金属-有机骨架ZIF-8@Fe3O4复合物的制备及其用于磁固相萃取对水中内分泌干扰物的测定

制备了金属-有机骨架ZIF-8@Fe_3O_4复合物,考察了ZIF-8生长次数、萃取时间、离子强度、pH值、解吸溶剂和解吸时间等对萃取和解吸的影响,并通过磁固相萃取结合高效液相色谱法将其成功用于水中双酚A、雌酚酮、壬基酚和辛基酚4种内分泌干扰物的检测。该方法对上述4种物质的线性范围为1.0～1 000μg/L,检出限为0.42～0.81μg/L,富集因子为61～144,日内和日间精密度分别为2.1%～4.3%和3.5%～5.8%。     

高效液相色谱法测定淤泥和土壤中双酚A、壬基酚和辛基酚

建立高效液相色谱法测定土壤和淤泥中双酚A、壬基酚和辛基酚.样品采用超声波萃取,以体积比1∶1的正己烷和丙酮作为提取剂,体积比90∶10的乙腈和水作为流动相,经SupelcosilTM LC PAH色谱柱(250×4.6 mm,5 μm)分离后荧光检测器检测,双酚A、壬基酚和辛基酚的荧光激发波长是227 nm,发射波长为313 nm,样品在6 min中内完全出峰.该方法的线性范围在0.1～20 μg/mL之间,在0.1μg/mL、0.5μg/mL和1.0 μg/mL3个浓度的添加水平下土壤和淤泥样品的加入回收率分别在83.7％～115.6％之间和94.3％～106.2％之间.该方法简单、快速和经济,可用于淤泥和土壤实际样品检测.     

加速溶剂萃取-液相色谱-质谱/质谱法分析动物组织中的壬基酚、辛基酚和双酚A

 建立了测定内分泌干扰物质烷基酚、双酚A的液相色谱-电喷雾串联质谱(负离子模式)分析方法,优化了样品前处理方法。以二氯甲烷作提取溶剂，采用加速溶剂萃取法萃取动物组织样品,萃取液用500 mg OASIS氨基固相萃取柱进行浓缩净化。对流动相组分和流动相添加剂对质谱的离子化效率进行了考察,测得3种化合物在高、中、低3个添加水平的回收率为88%~101%,相对标准偏差小于15%；双酚A、壬基酚和辛基酚的方法检出限分别为0.3, 0.05和0.1 μg/kg。对从北京市场上采集的27份动物组织样品进行检测，结果表明壬基酚广泛存在于各种动物源性食品中,检出含量为0.49~55.98 μg/kg，其中鱼肉组织中都检出壬基酚,而且其含量也较高(9.13~55.98 μg/kg)。     

固相萃取高效液相色谱质谱法测定海水中烷基酚和烷基酚聚氧乙烯醚

建立了固相萃取-高效液相色谱-电喷雾质谱分析海水中辛基酚、壬基酚、辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚和壬基酚聚氧乙烯醚的方法。海水样品经C18固相萃取柱富集净化后,以甲醇-水为流动相,在Hypersil GOLD色谱柱上分离,电喷雾质谱在选择离子监测模式下分析目标化合物,采用外标法定量。结果表明,4种化合物的平均加标回收率为59.6%～104.4%,相对标准偏差(RSD, n=3)为1.0%～13.5%;仪器检出限为0.08～3 μg/L。将本方法用于大连海岸6个采样点海水中辛基酚、壬基酚、辛基酚聚氧乙烯醚和壬基酚聚氧乙烯醚的检测发现,样品中壬基酚和壬基酚聚氧乙烯醚均有检出,且油港和海港附近海水中的含量较高。     

