Cyclometalated Iridium(III) and Rhodium(III) Complexes Containing Naphthyridine Ligands: Synthesis,Characterization and Biological Studies

The synthesis, crystal structure, and biological activity of new bis‐cyclometalated compounds [M(ptpy)₂(4‐chloro‐2‐methyl‐1,8‐naphthyridine)]PF₆ [M = Rh ( 1 ); M = Ir ( 2 ); ptpy = 2‐(p‐tolyl)pyridinato] and [M(ptpy)₂(2‐methyl‐1,8‐naphthyridine)]PF₆ [M = Rh ( 3 ); M = Ir ( 4 )] are described. The new compounds were prepared by the reaction of [{M(μ‐Cl)(ptpy)₂}₂] (M = Rh, Ir) with the corresponding naphthyridine ligands. The molecular structures of compounds 1 , 3 , and 4 were confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Bis‐cyclometalated Rhodium and Iridium Chloride Complexes Yield Different Products Upon Reaction With 9,10‐Diaminophenanthrene

The reaction of 9.10‐diaminophenanthrene with [{Rh(μ‐Cl)(ptpy)₂}₂] yields – quite unexpected – the new cyclometalated complex salts [Rh(ptpy)₂(9,10‐diiminophenanthrene)]PF₆ ( 1 ), whereas with the corresponding dinuclear iridium compound the “usual” [Ir(ptpy)₂(9,10‐diaminophenanthrene)]PF₆ ( 2 ) is obtained. The molecular structure of compound 1 was confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. 1 crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n as a dichloromethane solvate. Both compounds display significant cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines with the IC₅₀ values in the low micromolar range.     

Metal and Substituent Influence on the Cytostatic Activity of Cationic Bis-cyclometallated Iridium and Rhodium Complexes with Substituted 1,10-Phenanthrolines as Ancillary Ligands

Synthesis and characterization of the new cyclometalated complex salts [Rh(ptpy)₂(5.6-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)]PF₆ ( 1a ) [Rh(ptpy)₂(2.9-dimethyl-4.7-diphenyl-1,10- phenanthroline)]PF₆ ( 2a ), [Rh(ptpy)₂(5-amino-1,10-phenanthroline)] PF₆ ( 3a ), and [M(ptpy)₂ (pyrazino-[2.3-f]-1,10-phenanthroline)]PF₆ (M = Rh, 4a ; M = Ir, 4b ), (ptpy = 2-(p-tolyl)pyridinato) are described. The molecular structures of compounds 1b and 4a in the solid state were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. All these compounds and their already known Iridium counterparts 1b – 3b display significant cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinoma) and HT-29 (colon adenocarcinoma) with IC₅₀ values in the low micromolar range.     

DFT and TD‐DFT study of iridium complexes with low‐color‐temperature and low‐efficiency roll‐off properties

A series of heteroleptic cyclometalated Ir (III) complexes with low‐color‐temperature and low‐efficiency roll‐off properties, which cause a fast reduction in efficiency when the drive current increases, for organic light‐emitting devices are investigated theoretically to explore their electronic structures and spectroscopic properties. The geometries, electronic structures, lowest‐lying singlet absorptions and triplet emissions of (ptpy)₂Ir(acac), and the theoretically designed models (ptpy)₂Ir(tpip), (F‐ptpy)₂Ir(acac), (F‐ptpy)₂Ir(tpip), (F₂‐ptpy)₂Ir(acac) and (F₂‐ptpy)₂Ir(tpip), are investigated with density functional theory approaches, where ptpy denotes 4‐phenylthieno [3,2‐c] pyridine, acac denotes acetylacetonate, tpip denotes tetraphenylimido‐diphosphinate, F‐ptpy denotes 4‐(3‐fluorophenyl) thieno [3,2‐c] pyridine, and F₂‐ptpy denotes 4‐(2,4‐difluorophenyl) thieno [3,2‐c] pyridine.     

