一种新型双膦亚磷酸酯配体的合成及在1-己烯氢甲酰化反应中的应用

以4,4'-二羟基二苯丙烷和2,4-二叔丁基苯酚为原料合成了一种新型双膦亚磷酸酯配体,并用此配体和Rh(acac)(CO)2原位形成的催化体系催化1-己烯的氢甲酰化反应.系统考察了反应温度、压力、P/Rh和溶剂四种反应参数对催化体系的催化性能影响.选择了最佳的反应条件,在铑浓度为0.75×10-3mol/L、P/Rh比为10、温度100℃、压力(H2/CO=1)2.0MPa的条件下反应1.0h,在溶剂甲苯中1-己烯的转化率可达到100%,醛选择性为98.7%,TOF为3498.6h-1.在相同的条件下与以三苯基膦和单膦亚磷酸三(2,4-二叔丁基苯基)酯为配体的铑催化剂相比较,以新型双膦亚磷酸酯为配体的铑催化剂的催化活性是PPh3的1.6倍,而与亚磷酸三(2,4-二叔丁基苯基)酯的催化活性相当.     

含氮氧阴离子螯合配体的铑络合物的常压氢甲酰化催化性能

铑膦络合物是最常用的烯烃氢甲酰化反应的催化剂,目前改进这类催化剂的活性和选择性大多从选用新型膦配体着手,而很少研究改变铑络合物本身的配位环境.Rh(acac)(CO)_2等一价铑络合物是人们熟知的氢甲酰化催化剂,而类似结构的Rh(ON)(CO)_2型络合物(ON为氮氧阴离子配体)催化剂则尚未见报道.本文研究了Rh(ON)(CO)_2与膦配体组成的体系在常压下对烯烃氢甲酰化反应的催化作用.所用三种Rh(ON)(CO)_2型络合物的结构如下:     

4,4'',6,6''-四甲氧基-2,2''-二(二苯膦基)-1,1''-联吡啶(P-Phos)铑配合物催化苯乙烯不对称氢甲酰化反应

不对称氢甲酰化反应是以烯烃为原料制备光学活性醛的一种简便有效方法,所获得的光学活性醛则是合成手性药物、农药和食品添加剂等高附加值产物的重要中间体[1],不对称氢甲酰化反应中使用的膦配体在溶液中通常都对氧气非常敏感,少许的氧气就会导致反应活性和对映选择性的大幅降低[2],所以要求实验操作条件非常苛刻。本文报道双膦配体(R) P Phos[4,4’,2’,6,6’ 四甲氧基 2,2’ 二(二苯膦基) 1,1’ 联吡啶]和催化剂前体Rh(acac)(CO)2原位形成的催化剂对苯乙烯不对称氢甲酰化反应的催化性能。考察了反应温度、压力、膦/铑比等对反应的…     

新型双膦配体的合成及其在2-丁烯氢甲酰化反应中的应用

合成了以联苯为骨架,以吲哚为取代基的双膦配体,并研究了该配体与Rh(acac)(CO)2原位生成的催化剂在2-丁烯氧甲酰化反应中的催化性能.考察了膦/铑比、反应温度、反应压力以及2-丁烯与Rh(acae)(CO)2摩尔比等因素对反应活性及区域选择性的影响.结果表明,在60℃反应时,醛的正异比高达28.5;当压力为2.0...     

双膦配体DPPB的铑配合物催化烯烃氢甲酰化反应研究(2000年版)

研究了由 Rh(acac) (CO) 2 和 1 ,4-双 (二苯膦基 )苯 (简称 DPPB)组成的体系对烯烃氢甲酰化反应的催化作用 .考察了反应温度、压力、P/Rh比、催化剂浓度等对 1 -己烯氢甲酰化反应的影响 ,得到了较适宜的反应条件 .在相同条件下比较了该体系催化 1 -己烯、 1 -辛烯、 1 -十二烯的氢甲酰化反应的性能 .结果表明 ,随着底物碳链的增长 ,反应活性呈提高趋势 .实验证明 ,DPPB-铑配合物对苯乙烯的氢甲酰化反应有较高的催化活性和选择性 .     

