Structural Dynamics of Isomorphic Substitution in N,N′-Diallylbenzimidazolium Copper Halide π-Complexes [C7H5N2(C3H5)2]+[Cu2Cl3?xBrx]? (x=0, 1.60, 2.33, 3)

Two new -complexes of copper(I) halides with the 1,3-diallylbenzimidazolium cation, [C₇H₅N₂(C₃H₅)₂]⁺[Cu₂Cl_1.40Br_1.60]^– and [C₇H₅N₂(C₃H₅)₂]⁺[Cu₂Br₃]^–, have been synthesized and structurally defined (space group P2 ₁/c for both; a = 22.094(6), b = 9.272(8), c = 9.22(1) , = 118.26(4)° and a = 22.267(5), b = 9.311(3), c = 9.263(2) , = 117.51(2)°). The mutual effects of chlorine–bromine substitution and the efficiency of -interactions are discussed based on XRD data for these two compounds and for the compounds [C₇H₅N₂(C₃H₅)₂]⁺[Cu₂Cl₃]^– and [C₇H₅N₂(C₃H₅)₂]⁺[Cu₂Cl_0.67Br_2.33]^– studied previously.     

Three‐dimensional networks in 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate

The two title proton‐transfer compounds, 5‐methylimidazolium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻, (I), and bis(5‐methylimidazolium) 3‐carboxylato‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate, 2C₄H₇N₂⁺·C₇H₅O₆S²⁻, (II), are each organized into a three‐dimensional network by a combination of X—H...O (X = O, N or C) hydrogen bonds, and π–π and C—H...π interactions.     

Absolute partial and total electron impact ionization cross sections for C3H8 from threshold up to 950 eV

Electron impact ionization of propane (C₃H₈) was studied using the ion beam deflection technique and a double focussing mass spectrometer in conjunction with a recently developed correction procedure that accounts for discrimination due to the initial kinetic energy of fragment ions. The relative corrected partial ionization cross sections for the production of C₃H ₈ ⁺ , C₃H ₇ ⁺ , C₃H ₆ ⁺ , C₃H ₅ ⁺ , C₃H ₄ ⁺ , C₃H ₃ ⁺ , C₃H ₂ ⁺ , C₃H⁺, C ₃ ⁺ ; C₂H ₅ ⁺ , C₂H ₄ ⁺ , C₂H ₃ ⁺ , C₂H ₂ ⁺ , C₂H⁺, C ₂ ⁺ ; CH ₃ ⁺ , CH ₂ ⁺ , CH⁺, C⁺; C₃H ₅ ²⁺ , C₃H ₄ ²⁺ , C₃H ₃ ²⁺ and C₃H ₂ ²⁺ were determined from threshold up to 950 eV. Absolute partial ionization cross sections were obtained by charge weighted summing of all the observed partial ionization cross sections and by normalizing to a recent accurate determination of the total ionization cross section at 100 eV by Djuric et al. 1991. The absolute total ionization cross section curve obtained is in excellent agreement in shape and magnitude with the low energy data (<200 ev)=" of=" djuric=" et=" al.=" 1991=" and=" the=" high=" energy=" data=" points=" of=" schram=" et=" al.=">     

Polymorph of {2‐[(2‐hydroxyethyl)iminiomethyl]phenolato‐κO}dioxido{2‐[(2‐oxidoethyl)iminomethyl]phenolato‐κ3O,N,O′}molybdenum(VI)

