MnTaO2N: Polar LiNbO3‐type Oxynitride with a Helical Spin Order

The synthesis, structure, and magnetic properties of a polar and magnetic oxynitride MnTaO₂N are reported. High‐pressure synthesis at 6 GPa and 1400 °C allows for the stabilization of a high‐density structure containing middle‐to‐late transition metals. Synchrotron X‐ray and neutron diffraction studies revealed that MnTaO₂N adopts the LiNbO₃‐type structure, with a random distribution of O^2? and N^3? anions. MnTaO₂N with an “orbital‐inactive” Mn²⁺ ion (d⁵; S=5/2) exhibits a nontrivial helical spin order at 25 K with a propagation vector of [0,0,δ] (δ≈0.3), which is different from the conventional G‐type order observed in other orbital‐inactive perovskite oxides and LiNbO₃‐type oxides. This result suggests the presence of strong frustration because of the heavily tilted MnO₄N₂ octahedral network combined with the mixed O^2?/N^3? species that results in a distribution of (super)‐superexchange interactions.     

Tuning the Magnetic Moment of [Ru2(DPhF)3(O2CMe)L]+ Complexes (DPhF=N,N′‐Diphenylformamidinate): A Theoretical Explanation of the Axial Ligand Influence

The magnetic behaviour of the compounds containing the [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)]⁺ ion (DPhF^?=N,N′‐diphenylformamidinate) shows a strong dependence on the nature of the ligand bonded to the axial position. The new complexes [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(OPMe₃)][BF₄]?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ ( 1 ? 0.5 CH₂Cl₂) and [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(4‐pic)][BF₄] ( 2 ) (4‐pic=4‐methylpyridine) clearly display this influence. Complex 1 ?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ shows a magnetic moment corresponding to a S=3/2 system affected by the common zero‐field splitting (ZFS) and a weak antiferromagnetic interaction, whereas complex 2 displays an intermediate behaviour between S=3/2 and S=1/2 systems. The experimental data of complex 1 are fitted with a model that considers the ZFS effect using the Hamiltonian ?_D= S ? D ? S . The weak antiferromagnetic coupling is introduced as a perturbation, using the molecular field approximation. DFT calculations demonstrate that, in the [Ru₂(O₂CMe)(DPhF)₃(L)]⁺ complexes, the energy level of the metal–metal molecular orbitals is strongly dependent on the nature of the axial ligand (L). This study reveals that the increase in the π‐acceptor character of L leads to a greater split between the π* and δ* HOMO orbitals. The influence of the axial ligand in the relative energy between the doublet and quartet states in this type of complexes was also analysed. This study was performed on the new complexes 1 ?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ and 2 . The previously isolated [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(OH₂)][BF₄]?0.5 CH₂Cl₂ ( 3 ? 0.5 CH₂Cl₂) and [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)(CO)][BF₄]?CH₂Cl₂ ( 4 ?CH₂Cl₂) complexes were also included in this study as representative examples of spin‐admixed and low‐spin configurations, respectively. The [Ru₂(DPhF)₃(O₂CMe)]⁺ ( 5 ) unit was used as a reference compound. These theoretical studies are in accordance with the different magnetic behaviour experimentally observed.     

Stabilization of High‐Valence Ruthenium with Silicotungstate Ligands: Preparation,Structural Characterization,and Redox Studies of Ruthenium(III)‐Substituted α‐Keggin‐Type Silicotungstates with Pyridine Ligands, [SiW11O39RuIII(Py)]5−

