Sulfonate-bonded tin complexes for the production of diphenyl carbonate

Various tin complexes including dibutyltin oxide and dibutyltin diacetate were tested for their activities in the transesterification between dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and phenol to produce diphenyl carbonate (DPC). The activities of tin complexes were significantly enhanced by the co-presence of alkyl or arylsulfonic acid, possibly due to the in situ formation of sulfonate-bonded tin complexes. Highly active triflate-bonded tin species, [Bu₂Sn(OH)(OTf)]₂ and [Bu₂Sn(OAc)(OTf)]₂, were isolated from the reaction of triflic acid with dibutyltin oxide and dibutyltin diacetate, and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction study.     

Cationic organotin cluster [t‐Bu2Sn(OH)(H2O)]22+2OTf−‐catalyzed one‐pot three‐component syntheses of 5‐substituted 1H‐tetrazoles and 2,4,6‐triarylpyridines in water

The cationic organotin cluster [t‐Bu₂Sn(OH)(H₂O)]₂²⁺2OTf^? is easy to prepare and stable in air. The catalytic activity of [t‐Bu₂Sn(OH)(H₂O)]₂²⁺2OTf^? as a neutral organotin Lewis acid catalyst is probed through the one‐pot three‐component syntheses of 5‐substituted 1H‐tetrazoles from aldehydes, hydroxylamine hydrochloride and sodium azide, and of 2,4,6‐triarylpyridines from aromatic aldehydes, substituted acetophenones and ammonium acetate. The reactions proceed well in the presence of 1 mol% of [t‐Bu₂Sn(OH)(H₂O)]₂²⁺2OTf^? in water and provide the corresponding 5‐substituted 1H‐tetrazoles and 2,4,6‐triarylpyridines in good to excellent yields. The method reported has several advantages such as the catalyst being neutral, low catalyst loading and use of water as a green solvent.     

Dilithium Hexaorganostannate(IV) Compounds

Hypercoordination of main‐group elements such as the heavier Group 14 elements (silicon, germanium, tin, and lead) usually requires strong electron‐withdrawing ligands and/or donating groups. Herein, we present the synthesis and characterization of two hexaaryltin(IV) dianions in form of their dilithium salts [Li₂(thf)₂{Sn(2‐py^Me)₆}] (py^Me=C₅H₃N‐5‐Me) ( 2 ) and [Li₂{Sn(2‐py^OtBu)₆}] (py^OtBu=C₅H₃N‐6‐OtBu) ( 3 ). Both complexes are stable in the solid state and solution under inert conditions. Theoretical investigations of compound 2 reveal a significant valence 5s‐orbital contribution of the tin atom forming six strongly polarized tin–carbon bonds.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of diorganotin(IV) complexes with 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid

Two new diorganotin(IV) derivatives of 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid, {[Ph₂Sn(2,6‐C₅H₃N)(COO)₂][Na(2,6‐C₅H₃N)(COOH) (COO)(CH₃OH)₂]} ( 1 ) and [Me₂Sn(2,6‐C₅H₃N)(COO)₂(H₂O)]^•H₂O ( 2 ) were synthesized by the reaction of Ph₃SnCl and PhMe₂SnI with 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid, respectively in the presence of sodium methoxide or potassium iso‐propoxide. The prepared compounds were characterized by mass spectrometry, IR, ¹H, ¹³C and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopies. The molecular structures of both complexes were determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. The X‐ray structure revealed pentagonal bipyramidal geometry around the tin atom for compound 1, which is incorporated with a hexacoordinated monosodium derivative of 2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid. Complex 2 adopts a monomeric structure with two carboxylate oxygen atoms coordinated to tin in monodenate form from equatorial positions, and the coordination number is raised to six as the oxygen of water and pyridine nitrogen occupies the other equatorial positions of octahedron. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Hydrothermal Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Catalytic Properties of Three Coordination Polymers Containing ­Flexible Bis(benzimidazole) and Dicarboxylate Ligands

