The molecular structure of cis- and trans-bicyclo [4.2.0]-octane in the gas phase as studied by electron diffraction and molecular mechanics

The molecular structure of Cis- and trans-bicyclo[4.2.0]octane in the gas phase was studied. Molecular mechanics calculations applying Boyd's force Held were used for constraining differences between structural parameters during least squares analysis and for calculating vibrational amplitudes. The cyclohexane ring was found to have a distorted chair conformation, the ring in the cis isomer being flattened along the junction and more twisted in the other part. For the trans compound the reverse is true. The following structural parameters were obtained (r_a-structure):cis: r(C-C)_av. = 1.535 Å. Cyclohexane ring: average bond angle 112.9°; average torsional angle 48°. Cyclobutane ring: average bond angle 88.9°; puckering 157°. The dihedral angle between the bisecting planes of the C(2)-C(1)-C(6)-C(5) and C(8)-C(1)-C(6)-C(7) torsional angles, is 119° - the “connection angle” of the two rings.trans: r(C-C)_av.= 1.532 Å. Cyclohexane ring: average bond angle 110.4° ; average torsional angle 57°. Cyclobutane ring: average bond angle 87.3°; puckering 145°. The “connection angle” is 180° (C₂ symmetry).Comparison is made with structures of related compounds.     

Photochemische Reaktionen 115. Mitteilung [1]. Zur Photochemie konjugierter γ,δ-Epoxyenone: Der Einfluss eines Hydroxylsubstituenten in ϵ-Stellung

Photochemistry of Conjugated γ,δ-Epoxyenones: The Influence of a Hydroxy Substituent in ?-Position On ¹n, π*- or ¹π,π*-excitation (λ ≥ 347 or λ=254 nm), the ?-hydroxy-γ;,δ-epoxyenone 8 undergoes fission of the C(γ)? O bond followed by the cleavage of the C(δ)-C(?) bond. This hitherto unknown sequence of reactions is evidenced by the structure determination of the new type products 10–17 and 25 , including a synthetic proof for 12 and the X-ray analysis of 11 (X-ray data: triclinic P1; a=7,386(2), b=8,904(4), c=9,684(5)Å; α=82,29(4)°, β=74,46(3)°, γ=82,29(3)°; Z=2). The selective ¹π,π*-excitation also induces competitive C(γ)-C(δ) bond cleavage to yield the bicyclic acetal 18 and a ketonium-ylide intermediate a , which photochemically forms a carbene b giving the allene 19 and the cyclopropene 20 . On ¹n,π*-excitation of the acetate 9 the initial C(γ)-O bond fission is, in contrast to the behaviour of the corresponding alcohol 8 , followed by a 1,2-methyl shift affording (E/Z)- 28 or by a cyclization-autoxidation process yielding the lactone 29 .     

1-(2′-Deoxy-β-D-xylofuranosyl)cytosine: Base pairing of oligonucleotides with a configurationally altered sugar-phosphate backbone

Solid-phase synthesis of the oligo(2′-deoxynucleotides) 19 and 20 containing 2′-deoxy-β-D -xylocytidine ( 4 ) is described. For this purpose, 1-(2-deoxy-β-D -threo-pentofuranosyl)cytosine ( = 1-(2-deoxy-β-D -xylofuranosyl)-cytosine; 4 ) was protected at its 4-NH₂ group with a benzoyl (→ 5 ) or an isobutyryl (→ 8 ) residue, and a dimethoxytrityl group was introduced at 5′-OH (→ 7, 10 ; Scheme 2). Compounds 7 and 10 were converted into the 3′-phosphonates 11a,b . While 19 could be hybridized with 21 and 22 under formation of duplexes with a two-nucleotide overhang on both termini ( 19 · 21 : T_m 29°; 19 · 22 : T_m 22°), the decamer 20 bearing four xC_d residues could no longer be hybridized with one of the opposite strands. Moreover, the oligonucleotides d[(xC)₈? C] ( 13 ), d[(xC)₄? C] ( 14 ), d[C? (xC)₄? C] ( 15 ), and d[C? (xC)₃? C] ( 16 ) were synthesized. While 13 exhibits an almost inverted CD spectrum compared to d(C₉) ( 17 ), the other oligonucleotides show CD spectra typical for regular right-handed single helices. At pH 5, d[(xC)₈? C] forms a stable hemi-protonated duplex which exhibits a T_m of 60° (d[(CH⁺)₉] · d(C₉): T_m 36°). The thermodynamic parameters of duplex formation of ( 13H ⁺ · 13 ) and ( 17H ⁺ · 17 ) were calculated from their melting profiles and were found to be identical in ΔH but differ in ΔS ( 13H ⁺ · 13 : ΔS = ?287 cal/K mol; 17H ⁺ · 17 : ΔS = ?172 cal/K mol).     