十六烷基三羟乙基溴化铵促进1-辛烯氢甲酰化水/有机两相反应研究

研究了水/有机两相体系中表面活性剂十六烷基三羟乙基溴化铵(CTHAB)对Rh/TPPTS (TPPTS: 三[间-磺酸钠基苯基]膦)催化的1-辛烯氢甲酰化反应的促进作用, 初步证实了CTHAB分子中的羟基可与催化活性物种的铑之间发生配位. 与传统表面活性剂十六烷基三甲基溴化铵(CTAB)相比, 表面活性剂CTHAB的添加不仅加速了水/有机两相1-辛烯氢甲酰化反应, 而且提高了成醛的正/异比, 促进作用明显. 在 [Rh]=0.8 mmol/L, [TPPTS]/[Rh]=40, [CTHAB]=4.0 mmol/L, 90 ℃, 0.5 MPa, 1.5 h时, 生成醛的TOF为497 h^-1, 正/异比(L/B)可达25.6. 催化剂经7次循环后, 反应活性和成醛正/异比无明显下降. 该催化体系对不同长链烯烃氢甲酰化反应同样具有促进作用.     

双膦配体修饰铑催化乙酸乙烯酯氢甲酰化反应(英文)

研究了双膦配体对铑催化的乙酸乙烯酯氢甲酰化反应的促进作用,结果表明,在优化反应条件下,以双膦化合物2,2’-二(二苯膦甲基)-1,1’-联苯(BISBI)为配体时,铑催化乙酸乙烯酯氢甲酰化反应的TOF(转化频率)值达到4000h1,生成2-乙酰氧基丙醛的选择性99%.当在较温和的条件下Rh/BISBI催化乙酸乙烯酯氢甲酰化反应较长时间时TON(转化数)值达到9200,成醛率超过90%,2-乙酰氧基丙醛选择性仍保持99%.     

聚氧乙烯基取代膦—铑配合物催化有机单相苯乙烯氢甲酰化反应研究

基于非离子表面活性膦配体的临界溶解温度特性 ,研究了以 Rh Cl3· 3H2 O为催化剂前体、聚氧乙烯基取代膦为配体原位合成的膦铑配合物催化剂 ,对有机单相体系中苯乙烯氢甲酰化反应的催化性能 .考察了反应温度、压力及不同聚氧乙烯基取代膦 -铑配合物催化剂对反应的影响 .以 Rh/PETPP配合物为催化剂时 ,在 T=10 0℃ ,p=6 .0 MPa (CO/H2 =1∶ 1)条件下 ,反应 3.5 h后 ,烯烃转化率和产物醛收率可分别达 96 .7%和 92 .6 %     

新型配体三 (3,4-二甲氧基苯基) 膦的合成及其 Rh 配合物在 1-十二烯氢甲酰化反应中的催化性能

 将合成的三 (3,4-二甲氧基苯基) 膦 (TDMOPP) 用作 Rh 催化剂配体, 并用于 1-十二烯氢甲酰化反应, 考察了膦/铑比和反应温度对 Rh-TDMOPP 催化剂活性和选择性的影响. 结果表明, 在膦/铑比与反应温度较低时, Rh-TDMOPP 活性是 Rh-三苯基膦催化剂的 3 倍.     

膦配体链长对锚合膦配体修饰的Rh/SiO_2催化剂上氢甲酰化反应性能的影响(英文)

