首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)法对珠三角地区人群血浆中16种邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)的暴露情况进行分析。样品预处理采用乙腈沉淀蛋白,正己烷液液萃取。结果表明,血浆中检出邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二异丁酯(DiBP)、邻苯二甲酸二正丁酯(DnBP)、邻苯二甲酸丁基苄基酯(BBP)、邻苯二甲酸二环己基酯(DCHP)与邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)。其中DEHP的检出率为100%;其次为DiBP、DnBP与DMP,检出率分别为98.0%、62.0%和49.0%;DCHP与BBP的检出率最低,均为5.00%。∑PAEs的含量为12.4~1 399 ng/g,中值与平均值分别为39.8、57.7 ng/g。6种PAEs中DEHP占比最高,为90.01%~99.96%。对不同性别与年龄人群的PAEs暴露水平进行研究,发现女性与低年龄组(≤40岁)人群血浆中的PAEs浓度较高,但仅DMP存在显著性差异。  相似文献   

2.
鉴于现用标准的前处理方式存在操作复杂、耗时较长及设备昂贵等问题,选用易于实现的超声提取技术,通过考察不同提取条件对质控样中邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)类增塑剂提取效果的影响,提出了超声提取-气相色谱-质谱法测定塑料快递包装中邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸丁苄酯(BBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二正辛酯(DNOP)、邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)和邻苯二甲酸二异癸酯(DIDP)等6种PAEs类增塑剂含量的方法。将塑料包装样品剪成小块,称取0.5 g于玻璃萃取瓶中,加入20 mL二氯甲烷,于25℃超声30 min,上清液经0.45μm有机滤膜过滤,再加入一定量的邻苯二甲酸二戊酯(内标)溶液,使其质量浓度为5.0 mg·L^(-1)。6种PAEs在DB-5MS毛细管色谱柱上以柱升温程序的方式进行分离,用配有电子轰击离子源的质谱仪以全扫描方式进行检测,内标法定量。结果显示:6种PAEs标准曲线的线性范围为0.10~5.0 mg·L^(-1)(DBP、BBP、DEHP和DNOP)和1.0~50 mg·L^(-1)(DINP和DIDP),检出限(3S/N)为0.03~0.63 mg·kg^(-1);对空白样品进行加标回收试验,6种PAEs的回收率为92.2%~105%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)为0.76%~3.2%;方法用于10个塑料快递包装样品分析,除两种样品检出DBP和DEHP外,其他样品中均未检出目标物;对比了超声提取法、索氏提取法(GB/T 22048-2015)和微波消解法(SN/T 2249-2009)对质控样和实际样品测定结果的影响,质控样的测定结果均在认定值的不确定度范围内,实际样品中有3个样品检出DBP和DEHP,其余样品中均为未检出目标物,并且这3种前处理方式所得结果接近。  相似文献   

3.
采用静电纺丝法制备了聚酰胺6(PA6)纳米纤维膜, 结合固相萃取技术-液相色谱法(HPLC-UV)检测了市售牛奶样品中的6种邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)的含量. 对影响实验的各种因素, 如提取溶剂的种类及用量、超声时间、洗脱溶剂的种类及用量、纳米纤维膜的用量、pH及过样速度等进行了考察. 在最优化条件下, 邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯(DEP)、邻苯二甲酸丁基苄酯(BBP)、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己)酯(DEHP)和邻苯二甲酸二正辛酯(DOP)的检出限分别为0.02, 0.01, 0.05, 0.05, 0.10和0.25 ng/mL. 将该方法应用于不同品牌不同包装牛奶样品的检测, 只需2.5 mg PA6纳米纤维膜, 即可完全萃取样品中的PAEs, 相对标准偏差(RSD)小于5.82%, 回收率为93.40%~104.83%. 该方法测定牛奶中PAEs环境雌激素, 检出限低, 灵敏度高, 结果准确可靠, 重现性好.  相似文献   