Three metal‐organic coordination polymers, namely {[Cd(L1)(1,2‐chdc)] · 2H₂O}_n ( 1 ), {[Ni(L2)(1,2‐chdc)] · H₂O}_n ( 2 ), and [Cd(L2)(npht)]_n ( 3 ) [L1 = 1,2‐bis(2‐methylbenzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene, L2 = 1,2‐bis(5,6‐dimethylbenzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)benzene, 1,2‐H₂chdc = 1,2‐cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, H₂npht = 3‐nitrophthalic acid] were synthesized under hydrothermal conditions and structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction methods, IR spectroscopy, TGA, and elemental analysis. In compound 1 , two 1,2‐chdc^2– ligands connect two neighboring Cd atoms to form a dinuclear [Cd₂(1,2‐chdc)₂] subunit, which is further linked by L1 ligands to construct a 1D ladder‐like chain. Compound 2 exhibits a 2D (4,4) coordination network with {4⁴.6²} topology, whilst compound 3 shows a 1D helical chain structure. The fluorescence, UV/Vis diffuse reflection spectra, and catalytic properties of complexes 1 – 3 for the degradation of the congo red azo dye in a Fenton‐like process are investigated.     

Triorganotin(IV) Derivatives of Bidentate Schiff Bases: Synthesis and Spectral Studies

Abstract

Reaction of tri-n-butyl tin(IV) chloride with the sodium salt of Schiff bases [salicylidene-2-aminopyridine (sapH), salicylidene-2-amino-4-picoline (sapicH), salicylidene-2-methyl-1-aminobenzene (o-smabH), salicylidene-4-methyl-1-aminobenzene (p-smabH), salicylidene-1- aminobenzene (sabH), salicylidene-3-nitro-1-aminobenzene (snabH)] in MeOH-C₆H₆ mixture in 1:1 molar ratio produced complexes of the type [Buⁿ ₃Sn(sb)] (where sb = Schiff bases). All complexes obtained were characterized by elemental analysis (C, H, N, and Sn), infrared (IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR; ¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹⁹Sn), and TOF-MS spectroscopic studies. These complexes were found to be monomeric, colored viscous liquids and are soluble in polar solvents (methanol, ethanol, DMSO, and DMF). On the basis of ¹¹⁹Sn NMR observations, a five coordination geometry around tin(IV) atom in these complexes is proposed tentatively.     

Syntheses and crystal structures of four new organotin complexes with Schiff bases containing triazole

Four new organotin complexes, namely [(Bu₂Sn)₂O(EtO)(L1)]₂ (1), [(Bu₂Sn)₂O(EtO)(L2)]₂ (2), [(Bu₂Sn)₂O(EtO)(L3)]₂ (3) and [Ph₃Sn(L4)] · 0.5H₂O (4), were obtained by reactions of Bu₂SnO and Ph₃SnOH with 4-phenylideneamino-3-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-5-thione (HL1), 4-furfuralideneamino-3-methyl-1,2,4-triazole-5-thione (HL2), 4-(2-thienylideneamino)-3-ethyl-1,2,4 -triazole-5-thione (HL3) and 4-(3,5-di-t-butylsalicylideneamino)-3-ethyl-1,2,4-triazole-5-thione (HL4). Compounds 1-4 were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectra and their structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. Complexes 1-3 show similar structures containing a Sn₄O₄ ladder skeleton in which each of the exo tin atoms is bonded to the N atom of a corresponding thione-form deprotonated ligand. Complex 4 shows a mononuclear structure in which the tin atom of triphenyltin group is coordinated by the S atom of a thiol-form L4⁻ anion.     

