Polysulfonylamines. CXX. Bis(tetrahydrothiophene‐S)gold(I) benzene‐1,2‐disulfonimidate

Both ions of the title compound, [Au(C₄H₈S)₂](C₆H₄NO₄S₂), display crystallographic twofold symmetry. The Au atom exhibits linear coordination, with Au—S = 2.2948 (14) Å and S—Au—S = 178.47 (9)°. The crystal packing consists of layers of anions connected by C—H?O hydrogen bonds; the cations occupy cavities in these layers and the ions are linked by Au?N contacts of 3.009 (7) Å. Further C—H?O interactions connect the layers.     

trans‐Bis(thioacetato‐S)bis(triphenylphosphine‐P)nickel(II)

In the title compound, [Ni(C₂H₃OS)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], the Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and the tri­phenyl phosphine and thio­acetate ligands are bonded to the central Ni^II atom in a trans fashion, with Ni—S = 2.2020 (8) and Ni—P = 2.2528 (8) Å, and angle S—Ni—P = 92.47 (3)°.     

Bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) (a redetermination at 150 K) and bis(tetraphenylarsonium) bis(1,3‐dithiole‐2‐thione‐4,5‐dithiolato)zinc(II) (at 300 K)

The title compounds are salts of the general form (Q⁺)₂[Zn(dmit)₂]^2?, where dmit corresponds to the ligand (C₃S₅)^? present in both and Q⁺ to the counter‐cations (ⁿBu₄N)⁺ [or C₁₆H₃₆N⁺] and (Ph₄As)⁺ [or C₂₄H₂₀As⁺], respectively. In the first case, Zn is in the 4e special positions of space group C2/c and hence the [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? dianion possesses twofold axial crystallographic symmetry. Including these, there are now 11 known examples of [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? or its analogues, with O replacing the exocyclic thione S, and [Zn(dmio)₂]^2? dianions in nine structures with various Q. Comparison of these reveals a remarkable variation in details of the conformation which the dianion may adopt in terms of Zn coordination, equivalence of the Zn—S bond lengths, displacement of Zn from the plane of the ligand and overall dianion shape.     

Cancer‐associated pH‐responsive tetracopolymeric micelles composed of poly(ethylene glycol)‐b‐poly(L‐histidine)‐b‐poly(L‐lactic acid)‐b‐poly(ethylene glycol)

To create a novel vector for specifically delivering anticancer therapy to solid tumors, we used diafiltration to synthesize pH‐sensitive polymeric micelles. The micelles, formed from a tetrablock copolymer [poly(ethylene glycol)‐b‐poly(L ‐histidine)‐b‐poly(L ‐lactic acid)‐b‐poly(ethylene glycol)] consisted of a hydrophobic poly(L ‐histidine) (polyHis) and poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLA) core and a hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) shell, in which we encapsulated the model anticancer drug doxorubicin (DOX). The robust micelles exhibited a critical micellar concentration (CMC) of 2.1–3.5 µg/ml and an average size of 65–80 nm pH 7.4. Importantly, they showed a pH‐dependent micellar destabilization, due to the concurrent ionization of the polyHis and the rigidity of the PLA in the micellar core. In particular, the molecular weight of PLA block affected the ionization of the micellar core. Depending on the molecular weight of the PLA block, the micelles triggering released DOX at pH 6.8 (i.e. cancer acidic pH) or pH 6.4 (i.e. endosomal pH), making this system a useful tool for specifically treating solid cancers or delivering cytoplasmic cargo in vivo. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

(Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(nitronyl nitroxide) and (Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(iminonitroxide) and Their Copper Complexes

In contrast to diradicals connected by alternant hydrocarbons, only a few studies on those connected by nonalternant hydrocarbons have been reported. The syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of azulene‐1,3‐diyl linked bis(nitronyl nitroxide) (NN₂Az) and bis(iminonitroxide) (IN₂Az) diradicals and their Cu(hfac)₂ (hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetonate) complexes were investigated. NN₂Az was shown to have an intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction with J _obs/k _B=+10.0 K (H =−2J S ₁ ⋅S ₂) between (nitronyl nitroxide) spins, whereas IN₂Az was estimated to have a much weaker intramolecular magnetic interaction. The reactions of NN₂Az and IN₂Az with Cu(hfac)₂ gave a 1:2 [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] complex and a 1:1 [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] ⋅ C₆H₁₂ complex, respectively. [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] showed strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic interactions (J _1‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−800 K, J _2‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−500 K) between the Cu^II spins and the coordinating NN spins, whereas [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] exhibited a ferromagnetic exchange interaction (J _obs‐Cu‐R/k _B=+114 K) between the Cu^II spin and the imino‐coordinated iminonitroxide spin.     