Ruthenium(III)‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type silicotungstates with pyridine‐based ligands, [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(Py)]^5?, (Py: pyridine ( 1 ), 4‐pyridine‐carboxylic acid ( 2 ), 4,4′‐bipyridine ( 3 ), 4‐pyridine‐acetamide ( 4 ), and 4‐pyridine‐methanol ( 5 )) were prepared by reacting [SiW₁₁O₃₉Ru^III(H₂O)]^5? with the pyridine derivatives in water at 80 °C and then isolated as their hydrated cesium salts. These compounds were characterized using cyclic voltammetry (CV), UV/Vis, IR, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, titration, and X‐ray absorption near‐edge structure (XANES) analysis (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis of compounds 2 , 3 , and 4 revealed that Ru^III was incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and was coordinated by pyridine derivatives through a Ru? N bond. In the solid state, compounds 2 and 3 formed a dimer through π? π interaction of the pyridine moieties, whereas they existed as monomers in solution. CV indicated that the incorporated Ru^III–Py was reversibly oxidized into the Ru^IV–Py derivative and reduced into the Ru^II–Py derivative.     

Synthesis,crystal structure and magnetic properties of diaquabis(2,6‐diamino‐7H‐purin‐1‐ium‐κN9)bis(4,4′‐oxydibenzoato‐κO)cobalt(II) dihydrate

The title mononuclear Co^II complex, [Co(C₅H₇N₆)₂(C₁₄H₈O₅)₂(H₂O)₂]·2H₂O, has been synthesized and its crystal structure determined by X‐ray diffraction. The complex crystallizes in the triclinic space group P, with one formula unit per cell (Z = 1 and Z′ = ). It consists of a mononuclear unit with the Co^II ion on an inversion centre coordinated by two 2,6‐diamino‐7H‐purin‐1‐ium cations, two 4,4′‐oxydibenzoate anions (in a nonbridging κO‐monodentate coordination mode, which is less common for the anion in its Co^II complexes) and two water molecules, defining an octahedral environment around the metal atom. There is a rich assortment of nonbonding interactions, among which a strong N⁺—H…O⁻ bridge, with a short N…O distance of 2.5272 (18) Å, stands out, with the H atom ostensibly displaced away from its expected position at the donor side, towards the acceptor. The complex molecules assemble into a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded network. A variable‐temperature magnetic study between 2 and 300 K reveals an orbital contribution to the magnetic moment and a weak antiferromagnetic interaction between Co^II centres as the temperature decreases. The model leads to the following values: A (crystal field strength) = 1.81, λ (spin‐orbit coupling) = −59.9 cm⁻¹, g (Landé factor) = 2.58 and zJ (exchange coupling) = −0.5 cm⁻¹.     

[UF6]2−: A Molecular Hexafluorido Actinide(IV) Complex with Compensating Spin and Orbital Magnetic Moments

The first structurally characterized hexafluorido complex of a tetravalent actinide ion, the [UF₆]^2? anion, is reported in the (NEt₄)₂[UF₆]?2 H₂O salt ( 1 ). The weak magnetic response of 1 results from both U^IV spin and orbital contributions, as established by combining X‐ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) spectroscopy and bulk magnetization measurements. The spin and orbital moments are virtually identical in magnitude, but opposite in sign, resulting in an almost perfect cancellation, which is corroborated by ab initio calculations. This work constitutes the first experimental demonstration of a seemingly non‐magnetic molecular actinide complex carrying sizable spin and orbital magnetic moments.     

Dual Role of the 1,2,3‐Triazolium Ring as a Hydrogen‐Bond Donor and Anion–π Receptor in Anion‐Recognition Processes