Synthesis,spectra, crystal structures and anticancer studies of 26‐membered macrocyclic dibutyltin(IV) dithiocarbamate complexes: Single‐source precursors for tin sulfide nanoparticles

Four new macrocyclic dinuclear dibutyltin(IV) dithiocarbamate complexes of the type [Bu₂Sn(dtc)]₂, where dtc = hexane‐1,6‐diylbis(4‐fluorobenzyldithiocarbamate) anion ( 1 ), hexane‐1,6‐diylbis(4‐chlorobenzyldithiocarbamate) anion ( 2 ), hexane‐1,6‐diylbis(furfuryldithiocarbamate) anion ( 3 ) and hexane‐1,6‐diylbis(pyrrole‐2‐ylmethyldithiocarbamate) anion ( 4 ), have been prepared. The dithiocarbamate ligands efficiently self‐assemble with Bu₂Sn(IV) to form bimetallic 26‐membered macrocycles. All the complexes have been characterized using elemental analysis, infrared and NMR (¹H and ¹³C) spectroscopies and X‐ray crystallography. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis of all the complexes confirms the formation of the dinuclear metallomacrocycles in which dithiocarbamate ligands are asymmetrically bound to the tin atoms. The coordination sphere around the tin atom in 1 – 4 can be described as a skew trapezoidal bipyramid. The dimensions of the cavity of the macrocycles of 1 – 4 are ca 8.0 × 9.0 Å². Complexes 1 – 4 were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against MCF‐7 and HL‐60 cells. Complexes 1 and 2 are more active against MCF‐7 and HL‐60. Thermal decomposition of 1 and 4 yielded tin sulfides. They were characterized using powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD), high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy and UV diffuse reflectance and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopies. PXRD studies reveal that the as‐prepared tin sulfides are composed of orthorhombic phase of SnS.     

Supramolecular Stuctures from Mononuclear,Binuclear and 2D Net of Copper(II) Complexes with 6‐Hydroxypicolinic Acid

First examples of transition metal complexes with HpicOH [Cu(picOH)₂(H₂O)₂] ( 1 ), [Cu(picO)(2,2′‐bpy)]·2H₂O ( 2 ), [Cu(picO)(4,4′‐bpy)_0.5(H₂O)]_n ( 3 ), and [Cu(picO)(bpe)_0.5(H₂O)]_n ( 4 ) (HpicOH = 6‐hydroxy‐picolinic acid; 2,2′‐bpy = 2,2′‐bipyridine; 4,4′‐bpy = 4,4′‐bipyridine; bpe = 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane) have been synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The results show that HpicOH ligand can be in the enol or ketonic form, and adopts different coordination modes under different pH value of the reaction mixture. In complex 1 , HpicOH ligand is in the enol form and adopts a bidentate mode. While in complexes 2 – 4 , as the pH rises, HpicOH ligand becomes in the ketonic form and adopts a tridentate mode. The coordination modes in complexes 1 – 4 have not been reported before. Because of the introduction of the terminal ligands 2,2′‐bpy, complex 2 is of binuclear species; whereas in complexes 3 and 4 , picO ligands together with bridging ligands 4,4′‐bpy and bpe connect Cu^II ions to form 2D nets with (12³)₂(12)₃ topology.     

Structure and conformational motion of seven-coordinate diorganotin(IV) complexes derived from salen and salan type ligands

Reaction of R₂SnCl₂ (R = Me, nBu, Ph) and the potassium salts of salenN₃H₃ (N,N′-bis(salicylidene)diethylenetriamine) and saleanN₃H₅ (N,N′-bis(o-hydroxybenzyl)diethylenetriamine) provided diorganotin(IV) complexes of the composition [Me₂Sn(salenN₃H)]·solvate (solvate = 2.5H₂O, MeOH or DMSO), [nBu₂Sn(salenN₃H)]·H₂O, [Ph₂Sn(salenN₃H)]·2EtOH and [Me₂Sn(saleanN₃H₃)]·2.5H₂O. In all compounds the tin atoms are seven-coordinate and have pentagonal-bipyramidal coordination environments, in which the organic substituents attached to the tin atoms occupy the axial positions. This occurs both in solution and the solid state; however, in solution the molecules are involved in conformational equilibria that require the presence of intermediates, in which the N → Sn bonds are dissociated. Although the [saleanN₃H₃]²⁻ ligand is more flexible and basic, a very similar complexing behavior to that of [salenN₃H]²⁻ has been found, and there is evidence that it is even a weaker ligand. Both ligands show the tendency to adopt a curved conformation within the complex, thus indicating that the dynamic process resembles the flapping of butterfly wings. However, the folding is reduced with increasing steric bulk of the organic substitutents attached to the tin atoms. The six-membered heterocyclic rings in the [R₂Sn(salenN₃H)] derivatives have envelope conformation, while those in [Me₂Sn(saleanN₃H₃)] have distorted boat-conformation. Thus, small changes in the hybridization and basicity of the nitrogen atoms cause significant differences of the stability and the dynamic behavior of the resulting molecules.     