烯烃氢甲酰化反应产物醛是生产多种有机化合物的重要中间体,具有重要的工业价值.均相催化剂具有反应条件温和及催化效率高的优点,因而成为工业应用的主要催化体系,但催化剂分离复杂且昂贵.多相催化剂具有易分离和易回收的优点,但在氢甲酰化反应中的活性和选择性较低,因而大大阻碍了其在工业上的应用.为了得到兼具两种催化剂优点的新型催化剂,人们进行了数十年的研究,均相催化剂多相化便是其中一个研究热点.实现该策略最常用的一个方法是将均相催化剂固载到载体上,以此来达到催化剂易从反应物及产物中分离,同时保有高活性高选择性的目的.通过化学键将金属配合物的配体键合到载体上已经取得了一定的成功,但依然存在着活性组分流失和催化剂失活的问题.本课题组开发了一种锚合膦配体修饰的Rh/SiO_2新型催化剂,在乙烯氢甲酰化反应中表现出卓越的稳定性,反应1000 h后依然没有出现活性下降和组分流失的现象,这是因为配体和活性金属同时被固载在载体SiO_2上.但是由于配体和活性金属都不能自由移动,很多配体不能与金属原子有效接触,起不到配位效应,因而催化剂活性仍不够高.因此,为了提高锚合膦配体修饰的Rh/SiO_2催化剂的活性,我们合成了具有较长链长的膦DPPPTS,并与商业购买的链长较短的膦DPPETS做对比,研究锚合膦配体链长和催化剂活性的关系.使用N_2物理吸附、原位红外光谱(FT-IR)和固体~(31)P核磁共振(NMR)等探讨了膦配体链长影响催化性能的原因.固定床上乙烯氢甲酰化反应结果表明,当膦配体的链长增长一个亚甲基长度后,反应稳定后催化剂的活性提高了一倍以上.N_2物理吸附实验表明,延长配体的链长对催化剂结构性质的影响不大,因而也不会改变反应时的传质.催化剂吸附合成气(CO:H_2=1:1)的原位FT-IR结果表明,不同链长膦配体修饰的Rh/SiO_2催化剂上均原位生成了类似于用于均相氢甲酰化反应的Wilkinson型催化剂的活性物种HRh(CO)_2(DPPPTS)_2[或HRh(CO)_2(DPPETS)_2],以及吸附在Rh上的线式CO.这两种吸附物种均利于氢甲酰化反应的进行,其中以前者活性更好.从原位FT-IR结果同样看出,锚合链长较长的膦配体的催化剂(DPPPTS-Rh/SiO_2)上原位生成的活性物种量更多,因而催化活性更高.固体~(31)P NMR结果表明,催化剂上的膦以自由态的膦(高场峰β)和与Rh配位的膦(低场峰α)两种形式存在.α峰面积和β峰面积之比(r)越高代表与Rh配位的膦配体占总膦量的比例越高.发现DPPPTS-Rh/SiO_2催化剂的r值(1.31)高于DPPETS-Rh/SiO_2催化剂(1.05),即前者与Rh配位生成活性物种的膦配体的比例更高.结合原位FT-IR和固体~(31)P NMR的结果可知,链长较长的DPPPTS更容易与Rh配位,从而生成更多的铑膦配合物活性物种,因而催化剂活性更高.因此,增长锚合膦配体的链长有助于提高其修饰的Rh/SiO_2催化剂的活性.     

Rhodium phosphine complexes immobilized on silica as active catalysts for 1-hexene hydroformylation and arene hydrogenation

In immobilizing the rhodium complexes [Rh(acac)(CO)(P)] (1) and [Rh(acac)(P)₂] (2) (P = Ph₂PCH₂CH₂Si(OMe)₃) onto SiO₂, acetylacetone is found to be released through protonation of the acac ligand by the acidic silica-OH groups. The resulting complexes [Rh(O-{SiO₂}(HO-{SiO₂})(CO)(P-{SiO₂})] (1a) and [Rh(O-{SiO₂})(HO-{SiO₂})(P-{SiO₂})₂] (2a) were successfully tested with respect to their catalytic action on 1-hexene hydroformylation as well as benzene and toluene hydrogenation. The reaction outcome, viz. the formation of aldehydes versus isomerization, depends strongly on the presence and concentration of a phosphine co-catalyst. Thus, while 1a gave only a 17% yield of aldehyde in the absence of phosphines, the yield is increased to 54% in the presence of phosphinated silica P-{SiO₂} or even 94% if PPh₃ is added to the solution. Without extra added phosphine, both 1a and 2a effect mainly the isomerization of 1-hexene to 2-hexene. Pre-catalyst 1a catalyzes also the hydrogenation of benzene at 10.5 atm H₂ and 90 °C to give cyclohexane with a TOF of 608 h⁻¹.     

Rhodium complexes with dioximes as catalysts of hydroformylation and hydrogenation of 1-hexene

Rhodium(II) complexes with dioximes [Rh(Hdmg)₂(PPh₃)]₂ [I] (Hdmg=monoanion of dimethylglyoxime) and [Rh(Hdmg)(ClZndmg)(PPh₃)]₂ [II] catalyse hydroformylation and hydrogenation reactions of 1-hexene at 1 MPa CO/H₂ and 0.5 MPa H₂ at 353 K, respectively. Hydroformylation with complex [I] produces 94% of aldehydes (n/iso=2.2) and 6% 2-hexene whereas the second catalyst [II] gives ca. 40% of aldehydes (n/iso=2.1) and 60% of 2-hexene. Corresponding Rh(III) complexes are inactive in hydroformylation except of RhH(Hdmg)₂(PPh₃) [III], which shows activity similar to [I]. Complexes [Rh(Hdmg)₂(PPh₃)]₂ [I], [Rh(Hdmg)(ClZndmg)(PPh₃)]₂ [II], RhH(Hdmg)₂(PPh₃) [III] and [Rh(Hdmg)₂(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄ [V] catalyse 1-hexene hydrogenation with an average TON ca. 18 cycles/mol [Rh]×min. Complex [II] has also been found to catalyse hydrogenation of cyclohexene, 1,3-cyclohexadiene and styrene.     