Several bis(triazolium)‐based receptors have been synthesized as chemosensors for anion recognition. The central naphthalene core features two aryltriazolium side‐arms. NMR experiments revealed differences between the binding modes of the two triazolium rings: one triazolium ring acts as a hydrogen‐bond donor, the other as an anion–π receptor. Receptors 9²⁺?2BF₄ ^? (C₆H₅), 11²⁺?2BF₄ ^? (4‐NO₂?C₆H₄), and 13²⁺?2BF^4? (ferrocenyl) bind HP₂O₇^3? anions in a mixed‐binding mode that features a combination of hydrogen‐bonding and anion–π interactions and results in strong binding. On the other hand, receptor 10²⁺?2 BF₄ ^? (4‐CH₃O?C₆H₄) only displays combined Csp₂?H/anion–π interactions between the two arms of the receptors and the bound anion rather than triazolium (CH)⁺???anion hydrogen bonding. All receptors undergo a downfield shift of the triazolium protons, as well as the inner naphthalene protons, in the presence of H₂PO₄^? anions. That suggests that only hydrogen‐bonding interactions exist between the binding site and the bound anion, and involve a combination of cationic (triazolium) and neutral (naphthalene) C?H donor interactions. Theoretical calculations relate the electronic structure of the substituent on the aromatic group with the interaction energies and provide a minimum‐energy conformation for all the complexes that explains their measured properties.     

Composition‐Tailored 2 D Mn1−xRuxO2 Nanosheets and Their Reassembled Nanocomposites: Improvement of Electrode Performance upon Ru Substitution

Composition‐tailored Mn_1?xRu_xO₂ 2 D nanosheets and their reassembled nanocomposites with mesoporous stacking structure are synthesized by a soft‐chemical exfoliation reaction and the subsequent reassembling of the exfoliated nanosheets with Li⁺ cations, respectively. The tailoring of the chemical compositions of the exfoliated Mn_1?xRu_xO₂ 2 D nanosheets and their lithiated nanocomposites can be achieved by adopting the Ru‐substituted layered manganese oxides as host materials for exfoliation reaction. Upon the exfoliation–reassembling process, the substituted ruthenium ions remain stabilized in the layered Mn_1?xRu_xO₂ lattice with mixed Ru³⁺/Ru⁴⁺ oxidation state. The reassembled Li–Mn_1?xRu_xO₂ nanocomposites show promising pseudocapacitance performance with large specific capacitances of approximately 330 F g^?1 for the second cycle and approximately 360 F g^?1 for the 500th cycle and excellent cyclability, which are superior to those of the unsubstituted Li–MnO₂ homologue and many other MnO₂‐based materials. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis provides strong evidence for the enhancement of the electrical conductivity of 2 D nanostructured manganese oxide upon Ru substitution, which is mainly responsible for the excellent electrode performance of Li–Mn_1?xRu_xO₂ nanocomposites. The results underscore the powerful role of the composition‐controllable metal oxide 2 D nanosheets as building blocks for exploring efficient electrode materials.     

Vicinal Dinitridoruthenium‐Substituted Polyoxometalates γ‐[XW10O38{RuN}2]6− (X=Si or Ge)

Reaction of the divacant polyoxometalate K₈[γ‐XW₁₀O₃₆] (X=Si, Ge) with two equivalents of the metal‐nitrido precursor Cs₂[Ru^VINCl₅], at room temperature in water, produces K₂(Me₂NH₂)₂H₂[γ‐XW₁₀O₃₈{RuN}₂], X=Si ( DMA ‐ 1 a ) or Ge ( DMA ‐ 1 b ). The X‐ray crystal structures of both complexes show monomeric complexes with highly unusual vicinal terminal metal‐nitrido units. The Ru?N bond lengths are 1.594(10) and 1.612(11) Å in 1 a and 1 b , respectively. EXAFS studies confirmed the key structural assignments from X‐ray crystallography. The XANES spectrum of DMA‐1 a , diamagnetism, NMR (²⁹Si and ¹⁸³W) chemical shifts, voltammetric behavior, reductive titrations with [PW₁₂O₄₀]^4?, and computational data are all consistent with d² Ru^VI centers in these complexes. The FT‐IR and Raman spectra show the expected vibrational modes of the {γ‐XW₁₀} unit and the Ru?N stretch at 1080 cm^?1, respectively. Interestingly, reduction of DMA‐1 a by 4 equivalents of [PW₁₂O₄₀]^4? produces NH₃ in nearly quantitative yield. Cyclic voltammetry versus pH and calculations provide the energetics for the possible two‐electron reduction and two‐proton addition processes in this reaction.     