Methyl β‐d‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d‐allopyranoside tetrahydrate

The title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁·4H₂O, (I), crystallized from water, has an internal glycosidic linkage conformation having ϕ′ (O5_Gal—C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_All) = −96.40 (12)° and ψ′ (C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_All—C5_All) = −160.93 (10)°, where ring‐atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 denotes the anomeric C atom, C5 the ring atom bearing the exocyclic hydroxymethyl group, and C6 the exocyclic hydroxymethyl (CH₂OH) C atom in the βGalp and βAllp residues. Internal linkage conformations in the crystal structures of the structurally related disaccharides methyl β‐lactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside] methanol solvate [Stenutz, Shang & Serianni (1999). Acta Cryst. C 55 , 1719–1721], (II), and methyl β‐cellobioside [methyl β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside] methanol solvate [Ham & Williams (1970). Acta Cryst. B 26 , 1373–1383], (III), are characterized by ϕ′ = −88.4 (2)° and ψ′ = −161.3 (2)°, and ϕ′ = −91.1° and ψ′ = −160.7°, respectively. Inter‐residue hydrogen bonding is observed between O3_Glc and O5_Gal/Glc in the crystal structures of (II) and (III), suggesting a role in determining their preferred linkage conformations. An analogous inter‐residue hydrogen bond does not exist in (I) due to the axial orientation of O3_All, yet its internal linkage conformation is very similar to those of (II) and (III).     

Bis(4‐hydroxy­benzoato‐O)(1,4,8,11‐tetra­aza­cyclo­tetra­decane‐κ4N)nickel(II): a three‐dimensional framework built from O—H⋯O and N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds

The title compound, [Ni(C₇H₅O₃)₂(C₁₀H₂₄N₄)], contains octahedral Ni^II in a centrosymmetric trans configuration with Ni—N distances of 2.0637 (17) and 2.0699 (16) Å and an Ni—O distance of 2.1100 (14) Å. The mol­ecules are linked by a single type of O—H?O hydrogen bond [O?O 2.618 (2) Å and O—H?O 161°] into two‐dimensional sheets; a singletype of N—H?O hydrogen bond [N?O 2.991 (2) Å and N—H?O 139°] links these sheets into a three‐dimensional framework.     

Crystal structures of the pyrazinamide–p‐aminobenzoic acid (1/1) cocrystal and the transamidation reaction product 4‐(pyrazine‐2‐carboxamido)benzoic acid in the molten state

