographic symmetry. The environment around the Si atom can be described as a slightly distorted octahedron with the methyl­pyridine ligands occupying axial positions and the four halogen ligands in the equatorial plane. In spite of the different substitution pattern of the silicon centre, there are only insignificant differences between these five structures.     

Structural studies of (prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine hetero‐scorpionate copper complexes

The structures of five compounds consisting of (prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine complexed with copper in both the Cu^I and Cu^II oxidation states are presented, namely chlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(I) 0.18‐hydrate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]·0.18H₂O, (1), catena‐poly[[copper(I)‐μ₂‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ⁵N,N′,N′′:C²,C³] perchlorate acetonitrile monosolvate], {[Cu(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]ClO₄·CH₃CN}_n, (2), dichlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II) dichloromethane monosolvate, [CuCl₂(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]·CH₂Cl₂, (3), chlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II) perchlorate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]ClO₄, (4), and di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis({(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II)) bis(tetraphenylborate), [Cu₂Cl₂(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)₂][(C₆H₅)₄B]₂, (5). Systematic variation of the anion from a coordinating chloride to a noncoordinating perchlorate for two Cu^I complexes results in either a discrete molecular species, as in (1), or a one‐dimensional chain structure, as in (2). In complex (1), there are two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Complex (2) consists of the Cu^I atom coordinated by the amine and pyridyl N atoms of one ligand and by the vinyl moiety of another unit related by the crystallographic screw axis, yielding a one‐dimensional chain parallel to the crystallographic b axis. Three complexes with Cu^II show that varying the anion composition from two chlorides, to a chloride and a perchlorate to a chloride and a tetraphenylborate results in discrete molecular species, as in (3) and (4), or a bridged bis‐μ‐chlorido complex, as in (5). Complex (3) shows two strongly bound Cl atoms, while complex (4) has one strongly bound Cl atom and a weaker coordination by one perchlorate O atom. The large noncoordinating tetraphenylborate anion in complex (5) results in the core‐bridged Cu₂Cl₂ moiety.     

A novel one‐dimensional coordination polymer with Cd2+ and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid

catena‐Poly­[[[bis­[di­aqua(4,4′‐bi­pyridine)­cadmium(II)]‐bis­[μ‐(N′′‐carboxy­methyl­diethyl­enetri­amine‐N,N,N′,N′′‐tetra­ace­ta­to)­cadmium(II)]]‐μ‐4,4′‐bi­pyridine] tetradecahydrate], [Cd₄­(C₁₄H₁₉N₃O₁₀)₂(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃(H₂O)₄]·14H₂O or [Cd₄(HD­TPA)₂(BPY)₃(H₂O)₄]·14H₂O, where BPY is 4,4′‐bi­pyridine and HDTPA^4? is N′′‐carboxy­methyl­diethyl­enetri­amine‐N,N,N′,N′′‐tetra­acetate, consists of a one‐dimensional coordination polymer formed from a secondary building unit which comprises four Cd centres. The chain structure of the title compound was obtained by the use of a multidentate organic ligand, N,N,N′,N′′,N′′‐diethyl­enetri­amine­penta­acetic acid (H₅DTPA), which forms multiple chelate rings with the Cd metal centres. An extended network is formed via hydrogen bonds.     

Racemic and chiral 1‐[N‐(chloro­acetyl)carbamoylamino]‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐yl chloroacetate

In the racemic crystals of (1S,2R)‐ or (1R,2S)‐1‐[N‐(chloro­acetyl)­carbamoyl­amino]‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐yl chloro­acetate, C₁₄H₁₄Cl₂N₂O₄, (I), the enantiomeric mol­ecules form a dimeric structure via the N—H?O cyclic hydrogen bond of the carbamoyl moieties. In the chiral crystals of (—)‐(1S,2R)‐1‐[N‐(chloro­acetyl)­carbamoyl­amino]‐2,3‐di­hydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐yl chloro­acetate, C₁₄H₁₄Cl₂N₂O₄, (II), the N—­H?O intermolecular hydrogen bond forms a zigzag chain around the twofold screw axis. The melting points and calculated densities of (I) and (II) are 446 and 396 K, and 1.481 and 1.445 Mg m^?3, respectively.     

[N,N′‐Bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]­nickel(II) and [N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]copper(II)

In the title compounds, {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], and {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}copper(II), [Cu(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], the Ni^II and Cu^II atoms are coordinated by two iminic N and two phenolic O atoms of the N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminate (SALPD^2?, C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂^2?) ligand. The geometry of the coordination sphere is planar in the case of the Ni^II complex and distorted towards tetrahedral for the Cu^II complex. Both complexes have a cis configuration imposed by the chelate ligand. The dihedral angles between the N/Ni/O and N/Cu/O coordination planes are 17.20 (6) and 35.13 (7)°, respectively.     

The first metalloporphyrin dimer linked by a bridging phenylenedicarbene ligand

In the first bis­[ruthenium(II)–porphyrin]–dicarbene complex, μ‐[1,4‐phenyl­ene­bis(phenyl­methyl­idene‐κC)]bis­[(ethanol‐κO)(5,10,15,20‐tetra‐p‐tolyl­porphyrinato‐κ⁴N)ruthenium(II)] 1,2‐di­chloro­ethane trisolvate, [Ru₂(C₂₀H₁₄)(C₄₈H₃₆N₄)₂(C₂H₆O)₂]·3C₂H₄Cl₂, an inversion center is located at the center of the μ‐phenyl­ene group, leading to a parallel arrangement for the pair of porphyrin ring systems. The bond lengths and angles compare favourably with literature values for ruthenium–porphyrin–monocarbene complexes; the Ru=C(carbene) bond length and the C(phenyl)—C(carbene)—C(phenyl­ene) angle are 1.865 (3) Å and 112.3 (3)°, respectively. The Ru^II ion is displaced out of the C₂₀N₄ porphyrin least‐squares plane (by 0.2373 Å) toward the bridging ligand of the C_i‐symmetry dimer. The porphyrin ring systems of the dimer thus exhibit mildly domed conformations.     

