Scandium Reduced Arene Complex: Protonation and Reaction with Azobenzene

The reactivity of the reduced anthracene complex of scandium [Li(thf)₃][Sc{N(tBu)Xy}₂(anth)] ( 2-anth-Li ) (Xy=3,5-Me₂C₆H₃; anth=C₁₄H₁₀²⁻, thf=tetrahydrofuran) toward Brønsted acid [NEt₃H][BPh₄] and azobenzene is reported. While a stepwise protonation of 2-anth-Li with two equivalents of [NEt₃H][BPh₄] afforded the scandium cation [Sc{N(tBu)Xy}₂(thf)₂][BPh₄] ( 3 ), reduction of azobenzene gave a thermolabile, anionic scandium reduced azobenzene complex [Li(thf)][Sc{N(tBu)Xy}₂(η²-PhNNPh)] ( 4 ), which slowly lost one of the anilide ligands to form the neutral scandium azobenzene complex dimer [Sc{N(tBu)Xy}(μ-η²:η²-Ph₂N₂)]₂ ( 5 ). Exposure of 3 to CO₂ produced the scandium carbamate complex [Sc{κ²-O₂CN(tBu)(Xy)}₂][BPh₄] ( 6 ) as a result of CO₂ insertion into the Sc−N bonds. In an attempt to prepare scandium hydrides, the reaction of 3 with the hydride sources LiAlH₄ and Na[BEt₃H] led to the terminal aluminum hydride [AlH{N(tBu)Xy}₂(thf)] ( 7 ) and the scandium n-butoxide [Sc{N(tBu)(Xy)}₂(μ-OnBu)] ( 8 ) after Sc/Al transmetalation and nucleophilic ring-opening of THF, respectively. All reported compounds isolated in moderate to good yields were fully characterized.     

The dinuclear scandium(III) cyclooctatetraenyl chloride complex di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[(η8‐cyclooctatetraene)(tetrahydrofuran‐κO)scandium(III)]

Only a few cyclooctatetraene dianion (COT) π‐complexes of lanthanides have been crystallographically characterized. This first single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction characterization of a scandium(III) COT chloride complex, namely di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[(η⁸‐cyclooctatetraene)(tetrahydrofuran‐κO )scandium(III)], [Sc₂(C₈H₈)₂Cl₂(C₄H₈O)₂] or [Sc(COT)Cl(THF)]₂ (THF is tetrahydrofuran), (1), reveals a dimeric molecular structure with symmetric chloride bridges [average Sc—Cl = 2.5972 (7) Å] and a η⁸‐bound COT ligand. The COT ring is planar, with an average C—C bond length of 1.399 (3) Å. The Sc—C bond lengths range from 2.417 (2) to 2.438 (2) Å [average 2.427 (2) Å]. Direct comparison of (1) with the known lanthanide (Ln) analogues (La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Sm) illustrates the effect of metal‐ion (M ) size on molecular structure. Overall, the M —Cl, M —O, and M —C bond lengths in (1) are the shortest in the series. In addition, only one THF molecule completes the coordination environment of the small Sc^III ion, in contrast to the previously reported dinuclear Ln–COT–Cl complexes, which all have two bound THF molecules per metal atom.     

Surprisingly Different Reaction Behavior of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metal Bis(trimethylsilyl)amides toward Bulky N‐(2‐Pyridylethyl)‐N′‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)pivalamidine