New Rhenium(V) Nitrofuryl Semicarbazone Complexes.Crystal Structure of [ReOCl2(PPh3)(3‐(5‐Nitrofuryl)acroleine semicarbazone)]

The synthesis and characterization of the first two Re complexes with semicarbazone ligands is presented. Selected ligands are 5‐Nitro‐2‐furaldehyde semicarbazone (Nitrofurazone) ( L1 ) and its derivative 3‐(5‐Nitrofuryl)acroleine semicarbazone ( L2 ). Complexes of general formula [Re^VOCl₂(PPh₃) L ], where L = L1 and L2 , were prepared in good yields and high purity by reaction of [Re^VOCl₃(PPh₃)₂] with L in ethanol or methanol solutions. The complexes formula and molecular structures were supported by elemental analyses and electronic, FTIR, ¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P NMR spectroscopies. In addition, the crystal and molecular structure of [Re^VOCl₂(PPh₃) L2 ] was determined by X‐ray diffraction methods. [ReOCl₂(PPh₃)(3‐(5‐Nitrofuryl)acroleine semicarbazone)] crystallizes in the space group P‐1 with a = 11.2334(2), b = 11.3040(2), c = 12.5040(2) Å, α = 81.861(1), β = 63.555(1), γ = 83.626(1)°, and Z = 2. The Re(V) ion is in a distorted octahedral environment, equatorially coordinated to a deprotonated semicarbazone molecule acting as a bidentate ligand through its carbonylic oxygen and azomethynic nitrogen atoms, to an oxo ligand and a chlorine atom. The six‐fold coordination is completed by another chlorine atom and a triphenylphosphine ligand at the axial positions.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of Hydridoiridium Complexes Bearing a Pincer‐Type PSiP Ligand

A series of iridium tetrahydride complexes [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐R)] bearing a tridentate pincer‐type bis(phosphino)silyl ligand ([{2‐(R₂P)C₆H₄}₂MeSi]⁻, PSiP‐R, R=Cy, iPr, or tBu) were synthesized by the reduction of [IrCl(H)(PSiP‐R)] with Me₄N ⋅ BH₄ under argon. The same reaction under a nitrogen atmosphere afforded a rare example of thermally stable iridium(III)–dinitrogen complexes, [Ir(H)₂(N₂)(PSiP‐R)]. Two isomeric dinitrogen complexes were produced, in which the PSiP ligand coordinated to the iridium center in meridional and facial orientations, respectively. Attempted substitution of the dinitrogen ligand in [Ir(H)₂(N₂)(PSiP‐Cy)] with PMe₃ required heating at 150 °C to give the expected [Ir(H)₂(PMe₃)(PSiP‐Cy)] and a trigonal bipyramidal iridium(I)–dinitrogen complex, [Ir(N₂)(PMe₃)(PSiP‐Cy)]. The reaction of [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐Cy)] with three equivalents of 2‐norbornene (nbe) in benzene afforded [Ir^I(nbe)(PSiP‐Cy)] in a high yield, while a similar reaction of [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐R)] with an excess of 3,3‐dimethylbutene (tbe) in benzene gave the C H bond activation product, [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐R)], in high yield. The oxidative addition of benzene is reversible; heating [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐Cy)] in the presence of PPh₃ in benzene resulted in reductive elimination of benzene, coordination of PPh₃, and activation of the C H bond of one aromatic ring in PPh₃. [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐R)] catalyzed a direct borylation reaction of the benzene C H bond with bis(pinacolato)diboron. Molecular structures of most of the new complexes in this study were determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray analysis.     

Near‐IR Emitting Iridium(III) Complexes with Heteroaromatic β‐Diketonate Ancillary Ligands for Efficient Solution‐Processed OLEDs: Structure–Property Correlations

Three NIR‐emitting neutral Ir^III complexes [Ir(iqbt)₂(dpm)] ( 1 ), [Ir(iqbt)₂(tta)] ( 2 ), and [Ir(iqbt)₂(dtdk)] ( 3 ) based on the 1‐(benzo[b]thiophen‐2‐yl)‐isoquinolinate (iqtb) were synthesized and characterized (dpm=2,2,6,6‐tetramethyl‐3,5‐heptanedionate; tta=2‐thienoyltrifluoroacetonate; dtdk=1,3‐di(thiophen‐2‐yl)propane‐1,3‐dionate). The compounds emit between λ=680 and 850 nm with high luminescence quantum yields (up to 16 %). By combining electrochemistry, photophysical measurements, and computational modelling, the relationship between the structure, energy levels, and properties were investigated. NIR‐emitting, solution‐processed phosphorescent organic light‐emitting devices (PHOLEDs) were fabricated using the complexes. The devices show remarkable external quantum efficiencies (above 3 % with 1 ) with negligible efficiency roll‐off values, exceeding the highest reported values for solution‐processible NIR emitters.     