A novel dicationic phenoxaphosphino-modified Xantphos-type ligand: a ligand for highly active and selective, biphasic, rhodium catalysed hydroformylation in ionic liquids

A highly active and regioselective catalyst obtained from a novel dicationic ligand (1) and Rh(CO)2(acac) for hydroformylation of 1-hexene and 1-octene in ionic liquids is reported. Optimisation studies of various reaction parameters led to an unprecedentedly active (TOFs > 6200 mol mol(-1) h(-1), T= 100 degrees C), selective (l/b ratios > 40) and stable hydroformylation procedure. No catalyst leaching (Rh-loss < 0.07% of initial rhodium intake, P-loss < 0.4% of the initial phosphorus intake) or losses in performance could be measured during 1-octene hydroformylation recycle experiments in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate. At low catalyst loadings activities and regioselectivities competitive with one-phase catalysis in conventional solvents were observed. At high catalyst loadings the system is extremely stable and has a long shelf-life as a result of the formation of stable, if inactive rhodium dimers.     

抗烧结Rh-Sm_2O_3/SiO_2催化剂的制备和表征及其甲烷部分氧化制合成气性能

以乙酰丙酮铑(Rh(acac)_3)和乙酰丙酮钐(Sm(acac)_3)为前驱体,用浸渍法制备了Rh/SiO_2和Rh-Sm_2O_3/SiO_2催化剂。采用原位红外光谱、热重分析、低温N_2吸附、X射线粉末衍射、高分辨透射电子显微镜、H_2-程序升温还原和X射线光电子能谱等实验技术对催化剂的制备过程,比表面积和物相以及Rh与Sm_2O_3间的相互作用进行了表征,并以甲烷部分氧化制合成气为目标反应对催化剂的稳定性进行了考察。研究表明:以Rh(acac)_3和Sm(acac)_3为前驱体采用简单的浸渍法即可制备出Rh平均粒径为2.3 nm且具有良好抗烧结性能的Rh-Sm_2O_3/SiO_2催化剂。在浸渍过程中乙酰丙酮化合物通过与SiO_2表面羟基形成氢键而负载于载体表面。Sm(acac)_3在SiO_2表面的单层负载量(质量分数)约为31%,对应于Sm_2O_3的质量分数约为15%,只要Sm(acac)_3的质量分数低于这一阈值,均可保证分解后生成的Sm_2O_3以高分散形式负载于SiO_2上,且不会因高温(800°C)焙烧而团聚。高分散于SiO_2表面的Sm_2O_3与Rh之间存在强的相互作用,可显著提高Rh的分散度,防止其在高温反应条件下烧结,进而使低Rh负载量的催化剂表现出良好的甲烷部分氧化制合成气反应活性和稳定性。     

Kinetics and mechanisms of homogeneous catalytic reactions: Part 7. Hydroformylation of 1-hexene catalyzed by cationic complexes of rhodium and iridium containing PPh3

Cationic rhodium and iridium complexes of the type [M(COD)(PPh₃)₂]PF₆ (M = Rh, 1a; Ir, 1b) are efficient precatalysts for the hydroformylation of 1-hexene to its corresponding aldehydes (heptanal and 2-methylhexanal), under mild pressures (2–5 bar) and temperatures (60 °C for Rh and 100 °C for Ir) in toluene solution; the linear to branched ratio (l/b) of the aldehydes in the hydroformylation reaction varies slightly (between 3.0 and 3.7 for Rh and close to 2 for Ir). Kinetic and mechanistic studies have been carried out using these cationic complexes as catalyst precursors. For both complexes, the reaction proceeds according to the rate law r_i = K₁K₂K₃k₄[M][olef][H₂][CO]/([CO]² + K₁[H₂][CO] + K₁K₂K₃[olef][H₂]). Both complexes react rapidly with CO to produce the corresponding tricarbonyl species [M(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂]PF₆, M = Rh, 2a; Ir, 2b, and with syn-gas to yield [MH₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂]PF₆, M = Rh, 3a; Ir, 3b, which originate by CO dissociation the species [MH₂(CO)(PPh₃)₂]PF₆ entering the corresponding catalytic cycle. All the experimental data are consistent with a general mechanism in which the transfer of the hydride to a coordinated olefin promoted by an entering CO molecule is the rate-determining step of the catalytic cycle.     