包装材料中的酚类环境雌激素的测定-固相微萃取/气相色谱质谱法

建立了固相微萃取-气相色谱质谱法(SPME/GCMS)快速测定包装材料中的烷基酚、双酚A的分析方法,以CH2Cl2为提取溶剂,采用快速溶剂萃取法萃取包装材料中的酚类物质,萃取物经N,O双(三甲基硅烷基)三氟乙酰胺(BSTFA)衍生化后,用PDMS/DVB纤维萃取,利用GC-MS对包装材料中4-叔-丁基酚、4-叔-辛基酚、4-辛基酚、4-壬基酚、双酚A 5种目标物进行定性定量分析。结果表明,酚类物质主要存在于聚碳酸酯材料中,检测4-叔-辛基酚、4-辛基酚和双酚A的质量分数分别为82.44、60.28和78.35μg/kg。     

液相色谱串联质谱法测定化妆品中的双酚A、辛基酚及壬基酚

建立了护肤化妆品中双酚A、辛基酚和壬基酚的超高效液相色谱串联质谱分析方法。样品经二氯甲烷提取,氨基固相萃取柱净化后,用甲醇定容,采用Waters UPLC BEH C18色谱柱,以甲醇-0.05%氨水为流动相,梯度洗脱分离后,串联四极杆质谱多反应监测方式检测,以保留时间和子离子比定性,外标法定量。在优化条件下,该方法 5 min内可完成4种待测物的分析。双酚A、辛基酚和壬基酚在0.5～50.0μg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.999,方法的定量下限(LOQs)均为0.5μg/kg;在加标水平为0.5、1.0、10.0μg/kg时,护肤霜和护肤水样品中4种待测物的平均加标回收率为80%～96%,相对标准偏差(n=6)小于15%。该方法准确、快速、灵敏,适用于护肤化妆品中双酚A、辛基酚和壬基酚的快速确认和定量检测。     

高效液相色谱法对纺织品和食品包装材料中的壬基酚、辛基酚和双酚A的同时测定

建立了高效液相色谱-二极管阵列检测器(DAD)/荧光检测器(FLD)串联技术同时测定纺织品和食品包装材料中壬基酚、辛基酚和双酚A的方法.实验样品采用加速溶剂萃取法,以无水乙醇为提取溶剂,在10.3 MPa和120 ℃下静态循环提取2次,提取液经Supelclean Envi-Carb石墨化碳黑固相萃取柱净化,以Agilent Zorbax SB-Phenyl(250 mm×4.6 mm,5 μm)色谱柱分离后用DAD-FLD串联法进行检测.壬基酚、辛基酚和双酚A的DAD检测波长为225 nm;荧光激发波长为227 nm,发射波长为315 nm.在25、50、500 μg/kg的添加水平下,纺织品样品和食品包装材料样品的平均回收率均为93% ～98%,相对标准偏差分别为2.8% ～7.0%和2.9% ～6.9%.方法准确、简便、快速,可用于纺织品和食品包装材料的实际检验工作.     

同位素稀释液相色谱-串联质谱法测定动物性食品中的双酚A、壬基酚及辛基酚

建立了动物性食品肉、蛋和奶中双酚A、壬基酚和辛基酚的超高效液相色谱-串联质谱( UPLC-MS/MS)检测方法.比较了固相萃取法(SPE)和凝胶渗透色谱法(GPC)两种前处理技术,探讨了前处理过程中目标化合物背景污染的来源.最终采用乙酸乙酯-环己烷(1∶1,V/V)超声提取,经GPC净化后进行超高效液相色谱串联质谱分析.3种目标化合物的线性范围为0.25～1600 μg/L,相关系数R2＞ 0.999;对肉和鸡蛋样品,方法的定量限( LOQ)为0.2μg/kg;奶粉样品的LOQ为0.4 μg/kg.目标化合物在3个不同水平的加标回收率为85.9％～117.0％,RSD＜ 20％.应用本方法对市售动物性食品肉、蛋和奶进行了分析,壬基酚的检出率最高,含量为0.27～1357 μg/kg,此外还检出了双酚A.     

