Polysulfonylamines. CXX. Bis(tetrahydrothiophene‐S)gold(I) benzene‐1,2‐disulfonimidate

Both ions of the title compound, [Au(C₄H₈S)₂](C₆H₄NO₄S₂), display crystallographic twofold symmetry. The Au atom exhibits linear coordination, with Au—S = 2.2948 (14) Å and S—Au—S = 178.47 (9)°. The crystal packing consists of layers of anions connected by C—H?O hydrogen bonds; the cations occupy cavities in these layers and the ions are linked by Au?N contacts of 3.009 (7) Å. Further C—H?O interactions connect the layers.     

trans‐Cyano(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate) hydrate and trans‐hydroxo(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate)

The crystal structures of a pair of closely related macrocyclic cyano‐ and hydroxopenta­amine­cobalt(III) complexes, as their perchlorate salts, are reported. Although the two complexes, [Co(CN)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O and [Co(OH)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂, exhibit similar conformations, significant differences in the Co—N bond lengths arise from the influence of the sixth ligand (cyano as opposed to hydroxo). The ensuing hydrogen‐bonding patterns are also distinctly different. Disorder in the perchlorate anions was clearly resolved and this was rationalized on the basis of distinct hydrogen‐bonding motifs involving the anion O atoms and the N—H and O—H donors.     

trans‐Bis(thioacetato‐S)bis(triphenylphosphine‐P)nickel(II)

In the title compound, [Ni(C₂H₃OS)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], the Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and the tri­phenyl phosphine and thio­acetate ligands are bonded to the central Ni^II atom in a trans fashion, with Ni—S = 2.2020 (8) and Ni—P = 2.2528 (8) Å, and angle S—Ni—P = 92.47 (3)°.     

Insertion von Rhodizonsäure in die Gallium‐Gallium‐ bzw. Indium‐Indium‐Bindungen von Digallan(4)‐ bzw. Diindan(4)‐Verbindungen

Insertion of Rhodizonic Acid into the Gallium‐Gallium and Indium‐Indium Bonds of Digallane(4) and Diindane(4) Compounds Rhodizonic acid (C₆O₆H₂, 5, 6‐dihydroxy‐5‐cyclohexene‐1, 2, 3, 4‐tetraone) did not react with tetrakis[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl] digallane(4) ( 1 ) and the corresponding diindium compound ( 2 ) by the transfer of protons. Instead the acid was completely inserted into the element‐element bonds of the starting compounds and the gallium or indium atoms were oxidized from the oxidation state of +II to +III. In contrast to the free acid, the OH groups of the products are not attached to neighbouring carbon atoms, but occupy the 1, 4‐positions of the central six‐membered rings. Both dialkylgallium and dialkylindium groups of the products ( 3 (Ga) and 4 (In)) are coordinated by two oxygen atoms. They adopt opposite positions at the C₆O₆ molecular core.     

Bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) (a redetermination at 150 K) and bis(tetraphenylarsonium) bis(1,3‐dithiole‐2‐thione‐4,5‐dithiolato)zinc(II) (at 300 K)

The title compounds are salts of the general form (Q⁺)₂[Zn(dmit)₂]^2?, where dmit corresponds to the ligand (C₃S₅)^? present in both and Q⁺ to the counter‐cations (ⁿBu₄N)⁺ [or C₁₆H₃₆N⁺] and (Ph₄As)⁺ [or C₂₄H₂₀As⁺], respectively. In the first case, Zn is in the 4e special positions of space group C2/c and hence the [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? dianion possesses twofold axial crystallographic symmetry. Including these, there are now 11 known examples of [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? or its analogues, with O replacing the exocyclic thione S, and [Zn(dmio)₂]^2? dianions in nine structures with various Q. Comparison of these reveals a remarkable variation in details of the conformation which the dianion may adopt in terms of Zn coordination, equivalence of the Zn—S bond lengths, displacement of Zn from the plane of the ligand and overall dianion shape.     

Synthesis by ATRP of poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene,poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) and its hydrolysis product poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐poly(hydroxystyrene)

Diblock copolymers of poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene) and polystyrene or poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) are synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a 2‐bromopropionic ester macroinitiator prepared from commercial monohydroxyl functional narrow dispersity hydrogenated polybutadiene (Kraton Liquid Polymer, L‐1203). ATRP carried out in bulk and in xylene solution with cuprous bromide and two different complexing agents 2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy) and 1,1,4,7,10,10‐hexamethyltriethylenetetraamine (HMTETA) yielded well‐defined diblock copolymers with polydispersities around 1,3. The diblock copolymer with poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) was hydrolyzed to the corresponding poly(4‐hydroxystyrene) sequence.     

(Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(nitronyl nitroxide) and (Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(iminonitroxide) and Their Copper Complexes

In contrast to diradicals connected by alternant hydrocarbons, only a few studies on those connected by nonalternant hydrocarbons have been reported. The syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of azulene‐1,3‐diyl linked bis(nitronyl nitroxide) (NN₂Az) and bis(iminonitroxide) (IN₂Az) diradicals and their Cu(hfac)₂ (hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetonate) complexes were investigated. NN₂Az was shown to have an intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction with J _obs/k _B=+10.0 K (H =−2J S ₁ ⋅S ₂) between (nitronyl nitroxide) spins, whereas IN₂Az was estimated to have a much weaker intramolecular magnetic interaction. The reactions of NN₂Az and IN₂Az with Cu(hfac)₂ gave a 1:2 [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] complex and a 1:1 [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] ⋅ C₆H₁₂ complex, respectively. [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] showed strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic interactions (J _1‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−800 K, J _2‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−500 K) between the Cu^II spins and the coordinating NN spins, whereas [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] exhibited a ferromagnetic exchange interaction (J _obs‐Cu‐R/k _B=+114 K) between the Cu^II spin and the imino‐coordinated iminonitroxide spin.