A second polymorphic form (form I) of the previously reported compound {2‐[(2‐hydroxyethyl)iminiomethyl]phenolato‐κO}dioxido{2‐[(2‐oxidoethyl)iminomethyl]phenolato‐κ³O,N,O′}molybdenum(VI) (form II), [Mo(C₉H₉NO₂)O₂(C₉H₁₁NO₂)], is presented. The title structure differs from the previously reported polymorph [Głowiak, Jerzykiewicz, Sobczak & Ziółkowski (2003). Inorg. Chim. Acta, 356 , 387–392] by the fact that the asymmetric unit contains three molecules linked by O—H...O hydrogen bonds. These trimeric units are further linked through O—H...O hydrogen bonds to form a chain parallel to the [11] direction. As in the previous polymorph, each molecule is built up from an MoO₂²⁺ cation surrounded by an O,N,O′‐tridentate ligand (O⁻C₆H₄CH=NCH₂CH₂O⁻) and weakly coordinated by a second zwitterionic ligand (O⁻C₆H₄CH=N⁺HC₂H₄OH). All complexes are chiral with the absolute configuration at Mo being C or A. The main difference between the two polymorphs results from the alternation of the chirality at Mo within the chain.     

rac‐3‐Benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionic acid and its organic salts: possibilities of Yang photocyclization in crystals

The analysis of the crystal structures of rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionic acid, C₁₁H₁₂O₃, (I), morpholinium rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionate monohydrate, C₄H₁₀NO⁺·C₁₁H₁₁O₃⁻·H₂O, (II), pyridinium [hydrogen bis(rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionate)], C₅H₆N⁺·(H⁺·2C₁₁H₁₁O₃⁻), (III), and pyrrolidinium rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionate rac‐3‐benzoyl‐2‐methylpropionic acid, C₄H₁₀N⁺·C₁₁H₁₁O₃⁻·C₁₁H₁₂O₃, (IV), has enabled us to predict and understand the behaviour of these compounds in Yang photocyclization. Molecules containing the Ar—CO—C—C—CH fragment can undergo Yang photocyclization in solvents but they can be photoinert in the crystalline state. In the case of the compounds studied here, the long distances between the O atom of the carbonyl group and the γ‐H atom, and between the C atom of the carbonyl group and the γ‐C atom preclude Yang photocyclization in the crystals. Molecules of (I) are deprotonated in a different manner depending on the kind of organic base used. In the crystal structure of (III), strong centrosymmetric O...H...O hydrogen bonds are observed.     

One barbiturate and two solvated thiobarbiturates containing the triply hydrogen‐bonded ADA/DAD synthon,plus one ansolvate and three solvates of their coformer 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine

A path to new synthons for application in crystal engineering is the replacement of a strong hydrogen‐bond acceptor, like a C=O group, with a weaker acceptor, like a C=S group, in doubly or triply hydrogen‐bonded synthons. For instance, if the C=O group at the 2‐position of barbituric acid is changed into a C=S group, 2‐thiobarbituric acid is obtained. Each of the compounds comprises two ADA hydrogen‐bonding sites (D = donor and A = acceptor). We report the results of cocrystallization experiments of barbituric acid and 2‐thiobarbituric acid, respectively, with 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine, which contains a complementary DAD hydrogen‐bonding site and is therefore capable of forming an ADA/DAD synthon with barbituric acid and 2‐thiobarbituric acid. In addition, pure 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine was crystallized in order to study its preferred hydrogen‐bonding motifs. The experiments yielded one ansolvate of 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine (pyrimidine‐2,4‐diamine, DAPY), C₄H₆N₄, (I), three solvates of DAPY, namely 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–1,4‐dioxane (2/1), 2C₄H₆N₄·C₄H₈O₂, (II), 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/1), C₄H₆N₄·C₄H₉NO, (III), and 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine–1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1), C₄H₆N₄·C₅H₉NO, (IV), one salt of barbituric acid, viz. 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium barbiturate (barbiturate is 2,4,6‐trioxopyrimidin‐5‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₄H₃N₂O₃⁻, (V), and two solvated salts of 2‐thiobarbituric acid, viz. 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 2‐thiobarbiturate–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/2) (2‐thiobarbiturate is 4,6‐dioxo‐2‐sulfanylidenepyrimidin‐5‐ide), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₄H₃N₂O₂S⁻·2C₃H₇NO, (VI), and 2,4‐diaminopyrimidinium 2‐thiobarbiturate–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/2), C₄H₇N₄⁺·C₄H₃N₂O₂S⁻·2C₄H₉NO, (VII). The ADA/DAD synthon was succesfully formed in the salt of barbituric acid, i.e. (V), as well as in the salts of 2‐thiobarbituric acid, i.e. (VI) and (VII). In the crystal structures of 2,4‐diaminopyrimidine, i.e. (I)–(IV), R₂²(8) N—H…N hydrogen‐bond motifs are preferred and, in two structures, additional R₃²(8) patterns were observed.     