N‐(2,6‐Diisopropylphenyl)‐N′‐(2‐pyridylethyl)pivalamidine (Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)‐C₂H₄‐Py) ( 1 ), reacts with metalation reagents of lithium, magnesium, calcium, and strontium to give the corresponding pivalamidinates [(tmeda)Li{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}] ( 6 ), [Mg{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}₂] ( 3 ), and heteroleptic [{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ae{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}], with Ae being Ca ( 2 a ) and Sr ( 2 b ). In contrast to this straightforward deprotonation of the amidine units, the reaction of 1 with the bis(trimethylsilyl)amides of sodium or potassium unexpectedly leads to a β‐metalation and an immediate deamidation reaction yielding [(thf)₂Na{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}] ( 4 a ) or [(thf)₂K{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}] ( 4 b ), respectively, as well as 2‐vinylpyridine in both cases. The lithium derivative shows a similar reaction behavior to the alkaline earth metal congeners, underlining the diagonal relationship in the periodic table. Protonation of 4 a or the metathesis reaction of 4 b with CaI₂ in tetrahydrofuran yields N‐(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)pivalamidine (Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐NH₂) ( 5 ), or [(thf)₄Ca{Dipp‐N=C(tBu)‐N(H)}₂] ( 7 ), respectively. The reaction of AN(SiMe₃)₂ (A=Na, K) with less bulky formamidine Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N(H)‐C₂H₄‐Py ( 8 ) leads to deprotonation of the amidine functionality, and [(thf)Na{Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}]₂ ( 9 a ) or [(thf)K{Dipp‐N=C(H)‐N‐C₂H₄‐Py}]₂ ( 9 b ), respectively, are isolated as dinuclear complexes. From these experiments it is obvious, that β‐metalation/deamidation of N‐(2‐pyridylethyl)amidines requires bases with soft metal ions and also steric pressure. The isomeric forms of all compounds are verified by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis and are maintained in solution.     

The First [4+2]‐Coordinated Tetraorganolead Compound: Synthesis,Structure and Conversion into a Triorganolead Cation,a Benzoxaphosphaplumbole,and Diorganolead Dihalides

The syntheses and molecular structures, as determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, of the first intramolecularly [4+2]‐coordinated tetraorganolead compound {4‐t‐Bu‐2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₂}PbPh₃ ( 2 ) and the triphenyllead chloride adduct of the first intramolecularly coordinated benzoxaphosphaplumbole {[1(Pb), 3(P)‐Pb(Ph)₂OP(O)(OEt)‐5‐t‐Bu‐7‐P(O)(OEt)₂]C₆H₂·Ph₃PbCl} ( 3a ) are reported. The reaction of 2 with [Ph₃C]⁺ [PF₆]^— and p‐MeC₆H₄SO₃H, respectively, provides the triorganolead salts {4‐t‐Bu‐2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₂}PbPh₂⁺X^— ( 4 , X = PF₆; 4a , X = p‐MeC₆H₄SO₃). Reaction of 2 with bromine and hydrogen chloride, respectively, gives the diorganolead dihalides {4‐t‐Bu‐2, 6‐[P(O)(OEt)₂]₂C₆H₂}PbPhX₂ ( 5 , X = Br; 6 , X = Cl).     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Some Novel Trialkylsilyl‐substituted Lithium Benzyl Complexes [Li(tmeda)][CHRSiMe2R′] (R = Ph, 3,5‐Me2C6H3; R′ = Me,tBu, Ph)

The reactions of PhCH₂SiMe₃ ( 1 ), PhCH₂SiMe₂^tBu ( 2 ), PhCH₂SiMe₂Ph ( 3 ), 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃CH₂SiMe₃ ( 4 ), and 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃CH₂SiMe₂^tBu ( 5 ) with ⁿBuLi in tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) afford the corresponding lithium complexes [Li(tmeda)][CHRSiMe₂R′] (R, R′ = Ph, Me ( 6 ), Ph, ^tBu ( 7 ), Ph, Ph ( 8 ), 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃, Me ( 9 ), and 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃, ^tBu ( 10 )), respectively. The new compounds 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 and 10 have been characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, compounds 7 , 8 and 9 also by X‐ray structure analysis.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von Tris‐, Bis‐ und Mono(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl)‐Komplexen des Neodyms,Lanthans und des Yttriums