Different Complexation Behavior of P‐Functionalized Ferrocene Derivatives Towards SnCl2, SnCl4 and SnPh2Cl2: Auto‐ionization and Redox‐Type Reactions

The novel phosphonyl‐substituted ferrocene derivatives [Fe(η⁵‐Cp)(η⁵‐C₅H₃{P(O)(O‐iPr)₂}₂‐1,2)] ( Fc^1,2 ) and [Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₄P(O)(O‐iPr)₂}₂] ( Fc^1,1′ ) react with SnCl₂, SnCl₄, and SnPh₂Cl₂, giving the corresponding complexes [(Fc^1,2)₂SnCl][SnCl₃] ( 1 ), [{(Fc^1,1′)SnCl₂}_n] ( 2 ), [(Fc^1,1′)SnCl₄] ( 3 ), [{(Fc^1,1′)SnPh₂Cl₂}_n] ( 4 ), and [(Fc^1,2)SnCl₄] ( 5 ), respectively. The compounds are characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR and IR spectroscopy, ³¹P and ¹¹⁹Sn CP‐MAS NMR spectroscopy, cyclovoltammetry, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and single‐crystal as well as powder X‐ray diffraction analyses. The experimental work is accompanied by DFT calculations, which help to shed light on the origin for the different reaction behavior of Fc^1,1′ and Fc^1,2 towards tin(II) chloride.     

Generation and Reactivity of {(Ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[diisopropylphosphine‐κP]}‐{[2,4,6‐tri(tert‐butyl)phenyl]phosphino‐κP}rhodium ([Rh{PH(tBu3C6H2)}(iPr2PCH2CH2PiPr2)]): Catalytic C−P Bond Formation via Intramolecular C−H/P−H Dehydrogenative Cross‐Coupling

The complex [Rh(η³‐benzyl)(dippe)] ( 1 ; dippe=bis(diisopropylphosphino)ethane=(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[diisopropylphosphine]) reacted cleanly with Mes*PH₂ ( 2 ; Mes*=2,4,6‐^tBu₃C₆H₂) to provide a new Rh species [Rh(H)(dippe)(L)] ( 3 ), L being the 2,3‐dihydro‐3,3‐dimethyl‐1H‐phosphindole ligand 4 (=^tBu₂C₆H₂(CMe₂CH₂PH)) (Scheme 1). Complex 3 was converted to the corresponding chloride [Rh(Cl)(dippe)(L)] ( 6 ) when treated with CH₂Cl₂, whereas the dimeric species [Rh₂{μ‐^tBu₂C₆H₂(CMe₂CH₂P)}(μ‐H)(dippe)₂] ( 7 ) was formed upon thermolysis in toluene (Scheme 2). The structures of 6 and 7 ⋅C₇H₈ were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 1 and 3 served as catalyst precursors for the dehydrogenative coupling of C−H and P−H bonds in the conversion of 2 to 4 (Scheme 3). Deuteration studies with Mes*PD₂ exposed a complex series of bond‐activation pathways that appear to involve C−H activation of the dippe ligand by the Rh‐atom (Schemes 4 and 5)     