Experimental and DFT Evidence for the Fractional Non‐Innocence of a β‐Diketonate Ligand

New compounds [Ru(pap)₂(L)](ClO₄), [Ru(pap)(L)₂], and [Ru(acac)₂(L)] (pap=2‐phenylazopyridine, L^?=9‐oxidophenalenone, acac^?=2,4‐pentanedionate) have been prepared and studied regarding their electron‐transfer behavior, both experimentally and by using DFT calculations. [Ru(pap)₂(L)](ClO₄) and [Ru(acac)₂(L)] were characterized by crystal‐structure analysis. Spectroelectrochemistry (EPR, UV/Vis/NIR), in conjunction with cyclic voltammetry, showed a wide range of about 2 V for the potential of the Ru^III/II couple, which was in agreement with the very different characteristics of the strongly π‐accepting pap ligand and the σ‐donating acac^? ligand. At the rather high potential of +1.35 V versus SCE, the oxidation of L^? into L^. could be deduced from the near‐IR absorption of [Ru^III(pap)(L^.)(L^?)]²⁺. Other intense long‐wavelength transitions, including LMCT (L^?→Ru^III) and LL/CT (pap^.?→L^?) processes, were confirmed by TD‐DFT results. DFT calculations and EPR data for the paramagnetic intermediates allowed us to assess the spin densities, which revealed two cases with considerable contributions from L‐radical‐involving forms, that is, [Ru^III(pap⁰)₂(L^?)]²⁺?[Ru^II(pap⁰)₂(L^.)]²⁺ and [Ru^III(pap⁰)(L^?)₂]⁺?[Ru^II(pap⁰)(L^?)(L^?)]⁺. Calculations of electrogenerated complex [Ru^II(pap^.?)(pap⁰)(L^?)] displayed considerable negative spin density (?0.188) at the bridging metal.     

(8‐Dimethylamino‐1‐naphthyl)dimethylammonium 3‐carboxy‐1,4,5,‐6,7,7‐hexachlorobicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐ene‐2‐carboxylate hydrate

The structure of the title compound, C₁₄H₁₉N₂⁺·C₉H₃Cl₆O₄^?·H₂O, consists of singly ionized 1,4,5,6,7,7‐hexachlorobicyclo[2.2.1]hept‐5‐ene‐2,3‐dicarboxylic acid anions and protonated 1,8‐bis(dimethylamino)naphthalene cations. In the (8‐dimethylamino‐1‐napthyl)dimethylammonium cat­ion, a strong disordered intramolecular hydrogen bond is formed with N?N = 2.589 (3) Å. The geometry and occupancy obtained in the final restrained refinement suggest that the disordered hydrogen bond may be asymmetric. Water mol­ecules link the anion dimers into infinite chains via hydrogen bonding.     

Preparation and StructuralCharacterization of RuII‐DMSO and RuIII‐DMSO‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type Phosphotungstates, [PW11O39RuIIDMSO]5– and [PW11O39RuIIIDMSO]4–, and Catalytic Activity for Water Oxidation

Ru^II‐ and Ru^III‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type phosphotungstates with a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligand, [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIDMSO]^5– ( 1 ) and [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIIDMSO]^4– ( 2 ), were synthesized. Compound 1 was prepared by reaction of [PW₁₁O₃₉]^7– with [Ru^II(DMSO)₄]Cl₂ in water at 125 °C under hydrothermal conditions and was isolated as a cesium salt. Compound 2 was prepared by reaction of 1 with bromine in water at 60 °C and was isolated as a cesium salt. The compounds were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, elemental analysis, UV/Vis, IR,³¹P NMR, ¹⁸³W NMR, ¹H NMR, and XANES (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge)spectroscopic methods. Single crystal structural analysis of 1 revealed that Ru^II is incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and coordinated by DMSO through a Ru–S bond. Cyclic voltammetry of 1 indicated that the incorporated Ru^II‐DMSO is reversibly oxidizable to the Ru^III‐DMSO derivative 2 . Compound 1 showed catalytic activity for water oxidation in the presence of cerium ammonium nitrate as an oxidant.     