The synthesis of pharmaceutical cocrystals is a strategy to enhance the performance of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) without affecting their therapeutic efficiency. The 1:1 pharmaceutical cocrystal of the antituberculosis drug pyrazinamide (PZA) and the cocrystal former p‐aminobenzoic acid (p‐ABA), C₇H₇NO₂·C₅H₅N₃O, (1), was synthesized successfully and characterized by relevant solid‐state characterization methods. The cocrystal crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n containing one molecule of each component. Both molecules associate via intermolecular O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds [O...O = 2.6102 (15) Å and O—H...O = 168.3 (19)°; N...O = 2.9259 (18) Å and N—H...O = 167.7 (16)°] to generate a dimeric acid–amide synthon. Neighbouring dimers are linked centrosymmetrically through N—H...O interactions [N...O = 3.1201 (18) Å and N—H...O = 136.9 (14)°] to form a tetrameric assembly supplemented by C—H...N interactions [C...N = 3.5277 (19) Å and C—H...N = 147°]. Linking of these tetrameric assemblies through N—H...O [N...O = 3.3026 (19) Å and N—H...O = 143.1 (17)°], N—H...N [N...N = 3.221 (2) Å and N—H...N = 177.9 (17)°] and C—H...O [C...O = 3.5354 (18) Å and C—H...O = 152°] interactions creates the two‐dimensional packing. Recrystallization of the cocrystals from the molten state revealed the formation of 4‐(pyrazine‐2‐carboxamido)benzoic acid, C₁₂H₉N₃O₃, (2), through a transamidation reaction between PZA and p‐ABA. Carboxamide (2) crystallizes in the triclinic space group P with one molecule in the asymmetric unit. Molecules of (2) form a centrosymmetric dimeric homosynthon through an acid–acid O—H...O hydrogen bond [O...O = 2.666 (3) Å and O—H...O = 178 (4)°]. Neighbouring assemblies are connected centrosymmetrically via a C—H...N interaction [C...N = 3.365 (3) Å and C—H...N = 142°] engaging the pyrazine groups to generate a linear chain. Adjacent chains are connected loosely via C—H...O interactions [C...O = 3.212 (3) Å and C—H...O = 149°] to generate a two‐dimensional sheet structure. Closely associated two‐dimensional sheets in both compounds are stacked via aromatic π‐stacking interactions engaging the pyrazine and benzene rings to create a three‐dimensional multi‐stack structure.     

Carbonyl(5‐nitrotropolonato‐κ2O1,O2)(tri­phenyl­phosphine‐κP)­rhodium(I)

The molecule of the title complex, [Rh(5‐NO₂trop)(C₁₈H₁₅P)(CO)] (5‐­NO₂trop is 2‐hydroxy‐5‐nitrocyclo­hepta‐2,4,6‐trienone, C₇H₄NO₄), has a distorted square‐planar geometry. Strong intramolecular and weak intermolecular hydrogen bonding is observed, with H⋯O distances of the order of 2.25 and 2.55 Å, respectively. The Rh—CO, Rh—O (trans to CO), Rh—O (trans to P) and Rh—P bond distances are 1.775 (7), 2.072 (4), 2.068 (4) and 2.2397 (17) Å, respectively, the O—Rh—O angle is 77.09 (16)° and the bidentate O—C—C—O torsion angle is 1.5 (7)°.     

Ab initio studies on polymers. VII. Polyoxymethylene

The structure of an isolated, infinite polyoxymethylene chain has been investigated with the aid of the ab initio crystal orbital method applying a basis set of double-zeta quality. Restricting the primitive unit cell to a single CH₂O group, conformational potential curves as a function of the torsional angle have been evaluated. Only a single minimum closely corresponding to an all-gauche structure was detected. The all-trans conformation is a maximum on the energy curve for simultaneous rotation around C? O single bonds. Detailed geometry optimization in the vicinity of the all-gauche conformation led to the following structure: r_CO = r_OC = 1.425 Å, r_CH = 1.072 Å, ∠HCH = 111.7°, ∠OCO = 110.9°, ∠COC = 115.1°, and τ_OCOC = 70.75°. The computed torsional angle τ_OCOC lies midway between the hexagonal (78.2°) and the orthorhombic (63.5°) modification of solid polyoxymethylene.     