Tetraaquabis(d‐camphor‐10‐sulfonato)calcium(II)

The structure of the title compound, [Ca(C₁₀H₁₅O₄S)₂(H₂O)₄], is the first example in which two d ‐camphor‐10‐sulfonate anions are coordinated to a metal ion, in this case with direct Ca—O bonding. The molecule has crystallographically imposed twofold symmetry with the Ca atom on the twofold axis. Hydrogen bonds are formed between the coordinated water molecules and the O atoms of the SO₃⁻ groups of adjacent molecules, leading to the formation of a two‐dimensional layered network. The compound displays sharp wavelength‐selective transparency in the UV–visible spectrum, offering the potential for application as an optical filter.     

Tetrakis(diethyl‐phosphonat)‐, Tetrakis(ethyl‐phenylphosphinat)‐ und Tetrakis(diphenylphosphin‐oxid)‐substituierte Phthalocyanine

Tetrakis(diethyl phosphonate), Tetrakis(ethyl phenylphosphinate)‐, and Tetrakis(diphenylphosphine oxide)‐Substituted Phthalocyanines The title compounds 7, 9 , and 11 are obtained by tetramerization of diethyl (3,4‐dicyanophenyl)phosphonate ( 5 ), ethyl (3,4‐dicyanophenyl)phenylphosphinate ( 8 ), and 4‐(diphenylphosphinyl)benzene‐1,2‐dicarbonitrile ( 10 ). The ³¹P‐NMR spectra of the phthalocyanines 7, 9 , and 11 and of their metal complexes present five to eight signals confirming the formation of four constitutional isomers with the expected C_4h, D_2h, C_2v, and C_s symmetry. In the FAB‐MS of the Zn, Cu, and Ni complexes of 7 and 9 , the peaks of dimeric phthalocyanines are observed. By gel‐permeation chromatography, the monomeric complex [Ni( 7 )] and a dimer [Ni( 7 )]₂ can be separated. These dimers differ from the known phthalocyanine dimers, i.e., possibly the P(O)(OEt)₂ and P(O)(Ph)(OEt) substituents in 7 and 9 are involved in complexation. The free phosphonic acid complex [Zn( 12 )] and [Cu( 12 )] are H₂O‐soluble. In the FAB‐MS of [Zn( 12 )], only the peaks of the dimer are present; the ESI‐MS confirms the existence of the dimer and the metal‐free dimer. In the UV/VIS spectrum of [Zn( 12 )], the hypsochromic shift characteristic for the known type of dimers from 660–700 nm to 620–640 nm is observed. As in the FAB‐MS of [Zn( 12 )], the free phosphinic acid complex [Zn( 13 )] shows only the monomer, an ESI‐MS cannot be obtained for solubility problems. The UV/VIS spectrum of [Zn( 13 )] demonstrates the existence of the monomer as well as of the dimer.     

A ternary complex of aqua(18‐crown‐6)bis(o‐nitrophenolato)barium(II), the triaqua(18‐crown‐6)(o‐nitrophenolato)barium(II) cation and the o‐nitrophenolate anion

In the title compound [systematic name: tri­aqua(1,4,7,10,13,16‐hexaoxa­cyclo­octa­decane‐κ⁶O)(2‐nitro­phenolato‐κO)­barium(II)–aqua(1,4,7,10,13,16‐hexaoxa­cyclo­octa­decane‐κ⁶O)‐ bis(2‐nitro­phenolato‐κ²O,O′)­barium(II)–2‐nitro­phenolate (1/1/1)], [Ba(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(C₆H₄NO₃)(H₂O)₃][Ba(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(C₆H₄NO₃)₂(H₂O)](C₆H₄NO₃), the two Ba^II atoms encapsulated by the 18‐crown‐6 rings have different coordinations. Although both Ba^II atoms are coordinated to the six O atoms of the crowns, in the neutral moiety, the Ba^II atom is coordinated to one terminal O atom from a water mol­ecule, two phenolate O atoms and two nitro‐group O atoms, while in the cationic moiety, the Ba^II atom is coordinated to three terminal O atoms from water mol­ecules and one phenolate O atom. Both the crowns are eclipsed and translated along the b direction. In the asymmetric unit, the three components are interconnected by four O—H?O interactions. The packing is stabilized by two intermolecular C—H?O interactions and by one O—H?O interaction.     