The tris(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl) complexes [Ln(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₃] (Ln = Nd, La, Y) are obtained analytically pure by reaction of the tribromides LnBr₃·nTHF with the potassium compound K(Me₂C₅H₅)(thf)_n in THF in good yields. The structural characterization is carried out by X‐ray crystal structure analysis and NMR‐spectroscopically. The tris complexes can be transformed into the dimeric bis(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl) complexes [Ln₂(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₄X₂] (Ln, X: Nd, Cl, Br, I; La, Br, I; Y, Br) by reaction with the trihalides THF solvates in the molar ratio 2:1 in toluene. Structure and bonding conditions are determined for selected compounds by X‐ray crystal structure analysis and NMR‐spectroscopically in general. The dimer‐monomer equilibrium existing in solution was investigated NMR‐spectroscopically in dependence of the donor strength of the solvent and could be established also by preparation of the corresponding monomer neutral ligand complexes [Ln(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₂X(L)] (Ln, X, L: Nd, Br, py; La, Cl, thf; Br, py; Y, Br, thf). Finally the possibilities for preparation of mono(2,4‐dimethylpentadienyl)lanthanoid(III)‐dibromid complexes are shown and the hexameric structure of the lanthanum complex [La₆(η⁵‐Me₂C₅H₅)₆Br₁₂(thf)₄] is proved by X‐ray crystal structure analysis.     

Zur Reaktion von tert-Butyl-phosphaalkin mit Molybdänkomplexen

Reaction of tert -Butyl-phosphaalkyne with Molybdenum Complexes The reaction of tBuC≡P with [(CH₃CN)₃Mo(CO)₃] leads to the complex [Mo(CO)₄〈Mo(CO)₂(η⁴-P₃CtBu){η⁴-P₂(CtBu)₂}〉] 1 as well as to the alkyne complexes [Mo(CO)₄〈{P₃(CtBu)₂}{Mo(CO)₂(CtBu)}{η³-P₂(CtBu)₂}〉] 2 and [Mo(CtBu){η⁴-P₂(CtBu)₂(CO)}{η⁵-P₃(CtBu)₂}] 3 . All compounds are characterized by X-ray structural analysis, by NMR- and IR spectroscopy and by mass spectrometry. In complex 1 a 1,3-diphosphacyclobutadiene and a 1,2,4-triphosphacyclobutadiene are connected by two molybdenum carbonyl centres. In 2 a 1,3-diphosphacyclobutadiene is π- and a novel 1,2,4-triphospholyl ligand is σ-bonded at two Mo centres. A characteristic feature of 3 besides a π co-ordinated 1,2,4-triphospholyl ligand is a 3,4-diphosphacyclopentadienone as ligand, formed via CO insertion during the cyclodimerisation of two phosphaalkynes.     

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Study of Scandium(III) Complexes of DTPA and DOTA: A Step Toward Scandium Radiopharmaceuticals