Tetra‐μ‐acetato‐κ8O:O′‐bis[(N1,N2‐di‐p‐anisylformamidine‐κN2)ruthenium(II)](Ru—Ru): an example of an axial bis‐adduct of {Ru2}4+ tetracarboxyl­ate with N‐donor ligands

The title compound, [Ru₂(C₂H₃O₂)₄(C₁₅H₁₆N₂O₂)₂], lies on a crystallographic inversion center and exhibits an Ru—Ru bond length of 2.2847 (8) Å. There are weak intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the N¹,N²‐di‐p‐anisylformamidine (HDAniF) ligands and the bridging acetate ligands. The molecule is one of the few examples of a crystallographically characterized axial bis‐adduct of a {Ru₂}⁴⁺ complex with two N‐donor ligands.     

Contrasting Magnetic Behaviors in Rhodium‐ and Ruthenium‐Doped Cubic Perovskite SrFeO3: Nearly Ferromagnetic Metal versus Spin‐Glass Insulator

The effects of Rh and Ru doping for SrFeO₃, a helimagnetic metal with a cubic perovskite structure, are studied by magnetic and resistivity measurements. Although SrRhO₃ is a paramagnetic metal and SrRuO₃ is a ferromagnetic one, the Rh doping induces a nearly ferromagnetic metallic state, whereas the Ru doping induces a spin‐glass insulating state. Mössbauer measurements evidence a marked difference between SrFe_0.8Rh_0.2O₃ and SrFe_0.8Ru_0.2O₃ in the formal valences of Fe, which are estimated to be 4+ and 3.75+, respectively. The contrasting magnetic behaviors of Rh‐ and Ru‐doped SrFeO₃ are discussed in terms of the subtle balance between the double‐exchange ferromagnetism and the superexchange antiferromagnetism.     

Regioselective synthesis and characterization of monovanadium‐substituted β‐octamolybdate [VMo7O26]5−

The monovanadium‐substituted polyoxometalate anion [VMo₇O₂₆]^5?, exhibiting a β‐octamolybdate archetype structure, was selectively prepared as pentapotassium [hexaikosaoxido(heptamolybdenumvanadium)]ate hexahydrate, K₅[VMo₇O₂₆]·6H₂O ( VMo₇ ), by oxidation of a reduced vanadomolybdate solution with hydrogen peroxide in a fast one‐pot approach. X‐ray structure analysis revealed that the V atom occupies a single position in the cluster that differs from the other positions by the presence of one doubly‐bonded O atom instead of two terminal oxide ligands in all other positions. The composition and structure of VMo₇ was also confirmed by elemental analyses and IR spectroscopy. The selectivity of the synthesis was inspected by a ⁵¹V NMR investigation which showed that this species bound about 95% of V^V in the crystallization solution. Upon dissolution of VMo₇ in aqueous solution, the [VMo₇O₂₆]^5? anion is substantially decomposed, mostly into [VMo₅O₁₉]^3?, α‐[VMo₇O₂₆]^4? and [V₂Mo₄O₁₉]^4?, depending on the pH.     