Ligand‐Centred Reactivity of Bis(picolyl)amine Iridium: Sequential Deprotonation,Oxidation and Oxygenation of a “Non‐Innocent” Ligand

Treatment of [Ir(bpa)(cod)]⁺ complex [ 1 ]⁺ with a strong base (e.g., tBuO^?) led to unexpected double deprotonation to form the anionic [Ir(bpa?2H)(cod)]^? species [ 3 ]^?, via the mono‐deprotonated neutral amido complex [Ir(bpa?H)(cod)] as an isolable intermediate. A certain degree of aromaticity of the obtained metal–chelate ring may explain the favourable double deprotonation. The rhodium analogue [ 4 ]^? was prepared in situ. The new species [M(bpa?2H)(cod)]^? (M=Rh, Ir) are best described as two‐electron reduced analogues of the cationic imine complexes [M^I(cod)(Py‐CH₂‐N?CH‐Py)]⁺. One‐electron oxidation of [ 3 ]^? and [ 4 ]^? produced the ligand radical complexes [ 3 ]^. and [ 4 ]^.. Oxygenation of [ 3 ]^? with O₂ gave the neutral carboxamido complex [Ir(cod)(py‐CH₂‐N‐CO‐py)] via the ligand radical complex [ 3 ]^. as a detectable intermediate.     

Single Crystal Growth and Crystal Structure of Anhydrous Mercury(I) Nitrate,Hg2(NO3)2

Polycrystalline anhydrous Hg₂(NO₃)₂ was prepared by drying Hg₂(NO₃)₂·2H₂O over concentrated sulphuric acid. Evaporation of a concentrated and slightly acidified mercury(I) nitrate solution to which the same volumetric amount of pyridine was added, led to the growth of colourless rod‐like single crystals of Hg₂(NO₃)₂. Besides the title compound, crystals of hydrous Hg₂(NO₃)₂·2H₂O and the basic (Hg₂)₂(OH)(NO₃)₃ were formed as by‐products after a crystallization period of about 2 to 4 days at room temperature. The crystal structure was determined from two single crystal diffractometer data sets collected at —100°C and at room temperature: space group P2₁, Z = 4, —100°C [room temperature]: a = 6.2051(10) [6.2038(7)]Å, b = 8.3444(14) [8.3875(10)]Å, c = 11.7028(1) [11.7620(14)]Å, ß = 93.564(3) [93.415(2)]°, 3018 [3202] structure factors, 182 [182] parameters, R[Fμ² > 2σ(Fμ²)] = 0.0266 [0.0313]. The structure is built up of two crystallographically inequivalent Hg₂²⁺ dumbbells and four NO₃^— groups which form molecular [O₂N‐O‐Hg‐Hg‐O‐NO₂] units with short Hg‐O bonds. Via long Hg‐O bonds to adjacent nitrate groups the crystal packing is achieved. The Hg‐Hg distances with an average of d(Hg‐Hg) = 2.5072Å are in the typical range for mercurous oxo compounds. The oxygen coordination around the mercury dumbbells is asymmetric with four and six oxygen atoms as ligands for the two mercury atoms of each dumbbell. The nitrate groups deviate slightly from the geometry of an equilateral triangle with an average distance of d(N‐O) = 1.255Å.     

Versatile reactivity of half-sandwich Ir and Rh complexes toward carboranylamidinates and their derivatives: synthesis, structure, and catalytic activity for norbornene polymerization

Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of carboranylamidinate‐based half‐sandwich iridium and rhodium complexes are reported for the first time. Treatment of dimeric metal complexes [{Cp*M(μ‐Cl)Cl}₂] (M=Ir, Rh; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with a solution of one equivalent of nBuLi and a carboranylamidine produces 18‐electron complexes [Cp*IrCl(Cab^N‐DIC)] ( 1 a ; Cab^N‐DIC=[iPrN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHiPr)]), [Cp*RhCl(Cab^N‐DIC)] ( 1 b ), and [Cp*RhCl(Cab^N‐DCC)] ( 1 c ; Cab^N‐DCC=[CyN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHCy)]). A series of 16‐electron half‐sandwich Ir and Rh complexes [Cp*Ir(Cab^N′‐DIC)] ( 2 a ; Cab^N′‐DIC=[iPrN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NiPr)]), [Cp*Ir(Cab^N′‐DCC)] ( 2 b , Cab^N′‐DCC=[CyN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NCy)]), and [Cp*Rh(Cab^N′‐DIC)] ( 2 c ) is also obtained when an excess of nBuLi is used. The unexpected products [Cp*M(Cab^N,S‐DIC)], [Cp*M(Cab^N,S‐DCC)] (M=Ir 3 a , 3 b ; Rh 3 c , 3 d ), formed through BH activation, are obtained by reaction of [{Cp*MCl₂}₂] with carboranylamidinate sulfides [RN?C(closo‐1,2‐C₂B₁₀H₁₀)(NHR)]S^? (R=iPr, Cy), which can be prepared by inserting sulfur into the C? Li bond of lithium carboranylamidinates. Iridium complex 1 a shows catalytic activities of up to 2.69×10⁶ g_PNB ${{\rm{mol}}_{{\rm{Ir}}}^{ - {\rm{1}}} }Synthesis, structure, and reactivity of carboranylamidinate-based half-sandwich iridium and rhodium complexes are reported for the first time. Treatment of dimeric metal complexes [{Cp*M(μ-Cl)Cl}(2)] (M = Ir, Rh; Cp* = η(5)-C(5)Me(5)) with a solution of one equivalent of nBuLi and a carboranylamidine produces 18-electron complexes [Cp*IrCl(Cab(N)-DIC)] (1?a; Cab(N)-DIC = [iPrN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHiPr)]), [Cp*RhCl(Cab(N)-DIC)] (1?b), and [Cp*RhCl(Cab(N)-DCC)] (1?c; Cab(N)-DCC = [CyN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHCy)]). A series of 16-electron half-sandwich Ir and Rh complexes [Cp*Ir(Cab(N')-DIC)] (2?a; Cab(N')-DIC = [iPrN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NiPr)]), [Cp*Ir(Cab(N')-DCC)] (2?b, Cab(N')-DCC = [CyN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10)(NCy)]), and [Cp*Rh(Cab(N')-DIC)] (2?c) is also obtained when an excess of nBuLi is used. The unexpected products [Cp*M(Cab(N,S)-DIC)], [Cp*M(Cab(N,S)-DCC)] (M = Ir 3?a, 3?b; Rh 3?c, 3?d), formed through BH activation, are obtained by reaction of [{Cp*MCl(2)}(2)] with carboranylamidinate sulfides [RN=C(closo-1,2-C(2)B(10)H(10))(NHR)]S(-) (R = iPr, Cy), which can be prepared by inserting sulfur into the C-Li bond of lithium carboranylamidinates. Iridium complex 1?a shows catalytic activities of up to 2.69×10(6) g(PNB) mol(Ir)(-1) h(-1) for the polymerization of norbornene in the presence of methylaluminoxane (MAO) as cocatalyst. Catalytic activities and the molecular weight of polynorbornene (PNB) were investigated under various reaction conditions. All complexes were fully characterized by elemental analysis and IR and NMR spectroscopy; the structures of 1?a-c, 2?a, b; and 3?a, b, d were further confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Transition-Metal Complexes with Bidentate Ligands Spanning trans-Positions. IX. Preparation and 1H-NMR. Studies of complexes [MX2(1)] and [M′Cl(CO)(1)] (M = Pd,Pt; M′ = Rh,Ir; X = Cl,Br, I; 1 = 2, 11-Bis-(diphenylarsinomethyl)benzo[c]phenanthrene) and crystal and molecular structure of [PtCl2(1)]

The preparation of the bidentate ligand 2, 11-bis(diphenylarsinomethyl)benzo-[c]-phenanthrene ( 1 ) is described. This ligand reacts with appropriate substrates to give mononuclear square planar complexes of type [MX₂( 1 )] (M = Pd, Pt; X = Cl, Br, I) and [M′Cl(CO)( 1 )] (M′ = Rh, Ir) in which ligand 1 spans trans-positions. This is confirmed by the crystal structure of [PtCl₂( 1 )]. ¹H-NMR. spectra of the complexes are discussed and compared with those of model compounds trans-[MCl₂( 12 )₂] (M = Pd, Pt) and [M'Cl(CO)( 12 )₂] (M′ = Rh, Ir; 12 = AsBzPh₂).     