Darstellung,Eigenschaften und Kristallstruktur von [2-(1′-methyl-4-imidazolyl)phenyl-1-C,3′-N]acetylacetonatopalladium(II)

Synthesis, Properties, and Structure of [2-(1′-methyl-4-imidazolyl)phenyl-1-C,3′-N]-palladium(II) Acetylacetonate The reaction of Di-μ-chloro-bis[2-(1′-methyl-4-imidazolyl)phenyl-1-C,3′-N]palladium(II) with Thallium(I) acetylacetonate yields [2-(1′-methyl-4-imidazolyl)phenyl-1-C,3′-N]palladium(II) acetylacetonate. The complex crystallizes monoclinic in the space group P2₁/n with the lattice constants a = 1302.4(3), b = 836.0(2), c = 1341.3(3) pm, β = 93.69(3)°. Pd has a squareplanar coordination by two O atoms of acetylacetonate, the N atom of the imidazole ring, and the C atom of the phenyl group. I.r., n.m.r., and mass spectra are reported.     

1,4,7,10‐Tetra­oxacyclo­dodeca­ne–triphenyl­methane­thiol (1/2)

In the centrosymmetric formula unit of the title complex, C₈H₁₆O₄·2C₁₈H₁₆S, the 1,4,7,10‐tetra­oxacyclo­dodecane mol­ecule adopts the biangular [66] conformation, and the triphenyl­methane­thiol mol­ecules are linked to the macrocycle via a long S—H⋯O hydrogen bond [S⋯O = 3.460 (2) Å and S—H⋯O = 161 (2)°]. Attractive inter­actions of phenyl groups in edge‐to‐face conformations combine inversion‐related formula units into chains running along the [111] direction in the crystal structure. Association of the chains into sheets is achieved via C—H⋯π inter­actions.     

Crystal structure of 1:1 Complexes between urea and two crown ether derivatives of phthalic acid, 2,3,5,6,8,9,11,12,14,15-decahydrobenzo[1,4,7,10,13,16]hexaoxacyclo-octadecin-18,19-dicarboxylic acid (i) and 2,3,5,6,8,9,11,12-octahydro-benzo[1,4,7,10,13]pentaoxacyclopentadecin-15,16-dicarboxylic acid (II)

The crystal structures of the titlke compounds have been determined by X-ray diffraction. Urea, I crystallizes in the triclinic PI space group with cell dimensions a = 8.336(2), b = 11.009(2), c = 13.313(2) Å, α = 105.55(3), β = 103.62(3), γ = 104.63(3)° and Z = 2 final R value 0.072 for 2105 observations. Urea, II crystallizes in the orthorhombic P2₁2₁2₁ space group with cell dimensions a = 8.750(2), b = 10.844(3) and c = 21.215(3) Å and Z = 4, final R value 0.083 for 599 observations. All the hydrogen atoms were located in the complex urea, I ; urea molecules form hydrogen bonded dimers about centers of symmetry, these dimers are sandwiched between macrocyclic rings forming one simple and one bifurcated hydrogen bond from the “endo” hydrogen atoms to the ether oxygen atoms. These units are held by hydrogen bonding between the urea molecules and carboxylic acids in two other units; these hydrogen bonds are cyclic involving eight atoms -(N-H(exo)…O(keto)-C-O-H…O(urea)-C)-. Only one carboxylic acid group per molecule takes part in these hydrogen bonds, the other forms a short, 2.490(7) Å, internal bond to the acceptor keto oxygen atom. N(H)…O bonds range from 2.930(7) to 3.206(7) Å, O(H)…O is 2.475(6) Å. In the complex urea, II each urea is hydrogen bonded to three different host molecules and vice versa; the urea “endo” hydrogen atoms bond to the ether oxygen atoms, while both “exo” hydrogen atoms take part in cyclic hydrogen bonds to carboxylic acids. There is not internal hydrogen bond. N(H)…O bonds range from 2.83 to 3.26(2) A and the O-…O bonds are 2.55 and 2.56(2) Å.     