Physicochemical Characterization of Four Gadolinium(III) DTPA‐like Complexes

The analysis of ¹⁷O NMR transverse relaxation rates and EPR transverse electronic relaxation rates for aqueous solutions of the four DTPA‐like (DTPA = diethylenetriamine‐N,N,N′,N″,N″‐pentaacetic acid) complexes, [Gd(DTPA‐PY)(H₂O)]^? (DTPA‐PY = N′‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)), [Gd(DTPA‐HP)(H₂O)₂]^? (DTPA‐HP = N′‐(2‐hydroxypropyl)), [Gd(DTPA‐H1P)(H₂O)₂]^? (DTPA‐H1P = N′‐(2‐hydroxy‐1‐phenylethyl)) and [Gd(DTPA‐H2P)(H₂O)₂] (DTPA‐H2P = N′‐(2‐hydroxy‐2‐phenylethyl)), at various temperatures allows us to understand the water exchange dynamics of these four complexes. The water‐exchange lifetime (τM) parameters for [Gd(DTPA‐PY)(H₂O)]^?, [Gd(DTPA‐HP)(H₂O)₂]^?, [Gd(DTPA‐H1P)(H₂O)₂]^? and [Gd(DTPA‐H2P)(H₂O)₂] are of 585, 98, 163, and 69 ns, respectively. Compared with [Gd(DTPA)(H₂O)]^2? (τM = 303 ns), the τM value of [Gd(DTPA‐PY)(H₂O)]^? is slightly higher, but the other three complexes values are significantly lower than those of [Gd(DTPA)(H₂O)]^2?. This difference is explained by the fact that the gadolinium(III) complexes of DTPA‐HP, DTPA‐H1P, and DTPA‐H2P have two inner‐sphere waters. The ²H longitudinal relaxation rates of the labeled diamagnetic lanthanum complex allow the calculation of its rotational correlation time (τR). The τR values calculated for DTPA‐PY, DTPA‐HP, DTPA‐H1P, and DTPA‐H2P are of 127, 110, 142 and 147 ps, respectively. These four values are higher than the value of [La(DTPA)]^2? (τR = 103 ps), because the rotational correlation time is related to the magnitude of its molecular weight.     

Trans‐bis(saccharinato)cadmium(II) Complexes with 2‐Pyridylethanol: Synthesis,Crystal Structures,Spectral and Thermal Characterization of [Cd(sac)2(pyet)2] and [Cd(sac)2(H2O)(dmso)(pyet)]

Two trans saccharinate (sac) complexes of cadmium(II) with 2‐pyridylethanol (pyet) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analyses, FT—IR spectroscopy, thermal analysis and single crystal X‐ray diffractometry. The [Cd(sac)₂(pyet)₂] ( 1 ) and [Cd(sac)₂(H₂O)(dmso)(pyet)] ( 2 ) complexes crystallize in the monoclinic (P2₁/c) and orthorhombic [P2₁2₁2₁] crystal systems, respectively. The sac ligands in both complexes are N‐coordinated and located in trans positions, while the pyet molecules act as a bidentate N‐ and O‐donor ligand forming two six‐membered chelate rings. Thermal decomposition of the complexes in air results in elimination of aqua, dmso and pyet ligands, respectively, forming cadmium saccharinate as a stable intermediate, which also decomposes at higher temperatures to give cadmium oxide.     

Synthesis, structure and cytotoxicity of diorganotin(IV) complexes of 2,6-lutidine-α,3-diol (Lu): The crystal structures of Lu and [SnMe2(H2O)(Lu-2H)]

The reaction of dimethyl-, diethyl- and dibutyltin(IV) oxide with 2,6-lutidine-α²,3-diol (Lu) [2-(hydroxymethyl)-3-hydroxy-6-methylpyridine] in toluene/ethanol has been investigated. The compounds were isolated and characterized by IR, Raman and Mössbauer spectroscopy, EI and FAB mass spectrometry and ¹H and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectroscopy. The structures of Lu and [SnMe₂(H₂O)(Lu-2H)] were determined by X-ray diffraction. The crystal of [SnMe₂(H₂O)(Lu-2H)] contains dimeric [SnMe₂(H₂O)(Lu-2H)]₂ units, in which the tin atom is coordinated to the O atoms of the two deprotonated hydroxymethyl groups and one deprotonated phenolic hydroxyl group. The distorted octahedral coordination polyhedron of each tin atom is completed by a water molecule and two methyl C atoms. The butyl derivative exhibited significant in vitro antitumor activity against the human carcinoma cell lines HeLa-229, A2780 and A2780cis, although minor than that of the pyridoxine derivative prepared previously.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)3L(μ‐η1 : η2‐C≡CPh)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (L = CO,PnBu3)