Six two‐ and three‐component ammonium carboxylate salt structures with a ladder‐type hydrogen‐bonding motif,three incorporating neutral carboxylic acid molecules

Six ammonium carboxylate salts are synthesized and reported, namely 2‐propylammonium benzoate, C₃H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻, (I), benzylammonium (R)‐2‐phenylpropionate, C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₉H₉O₂⁻, (II), (RS)‐1‐phenylethylammonium naphthalene‐1‐carboxylate, C₈H₁₂N⁺·C₁₁H₇O₂⁻, (III), benzylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₆H₁₀N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (IV), cyclopropylammonium–benzoate–benzoic acid (1/1/1), C₃H₈N⁺·C₇H₅O₂⁻·C₇H₆O₂, (V), and cyclopropylammonium–ea‐cis‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylate–ee‐trans‐cyclohexane‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (2/1/1), 2C₃H₈N⁺·C₈H₁₀O₄²⁻·C₈H₁₂O₄, (VI). Salts (I)–(III) all have a 1:1 ratio of cation to anion and feature three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds which form one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded ladders. Salts (I) and (II) have type II ladders, consisting of repeating R₄³(10) rings, while (III) has type III ladders, in this case consisting of alternating R₄²(8) and R₄⁴(12) rings. Salts (IV) and (V) have a 1:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to benzoic acid. They have type III ladders formed by three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds, while the benzoic acid molecules are pendant to the ladders and hydrogen bond to them via O—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds. Salt (VI) has a 2:1:1 ratio of cation to anion to acid and does not feature any hydrogen‐bonded ladders; instead, the ionized and un‐ionized components form a three‐dimensional network of hydrogen‐bonded rings. The two‐component 1:1 salts are formed from a 1:1 ratio of amine to acid. To create the three‐component salts (IV)–(VI), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced so as to deprotonate only half of the acid molecules, and then to observe how the un‐ionized acid molecules are incorporated into the ladder motif. For (IV) and (V), the ratio of amine to acid was reduced to 1:2, while for (VI) the ratio of amine to acid required to deprotonate only half the diacid molecules was 1:1.     

Almotriptan,an antimigraine agent,and its malate salt

The crystal structures of almotriptan {systematic name: N,N‐dimethyl‐2‐[5‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐ylsulfonylmethyl)‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl]ethanamine}, C₁₇H₂₅N₃O₂S, and almotriptan malate {systematic name: N,N‐dimethyl‐2‐[5‐(pyrrolidin‐1‐ylsulfonylmethyl)‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl]ethanaminium malate, C₁₇H₂₆N₃O₂S⁺·C₄H₅O₅⁻, a novel selective serotonin 1B/D agonist, have been determined in order to gain further insight into the structure–activity relationships of triptans. The two structures differ in the orientation of their sulfonylpyrrolidine side chains. A comparison with other triptans reveals that molecules of almotriptan, sumatriptan, zolmitriptan and rizatriptan can adopt two principal conformations. N—H...N, N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the molecular packing.     