Reinvestigation of the Synthesis of Ketanserin (5) and its Hydrochloride Salt (5.HCl) via 3‐(2‐Chloroethyl)‐2,4‐(1H,3H)‐quinazolinedione (2) or Dihydro‐5H‐oxazole(2,3‐b)quinazolin‐5‐one (1)

The synthesis of ketanserin ( 5 ) and its hydrochloride salt ( 5.HCl ) using respectively equimolar amounts of 3‐(2‐chloroethyl)‐2,4‐(1H,3H)‐quinazolinedione ( 2 ) with 4‐(parafluorobenzoyl)piperidine ( 3 ) and dihydro‐5H‐oxazole(2,3‐b)quinazolin‐5‐one ( 1 ) with hydrochloride salt of 4‐(parafluorobenzoyl)piperidine ( 3.HCl ) is reinvestigated. The one‐pot reaction of ethyl‐2‐aminobenzoate with ethyl chloroformate and ethanol amine has afforded 3‐(2‐chloroethyl)‐2,4‐(1H,3H)‐quinazolinedione ( 2 ) (86%) that was then refluxed with 4‐(parafluorobenzoyl)piperidine ( 3 ) in ethyl methyl ketone in the presence of sodium carbonate to obtain free base of ketanserin (87%). In another attempt, a very pure hydrochloride salt of ketanserin ( 5.HCl ) was synthesized using equimolar amounts of dihydro‐5H‐oxazole(2,3‐b)quinazolin‐5‐one ( 1 ) and hydrochloride salt of 4‐(parafluorobenzoyl)piperidine ( 3.HCl ) by a solvent‐less fusion method. Thus, under optimized conditions, 180°C and a reaction time of 30 min, the powder mixture was transformed into glassy crystals that were initially readily soluble in chloroform but were transformed afterwards over time (2 h) to white precipitates ( 5.HCl ) suspended in chloroform with a yield of 72%.     

Undecacarbonyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum,undecacarbonyl(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum and undecacarbonyl(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum

The three title compounds tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐methylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo), tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo) and tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo), [MoIr₃(η⁵‐C₅H_5?nMe_n)(μ‐CO)₃(CO)₈], where n = 1, 4 or 5, have a pseudo­tetrahedral MoIr₃ core geometry, with a η⁵‐C₅H_5?nMe_n group ligating the Mo atom, bridging carbonyls spanning the edges of an MoIr₂ face, and eight terminally bound carbonyls.     

Hierarchical Self‐Assembly of Double‐Crystalline Poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane)‐block‐poly(2‐iso‐propyl‐2‐oxazoline) (PFDMS‐b‐PiPrOx) Block Copolymers

The step‐wise solution self‐assembly of double crystalline organometallic poly(ferrocenyldimethylsilane)‐block‐poly(2‐iso‐propyl‐2‐oxazoline) (PFDMS‐b‐PiPrOx) diblock copolymers is demonstrated. Two block copolymers are obtained by copper‐catalyzed azide‐alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC), featuring PFDMS/PiPrOx weight fractions of 46/54 (PFDMS₃₀‐b‐PiPrOx₇₅) and 30/70 (PFDMS₃₀‐b‐PiPrOx₁₅₅). Nonsolvent induced crystallization of PFDMS in acetone leads in both cases to cylindrical micelles with a PFDMS core. Afterward, the structures are transferred into water for sequential temperature‐induced crystallization of the PiPrOx corona, leading to hierarchical double crystalline superstructures, which are investigated using scanning electron microscopy, wide angle X‐ray scattering, and differential scanning calorimetry.

     

trans‐Bis(diethanolamine‐N,O)bis(saccharinato‐N)cadmium(II)

The structure of the title complex consists of isolated [Cd(C₇H₄NO₃S)₂(C₄H₁₁NO₂)₂] units. The Cd²⁺ cation lies on an inversion centre and is octahedrally coordinated by two N,O‐bidentate diethanol­amine (dea) and two N‐bonded saccharinate (sac) ligands [saccharin is 1,2‐benziso­thia­zol‐3(2H)‐one 1,1‐dioxide]. The dea ligands constitute the equatorial plane of the octahedron, forming two five‐membered chelate rings around the Cd^II ion, while the sac ligands are localized at the axial positions. The Cd—N_sac, Cd—N_dea and Cd—O_dea bond distances are 2.3879 (12), 2.3544 (14) and 2.3702 (13) Å, respectively. The H atoms of the free and coordinated hydroxyl groups of the dea ligands are involved in hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl and sulfonyl O atoms of the neighbouring sac ions, while the amine H atom forms a hydrogen bond with the free hydroxyl O atom. The individual mol­ecules are held together by strong hydrogen bonds, forming an infinite three‐dimensional network.