Controlled Formation of Thiol‐Thiolate Hydrogen versus Disulfide Bonds between Two Iridium(III) Centers

Here, we report an iridium(III) coordination system with 2‐aminoethanethiolate (aet), which shows the formation of S?H???S hydrogen and S?S disulfide bonds in a controlled manner. Treatment of fac‐[Ir(aet)₃] with aqueous HBF₄ under aerobic conditions gave dinuclear [Ir₂(aet)₄(cysta)]²⁺ ([ 1 ]²⁺; cysta=cystamine) with a single S?S disulfide bond, while dimeric [Ir₂(aet)₃(Haet)₃](BF₄)₃ ([ 2 ](BF₄)₃) with a triple S?H???S hydrogen bond was formed by similar treatment under anaerobic conditions. Upon exposure to air, [ 2 ]³⁺ was converted to dinuclear [Ir₂(aet)₂(Haet)₂(cysta)]⁴⁺ ([ 3 ]⁴⁺), in which two Ir^III centers are spanned by a double S?H???S hydrogen bond and a single S?S disulfide bond. Complex [ 3 ]⁴⁺ was interconvertible with [ 1 ]²⁺ via the removal/addition of protons on S donors, accompanied by the intermolecular exchange of the fac‐[Ir(aet)₃] units. Complexes [ 1 ]²⁺, [ 2 ]³⁺, and [ 3 ]⁴⁺, isolated as BF₄^? salts, were fully characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography.     

Construction of tetranuclear macrocycles through C-H activation and structural transformation induced by [2+2] photocycloaddition reaction

A series of binuclear complexes [{Cp*Ir(OOCCH₂COO)}₂(pyrazine)] ( 1 b ), [{Cp*Ir(OOCCH₂COO)}₂(bpy)] ( 2 b ; bpy=4,4′‐bipyridine), [{Cp*Ir(OOCCH₂COO)}₂(bpe)] ( 3 b ; bpe=trans‐1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene) and tetranuclear metallamacrocycles [{(Cp*Ir)₂(OOC‐C?C‐COO)(pyrazine)}₂] ( 1 c ), [{(Cp*Ir)₂(OOC‐C?C‐COO)(bpy)}₂] ( 2 c ), [{(Cp*Ir)₂(OOC‐C?C‐COO)(bpe)}₂] ( 3 c ), and [{(Cp*Ir)₂[OOC(H₃C₆)‐N?N‐(C₆H₃)COO](pyrazine)}₂] ( 1 d ), [{(Cp*Ir)₂[OOC(H₃C₆)‐N?N‐(C₆H₃)COO](bpy)}₂] ( 2 d ), [{(Cp*Ir)₂[OOC(H₃C₆)‐N?N‐(C₆H₃)COO](bpe)}₂] ( 3 d ) were formed by reactions of 1 a – 3 a {[(Cp*Ir)₂(pyrazine)Cl₂] ( 1 a ), [(Cp*Ir)₂(bpy)Cl₂] ( 2 a ), and [(Cp*Ir)₂(bpe)Cl₂] ( 3 a )} with malonic acid, fumaric acid, or H₂ADB (azobenzene‐4,4′‐chcarboxylic acid), respectively, under mild conditions. The metallamacrocycles were directly self‐assembled by activation of C? H bonds from dicarboxylic acids. Interestingly, after exposure to UV/Vis light, 3 c was converted to [2+2] cycloaddition complex 4 . The molecular structures of 2 b , 1 c , 1 d , and 4 were characterized by single‐crystal x‐ray crystallography. Nanosized tubular channels, which may play important roles for their stability, were also observed in 1 c , 1 d , and 4 . All complexes were well characterized by ¹H NMR and IR spectroscopy, as well as elemental analysis.     

Spectroscopic and Crystal Structure of Europium(III) Picrate Complexes with Novel BINOL Derivatives

Two novel ligands N‐Benzyl‐2‐{2′‐[(benzyl‐phenyl‐carbamoyl)‐methoxy]‐[1,1′]binaphthalenyl‐2‐yloxy}‐N‐phenyl‐acetamide (L1) and N‐Methyl‐2‐{2′‐[(methyl‐phenyl‐carbamoyl)‐methoxy]‐[1,1′]binaphthalenyl‐2‐yloxy}‐N‐phenyl‐acetamide (L2), and their europium(III) complexes with picrate, [Eu(pic)₃(L1)] and [Eu(pic)₃(L2)], were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, UV‐Vis and fluorescence spectroscopy. The crystal structure of [Eu(pic)₃(L1)]·2CHCl₃ was determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The europium atom is coordinated by nine oxygen atoms of four from the L1 and five from two bidentate and one unidentate picrates. The fluorescent intensity of [Eu(pic)₃(L2)] is about 2.6 times that of [Eu(pic)₃(L1)] in solid states. But in CHCl₃ solution, the fluorescent intensity of [Eu(pic)₃(L1)] is stronger slightly than [Eu(pic)₃(L2)].     