Offline oxygen isotope analysis of organic compounds with high N:O

Although the advantages of online δ¹⁸O analysis of organic compounds make its broad application desirable, researchers have encountered NO⁺ isobaric interference with CO⁺ at m/z 30 (e.g. ¹⁴N¹⁶O⁺, ¹²C¹⁸O⁺) when analyzing nitrogenous substrates. If the δ¹⁸O value of inter‐laboratory standards for substrates with high N:O value could be confirmed offline, these materials could be analyzed periodically and used to evaluate δ¹⁸O data produced online for nitrogenous unknowns. To this end, we present an offline method based on modifications of the methods of Schimmelmann and Deniro (Anal. Chem. 1985; 57: 2644) and Sauer and Sternberg (Anal. Chem. 1994; 66: 2409), whereby all the N₂ from the gas products of a chlorinated pyrolysis was eliminated, resulting in purified CO₂ for analysis via a dual‐inlet isotope ratio mass spectrometry system. We evaluated our method by comparing observed δ¹⁸O values with previously published or inter‐laboratory calibrated δ¹⁸O values for five nitrogen‐free working reference materials; finding isotopic agreement to within ±0.2‰ for SIGMA® cellulose, IAEA‐CH3 cellulose (C₆H₁₀O₅) and IAEA‐CH6 sucrose (C₁₂H₂₂O₁₁), and within ±1.8‰ for IAEA‐601 and IAEA‐602 benzoic acids (C₇H₆O₂). We also compared the δ¹⁸O values of IAEA‐CH3 cellulose and IAEA‐CH6 sucrose that was nitrogen‐'doped' with adenine (C₅H₅N₅), imidazole (C₃H₄N₂) and 2‐aminopyrimidine (C₄H₅N₃) with the undoped δ¹⁸O values for the same substrates; yielding isotopic agreement to within ±0.7‰. Finally, we provide an independent analysis of the δ¹⁸O value of IAEA‐600 caffeine (C₈H₁₀N₄O₂), previously characterized using online systems exclusively, and discuss the reasons for an average 1.4‰ enrichment in δ¹⁸O observed offline relative to the consensus online δ¹⁸O value. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Eight new crystal structures of 5‐(hydroxymethyl)uracil, 5‐carboxyuracil and 5‐carboxy‐2‐thiouracil: insights into the hydrogen‐bonded networks and the predominant conformations of the C5‐bound residues

In order to examine the preferred hydrogen‐bonding pattern of various uracil derivatives, namely 5‐(hydroxymethyl)uracil, 5‐carboxyuracil and 5‐carboxy‐2‐thiouracil, and for a conformational study, crystallization experiments yielded eight different structures: 5‐(hydroxymethyl)uracil, C₅H₆N₂O₃, (I), 5‐carboxyuracil–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1), C₅H₄N₂O₄·C₃H₇NO, (II), 5‐carboxyuracil–dimethyl sulfoxide (1/1), C₅H₄N₂O₄·C₂H₆OS, (III), 5‐carboxyuracil–N,N‐dimethylacetamide (1/1), C₅H₄N₂O₄·C₄H₉NO, (IV), 5‐carboxy‐2‐thiouracil–N,N‐dimethylformamide (1/1), C₅H₄N₂O₃S·C₃H₇NO, (V), 5‐carboxy‐2‐thiouracil–dimethyl sulfoxide (1/1), C₅H₄N₂O₃S·C₂H₆OS, (VI), 5‐carboxy‐2‐thiouracil–1,4‐dioxane (2/3), 2C₅H₄N₂O₃S·3C₆H₁₂O₃, (VII), and 5‐carboxy‐2‐thiouracil, C₁₀H₈N₄O₆S₂, (VIII). While the six solvated structures, i.e. (II)–(VII), contain intramolecular S(6) O—H…O hydrogen‐bond motifs between the carboxy and carbonyl groups, the usually favoured R₂²(8) pattern between two carboxy groups is formed in the solvent‐free structure, i.e. (VIII). Further R₂²(8) hydrogen‐bond motifs involving either two N—H…O or two N—H…S hydrogen bonds were observed in three crystal structures, namely (I), (IV) and (VIII). In all eight structures, the residue at the ring 5‐position shows a coplanar arrangement with respect to the pyrimidine ring which is in agreement with a search of the Cambridge Structural Database for six‐membered cyclic compounds containing a carboxy group. The search confirmed that coplanarity between the carboxy group and the cyclic residue is strongly favoured.     