A Diruthenium‐Based Mixed Spin Complex Ru25+(S=1/2)‐CN‐Ru25+(S=3/2)

An unusual tetra‐nuclear linear cyanido‐bridged complex [Ru₂(μ‐ap)₄‐CN‐Ru₂(μ‐ap)₄](BPh₄) ( 1 ) (ap=2‐anilinopyridinate) has been synthesized and well characterized. The crystallographic data, magnetic measurement, IR, EPR and theoretical calculation results demonstrate that complex 1 is the first example of mixed spin Ru₂⁵⁺‐based complex with uncommon electronic configurations of S=1/2 for the cyanido‐C bound Ru₂⁵⁺ and S=3/2 for the cyanido‐N bound Ru₂⁵⁺. This phenomenon can be understood by the theoretical calculation results that from the precursor Ru₂(μ‐ap)₄(CN) (S=3/2) to complex 1 the energy gap between π* and δ* orbitals of the cyanido‐C bound Ru₂⁵⁺ core increases from 0.57 to 1.61 eV due to the enhancement of asymmetrical π back‐bonding effect, but that of the cyanido‐N bound Ru₂⁵⁺ core is essential identical (0.56 eV). Besides, the analysis of UV/Vis‐NIR spectra suggests that there exists metal to metal charge transfer (MMCT) from the cyanido‐N bound Ru₂⁵⁺ (S=3/2) to the cyanido‐C bound Ru₂⁵⁺ (S=1/2), supported by the TDDFT calculations.     

Unraveling σ and π Effects on Magnetic Anisotropy in cis‐NiA4B2 Complexes: Magnetization,HF‐HFEPR Studies,First‐Principles Calculations,and Orbital Modeling

By using complementary experimental techniques and first‐principles theoretical calculations, magnetic anisotropy in a series of five hexacoordinated nickel(II) complexes possessing a symmetry close to C_2v, has been investigated. Four complexes have the general formula [Ni(bpy)X₂]ⁿ⁺ (bpy=2,2′‐bipyridine; X₂=bpy ( 1 ), (NCS^?)₂ ( 2 ), C₂O₄^2? ( 3 ), NO₃^? ( 4 )). In the fifth complex, [Ni(HIM₂‐py)₂(NO₃)]⁺ ( 5 ; HIM₂‐py=2‐(2‐pyridyl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazolyl‐1‐hydroxy), which was reported previously, the two bpy bidentate ligands were replaced by HIM₂‐py. Analysis of the high‐field, high‐frequency electronic paramagnetic resonance (HF‐HFEPR) spectra and magnetization data leads to the determination of the spin Hamiltonian parameters. The D parameter, corresponding to the axial magnetic anisotropy, was negative (Ising type) for the five compounds and ranged from ?1 to ?10 cm^?1. First‐principles SO‐CASPT2 calculations have been performed to estimate these parameters and rationalize the experimental values. From calculations, the easy axis of magnetization is in two different directions for complexes 2 and 3 , on one hand, and 4 and 5 , on the other hand. A new method is proposed to calculate the g tensor for systems with S=1. The spin Hamiltonian parameters (D (axial), E (rhombic), and g_i) are rationalized in terms of ordering of the 3 d orbitals. According to this orbital model, it can be shown that 1) the large magnetic anisotropy of 4 and 5 arises from splitting of the e_g‐like orbitals and is due to the difference in the σ‐donor strength of NO₃^? and bpy or HIM₂‐py, whereas the difference in anisotropy between the two compounds is due to splitting of the t_2g‐like orbitals; and 2) the anisotropy of complexes 1 – 3 arises from the small splitting of the t_2g‐like orbitals. The direction of the anisotropy axis can be rationalized by the proposed orbital model.     

Combined Experimental and Computational Studies on the Physical and Chemical Properties of the Renewable Amide, 3‐Acetamido‐5‐acetylfuran