4.
建立了一种快速、高效、灵敏的基质分散-磁性固相萃取/液相色谱(dMSPE/HPLC)方法,用于测定白酒中6种邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物(PAEs)残留量。样品用聚苯乙烯纳米磁性高分子材料进行富集处理后,经C8反相液相色谱柱(250 mm×4.6 mm×5μm)分离,以甲醇-水为流动相,梯度洗脱,230 nm检测。重点考察了样品p H值、吸附时间和洗脱剂的种类与用量等对PAEs富集回收率的影响。结果表明,在最佳实验条件下,6种PAEs在2~500 ng/L浓度范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数(r2)均不小于0.997 9;平均回收率为85.2%~101.2%,相对标准偏差(RSDs)为0.8%~9.2%;检出限(LODs)为0.22~4.5 ng/L,定量下限(LOQs)为1.2~10 ng/L。方法可用于白酒中PAEs的快速筛查和确证分析。  相似文献   

5.
邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)是塑化剂产品中使用最广泛的一类化合物,准确分析海洋中邻苯二甲酸酯的种类、组成及浓度水平,对认识PAEs在海洋环境的迁移变化及生态效应具有重要意义.本研究建立了固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用技术分析海水与沉积物中PAEs的方法,确定了萃取时间、萃取温度等最佳实验条件.本方法测定海水与沉积物中PAEs含量的精密度为±10%,检出限分别为0.04~0.32 ng/L和0.12~1.60μg/kg;除邻苯二甲酸二甲酯(DMP)外,海水中PAEs回收率为68.0%~114.0%,沉积物中PAEs回收率为76.4%~105.0%.利用本方法测得长江口及其邻近海域水体与沉积物中PAEs的浓度分别为0.270~1.39μg/L和0.79~34.8μg/kg.实验表明,本方法操作简单,准确度高,大大缩减了海水萃取体积,能够应用于近岸海水与沉积物中PAEs含量的准确分析.  相似文献   

6.
建立一种固相萃取(SPE)富集,超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法(UHPLC-MS/MS)检测水中6种痕量邻苯二甲酸酯类化合物[PAEs,包括邻苯二甲酸二(4-甲基-2-戊基)酯(BMPP)、邻苯二甲酸二己酯(DHXP)、邻苯二甲酸二环己酯(DCHP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-丁氧基)乙酯(DBEP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基)己酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二壬酯(DNP)]的方法。样品用Waters Oasis HLB SPE柱萃取,用Box-Behnken Design响应面设计优化水中PAEs提取的固相萃取条件:样品量为200 mL时,上样流量为3 mL·min~(-1),淋洗剂为9 mL的9%(体积分数)甲醇溶液,洗脱剂为6 mL甲醇和3 mL乙酸乙酯组成的混合溶液。洗脱液氮吹至近干,经甲醇复溶后过0.22μm有机滤膜,滤液供UHPLC-MS/MS分析。以Agilent Poroshell 120EC-C_(18)色谱柱为固定相,以不同体积比的甲醇和水组成的混合溶液为流动相进行梯度洗脱,色谱分离后的PAEs进入MS/MS,在电喷雾离子源正离子(ESI~+)模式和多反应监测(MRM)模式下检测。结果显示:在优化的试验条件下,6种PAEs可在9 min内完成出峰,6种PAEs的质量浓度均在1~20μg·L~(-1)内与其对应的峰面积呈线性关系,检出限(3S/N)为0.05~0.12μg·L~(-1)。对基质水样进行3个浓度水平的加标回收试验,所得回收率为79.2%~103%,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)为1.3%~9.2%。方法用于淮安市枯水期和丰水期出厂水、二次供水和末梢水的分析,研究了其污染特征,结果显示:6种PAEs均被不同程度地检出;枯水期水样中具有致癌风险的DEHP含量较高;丰水期水样中的DNP、DCHP、DHXP含量较枯水期的高;丰水期水样中的PAEs含量高于枯水期的。按照美国环境保护署(EPA)暴露风险评价方法对枯水期水样中的DEHP进行健康风险评估,所得风险值1.26×10~(-7)(女性)和1.03×10~(-7)(男性)均低于EPA和其他国际组织规定的标准限值(10~(-4)~10~(-6))。  相似文献   

7.
基质固相分散-气相色谱/质谱法测定蔬菜中的邻苯二甲酸酯   总被引:13,自引:0,他引:13  
王明林  寇立娟  张玉倩  史衍玺 《色谱》2007,25(4):577-580
利用基质固相分散-气相色谱/质谱法测定了蔬菜中的邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯、邻苯二甲酸丁基苄基酯和邻苯二甲酸二异辛酯。蔬菜样品经弗罗里硅土和石墨化炭黑研磨均匀后,用乙酸乙酯淋洗净化,结果表明:上述5种邻苯二甲酸酯在0.05~10.00 mg/L 范围内具有良好的线性,样品的添加回收率为76%~90%,相对标准偏差为2%~7%,5种邻苯二甲酸酯的检出限为0.01~0.024 mg/kg。该方法操作简便、经济,分析速度快,适用于大批量样品的分析。  相似文献   