A solid‐state oxidation of 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfinate to 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate

The organic acid–base complex 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfonate, C₅H₁₄N₃⁺·C₇H₇O₃S⁻, was obtained from the corresponding 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium 4‐methylbenzenesulfinate complex, C₅H₁₄N₃⁺·C₇H₇O₂S⁻, by solid‐state oxidation in air. Comparison of the two crystal structures reveals similar packing arrangements in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c, with centrosymmetric 2:2 tetramers being connected by four strong N—H...O=S hydrogen bonds between the imine N atoms of two 1,1,3,3‐tetramethylguanidinium bases and the O atoms of two acid molecules.     

Solvent‐mediated pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bond motifs in three lamotrigine–carboxylic acid complexes

Lamotrigine, an antiepileptic drug, has been complexed with three aromatic carboxylic acids. All three compounds crystallize with the inclusion of N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) solvent, viz. lamotriginium [3,5‐diamino‐6‐(2,3‐dichlorophenyl)‐1,2,4‐triazin‐2‐ium] 4‐iodobenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₈Cl₂N₅⁺·C₇H₄IO₂⁻·C₃H₇NO, (I), lamotriginium 4‐methylbenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₇Cl₂N₅⁺·C₈H₈O₂⁻·C₃H₇NO, (II), and lamotriginium 3,5‐dinitro‐2‐hydroxybenzoate N,N‐dimethylformamide monosolvate, C₉H₈Cl₂N₅⁺·C₇H₃N₂O₇⁻·C₃H₇NO, (III). In all three structures, proton transfer takes place from the acid to the lamotrigine molecule. However, in (I) and (II), the acidic H atom is disordered over two sites and there is only partial transfer of the H atom from O to N. In (III), the corresponding H atom is ordered and complete proton transfer has occurred. Lamotrigine–lamotrigine, lamotrigine–acid and lamotrigine–solvent interactions are observed in all three structures and they thereby exhibit isostructurality. The DMF solvent extends the lamotrigine–lamotrigine dimers into a pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif.     

Photofragmentation of 2‐Deoxy‐D‐Ribose Molecules in the Gas Phase

We have measured the synchrotron‐induced photofragmentation of isolated 2‐deoxy‐D ‐ribose molecules (C₅H₁₀O₄) at four photon energies, namely, 23.0, 15.7, 14.6, and 13.8 eV. At all photon energies above the molecule′s ionization threshold we observe the formation of a large variety of molecular cation fragments, including CH₃⁺, OH⁺, H₃O⁺, C₂H₃⁺, C₂H₄⁺, CH_xO⁺ (x=1,2,3), C₂H_xO⁺ (x=1–5), C₃H_xO⁺ (x=3–5), C₂H₄O₂⁺, C₃H_xO₂⁺ (x=1,2,4–6), C₄H₅O₂⁺, C₄H_xO₃⁺ (x=6,7), C₅H₇O₃⁺, and C₅H₈O₃⁺. The formation of these fragments shows a strong propensity of the DNA sugar to dissociate upon absorption of vacuum ultraviolet photons. The yields of particular fragments at various excitation photon energies in the range between 10 and 28 eV are also measured and their appearance thresholds determined. At all photon energies, the most intense relative yield is recorded for the m/q=57 fragment (C₃H₅O⁺), whereas a general intensity decrease is observed for all other fragments— relative to the m/q=57 fragment—with decreasing excitation energy. Thus, bond cleavage depends on the photon energy deposited in the molecule. All fragments up to m/q=75 are observed at all photon energies above their respective threshold values. Most notably, several fragmentation products, for example, CH₃⁺, H₃O⁺, C₂H₄⁺, CH₃O⁺, and C₂H₅O⁺, involve significant bond rearrangements and nuclear motion during the dissociation time. Multibond fragmentation of the sugar moiety in the sugar–phosphate backbone of DNA results in complex strand lesions and, most likely, in subsequent reactions of the neutral or charged fragments with the surrounding DNA molecules.     