Highly active rhodium/phosphorus catalytic system for the hydroformylation of α-methylstyrene

Rhodium catalyzed hydroformylation of a-methylstyrene was investigated in the presence of monodentate phosphine ligands L1–L6. We found that the phosphine with good p-acceptability could efficiently improve the activity of the a-methylstyrene hydroformylation. The big steric hindrance of a-C in a-methylstyrene enhanced the regioselectivity towards the linear aldehyde, which resulted in3-phenylbutanal as the predominant product(99.0%). When tris(N-pyrrolyl)phosphine(L1) modified Rh(acac)(CO)_2was employed as the catalyst, the TOF could reach up to 5786 h~(-1)in the a-methylstyrene hydroformylation at relatively mild conditions(110 8C, 6 MPa).     

Markovnikov hydroformylation catalyzed by ROPAC in the presence of phosphine and phosphine oxide ligands

Rhodium-catalyzed hydroformylation of 1-octene in the presence of different phosphine and phosphine oxide ligands has been investigated. The molecular structure of new phosphine ligand, fluorenylidine methyl phenyl diphenylphosphine, was determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. Parameters such as different ligands, molar ratio of ligand to rhodium complex, ratio of olefin to rhodium complex, pressure of CO : H₂ mixture, and time of the reaction were studied. The linear aldehyde was the main product when the phosphine ligands were used as auxiliary ligands while the selectivity was changed to the branched products when the related phosphine oxide ligands were used. Under optimized reaction conditions, in the presence of [Rh(acac)(CO)(Ph₃P)]-di(1-naphthyl)phenyl phosphine oxide, conversion of 1-octene reached 97% with 87% selectivity of branched aldehyde.     

"Solventless" continuous flow homogeneous hydroformylation of 1-octene

The hydroformylation of 1-octene under continuous flow conditions is described. The system involves dissolving the catalyst, made in situ from [Rh(acac)(CO)(2)] (acacH=2,4-pentanedione) and [RMIM][TPPMS] (RMIM=1-propyl (Pr), 1-pentyl (Pn) or 1-octyl (O) -3-methyl imidazolium, TPPMS=Ph(2)P(3-C(6)H(4)SO(3))), in a mixture of nonanal and 1-octene and passing the substrate, 1-octene, together with CO and H(2) through the system dissolved in supercritical CO(2) (scCO(2)). [PrMIM][TPPMS] is poorly soluble in the medium so heavy rhodium leaching (as complexes not containing phosphine) occurs in the early part of the reaction. [PnMIM][TPPMS] affords good rates at relatively low catalyst loadings and relatively low overall pressure (125 bar) with rhodium losses <1 ppm, but the catalyst precipitates at higher catalyst loadings, leading to lower reaction rates. [OMIM][TPPMS] is the most soluble ligand and promotes high reaction rates, although preliminary experiments suggested that rhodium leaching was high at 5-10 ppm. Optimisation aimed at balancing flows so that the level within the reactor remained constant involved a reactor set up based around a reactor fitted with a sight glass and sparging stirrer with the CO(2) being fed by a cooled head HPLC pump, 1-octene by a standard HPLC pump and CO/H(2) through a mass flow controller. The pressure was controlled by a back pressure regulator. Using this set up, [OMIM][TPPMS] as the ligand and a total pressure of 140 bar, it was possible to control the level within the reactor and obtain a turnover frequency of ca. 180 h(-1). Rhodium losses in the optimised system were 100 ppb. Transport studies showed that 1-octene is preferentially transported over the aldehydes at all pressures, although the difference in mol fraction in the mobile phase was less at lower pressures. Nonanal in the mobile phase suppresses the extraction of 1-octene to some extent, so it is better to operate at high conversion and low pressure to optimise the extraction of the products relative to the substrate. CO and H(2) in the mobile phase also suppress the extraction efficiency by as much as 80%.     

Hydroformylation and hydrocarbethoxylation of 1,2-dicarbethoxy-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridazine and 1,2-dicarbethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridazine

The unsaturated compounds 1,2-dicarbethoxy-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridazine 1 and 1,2-dicarbethoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydropyridazine 2 have been hydroformylated and hydrocarbethoxylated in the presence of some well known cobalt, rhodium, palladium and platinum catalysts. The hydroformylation reaction can be tuned by a suitable choice of the catalyst precursor and reaction conditions, thus allowing the synthesis with high selectivity of one of the two possible isomeric aldehydes. The carbonylation reaction is less synthetically useful, since it shows low activity and unsatisfactory chemo- and regio-selectivity. However, the ester 1,2,4-tricarbethoxyhexahydropyridazine 10 can be prepared in good yield from olefin 1 by using the complex [PdCl₂(PPh₃)₂] as the catalyst precursor.