8.
采用气相色谱-串联质谱法测定蔬菜和土壤中17种邻苯二甲酸酯的含量。蔬菜样品用乙腈均质提取,土壤利用水和乙腈振荡提取。在气相色谱分离中用DB-1701MS色谱柱为固定相,在质谱分析中采用多反应监测模式。17种邻苯二甲酸酯的质量浓度均在2.00~500μg·L-1范围内与其峰面积呈线性关系,测定下限(10S/N)在0.01~0.32μg·kg-1之间。以空白样品为基体进行加标回收试验,所得回收率在71.1%~118%之间,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=6)在0.20%~15%之间。  相似文献   

9.
建立了加速溶剂萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱法测定玩具中邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)、邻苯二甲酸丁苄酯(BBP)、邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基)己酯(DEHP)、邻苯二甲酸二正辛酯(DNOP)、邻苯二甲酸二异壬酯(DINP)和邻苯二甲酸二异癸酯(DIDP)6种邻苯二甲酸酯类增塑剂的分析方法。采用加速溶剂萃取方式提取样品中6种增塑剂,二氯甲烷作溶剂,外标法定量,LC-MS/MS分析时间12 min。玩具中DBP、BBP、DEHP、DNOP、DINP和DIDP平均加标回收率92.7%~101.4%;平均相对标准偏差为3.3%~4.1%;检出限分别为50、10、40、40、90和100μg/kg。方法已经应用于玩具材料中上述6种增塑剂的测定。  相似文献   

10.
林兴桃  王小逸  赵靖强 《色谱》2016,34(5):528-532
建立了固相萃取-气相色谱-质谱测定尿液中邻苯二甲酸单酯和双酯的分析方法。尿液经 β-葡萄糖苷酸酶酶解后进行固相萃取净化,用乙腈、乙酸乙酯和乙醚-正己烷(1: 19, v/v)分别洗脱,合并洗脱液,氮气吹干后,用N,O-双三甲基硅基三氟乙酰胺(BSTFA)对邻苯二甲酸单酯进行硅烷化处理,使用气相色谱-质谱法检测。邻苯二甲酸单酯和双酯的线性范围为5~1000 μ g/L,检出限为0.3~1.1 μ g/L,回收率为77.9%~97.7%,相对标准偏差为3.7%~10.9%。应用该方法对50份尿液进行检测,检出邻苯二甲酸二(2-乙基己基)酯(DEHP)等7种邻苯二甲酸单酯和双酯类物质,平均质量浓度为6.0~142.7 μ g/L。该方法准确、可靠、灵敏度高,适用于尿液中邻苯二甲酸单酯和双酯的同时测定。  相似文献   

11.
A novel method using microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography combining accelerated solvent extraction was developed for quantitative analysis of six phthalate esters (PAEs) including dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, benzyl butyl phthalate, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, as well as dioctyl phthalate. The effect of each individual component within the microemulsions, i.e. oil phase, surfactant and co-surfactant on resolution of the analytes was systematically studied. Baseline separation of six PAEs was achieved within 26?min by using the microemulsion buffer containing a 60?mmol/L borate buffer at pH 9.0, 0.5% v/v n-octane as oil droplets, 100?mmol/L sodium cholate as surfactant and 5.0% v/v 1-butanol as co-surfactant. The purposed accelerated solvent extraction-microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography method was successfully applied to the determination of trace amount of PAEs in soil samples collected from three different fields in areas of Fujian Province and the contents of dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, benzyl butyl phthalate, bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and dioctyl phthalate were 0.63-0.68, 0.32-0.63, 2.53-3.96, 0-1.75, 7.32-11.7 and 0-3.46mg/kg, respectively. It was validated that the results were consistent with those obtained by GC-MS method.  相似文献   