[Cu(C8H16N4O2)0.5{N(CN)2}]n,a novel ladder‐like coordination polymer

A new polymeric copper complex, viz.catena‐poly[[[μ‐N,N′‐bis(3‐amino­propyl)oxa­mid­ato‐κ⁶N,N′,O:N′′,N′′′,O′]­dicopper(II)]‐di‐μ‐dicyan­amido‐1:1′κ²N¹:N⁵;2:2′κ²N¹:N⁵], [Cu₂(C₈H₁₆N₄O₂)(C₂N₃)₂]_n or [Cu(oxpn)_0.5{N(CN)₂}]_n [where H₂oxpn is N,N′‐bis(3‐amino­propyl)­ox­amide], has been ­synthesized by the reaction of Cu(oxpn), [Cu(ClO₄)₂]·6H₂O and NaN₃. In the crystal structure, the Cu atom is five‐coordinate and has a square‐pyrimidal (SP) configuration. In the polymer, dicyan­amide (dca⁻) groups link Cu^II cations in a μ‐1,5‐bridging mode, generating novel ladders in which each step is composed of dimeric [Cu₂(oxpn)]²⁺ cations. Abundant hydrogen bonds connect the polymer ladders into a two‐dimensional network structure.     

Clemizoledichlorocobalt(II)

The structure of di­chloro­[1‐(p‐chloro­benzyl)‐2‐(1‐pyrrol­idinyl­methyl‐N)‐1,3‐benz­imidazole‐N³]­cobalt(II), [Co­Cl₂(C₁₉­H₂₀ClN₃)], contains a mol­ecule of clemizole bound in a bidentate manner to cobalt through its imidazole and pyrrolidinyl N atoms, with significantly different Co—N distances of 1.976 (5) and 2.126 (5) Å, respectively. The geometry around cobalt is distorted tetrahedral, with significantly different Co—Cl distances of 2.217 (2) and 2.233 (2) Å, and the pyrrolidinyl ring is disordered.     

Comparative X‐ray study of three nickel(II)–thio­cyanate compounds

Three cis nickel–di­thio­cyanate (SCN) complexes with different N,N′‐bidentate bases have been prepared and their crystal structures determined: bis(2,2′‐bi­pyridine‐N,N′)­bis­(thio­cyan‐­ato‐N)­nickel(II), [Ni(SCN)₂­(C₁₀H₈N₂)₂], bis(1,10‐phen­anthroline‐N,N′)­bis­(thio­cyanato‐N)­nickel(II), [Ni(SCN)₂­(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂], and bis(2,9‐di­methyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline‐N,N′)­bis­(thiocyanato‐N)nickel(II) mono­hydrate, [Ni(SCN)₂­(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂]·H₂O. Distortions due to ligand size are discussed.     

Packing considerations of bis‐dimedone derivatives

We have determined the crystal structures of 2,2′‐(4‐fluoro­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₇FO₄, (I), 2,2′‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hy­droxy‐5,5‐dimethyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₇ClO₄, (II), 2,2′‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₃H₂₈O₅, (III), 2,2′‐(4‐methyl­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₄H₃₀O₄, (IV), 2,2′‐(4‐methoxy­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hy­droxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₄H₃₀O₅, (V), and 2,2′‐(4‐N,N′‐di­methyl­amino­phenyl)­methyl­enebis(3‐hydroxy‐5,5‐di­methyl‐2‐cyclo­hexen‐1‐one), C₂₅H₃₃NO₄, (VI). Structures (III) to (VI) of these bis‐dimedone derivatives show nearly the same packing pattern irrespective of the different substituent in the para position of the aromatic ring. However, (II) does not fit into this scheme, although the Cl atom is a substituent not too different from the others. The different packing of the fluoro compound, (I), can be explained by the fact that it crystallizes with two mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit, which show a different conformation of the dimedone ring. On the other hand, (I) shows a similar packing pattern to bis(2‐hydroxy‐4,4‐di­methyl‐6‐oxo‐1‐cyclo­hexenyl)­phenyl­methane, a compound containing an aromatic ring without any substituent and with Z′ = 2.     

(Z)‐2‐Methylbuten‐1‐yl(aryl)iodonium trifluoromethanesulfonates containing electron‐withdrawing groups on the aryl moiety

The crystal structures of [(Z)‐2‐methyl­but‐1‐en‐1‐yl]­[4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­iodo­nium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate, C₁₂H₁₃F₃I⁺·CF₃O₃S^?, (I), (3,5‐di­chloro­phenyl)­[(Z)‐2‐methyl­but‐1‐en‐1‐yl]­iodo­nium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate, C₁₁H₁₂­Cl₂I⁺·CF₃O₃S^?, (II), and bis{[3,5‐bis­(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl][(Z)‐2‐methyl­but‐1‐en‐1‐yl]­iodo­nium} bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate) di­chloro­methane solvate, 2C₁₃H₁₂F₆I⁺·­2CF₃­O₃S^?·CH₂Cl₂, (III), are described. Neither simple acyclic β,β‐di­alkyl‐substituted alkenyl­(aryl)­idonium salts nor a series containing electron‐deficient aryl rings have been described prior to this work. Compounds (I)–(III) were found to have distorted square‐planar geometries, with each I atom interacting with two tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate counter‐ions.