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (L = CO, PⁿBu₃) [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) reacts with several phosphines (L) in refluxing toluene under substitution of one carbonyl ligand and yields the compounds [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] (L = PⁿBu₃, 2 a ; L = PCy₂H, 2 b ; L = dppm‐P, 2 c ; dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). The reactivity of 1 as well as the activated complexes 2 a – c towards phenylethyne was studied. Thus 1 , 2 a and 2 b , respectively, react with PhC≡CH in refluxing toluene with elimination of dihydrogen to the acetylide‐bridged complexes [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) and [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 a and 4 b ). The molecular structures of 3 and 4 a were determined by crystal structure analyses.     

Platinum(II) Mixed Ligand Complexes with Thiourea Derivatives,Dimethyl Sulphoxide and Chloride: Syntheses,Molecular Structures,and ESCA Data

The platinum(II) mixed ligand complexes [PtCl(L^1‐6)(dmso)] with six differently substituted thiourea derivatives HL, R₂NC(S)NHC(O)R′ (R = Et, R′ = p‐O₂N‐Ph: HL¹; R = Ph, R′ = p‐O₂N‐Ph: HL²; R = R′ = Ph: HL³; R = Et, R′ = o‐Cl‐Ph: HL⁴; R₂N = EtOC(O)N(CH₂CH₂)₂N, R′ = Ph: HL⁵) and Et₂NC(S)N=CNH‐1‐Naph (HL⁶), as well as the bis(benzoylthioureato‐κO, κS)‐platinum(II) complexes [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂] have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, FAB(+)‐MS, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, as well as X‐ray structure analysis ([PtCl(L¹)(dmso)] and [PtCl(L^{3, 4})(dmso)]) and ESCA ([PtCl(L^{1, 2})(dmso)] and [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂]). The mixed ligand complexes [PtCl(L)(dmso)] have a nearly square‐planar coordination at the platinum atoms. After deprotonation, the thiourea derivatives coordinate bidentately via O and S, DMSO bonds monodentately to the Pt^II atom via S atom in a cis arrangement with respect to the thiocarbonyl sulphur atom. The Pt—S‐bonds to the DMSO are significant shorter than those to the thiocarbonyl‐S atom. In comparison with the unsubstituted case, electron withdrawing substituents at the phenyl group of the benzoyl moiety of the thioureate (p‐NO₂, o‐Cl) cause a significant elongation of the Pt—S(dmso)‐bond trans arranged to the benzoyl‐O—Pt‐bond. The ESCA data confirm the found coordination and bonding conditions. The Pt 4f_7/2 electron binding energies of the complexes [PtCl(L^{1, 2})(dmso)] are higher than those of the bis(benzoylthioureato)‐complexes [Pt(L^{1, 2})₂]. This may indicate a withdrawal of electron density from platinum(II) caused by the DMSO ligands.     

Synthesis and characterization of the first diorganotin(IV) complexes containing mixed arylazobenzoic acids and having skew trapezoidal bipyramidal geometry

Three diorganotin(IV) complexes of the type, [R₂Sn(L^aH)(L^bH)] (R = ⁿBu or Me and, L^aH and L^bH are two different 5-[(E)-2-(aryl)-1-diazenyl]-2-hydroxybenzoate residues; a: aryl = 4′-Cl-(held constant) and b: aryl = 4′-Me or 4′-Br) have been prepared either by reacting ⁿBu₂SnO, L^aHH′ and L^bHH′ (1:1:1) in anhydrous toluene or by reacting Me₂SnCl₂, L^aHNa and L^bHNa (1:1:1) in anhydrous methanol. The products were characterized by microanalysis, IR, NMR (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹Sn) and ^119mSn Mössbauer spectroscopy. A full characterization of the structures of the complexes [ⁿBu₂Sn(L^aH)(L^bH)] (1 and 2) and [Me₂Sn(L^aH)(L^bH)] (3) in the solid state were accomplished by single crystal X-ray crystallography. These complexes were found to adopt the usual dicarboxylato structural type with a skew-trapezoidal bipyramidal arrangement around the tin atom.     