Diethylenetriamine‐N,N,N′,N′′,N′′‐pentaacetic acid (DTPA) and 1,4,7,10‐tetraazacyclododecane‐1,4,7,10‐tetraacetic acid (DOTA) scandium(III) complexes were investigated in the solution and solid state. Three ⁴⁵Sc NMR spectroscopic references suitable for aqueous solutions were suggested: 0.1 M Sc(ClO₄)₃ in 1 M aq. HClO₄ (δ_Sc=0.0 ppm), 0.1 M ScCl₃ in 1 M aq. HCl (δ_Sc=1.75 ppm) and 0.01 M [Sc(ox)₄]^5? (ox^2?=oxalato) in 1 M aq. K₂C₂O₄ (δ_Sc=8.31 ppm). In solution, [Sc(dtpa)]^2? complex (δ_Sc=83 ppm, ?ν=770 Hz) has a rather symmetric ligand field unlike highly unsymmetrical donor atom arrangement in [Sc(dota)]^? anion (δ_Sc=100 ppm, ?ν=4300 Hz). The solid‐state structure of K₈[Sc₂(ox)₇] ? 13 H₂O contains two [Sc(ox)₃]^3? units bridged by twice “side‐on” coordinated oxalate anion with Sc³⁺ ion in a dodecahedral O₈ arrangement. Structures of [Sc(dtpa)]^2? and [Sc(dota)]^? in [(Hguanidine)]₂[Sc(dtpa)] ? 3 H₂O and K[Sc(dota)][H₆dota]Cl₂ ? 4 H₂O, respectively, are analogous to those of trivalent lanthanide complexes with the same ligands. The [Sc(dota)]^? unit exhibits twisted square‐antiprismatic arrangement without an axial ligand (TSA′ isomer) and [Sc(dota)]^? and (H₆dota)²⁺ units are bridged by a K⁺ cation. A surprisingly high value of the last DOTA dissociation constant (pK_a=12.9) was determined by potentiometry and confirmed by using NMR spectroscopy. Stability constants of scandium(III) complexes (log K_ScL 27.43 and 30.79 for DTPA and DOTA, respectively) were determined from potentiometric and ⁴⁵Sc NMR spectroscopic data. Both complexes are fully formed even below pH 2. Complexation of DOTA with the Sc³⁺ ion is much faster than with trivalent lanthanides. Proton‐assisted decomplexation of the [Sc(dota)]^? complex (τ_1/2=45 h; 1 M aq. HCl, 25 °C) is much slower than that for [Ln(dota)]^? complexes. Therefore, DOTA and its derivatives seem to be very suitable ligands for scandium radioisotopes.     

Zirconium Complexes of Two Different Iminopyrrolyl Ligands – Syntheses and Structures

The reaction involving N‐aryliminopyrrolyl ligand, 2‐((p‐Me‐C₆H₃N=CMe)–C₄H₃NH) ( 1a ) (Imp^Me‐H), and Zr(OtBu)₄ in a 2:1 molar ratio in toluene at 90 °C afforded the corresponding bis(iminopyrrolyl) complex of zirconium, [(Imp^Me)₂Zr(OtBu)₂] ( 2a ) having two bidentate iminopyrrole groups in the coordination sphere. In contrast, the bulkier 2‐((2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃N=CH)–C₄H₃NH) ( 1b ) (Imp^Dipp‐H) and Zr(OtBu)₄ in a 1:1 molar ratio under the same condition yielded the corresponding mono(iminopyrrolyl) complex of zirconium, [(Imp^Dipp)Zr(OtBu)₃(THF)] ( 2b ), which contains only one bidentate iminopyrrole moiety in the coordination sphere. Both complexes were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. The solid‐state structures reveal that the bulky iminopyrrole ligands cause a steric crowding around the zirconium ion along with three tert‐butoxide ligands attached to the central metal atom.     

Synthesis and Structure of (N,)C,N‐chelated Organoantimony(III) and Bismuth(III) Cations and Isolation of Their Adducts with Ag[CB11H12]

The treatment of N,C,N‐chelated antimony(III) and bismuth(III) chlorides [C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NR)₂]MCl₂ [R = tBu and M = Sb ( 1 ) or Bi ( 2 ); R = Dmp and M = Sb ( 3 ) or Bi ( 4 )] (Dmp = 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃) with one molar equivalent of Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] led to a smooth formation of corresponding ionic pairs {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NR)₂]MCl}⁺[CB₁₁H₁₂]^– [R = tBu and M = Sb ( 7 ) or Bi ( 8 ), R = Dmp and M = Sb ( 9 ) or Bi ( 10 )]. Similarly, the reaction of C,N‐chelated analogues [C₆H₂‐2‐(CH=NDip)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]MCl₂ [M = Sb ( 5 ) or Bi ( 6 ), Dip = 2′,6′‐iPr₂C₆H₃] gave compounds {[C₆H₂‐2‐(CH=NDip)‐4,6‐(tBu)₂]MCl}⁺[CB₁₁H₁₂]^– [M = Sb ( 11 ) or Bi ( 12 )]. All compounds 7 – 12 were characterized with ¹H, ¹¹B and ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectroscopy, ESI‐mass spectrometry, IR spectroscopy, and molecular structures of 7 – 9 and 12 were determined by the help of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. In contrast, all attempts to cleave also the second M–Cl bond in 7 – 12 using another molar equivalent Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] remained unsuccessful. Nevertheless, the reaction between 7 (or 8 ) and Ag[CB₁₁H₁₂] produced unprecedented adducts of both reagents namely {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NtBu)₂]SbCl}₂²⁺[Ag₂(CB₁₁H₁₂)₄]^2– ( 13 ) and {[C₆H₃‐2,6‐(CH=NtBu)₂]BiCl}⁺[Ag(CB₁₁H₁₂)₂]^– ( 14 ) in a reproducible manner. The molecular structures of these sparingly soluble compounds were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Zincocene and Dizincocene N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Complexes and Catalytic Hydrogenation of Imines and Ketones