Syntheses and Structures of Homo‐ and Heterobimetallic Complexes Containing a (Cyclopentadienone)rhodium(I) Fragment

The reaction of [RhCl(η⁴‐Ph₂R₂C₄CO)]₂ (R=Ph, 2‐naphthyl) with the dimeric complexes [RuCl₂(p‐cymene)]₂ p‐cymene=1‐methyl‐4‐(1‐methylethyl)benzene, [RuCl₂(1,3,5‐Et₃C₆H₃)]₂, [MCl₂(Cp*)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir; Cp*=1,2,3,4,5‐pentamethylcyclopenta‐2,4‐dien‐1‐yl), [RuCl₂(CO)₃]₂, [RuCl₂(dcypb)(CO)]₂ (dcypb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[dicyclohexylphosphine]), [(dppb)ClRu(μ‐Cl)₂(μ‐OH₂)RuCl(dppb)] (dppb=butane‐1,4‐diylbis[diphenylphosphine]), and [(dcypb)(N₂)Ru(μ‐Cl)₃RuCl(dcypb)] was investigated. In all cases, mixed, chloro‐bridged complexes were formed in quantitative yield (see 5 – 8, 9 – 16, 18, 19, 21 , and 22 ). The six new complexes 5, 8, 9, 13, 15 , and 22 were characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis (Figs. 1–3).     

IrIII and RuII Complexes Containing Triazole‐Pyridine Ligands: Luminescence Enhancement upon Substitution with β‐Cyclodextrin

Novel 2‐(1‐substituted‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐4‐yl)pyridine (pytl) ligands have been prepared by “click chemistry” and used in the preparation of heteroleptic complexes of Ru and Ir with bipyridine (bpy) and phenylpyridine (ppy) ligands, respectively, resulting in [Ru(bpy)₂(pytl‐R)]Cl₂ and [Ir(ppy)₂(pytl‐R)]Cl (R=methyl, adamantane (ada), β‐cyclodextrin (βCD)). The two diastereoisomers of the Ir complex with the appended β‐cyclodextrin, [Ir(ppy)₂(pytl‐βCD)]Cl, were separated. The [Ru(bpy)₂(pytl‐R)]Cl₂ (R=Me, ada or βCD) complexes have lower lifetimes and quantum yields than other polypyridine complexes. In contrast, the cyclometalated Ir complexes display rather long lifetimes and very high emission quantum yields. The emission quantum yield and lifetime (Φ=0.23, τ=1000 ns) of [Ir(ppy)₂(pytl‐ada)]Cl are surprisingly enhanced in [Ir(ppy)₂(pytl‐βCD)]Cl (Φ=0.54, τ=2800 ns). This behavior is unprecedented for a metal complex and is most likely due to its increased rigidity and protection from water molecules as well as from dioxygen quenching, because of the hydrophobic cavity of the βCD covalently attached to pytl. The emissive excited state is localized on these cyclometalating ligands, as underlined by the shift to the blue (450 nm) upon substitution with two electron‐withdrawing fluorine substituents on the phenyl unit. The significant differences between the quantum yields of the two separate diastereoisomers of [Ir(ppy)₂(pytl‐βCD)]Cl (0.49 vs. 0.70) are attributed to different interactions of the chiral cyclodextrin substituent with the Δ and Λ isomers of the metal complex.     