1:2 Complexes of chloranilic acid with pyrazole and imidazole,and the aceto­nitrile solvate of a 1:1 complex with imidazole

2,5‐Di­chloro‐3,6‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone (chloranilic acid) forms X—H?Y (X, Y = N or O) and C—H?Cl hydrogen bonds with pyrazole and imidazole to afford bis­(pyrazolium) di­chloro­anilate and bis­(imidazolium) di­chloro­anilate, (I) and (II), both 2C₃H₅N₂⁺·C₆Cl₂O₄^2?, and imidazolium chloro­anilate aceto­nitrile solvate, C₃H₅N₂⁺·­C₆HCl₂O₄^?·C₂H₃N, (III). Their crystal structures demonstrate three novel supramolecular architectures based on supramolecular synthons to build a ladder, (I), a two‐dimensional network, (II), and a flat ribbon, (III).     

Conformational studies of hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid and orotic acid

Hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid [2‐(2,5‐dioxoimidazolidin‐4‐yl)acetic acid] and orotic acid (2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐4‐carboxylic acid) each contain one rigid acceptor–donor–acceptor hydrogen‐bonding site and a flexible side chain, which can adopt different conformations. Since both compounds may be used as coformers for supramolecular complexes, they have been crystallized in order to examine their conformational preferences, giving solvent‐free hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid, C₅H₆N₂O₄, (I), and three crystals containing orotic acid, namely, orotic acid dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₅H₄N₂O₄·C₂H₆OS, (IIa), dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (1/1), C₂H₈N⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·C₅H₄N₂O₄, (IIb), and dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (3/1), 3C₂H₈N⁺·3C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·C₅H₄N₂O₄, (IIc). The crystal structure of (I) shows a three‐dimensional network, with the acid function located perpendicular to the ring. Interestingly, the hydroxy O atom acts as an acceptor, even though the carbonyl O atom is not involved in any hydrogen bonds. However, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), the acid functions are only slightly twisted out of the ring planes. All H atoms of the acidic functions are directed away from the rings and, with respect to the carbonyl O atoms, they show an antiperiplanar conformation in (I) and synperiplanar conformations in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc). Furthermore, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), different conformations of the acid O=C—C—N torsion angle are observed, leading to different hydrogen‐bonding arrangements depending on their conformation and composition.     

2,4‐Diamino‐6‐methyl‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium trifluoroacetate

Crystals of the title compound, C₄H₈N₅⁺·C₂F₃O₂⁻, are built up of singly protonated 2,4‐diamino‐6‐methyl‐1,3,5‐triazin‐1‐ium cations and trifluoroacetate anions. The CF₃ group of the anion is disordered. The oppositely charged ions interact via almost linear N—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming a CF₃COO⁻...C₄H₈N₅⁺ unit. Two units related by an inversion centre interact through a pair of N—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming planar (CF₃COO⁻...C₄H₈N₅⁺...C₄H₈N₅⁺·CF₃COO⁻) aggregates that are linked by a pair of N—H...O hydrogen bonds into chains running along the c axis.     

Structural study of six cycloalkylammonium cinnamate salt structures featuring one‐dimensional columns and two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded networks

Six ammonium carboxylate salts, namely cyclopentylammonium cinnamate, C₅H₁₂N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (I), cyclohexylammonium cinnamate, C₆H₁₄N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (II), cycloheptylammonium cinnamate form I, C₇H₁₆N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (IIIa), and form II, (IIIb), cyclooctylammonium cinnamate, C₈H₁₈N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (IV), and cyclododecylammonium cinnamate, C₁₂H₂₆N⁺·C₉H₇O₂⁻, (V), are reported. Salts (II)–(V) all have a 1:1 ratio of cation to anion and feature three N⁺—H...O⁻ hydrogen bonds forming one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded columns consisting of repeating R₄³(10) rings, while salt (I) has a two‐dimensional network made up of alternating R₄⁴(12) and R⁶₈(20) rings. Salt (III) consists of two polymorphic forms, viz. form I having Z′ = 1 and form II with Z′ = 2. The latter polymorph has disorder of the cycloheptane rings in the two cations, as well as whole‐molecule disorder of one of the cinnamate anions. A similar, but ordered, Z′ = 2 structure is seen in salt (IV).     