12.
A simple and rapid method using microextraction by packed sorbent coupled with gas chromatography and mass spectrometry has been developed for the analysis of five phthalates, namely, diethyl phthalate, benzyl‐n‐butyl phthalate, dicyclohexyl phthalate, di‐n‐butyl phthalate, and di‐n‐propyl phthalate, in cold drink and cosmetic samples. The various parameters that influence the microextraction by packed sorbent performance such as extraction cycle (extract–discard), type and amount of solvent, washing solvent, and pH have been studied. The optimal conditions of microextraction using C18 as the packed sorbent were 15 extraction cycles with water as washing solvent and 3 × 10 μL of ethyl acetate as the eluting solvent. Chromatographic separation was also optimized for injection temperature, flow rate, ion source, interface temperature, column temperature gradient and mass spectrometry was evaluated using the scan and selected ion monitoring data acquisition mode. Satisfactory results were obtained in terms of linearity with R2 >0.9992 within the established concentration range. The limit of detection was 0.003–0.015 ng/mL, and the limit of quantification was 0.009–0.049 ng/mL. The recoveries were in the range of 92.35–98.90% for cold drink, 88.23–169.20% for perfume, and 88.90–184.40% for cream. Analysis by microextraction by packed sorbent promises to be a rapid method for the determination of these phthalates in cold drink and cosmetic samples, reducing the amount of sample, solvent, time and cost.  相似文献   

13.
A method for determining a group of phthalate esters in pharmaceutical formulae used in parenteral nutrition samples (with and without vitamins) has been developed. The phthalic acid esters (PAEs) studied were dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, butyl benzyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate, di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, and dioctyl phthalate. This group of phthalates was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry, working in positive ion mode. The phthalates analyzed were extracted from the sample using hexane and sodium hydroxide. The hexane was then evaporated, and the compounds were redissolved in acetonitrile. The compounds were separated by HPLC working in gradient mode with acetonitrile-ultrapure water starting from 5% to 75% acetonitrile in 5 min, followed by isocratic elution for 27 min. Standard calibration curves were linear for all the analytes over the concentration range 10–250 μg L−1. The method was precise (with RSD from 3.3% to 12.9%) and sensitive. The proposed analytical method has been applied to the analysis of these compounds in different pharmaceutical formulae (with different compositions) for parenteral nutrition samples in order to check the presence of phthalates and determine their concentration.  相似文献   

14.
A novel method using vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced‐emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction has been developed for the extraction of phthalate esters (PAEs) in Chinese liquor samples prior to analysis by GC–MS. In the proposed method, a high‐density extraction solvent (carbon tetrachloride) was dispersed into samples with the aid of a surfactant (Triton X‐100) and vortex agitation, resulting in a short extraction equilibrium (30 s). After centrifugation, a single microdrop of solvent was easily collected for GC–MS analysis. Key factors that affected the extraction efficiency were optimized. Under the optimum conditions, linearity was found in the range from 0.05 to 50 μg/L. Coefficients of determination varied from 0.9938 to 0.9971. LODs, based on an S/N of 3, ranged from 4.9 to 13 ng/L. Enrichment factors varied from 140 to 184. Reproducibility and recoveries were assessed by testing a series of three liquor samples that were spiked with different concentration levels. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of PAEs in 16 Chinese liquor samples. In this work, high‐density‐solvent vortex‐assisted surfactant‐enhanced‐emulsification liquid–liquid microextraction was applied for the first time for the extraction of PAEs in Chinese liquor samples and was proved to be simple, rapid, and sensitive.  相似文献   

15.
A sensitive liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry method combined with solid-phase extraction and silica cartridge cleanup was established for 16 sulfonamides and trimethoprim in various water matrices. Signal suppression of all target analytes in sewage treatment plant influent, effluent and river water was improved by this method developed in this study. The method detection limits for 17 analytes were 20-200 pg/L for influent, 16-120 pg/L for effluent and 8.0-60 pg/L for river water with overall mean recoveries of 62-102% in all studied matrices. This method was used to analyze residual sulfonamides and trimethoprim in wastewater and river samples from Japan, and 8 analytes (0.08 (sulfadimethoxine)-161 ng/L (sulfapyridine) in wastewater and 10 (0.03 (sulfamethizol)-8.9 ng/L (sulfaquinoxaline) in river samples were detected.  相似文献   