分子印迹固相萃取检测罐装食品中双酚A

以双酚A为模板分子,3-氨基丙基乙氧基硅烷为功能单体,通过溶胶-凝胶反应合成双酚A分子印迹纳米硅胶微球。以印迹微球为固相萃取吸附剂,优化固相萃取条件,确定二氯甲烷为上样溶剂。固相萃取选择性实验表明,在双酚A及其结构类似物四溴双酚A、双酚C、壬基酚的混合物溶液中,印迹萃取柱对双酚A具有良好的选择性能,回收率达到90.7%。浓度为2.5和5μmol/L的加标罐装食品样品,经印迹萃取柱预处理,液相色谱检测得到回收率72%～84%,相对标准偏差2.9%～4.4%。     

新型毛细管内固相萃取-气相色谱法检测纺织品中烷基酚类物质

建立了毛细管内固相萃取(SPE)-气相色谱(GC)检测纺织品中壬基酚和辛基酚含量的分析方法。通过比较4种性质不同固相萃取剂的萃取效果,筛选出对烷基酚(APs)类物质萃取效果最佳的固相萃取剂,将其作为填充物质制作毛细管内固相萃取柱,将毛细管内固相萃取法与气相色谱联用进行分析检测。最佳固相萃取剂为Abselut NEXUS,毛细管内固相萃取最佳条件为:1.2μL甲醇和1.2μL超纯水活化,1.2μL甲醇洗脱,上样速率是0.4μL/min。该法在较低浓度范围内呈现良好的线性相关性,对烷基酚的富集倍数约为100倍,对辛基酚和壬基酚的检出限分别为3.7μg/L和4.5μg/L,加标回收率分别为85.6%~98.2%和83.8%~95.7%,结果表明,此法能够简捷、迅速、有效地检测出纺织品中残留的烷基酚类物质。     

固相萃取-高效液相色谱法同时测定水中的对二氯苯与六氯苯

采用国产新型D4020 大孔吸附树脂作固定相,用自制的玻璃富集柱研究了柱长、上样速度、样品溶液的pH、盐度等因素对对二氯苯与六氯苯吸附率的影响,确定了最佳固相萃取条件,建立了固相萃取-高效液相色谱同时测定水中痕量对二氯苯与六氯苯的分析方法;不同加标水平的对二氯苯与六氯苯的回收率为86.4%～93.9%,RSD≤4.2%,检出限分别为0.85和0.10 ng/mL;方法已用于实际水样分析.     

固相萃取/气相色谱-质谱法测定玩具中10种有机物的迁移量

建立了玩具中10种有机物迁移量的固相萃取/气相色谱-质谱测定方法。样品在25 mL去离子水中迁移60min,得到的迁移液流经Chromabond Easy固相萃取柱,用乙酸乙酯洗脱5次,每次1 mL。洗脱液过滤膜后通过60m DB-624色谱柱分离,质谱进行检测,外标法定量。方法对于不同有机物的定量限(LOQ)在0.0...     

Determination of estrogens and their metabolites in water using C30 SPE-LC-MS

Triacontyl bonded silica (C(30)) material was applied as solid-phase extraction (SPE) sorbent and an SPE-LC-MS method was established for the determination of eight estrogens and their metabolites in water samples. Compared to commercial C(18) SPE cartridge, the performance of C(30) was evaluated in various important SPE conditions, such as sorbent mass, elution solvent and its volume, loading flow rate, and sample loading volume. The results showed a superior performance of C(30)-C(18) by the shorter treatment time and fewer required elution solvent. In the optimum conditions, the results showed good recoveries (80.5-109.4%), excellent linear relationships (0.02-1 ng/mL, except 2-MeO-E(2)), high precisions (lower than 10.0% RSD for both low and high spiked concentration), and low LODs (1-16 ng/L). Method validation using C(30) packed cartridge was also testified with spiked real water samples, including tap water and river water. Satisfy results demonstrated the feasibility of C(30) SPE to the analysis for real environmental waters.     