The N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) adducts Zn(Cp^R)₂(NHC)] (Cp^R=C₅HMe₄, C₅H₄SiMe₃; NHC=ItBu, IDipp (Dipp=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl), IMes (Mes=mesityl), SIMes) were prepared and shown to be active catalysts for the hydrogenation of imines, whereas decamethylzincocene [ZnCp*₂] is highly active for the hydrogenation of ketones in the presence of noncoordinating NHCs. The abnormal carbene complex [Zn(OCHPh₂)₂(aItBu)]₂ was formed from spontaneous rearrangement of the ItBu ligand during incomplete hydrogenation of benzophenone. Two isolated Zn^I adducts [Zn₂Cp*₂(NHC)] (NHC=ItBu, SIMes) are presented and characterized as weak adducts on the basis of ¹³C NMR spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction experiments. A mechanistic proposal for the reduction of [ZnCp*₂] with H₂ to give [Zn₂Cp*₂] is discussed.     

Terminal Alkyne Coupling Reactions Through a Ring: Effect of Ring Size on Rate and Regioselectivity

Terminal alkyne coupling reactions promoted by rhodium(I) complexes of macrocyclic NHC-based pincer ligands—which feature dodecamethylene, tetradecamethylene or hexadecamethylene wingtip linkers viz. [Rh(CNC-n)(C₂H₄)][BAr^F₄] (n=12, 14, 16; Ar^F=3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃)—have been investigated, using the bulky alkynes HC≡CtBu and HC≡CAr’ (Ar’=3,5-tBu₂C₆H₃) as substrates. These stoichiometric reactions proceed with formation of rhodium(III) alkynyl alkenyl derivatives and produce rhodium(I) complexes of conjugated 1,3-enynes by C−C bond reductive elimination through the annulus of the ancillary ligand. The intermediates are formed with orthogonal regioselectivity, with E-alkenyl complexes derived from HC≡CtBu and gem-alkenyl complexes derived from HC≡CAr’, and the reductive elimination step is appreciably affected by the ring size of the macrocycle. For the homocoupling of HC≡CtBu, E-tBuC≡CCH=CHtBu is produced via direct reductive elimination from the corresponding rhodium(III) alkynyl E-alkenyl derivatives with increasing efficacy as the ring is expanded. In contrast, direct reductive elimination of Ar'C≡CC(=CH₂)Ar’ is encumbered relative to head-to-head coupling of HC≡CAr’ and it is only with the largest macrocyclic ligand studied that the two processes are competitive. These results showcase how macrocyclic ligands can be used to interrogate the mechanism and tune the outcome of terminal alkyne coupling reactions, and are discussed with reference to catalytic reactions mediated by the acyclic homologue [Rh(CNC-Me)(C₂H₄)][BAr^F₄] and solvent effects.     