Oxo(trisyl)boran (Me3Si)3C?BO als Zwischenstufe

Oxo(trisyl)borane (Me₃Si)₃C? B?O as an Intermediate The acyclic trisylboranes R? B(OSiMe₃)? Cl ( 4 a ) and R? B(OH)? H ( 5 a ) and the cyclic boranes (? RB? O? CO? CO? O? ) ( 1 a ) and (? RB? O? RB? O? SO₂? O? ) ( 6 a ) [R = (Me₃Si)₃C, “Trisyl”] are thermolyzed in the gasphase to give well-defined products. The tris(trisyl)boroxine (? RB? O? )₃ ( 2 a ) is formed from 4 a and 5 a at 140 and 160°C, respectively, besides Me₃SiCl and H₂, respectively, whereas the six-membered ring [? BMe? CH(SiMe₃)? SiMe₂? O? SiMe₂? CH₂? ] ( 8 ) is the product from 1 a and 6 a at 600 and 700°C, respectively, besides CO/CO₂ and SO₃, respectively. The oxoborane R? B?O is presumably a common intermediate. It is stabilized at the lower temperature by cyclotrimerization to give 2 and at the higher temperature by a sequence of several intramolecular steps: a 1,3-silyl shift along the chain C? B? O, an exchange of Me and Me₃SiO along the chain Si? C? B, and a C? H addition to the B?C double bond; the steps can be rationalized by analogous known reactions. The gas-phase thermolysis at 600°C of the dioxaboracyclohexenes (? BR? O? CR′ = CH? CRR′? O? ) ( 7 b? d ; R = Me, iPr, tBu; R′ = Me) yields the boroxines (RBO)₃ and the enones Me? CO? CH?CHR? Me; the cyclohexene 7 e (R = Me; R′ = CF₃) is not decomposed at 600°C.     

Methyl 4‐O‐β‐d‐galacto­pyran­osyl α‐d‐gluco­pyran­oside (methyl α‐lactoside)

Methyl α‐lactoside, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁, (I), is described by glycosidic torsion angles ϕ (O5_gal—C1_gal—O1_gal—C4_glc) and ψ (C1_gal—O1_gal—C4_glc—C5_glc), which have values of −93.52 (13) and −144.83 (11)°, respectively, where the ring atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 is the anomeric C atom and C6 is the exocyclic hydroxy­methyl (–CH₂OH) C atom in both residues. The linkage geometry is similar to that observed in methyl β‐lactoside methanol solvate, (II), in which ϕ is −88.4 (4)° and ψ is −161.3 (4)°. As in (II), an inter­molecular O3_glc—H⋯O5_gal hydrogen bond is observed in (I). The hydroxy­methyl group conformation in both residues is gauche–trans, with torsion angles ω_gal (O5_gal—C5_gal—C6_gal—O6_gal) and ω_glc (O5_glc—C5_glc—C6_glc—O6_glc) of 69.15 (13) and 72.55 (14)°, respectively. The latter torsion angle differs substantially from that found for (II) [−54.6 (2)°; gauche–gauche]. Cocrystallization of methanol, which is hydrogen bonded to O6_glc in the crystal structure of (II), presumably affects the hydroxy­methyl conformation in the Glc residue in (II).     

Alkylidinphosphane und -arsane. I [P ≡ C?S]−[Li(dme)3]+ – Synthese und Struktur

Alkylidynephosphanes and -arsanes. I [P ≡ C? S]^?[Li(dme)₃]⁺ – Synthesis and Structure O,O′-Diethyl thiocarbonate and bis(tetrahydrofuran)-lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanide dissolved in 1,2-dimethoxyethane, react below 0°C to give ethoxy trimethylsilane and tris(1,2-dimethoxyethane-O,O′)lithium 2λ³-phosphaethynylsulfanide – [P≡C? S]^? [Li(dme)₃]⁺ – ( 1a ). Apart from bis(trimethylsilyl)sulfane or carbon oxide sulfide, dark red concentrated solutions of λ³-phosphaalkyne 1 are also obtained from reactions of carbon disulfide with bis(tetrahydrofuran)-lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)phosphanide or with the homologous lithoxy-methylidynephosphane ( 2 ) [1]. The ir spectrum shows two absorptions at 1762 and 747 cm^?1 characteristic for the P≡C and C? S stretching vibrations. The nmr parameters {δ(³¹P) ? 121.3; δ(¹³C) 190.8 ppm; ¹J_CP 18.2 Hz} resemble much more values of diorganylamino-2λ³-phosphaalkynes than those of bis(1,2-dimethoxyethane-O,O′)lithoxy-methylidyne-phosphane ( 2a ). As found by an X-ray structure analysis (P2₁/c; a = 1192.6(16); b = 1239.1(19); c = 1414.8(26) pm; β = 105.91(13)° at ?100 ± 3°C; Z = 4 formula units; wR = 0.064) of pale yellow crystals (mp. + 16°C) isolated from the reaction with O,O′-diethyl thiocarbonate, the solid is built up of separate [P≡C? S]^? and [Li(dme)₃]⁺ ions. Typical bond lengths and angles are: P≡C 155.5(11); C? S 162.0(11); Li? O 206.4(17) to 220.3(20) pm; P≡C? S 178.9(7)°.     