Studies on the γ-effects. Part 3. Variations in the γ-effects ofN-substituted benzylamines,o-aminomethylphenols and 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazines against theE s ′ substituent constants

The magnitude of the -effects on¹³C chemical shifts was studied as function of theN-substitution [Me, Et, Bu, CH₂C₆H₅, CH₂CH₂C₆H₅, Prⁱ, Bu^t, Bu^s, c-C₆H₁₁, CH(CH₃)C₆H₅, Bu^t, or Ph] for several benzylamines,o-aminomethylphenols and 3,4-dihydro-2H-1,3-benzoxazines. A correlation between the _c-values and the steric substituent constants (E _s ) of theN-substituents proved useful in characterizing the variation of the -effects along with the conformational factors. The diastereospecificity of the -effects is discussed for purposes of configurational assignments.For part 2, see Ref. 1. This paper is also Part 5 in the series Studies on the Benzoxazine Series.     

Anilinium mono­hydrogen dl‐malate

Crystals of the title salt, [(C₆H₅NH₃)]⁺·[(HOOC(CH₂)CH(OH)COO)]⁻ or C₆H₈N⁺·C₄H₅O₅⁻, are built up from protonated anilinium residues and monodissociated dl ‐malate ions. The NH₃⁺ group of the anilinium cation is ordered at room temperature. Rotation of the NH₃⁺ group along the C(aromatic)—Nsp³ bond (often observed at room temperature in other anilinium salts) is prevented by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds between the NH₃⁺ group and the malate anions. The anions are connected by four O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds into two‐dimensional sheets parallel to the (001) plane. The charged moieties, i.e. the anilinium cations and the sheets of hydrogen‐bonded malate anions, form two‐dimensional layers in which the phenyl rings of the anilinium residues lie perpendicular to the malate‐ion sheets. The conformation of the monodissociated malate ion in the crystal is compared with that obtained from ab initio molecular‐orbital calculations.     

Supramolecular association in proton‐transfer adducts containing benzamidinium cations. I. Four molecular salts with uracil derivatives

Four organic salts, namely benzamidinidium orotate (2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐4‐carboxylate) hemihydrate, C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·0.5H₂O (BenzamH⁺·Or⁻), (I), benzamidinium isoorotate (2,4‐dioxo‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐5‐carboxylate) trihydrate, C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·3H₂O (BenzamH⁺·Isor⁻), (II), benzamidinium diliturate (5‐nitro‐2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐4‐olate) dihydrate, C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₂N₃O₅⁻·2H₂O (BenzamH⁺·Dil⁻), (III), and benzamidinium 5‐nitrouracilate (5‐nitro‐2,4‐dioxo‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyrimidin‐1‐ide), C₇H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₂N₃O₄⁻ (BenzamH⁺·Nit⁻), (IV), have been synthesized by a reaction between benzamidine (benzenecarboximidamide or Benzam) and the appropriate carboxylic acid. Proton transfer occurs to the benzamidine imino N atom. In all four acid–base adducts, the asymmetric unit consists of one tautomeric aminooxo anion (Or⁻, Isor⁻, Dil⁻ and Nit⁻) and one monoprotonated benzamidinium cation (BenzamH⁺), plus one‐half (which lies across a twofold axis), three and two solvent water molecules in (I), (II) and (III), respectively. Due to the presence of protonated benzamidine, these acid–base complexes form supramolecular synthons characterized by N⁺—H...O⁻ and N⁺—H...N⁻ (±)‐charge‐assisted hydrogen bonds (CAHB).