Cobalt complexes of a selenium diimide and a tellurium diimide dimer

[CoCl₂{N,N′-Te₂(N^tBu)₄}] (1) was obtained in good yields by the reaction of equimolar amounts of (^tBu)NTe(μ-N^tBu)₂TeN(^tBu) and CoCl₂ in toluene under an argon atmosphere. The crystal structure of 1·CH₂Cl₂ showed that the dimeric tellurium diimide ligand is N,N′-chelated to cobalt. The related reaction of Se(N^tBu)₂ and CoCl₂ affords a green product tentatively identified as a 1:1 adduct [CoCl₂{N,N′-Se(N^tBu)₂}] (CHN analysis). However, recrystallization from thf produces the ion-separated complex [Co₂(μ-Cl)₃{N,N′-Se(N^tBu)₂}₂(thf)₂][CoCl₃{NH₂(^tBu)}]·1½thf (2·1½thf), in which the monomeric selenium diimide ligand is N,N′-chelated to cobalt in the cation. A pathway for the formation of 2 from [CoCl₂{N,N′-Se(N^tBu)₂}] in thf is proposed.     

Lanthanide(II) Complexes of the Dihydrotriazinido Ligand [N{C(Ph)=N}2C(tBu)Ph]−

The potassium dihydrotriazinide K(L^Ph,tBu) ( 1 ) was obtained by a metal exchange route from [Li(L^Ph,tBu)(THF)₃] and KOtBu (L^Ph,tBu = [N{C(Ph)=N}₂C(tBu)Ph]). Reaction of 1 with 1 or 0.5 equivalents of SmI₂(thf)₂ yielded the monosubstituted Sm^II complex [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)I(THF)₄] ( 2 ) or the disubstituted [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Attempted synthesis of a heteroleptic Sm^II amido‐alkyl complex by the reaction of 2 with KCH₂Ph produced compound 3 due to ligand redistribution. The Yb^II bis(dihydrotriazinide) [Yb(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 4 ) was isolated from the 1:1 reaction of YbI₂(THF)₂ and 1 . Molecular structures of the crystalline compounds 2 , 3· 2C₆H₆ and 4· PhMe were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and Reactivity of Cationic Gold Diarylallenylidene Complexes

Methoxide abstraction from gold acetylide complexes of the form (L)Au[η¹‐C≡CC(OMe)ArAr′] (L=IPr, P(^tBu)₂(ortho‐biphenyl); Ar/Ar′=C₆H₄X where X=H, Cl, Me, OMe) with trimethylsilyl trifluoromethanesulfonate (TMSOTf) at −78 °C resulted in the formation of the corresponding cationic gold diarylallenylidene complexes [(L)Au=C=C=CArAr′]⁺ OTf⁻ in ≥85±5 % yield according to ¹H NMR analysis. ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopic analysis of these complexes established the arene‐dependent delocalization of positive charge on both the C1 and C3 allenylidene carbon atoms. The diphenylallenylidene complex [(IPr)Au=C=C=CPh₂]⁺ OTf⁻ reacted with heteroatom nucleophiles at the allenylidene C1 and/or C3 carbon atom.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of a Gold Carbenoid Complex That Lacks Heteroatom Stabilization

Hydride abstraction from the neutral gold cycloheptatrienyl complex [( P )Au(η¹‐C₇H₇)] ( P =P(tBu)₂(o‐biphenyl)) with triphenylcarbenium tetrafluoroborate at −80 °C led to the isolation of the cationic gold cycloheptatrienylidene complex [( P )Au(η¹‐C₇H₆)]⁺ BF₄⁻ in 52 % yield, which was characterized in solution and by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. This cycloheptatrienylidene complex represents the first example of a gold carbenoid complex that lacks conjugated heteroatom stabilization of the electron‐deficient C1 carbon atom. The cycloheptatrienylidene ligand of this complex is reactive; it can be reduced by mild hydride donors, and converted to tropone in the presence of pyridine N‐oxide.     