Ab initio studies of structural features not easily amenable to experiment. 38. Structural and conformational investigations of propanoic, 2-methylpropanoic,and butanoic acid

The structures and conformational energies of several conformations of propanoic acid, 2-methylpropanoic acid, and butanoic acid were determined by geometrically unconstrained ab initio gradient geometry refinement on the 4-21G level. The O?C? C? C torsional potentials of propanoic acid and butanoic acid are found to be practically identical. There are energy minima at 0° and 120°, and maxima in the 60° region and at 180°. In 2-methylpropanoic acid there are energy minima at H? C? C?O dihedral angles of 0° and 120°, and maxima at 60° and 180°. The exact positions of the maxima and minima of the H? C? C?O torsional potential of 2-methylpropanoic acid are found to be predictable from propanoic acid rotational-potential parameters. Some conformationally dependent, local geometry trends are discussed.     

Total synthesis of (−)-dictyostatin, a microtubule-stabilising anticancer macrolide of marine sponge origin

An efficient convergent synthesis of the anticancer marine macrolide (−)-dictyostatin is described that proceeds in 4.6% yield over 27 steps. Most of the stereocentres were configured using substrate control, making use of a common building block to install the C12-C14 and C20-C22 stereotriads, with a lactate boron aldol reaction employed to construct a C4-C10 β-ketophosphonate as utilised in the pivotal Still-Gennari HWE coupling step with a fully elaborated C11-C26 aldehyde. Following introduction of the (2Z,4E)-dienoate, a modified Yamaguchi macrolactonisation and deprotection delivered the requisite 22-membered macrocyclic lactone.     

A new polymorph of 1‐ferrocenyl‐3‐(3‐nitroanilino)propan‐1‐one

Recrystallization of the title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₁₄H₁₃N₂O₃)], from a mixture of n‐hexane and dichloromethane gave the new polymorph, denoted (I), which crystallizes in the same space group (P) as the previously reported structure, denoted (II). The Fe—C distances in (I) range from 2.015 (3) to 2.048 (2) Å and the average value of the C—C bond lengths in the two cyclopentadienyl (Cp) rings is 1.403 (13) Å. As indicated by the smallest C—Cg1—Cg2—C torsion angle of 1.4° (Cg1 and Cg2 are the centroids of the two Cp rings), the orientation of the Cp rings in (I) is more eclipsed than in the case of (II), for which the value was 15.3°. Despite the pronounced conformational similarity between (I) and (II), the formation of self‐complementary N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded dimers represents the only structural motif common to the two polymorphs. In the extended structure, molecules of (I) utilize C—H...O hydrogen bonds and, unlike (II), an extensive set of intermolecular C—H...π interactions. Fingerprint plots based on Hirshfeld surfaces are used to compare the packing of the two polymorphs.     