SPE – Microwave‐assisted extraction coupled system for the extraction of pesticides from water samples

SPE is a commonly applied technique for preconcentration of pesticides from water samples. Microwave‐assisted extraction (MAE) technique is the extraction applied for preconcentration of different compounds from solid samples. SPE coupled with MAE is capable of preconcentrating these compounds from water samples too. This investigation was aimed at improving the efficiency of atrazine, alachlor, and α‐cypermethrin pesticide extraction from the spiked water samples applying SPE followed by MAE. In this way, MAE served for elution of pesticides from C₁₈‐extraction disks with solvent heated by microwave energy. Various elution conditions were tested for their effects on the extraction efficiency of the SPE–MAE combined technique. Several parameters, such as elution solvent volume (mL), elution temperature (°C), and duration of elution (min), affect the extraction efficiency of the SPE–MAE coupled system and need to be optimized for the selected pesticides. In order to develop a mathematical model, 15 experiments were performed in the central composite design. The equation was then used to predict recoveries of the pesticides under specific experimental conditions. Optimization of microwave extraction was accomplished using the genetic algorithm approach. Best results were achieved using 20 mL of ethanol at 60°C. Optimal hold time was 5 min and 24 s. The SPE–MAE combination was also compared with the conventional SPE extraction technique with elution of a nonpolar or a moderately polar compound with nonpolar solvents.     

饮用水中9种卤乙酸的超高效液相色谱法测定

建立了固相萃取/超高效液相色谱(SPE/UPLC)测定饮用水中9种痕量卤乙酸(HAAs)的分析方法.对固相萃取和液相色谱等分析条件进行了优化,选择Lichrolut EN固相萃取小柱富集饮用水中的HAAs,三乙胺-磷酸缓冲液和甲醇作为UPLC的流动相.在优化的分析条件下,9种卤乙酸在6min内实现基线分离,所有目标物在一定质量浓度范围内线性良好,相关系数为0.995 7～0.9999;一氯乙酸(MCAA)的检出限为10.85μg/L,其它8种化合物的检出限为0.25～0.70μg/L;除MCAA外,其它目标物在低、中、高3种加标水平的回收率为60%～106%.方法的相对标准偏差(RSD,n=5)为2.0%～5.7%.将此方法应用于我国北方某城市自来水中卤乙酸的测定,5种HAAs被检出.方法灵敏度高、简便快捷,可用于生活饮用水中痕量卤乙酸的测定.     

高效液相色谱法和固相萃取法用于环境中农药残留物分析的研究进展

农药是一类被广泛使用的毒药 ,由于它们在现代农业中的广泛使用及其毒性 ,越来越引起人们对水、食品、农产品以及环境中的农药残留分析的重视 ,高效液相色谱法 (HPLC)和固相萃取法 (SPE)由于其具有分析速度快、灵敏度高的特点 ,特别适合于农药残留物分析 .本文对近年来用于环境中农药残留物的分析和有关的研究进展做了较全面的评述     

Solid-phase trapping of solutes for further chromatographic or electrophoretic analysis

Because of its simplicity, speed and effectiveness, solid-phase extraction (SPE) has become the preferred technique for concentration of selected analytes prior to chromatographic or electrophoretic analysis. In this review the historical development of SPE is briefly traced. Then the principles of SPE are reviewed in some detail. Numerous references are given on the format, sorbents, elution conditions, online techniques and automation with special emphasis on relatively recent developments. The principles and recent advances in solid-phase microextraction (SPME) are also reviewed. The final section on selected recent applications includes an extensive list of references to work published within the last three years. Future trends and developments are discussed briefly.     