Flexidentate Coordination Behavior and Chemical Non-Innocence of a Bis(1,3-Diphosphacyclobutadiene) Sandwich Anion

The homoleptic 1,3-diphosphacyclobutadiene sandwich complex [Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂]⁻ behaved as a versatile and highly flexible metalloligand toward Ni²⁺, Ru²⁺, Rh⁺, and Pd²⁺ cations, forming a range of unusual oligonuclear compounds. The reaction of [K(thf)₂{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂}] with [Ni₂Cp₃]BF₄ initially afforded the σ-complex [CpNi{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂}(thf)] ( 2 ), which converted into [Co(η⁴-CpNi{1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂-κP,κC})(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)] ( 3 ) below room temperature. The structure of 3 contains an unprecedented 1,4-diphospha-2-nickelacyclopentadiene moiety formed by an oxidative addition of a ligand P−C bond onto nickel. At elevated temperatures, 3 isomerized to [Co(η⁴-CpNi{1,4-P₂C₂tBu₂-κ²P,P})(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)] ( 4 ), which features a 1,3-diphospha-2-nickelacyclopentadiene unit. Transmetalation of [K(thf)₂{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂}] with [Cp*RuCl]₄ (Cp*=C₅Me₅) afforded tetranuclear [(Cp*Ru)₃(μ-Cl)₂{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂}] ( 5 ), in which the [Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂]⁻ anion acts as a chelate ligand toward Ru²⁺. The diphosphido complex [(Cp*Ru)₂(μ,η²-P₂)(μ,η²-C₂tBu₂)] ( 6 ) was formed as a byproduct. Pure compound 6 was isolated after prolonged heating of the reaction mixture. The reaction of [K(thf)₂{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂R₂)₂}] (R=tBu; adamantyl, Ad) with [RhCl(cod)]₂ (cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene) afforded unprecedented π-complexes [Rh(cod){Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂R₂)₂}] ( 7 : R=tBu; 8 : R=Ad), in which one μ:η⁴:η⁴-P₂C₂R₂ ligand bridges two metal atoms. The pentanuclear complex [Pd₃(PPh₃)₂{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂}₂] ( 10 ), featuring a Pd₃ chain and a rare 1,4-diphospha-2-butene ligand, was synthesized by reacting [K(thf)₂{Co(η⁴-1,3-P₂C₂tBu₂)₂}] with cis-PdCl₂(PPh₃)₂. The redox properties of selected compounds were analyzed by cyclic voltammetry, whereas DFT calculations gave additional insight into the electronic structures. The results of this study revealed several remarkable and previously unrecognized properties of the [Co(P₂C₂tBu₂)₂]⁻ anion.     

The Nature of the UC Double Bond: Pushing the Stability of High‐Oxidation‐State Uranium Carbenes to the Limit

Treatment of [K(BIPM^MesH)] (BIPM^Mes={C(PPh₂NMes)₂}^2?; Mes=C₆H₂‐2,4,6‐Me₃) with [UCl₄(thf)₃] (1 equiv) afforded [U(BIPM^MesH)(Cl)₃(thf)] ( 1 ), which generated [U(BIPM^Mes)(Cl)₂(thf)₂] ( 2 ), following treatment with benzyl potassium. Attempts to oxidise 2 resulted in intractable mixtures, ligand scrambling to give [U(BIPM^Mes)₂] or the formation of [U(BIPM^MesH)(O)₂(Cl)(thf)] ( 3 ). The complex [U(BIPM^Dipp)(μ‐Cl)₄(Li)₂(OEt₂)(tmeda)] ( 4 ) (BIPM^Dipp={C(PPh₂NDipp)₂}^2?; Dipp=C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂; tmeda=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine) was prepared from [Li₂(BIPM^Dipp)(tmeda)] and [UCl₄(thf)₃] and, following reflux in toluene, could be isolated as [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)₂(thf)₂] ( 5 ). Treatment of 4 with iodine (0.5 equiv) afforded [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)₂(μ‐Cl)₂(Li)(thf)₂] ( 6 ). Complex 6 resists oxidation, and treating 4 or 5 with N‐oxides gives [{U(BIPM^DippH)(O)₂‐ (μ‐Cl)₂Li(tmeda)] ( 7 ) and [{U(BIPM^DippH)(O)₂(μ‐Cl)}₂] ( 8 ). Treatment of 4 with tBuOLi (3 equiv) and I₂ (1 equiv) gives [U(BIPM^Dipp)(OtBu)₃(I)] ( 9 ), which represents an exceptionally rare example of a crystallographically authenticated uranium(VI)–carbon σ bond. Although 9 appears sterically saturated, it decomposes over time to give [U(BIPM^Dipp)(OtBu)₃]. Complex 4 reacts with PhCOtBu and Ph₂CO to form [U(BIPM^Dipp)(μ‐Cl)₄(Li)₂(tmeda)(OCPhtBu)] ( 10 ) and [U(BIPM^Dipp)(Cl)(μ‐Cl)₂(Li)(tmeda)(OCPh₂)] ( 11 ). In contrast, complex 5 does not react with PhCOtBu and Ph₂CO, which we attribute to steric blocking. However, complexes 5 and 6 react with PhCHO to afford (DippNPPh₂)₂C?C(H)Ph ( 12 ). Complex 9 does not react with PhCOtBu, Ph₂CO or PhCHO; this is attributed to steric blocking. Theoretical calculations have enabled a qualitative bracketing of the extent of covalency in early‐metal carbenes as a function of metal, oxidation state and the number of phosphanyl substituents, revealing modest covalent contributions to U?C double bonds.     