The CoIII—C bond in (1‐thia‐4,7‐diazacyclodecyl‐κ3N4,N7,C10)(1,4,7‐triazacyclononane‐κ3N1,N4,N7)cobalt(III) dithionate hydrate

In the title compound, [Co(C₆H₁₅N₃)(C₇H₁₅N₂S)]S₂O₆·H₂O, the Co—C bond distance is 1.9930 (13) Å, which is shorter than for related compounds with the linear 1,6‐di­amino‐3‐thia­hexan‐4‐ide anion in place of the macrocyclic 1‐thia‐4,7‐diazacyclo­decan‐8‐ide anion. The coordinated carbanion produces an elongation of 0.102 (7) Å of the Co—N bond to the 1,4,7‐tri­aza­cyclo­nonane N atom in the trans position. This relatively small trans influence is presumably a result of the tri­amine ligand forming strong bonds to the Co^III atom.     

trans‐Bis(dimethyl sulfoxide‐κO)bis(3‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydroquinoxaline‐2‐carboxylato‐κ2N1,O2)copper(II)

The title compound, [Cu(C₉H₅N₂O₃)₂(C₂H₆OS)₂], consists of octahedrally coordinated Cu^II ions, with the 3‐oxo‐3,4‐dihydroquinoxaline‐2‐carboxylate ligands acting in a bidentate manner [Cu—O = 1.9116 (14) Å and Cu—N = 2.1191 (16) Å] and a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) molecule coordinated axially via the O atom [Cu—O = 2.336 (5) and 2.418 (7) Å for the major and minor disorder components, respectively]. The whole DMSO molecule exhibits positional disorder [0.62 (1):0.38 (1)]. The octahedron around the Cu^II atom, which lies on an inversion centre, is elongated in the axial direction, exhibiting a Jahn–Teller effect. The ligand exhibits tautomerization by H‐atom transfer from the hydroxyl group at position 3 to the N atom at position 4 of the quinoxaline ring of the ligand. The complex molecules are linked through an intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond [N...O = 2.838 (2) Å] formed between the quinoxaline NH group and a carboxylate O atom, and by a weak intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bond [3.392 (11) Å] formed between a carboxylate O atom and a methyl C atom of the DMSO ligand. There is a weak intramolecular C—H...O hydrogen bond [3.065 (3) Å] formed between a benzene CH group and a carboxylate O atom.     

Single Crystal Growth and Crystal Structure of Anhydrous Mercury(I) Nitrate,Hg2(NO3)2

Polycrystalline anhydrous Hg₂(NO₃)₂ was prepared by drying Hg₂(NO₃)₂·2H₂O over concentrated sulphuric acid. Evaporation of a concentrated and slightly acidified mercury(I) nitrate solution to which the same volumetric amount of pyridine was added, led to the growth of colourless rod‐like single crystals of Hg₂(NO₃)₂. Besides the title compound, crystals of hydrous Hg₂(NO₃)₂·2H₂O and the basic (Hg₂)₂(OH)(NO₃)₃ were formed as by‐products after a crystallization period of about 2 to 4 days at room temperature. The crystal structure was determined from two single crystal diffractometer data sets collected at —100°C and at room temperature: space group P2₁, Z = 4, —100°C [room temperature]: a = 6.2051(10) [6.2038(7)]Å, b = 8.3444(14) [8.3875(10)]Å, c = 11.7028(1) [11.7620(14)]Å, ß = 93.564(3) [93.415(2)]°, 3018 [3202] structure factors, 182 [182] parameters, R[Fμ² > 2σ(Fμ²)] = 0.0266 [0.0313]. The structure is built up of two crystallographically inequivalent Hg₂²⁺ dumbbells and four NO₃^— groups which form molecular [O₂N‐O‐Hg‐Hg‐O‐NO₂] units with short Hg‐O bonds. Via long Hg‐O bonds to adjacent nitrate groups the crystal packing is achieved. The Hg‐Hg distances with an average of d(Hg‐Hg) = 2.5072Å are in the typical range for mercurous oxo compounds. The oxygen coordination around the mercury dumbbells is asymmetric with four and six oxygen atoms as ligands for the two mercury atoms of each dumbbell. The nitrate groups deviate slightly from the geometry of an equilateral triangle with an average distance of d(N‐O) = 1.255Å.