16.
建立了采用超声辅助分散液液微萃取技术结合高效液相色谱法(UA-DLLME-HPLC)对4种邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)进行富集、检测的方法,并成功应用于实际水样分析。实验中采用富集因子来评价萃取效率,考察并优化了影响萃取效率的主要因素,包括萃取剂类型和用量、分散剂类型和用量、超声时间、离子强度、萃取时间和pH值等。结果表明: 在最佳萃取条件下,该法对4种PAEs(邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、邻苯二甲酸二乙酯、邻苯二甲酸二丁酯和邻苯二甲酸二正辛酯)具有较高的富集能力,富集因子分别为71、144、169和159;检出限分别为3.78、1.77、3.07和3.30 μg/L。对实验室自来水、某品牌矿泉水以及湖水分别加标50、200及500 μg/L的回收率为82.99%~114.47%,相对标准偏差为1.93%~8.31%。该法简便、快速、环保,可以用于测定实际水样中的PAEs类增塑剂。  相似文献   

17.
本文建立了固相萃取-气相色谱法定量分析地下水中酞酸酯类(PAEs)有机污染物的方法。利用正交试验和单因素实验对影响回收率的4个主要因素(洗脱溶剂种类、水样体积、洗脱溶剂体积、固相萃取小柱填料量)进行了萃取条件的优化。综合考虑各方面因素后确定的最佳萃取条件为:二氯甲烷和丙酮为洗脱剂,体积8mL、0.5L水样、柱填料500mg。方法线性范围0.05~10.00μg/L,检出限0.05~0.341ng/L,相对标准偏差0.038%~1.107%。该方法应用于江汉平原地下水中PAEs测定,取得满意结果。  相似文献   

18.
A novel method based on column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry (LC-MS) coupled with an on-line extraction column containing conjugated avidin has been developed for direct injection analysis of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and its metabolite, mono(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), in blood samples. The sample preparation for on-line extraction involved the mixing of blood samples with internal standards, DEHP-d(4) and MEHP-d(4), in LC glass vials. A linear response was found for column-switching LC-MS when tests were conducted within the validated range of 25 to 1000 ng mL(-1) for DEHP and 5 to 1000 ng mL(-1) for MEHP, with correlation coefficients (r) greater than 0.999. In addition, the recoveries of DEHP and MEHP from human plasma were calculated by using this method with on-line extraction, yielding recoveries of up to 91.2% (RSD<5%). We measured the background levels of DEHP and MEHP in six human plasma samples from healthy volunteers and three fetal bovine serum samples for cell-line culture. DEHP and MEHP were not detected in all human plasma samples (N.D. is <25 ng mL(-1) for DEHP, and N.D. is <5.0 ng mL(-1) for MEHP). In contrast, high DEHP contamination of commercially available fetal bovine serum samples was found by this method.  相似文献   

19.
许兵兵  李晓敏  张庆合  朱维晃 《色谱》2018,36(8):786-794
建立了气相色谱-串联质谱(GC-MS/MS)测定复杂基体婴儿奶粉中16种邻苯二甲酸酯类塑化剂的分析方法。奶粉样品以水溶解均质,乙腈提取,乙二胺-N-丙基硅烷(PSA)类型玻璃固相萃取柱净化,DB-5 MS UI气相色谱柱(30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm)分离,同位素稀释质谱法(IDMS)定量。比较了氧化铝/PSA和PSA两种固相萃取柱在不同洗脱条件下萃取16种塑化剂的回收率。最终选择PSA固相萃取柱,以正己烷-丙酮(60:40,v/v)作为洗脱溶剂,实现奶粉基体中16种塑化剂的净化。采用基质匹配同位素内标法定量,16种塑化剂在0.01~2.0 mg/kg范围内线性良好,线性相关系数(R2)大于0.9996,检出限和定量限分别是0.15~2.50 μg/kg和0.50~8.33 μg/kg,加标回收率为96.1%~104.0%,相对标准偏差(RSD)小于3.3%(n=5),该方法灵敏度好、精密度高,适用于婴儿奶粉基体中16种塑化剂的痕量分析。  相似文献   

20.
A method for the determination of 5 triazine herbicides and 12 degradation products in environmental water samples using liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/MS) has been developed. The pesticides in water were extracted with two types of solid phase: a styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer and a graphitized carbon black. Desorption solvents for the extracted compounds were acetone for the styrene-divinylbenzene copolymer and methanol for the graphitized carbon black. Overall recoveries from ground water and river water ranged from 73% to 111%. The limits of detection (LODs) were 0.2 to 28 ng l(-1). This method was applied to several ground water samples.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号