Molybdenum(VI) Bis(imido) Complexes: From Frustrated Lewis Pairs to Weakly Coordinating Cations

Molybdenum(VI) bis(imido) complexes [Mo(NtBu)₂(L^R)₂] (R=H 1 a ; R=CF₃ 1 b ) combined with B(C₆F₅)₃ ( 1 a /B(C₆F₅)₃, 1 b /B(C₆F₅)₃) exhibit a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) character that can heterolytically split H−H, Si−H and O−H bonds. Cleavage of H₂ and Et₃SiH affords ion pairs [Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂][HB(C₆F₅)₃] (R=H 2 a ; R=CF₃ 2 b ) composed of a Mo(VI) amido imido cation and a hydridoborate anion, while reaction with H₂O leads to [Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂][(HO)B(C₆F₅)₃] (R=H 3 a ; R=CF₃ 3 b ). Ion pairs 2 a and 2 b are catalysts for the hydrosilylation of aldehydes with triethylsilane, with 2 b being more active than 2 a . Mechanistic elucidation revealed insertion of the aldehyde into the B−H bond of [HB(C₆F₅)₃]⁻. We were able to isolate and fully characterize, including by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis, the inserted products Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂][{PhCH₂O}B(C₆F₅)₃] (R=H 4 a ; R=CF₃ 4 b ). Catalysis occurs at [HB(C₆F₅)₃]⁻ while [Mo(NtBu)(NHtBu)(L^R)₂]⁺ (R=H or CF₃) act as the cationic counterions. However, the striking difference in reactivity gives ample evidence that molybdenum cations behave as weakly coordinating cations (WCC).     

Synthesis of a “Masked” Terminal Nickel(II) Sulfide by Reductive Deprotection and its Reaction with Nitrous Oxide

The addition of 1 equiv of KSCPh₃ to [L^RNiCl] (L^R={(2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)NC(R)}₂CH; R=Me, tBu) in C₆H₆ results in the formation of [L^RNi(SCPh₃)] ( 1 : R=Me; 2 : R=tBu) in good yields. Subsequent reduction of 1 and 2 with 2 equiv of KC₈ in cold (?25 °C) Et₂O in the presence of 2 equiv of 18‐crown‐6 results in the formation of “masked” terminal Ni^II sulfides, [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^RNi(S)] ( 3 : R=Me; 4 : R=tBu), also in good yields. An X‐ray crystallographic analysis of these complexes suggests that they feature partial multiple‐bond character in their Ni? S linkages. Addition of N₂O to a toluene solution of 4 provides [K(18‐crown‐6)][L^tBuNi(SN?NO)], which features the first example of a thiohyponitrite (κ²‐[SN?NO]^2?) ligand.