Porous metal membranes for solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Solid-phase extraction (SPE) is one of the most important techniques for sample preparation, purification, concentration and cleanup. Membranes made from synthetic organic polymers, cellulose, or glass fibers are used for sample pretreatment. In this work, we report that a porous metal membrane, the metal filter in HPLC, was used as a novel kind of solid-phase extraction adsorbent material. To evaluate the performance of the porous metal membrane for the SPE, naphthalene, fluorene, anthracene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, perylene and benzo(a)pyrene were selected as analytes. Several parameters that affected the extraction efficiency such as the extraction time, the concentration of NaCl, the extraction temperature and the agitation speed were optimized. The experimental result indicates that the porous metal membrane possesses high adsorption ability to the tested polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Under the optimum conditions, the detection limits of the developed method were in the range of 0.03-0.082 μg L(-1) (S/N = 5), and excellent linear correlations between peak area and concentration of PAHs were found over the range of 0.1-60 μg L(-1). The precisions (RSD) for five replicate extractions of the PAHs from sample solutions were in the range of 2.6-5.0%. The recoveries of the PAHs from tap water and river water samples spiked with 9 PAHs (20 μg L(-1) of each individual PAH) ranged from 83.0% to 112.5%. The porous metal membrane is durable, simple, inexpensive, reproducible and has a high adsorption ability for use in SPE of PAHs.     

Cloud point and solid phase extraction of vanadium in surface and bottled mineral water samples using 8-hydroxyquinoline as a complexing reagent

Cloud point extraction (CPE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) methods were developed for the determination of ??g l^?1 of vanadium ions in surface, tap and bottled mineral water samples, based on the rapid reaction of vanadium(V) with 8- hydroxyquinoline (8-quinolinol) at pH 3?C5. Both the sensitive extraction methods were successfully employed for the preconcentration of V in real samples. For CPE, V complexed with 8-quinolinol and then was entrapped in non-ionic surfactant Triton X-114, while for SPE, V was adsorbed on XAD -2 impregnated with 8-quinolinol. The experimental conditions for SPE (pH, eluent, and contact time between the liquid sample and the resin) and CPE (pH of sample solution, concentration of 8- quinolinol and Triton X-114, equilibration temperature and time period for shaking) were investigated in detail. The validity of SPE/CPE of V was checked by certified reference material of water (SRM-1643e). The extracted surfactant-rich phase (200 ??l) was mixed with 200 ??l of HNO₃ in ethanol and this final volume was injected into electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry with different modifiers. Under these conditions, the preconcentration of 25 ml sample solution allowed the raising of an enrichment factor of 100 and 10 folds for CPE and SPE, respectively. The concentration of V in surface water (river and lake), tap water and bottled mineral water samples was found to be in the range of 1.30?C19.9, 1.05?C5.25 and 0.67?C1.21 ??g l^?1, respectively.     

Automated trace level determination of glyphosate and aminomethyl phosphonic acid in water by on-line anion-exchange solid-phase extraction followed by cation-exchange liquid chromatography and post-column derivatization.

An automated method based on the on-line coupling of anion-exchange solid-phase extraction (SPE) and cation-exchange liquid chromatography followed by post-column derivatization and fluorescence detection has been developed for the trace level determination of glyphosate and its primary conversion product aminomethyl phosphonic acid (AMPA) in water. PRP-X100 poly(styrene-divinylbenzene)-trimethylammonium anion-exchange cartridges (20 x 2 mm, 10 microm) were selected for the SPE of glyphosate and AMPA. The ionic compounds present in the samples strongly influenced the extraction of both analytes; however, when an on-line ion-exchange clean-up step was introduced before sample SPE, the problem was largely solved. By processing 100-ml samples detection limits better than 0.02 microg/l for glyphosate and 0.1 microg/l for AMPA were achieved in river water. Both analytes were unstable in solution and the approach of storing samples on the PRP-X100 SPE cartridges was evaluated for a period of 1 month under three different storage conditions (deep freeze, refrigeration and 20 degrees C).