The pK_a of 3‐acetamido‐5‐acetylfuran (3A5AF) was predicted to be in the range 18.5–21.5 by using the B3LYP/6‐311+G(2d,p) method and several amides as references. The experimental pK_a value, 20.7, was determined through UV/Vis titrations. Its solubility was measured in methanol‐modified supercritical CO₂ (mole fraction, 3.23×10^?4, cloud points 40–80 °C) and it was shown to be less soluble than 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (5‐HMF). Dimerization energies were calculated for 3A5AF and 5‐HMF to compare hydrogen bonding, as such interactions will affect their solubility. Infrared and ¹H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of 3A5AF samples support the existence of intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The highest occupied molecular orbital, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital, and electrostatic potential of 3A5AF were determined through molecular orbital calculations using B3LYP/6‐311+G(2d,p). The π–π* transition energy (time‐dependent density functional theory study) was compared with UV/Vis data. Calculated atomic charges were used in an attempt to predict the reactivity of 3A5AF. A reaction between 3A5AF and CH₃MgBr was conducted. As 3A5AF is a recently developed renewable compound that has previously not been studied extensively, these studies will be helpful in designing future reactions and processes involving this molecule.     

Pefloxacinium methane­sulfonate 0.10‐hydrate

The crystal structure of 4‐(3‐carboxy‐1‐ethyl‐6‐fluoro‐1,4‐di­hydro‐4‐oxo‐7‐quinolyl)‐1‐methyl­piperazinium methane­sulfonate 0.10‐hydrate, C₁₇H₂₁FN₃O₃⁺·CH₃O₃S^?·0.10H₂O, contains pefloxacinium cations, methane­sulfonate anions and a partially occupied water of solvation. The quinoline ring system in the cation is essentially planar. The anions lie parallel to each other about inversion centers. The structure is stabilized by strong hydrogen bonds involving the terminal piperazinyl‐N atom of the cation and an O atom of the anion [N?O 2.739 (2) Å], and a strong intramolecular hydrogen bond between carbonyl and carboxyl groups [O?O 2.523 (2) Å].     

Two‐Orbital Three‐Electron Stabilizing Interaction for Direct Co2+As3+ Bonds involving Square‐Planar CoO4 in BaCoAs2O5

The quest for new oxides with cations containing active lone‐pair electrons (E) covers a broad field of targeted specificities owing to asymmetric electronic distribution and their particular band structure. Herein, we show that the novel compound BaCoAs₂O₅, with lone‐pair As³⁺ ions, is built from rare square‐planar Co²⁺O₄ involved in direct bonding between As³⁺E and Co²⁺ d_z2 orbitals (Co? As=2.51 Å). By means of DFT and Hückel calculations, we show that this σ‐type overlapping is stabilized by a two‐orbital three‐electron interaction allowed by the high‐spin character of the Co²⁺ ions. The negligible experimental spin‐orbit coupling is expected from the resulting molecular orbital scheme in O₃AsE–CoO₄ clusters.     

Exchange‐Coupled fct‐FePd/α‐Fe Nanocomposite Magnets Converted from Pd/Fe3O4 Core/Shell Nanoparticles

We report the controlled synthesis of exchange‐coupled face‐centered tetragonal (fct) FePd/α‐Fe nanocomposite magnets with variable Fe concentration. The composite was converted from Pd/Fe₃O₄ core/shell nanoparticles through a high‐temperature annealing process in a reducing atmosphere. The shell thickness of core/shell Pd/Fe₃O₄ nanoparticles could be readily tuned, and subsequently the concentration of Fe in nanocomposite magnets was controlled. Upon annealing reduction, the hard magnetic fct‐FePd phase was formed by the interdiffusion between reduced α‐Fe and face‐centered cubic (fcc) Pd, whereas the excessive α‐Fe remained around the fct‐FePd grains, realizing exchange coupling between the soft magnetic α‐Fe and hard magnetic fct‐FePd phases. Magnetic measurements showed variation in the magnetic properties of the nanocomposite magnets with different compositions, indicating distinct exchange coupling at the interfaces. The coercivity of the exchange‐coupled nanocomposites could be tuned from 0.7 to 2.8 kOe and the saturation magnetization could be controlled from 93 to 160 emu g^?1. This work provides a bottom‐up approach using exchange‐coupled nanocomposites for engineering advanced permanent magnets with controllable magnetic properties.