Oxovanadium(IV,V) Complexes with 2‐Acetylpyridine‐2‐furanoylhydrazone (Hapf) as Ligand. X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [VO2(apf)] and [V2O2(μ‐O)2(apf)2]

The preparation of oxovanadium(IV, V) coordination compounds with 2‐acetylpyridine‐2‐furanoylhydrazone (Hapf) is described. [VO(apf)(acac)] was prepared from oxovanadium(IV) diacetylacetonate [VO(acac)₂] by reaction with Hapf in methanol or dichloromethane. The complex is paramagnetic and its EPR spectrum is consistent with an octahedral coordination for the vanadium(IV) atom. Voltammetry studies of [VO(apf)(acac)] indicate an irreversible oxidation, in agreement with the chemical behavior of the compound in solution. The vanadium(IV) complex undergoes slow oxidation in alcoholic solution, losing the acetylacetonate ligand to form [VO₂(apf)] and [V₂O₂(μ‐O)₂(apf)₂]. The crystal structures of these last compounds were determined by X‐ray diffraction methods. [V₂O₂(μ‐O)₂(apf)₂] crystallizes monoclinic [P2₁/c, Z = 2, a = 817.400(10), b = 1650.90(3), c = 984.70(2) pm, β = 112.7190(10)°]. The crystal structure consists of dimeric units, in which two μ‐oxo ligands subtend asymmetric bridges between the vanadium atoms in a very distorted octahedral coordination. In the crystal of [VO₂(apf)], orthorhombic [Pnma, Z = 4, a = 1630.000(10), b = 675.10(4), c = 1136.40(2) pm], the vanadium(V) atom is pentacoordinated.     

Synthesis,Characterization and Properties of TbIII and DyIII Coordination Compounds based on Isomeric Ligands

Reactions of the isomeric ligands Hpztza [Hpztza = 5‐(2‐pyrazinyl)tetrazole‐2‐acetic acid] and Hpmtza [Hpmtza = 5‐(2‐pyramidyl)tetrazole‐2‐acetic acid] with TbCl₃ · 6H₂O or DyCl₃ · 6H₂O under solvothermal conditions afforded four mononuclear complexes, [Ln(pztza)₂(H₂O)₆] · pztza · 3H₂O [Ln = Tb ( 1 ), Dy ( 2 )] and [Ln(pmtza)₂(H₂O)₆] · Cl · 3H₂O [Ln = Tb ( 3 ), Dy ( 4 )]. The compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. X‐ray diffraction analyses reveal that all structures are mononuclear. The four compounds are self‐assembled to form three‐dimensional networks by hydrogen bonds. The different positions of the nitrogen atom control the coordination mode of the ligands and further influence the crystal structures. Furthermore, the luminescence properties were also investigated at room temperature in the solid state.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structures,and Luminescent Properties of Two Complexes based on 5‐tert‐Butylisophthalic Acid and 1, 2‐Bis(4‐pyridyl) Ethane

Abstract. Two coordination polymers, namely, [Zn(bpe)_0.5(Htbip)(tbip)_0.5] · H₂O ( 1 ) and [Cd(bpe)_0.5(tbip)] ( 2 ) [H₂tbip = 5‐tert‐butylisophthalic acid and bpe = 1, 2‐ bis(4‐pyridyl) ethane] were synthesized through hydrothermal reactions. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that complex 1 presents a three‐dimensional (3D) six‐connected uninodal structure with the type of topology of svi‐x/I4/mcm → Ibam, whereas complex 2 holds a 2D 4⁴‐sql layer structure. Moreover, the photoluminescent properties of the complexes at room temperature were investigated.     

Crystal Structures,Magnetism, and Dye Degradation Catalytic Properties of Copper 2‐Methoxycarboxybenzoate Coordination Complexes

Copper coordination complexes containing the 2‐methoxycarboxybenzoate (2‐mcob) ligand show different topologies depending on the nature of the dipyridyl coligand. [Cu₂(2‐mcob)₂(ebin)]_n ( 1 ) [ebin = ethanebis(isonicotinamide)] shows a ladder structure based on anti‐syn bridged [Cu(OCO)]_n chain motifs. [Cu₂(2‐mcob)₂(bbin)(H₂O)₂] ( 2 ) [bbin = butanebis(isonicotinamide)] displays a dimeric molecular structure. [Cu₂(2‐mcob)₂(hbin)]_n ( 3 ) [hbin = hexanebis(isonicotinamide)] manifests a ladder structure very similar to that of 1 . {[Cu(2‐mcob)(dpa)] · H₂O}_n ( 4 ) [dpa = bis(4‐pyridyl)amine] shows a chain coordination polymer structure. All four materials showed significant promise as heterogeneous degradation catalysts for Congo Red dye in aqueous suspension under ultraviolet irradiation. Variable temperature magnetic susceptibility experiments for 1 indicated the presence of weak antiferromagnetic exchange (g = 2.059(2), J = –0.84(2) cm^–1). Thermal degradation behavior is also discussed.