Synthesis and characterization of aluminum(III) and tin(II) complexes supported by diiminophosphinate ligands and their application in ring‐opening polymerization catalysis of ε‐caprolactone

A series of Al(III) and Sn(II) diiminophosphinate complexes have been synthesized. Reaction of Ph(ArCH₂)P(?NBu^t)NHBu^t (Ar = Ph, 3 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 4 ) with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave aluminum complexes [R₂Al{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (R = Me, Ar = Ph, 5 ; R = Me, Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 6 ; R = Et, Ar = Ph, 7 ; R = Et, Ar = quinolyl, 8 ). Lithiated 3 and 4 were treated with SnCl₂ to afford tin(II) complexes [ClSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (Ar = Ph, 9 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 10 ). Complex 9 was converted to [(Me₃Si)₂NSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 11 ) by treatment with LiN(SiMe₃)₂. Complex 11 was also obtained by reaction of 3 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂]. Complex 9 reacted with [LiOC₆H₄Bu^t‐4] to yield [4‐Bu^tC₆H₄OSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 12 ). Compounds 3–12 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of complexes 6 , 10 , and 11 were further characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalytic activity of complexes 5–8 , 11 , and 12 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) was studied. In the presence of BzOH, the complexes catalyzed the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐CL in the activity order of 5 > 7 ≈ 8 > 6 ? 11 > 12 , giving polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions. The kinetic studies showed a first‐order dependency on the monomer concentration in each case. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 4621–4631, 2006     

Die ersten Röntgenstrukturen kationischer Diorganylzinn(IV)‐Dichelate [R2Sn(L–L)2]2⊕ mit zweizähnigen Phosphanoxid‐Liganden: Di(methansulfonyl)amid als nichtkoordinierendes Gegenion

Polysulfonylamines. CXI. The First X‐Ray Structures of Cationic Diorganyltin(IV) Dichelates [R₂Sn(L–L)₂]^2⊕ Involving Bidentate Phosphine Oxide Ligands: Di(methanesulfonyl)amide as a Non‐Coordinating Counter‐Ion The reaction of Me₂Sn(A)₂, where A^⊖ = (MeSO₂)₂N^⊖, with DPPOE = ethane‐1,2‐diylbis(diphenylphosphine oxide) or CDPPOET = cis‐ethene‐1,2‐diylbis(diphenylphosphine oxide) yields the ionic dichelates [Me₂Sn(dppoe)₂]^2⊕ · 2 A^⊖ ( 1 ; monoclinic, space group P2₁/c) and [Me₂Sn(cdppoet)₂]^2⊕ · 2 A^⊖ ( 2 ; monoclinic, P2₁/n). A solvated variety of 2 , [Me₂Sn(cdppoet)₂]^2⊕ · 2 A^⊖ · Et₂O · 0.15 MeCN ( 4 ; triclinic, P 1), was serendipitously obtained by thermal degradation of the new compound [Me₂Sn(A)(μ‐OH)]₂ · 2 CDPPOET in an MeCN/Et₂O medium. The crystals of 1 , 2 and 4 consist of discrete formula units (one independent unit for 1 and 2 , two independent units for 4 ); in the structure of 4 , the solvent molecules are located in lattice cavities. All the tin atoms lie on crystallographic inversion centres and display moderately distorted octahedral C₂O₄ coordinations with short Sn–O bonds in the range 218–223 pm. Within the formula units, the anions are connected to the P–CH donor groups of the chelating ligands by C–H…O/N interactions, some of which are remarkably short (e.g. in 1 : H…O 220 pm, C–H…O 170°; H…N 242 pm, C–H…N 153°).