Halide Abstraction by Na[B{C6H3(CF3)2‐3,5}4]: Synthesis and Structural Characterization of the Rhodium(I) Cations [(η6‐arene)Rh(PPh3)2]+ (Arene = benzene,toluene)

Halide abstraction from [(Ph₃P)₂Rh(μ‐Cl)]₂ by the sodium salt of the weakly coordinating [BAr^f₄]^? anion [Ar^f = C₆H₃(CF₃)₂‐3,5] in the presence of excess arene offers a convenient, high‐yielding route to the half‐sandwich cations [(arene)Rh(PPh₃)₂]⁺[BAr^f₄]^? [arene = benzene ( 1 ), toluene ( 2 )]. Crystalline samples of 1 and 2 are isomorphous [a = 13.1270(2), b = 15.3030(2), c = 17.5760(3) Å, α = 74.620(1), β = 81.533(1), γ = 88.540(1)° for 1 ] and feature the arene ligand bound to the rhodium atom in η⁶ fashion.     

Ruthenium bidentate phosphine complexes for the coordination and catalytic dehydrogenation of amine- and phosphine-boranes

Addition of the amine–boranes H₃B ? NH₂tBu, H₃B ? NHMe₂ and H₃B ? NH₃ to the cationic ruthenium fragment [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(OH₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 2 ; xantphos=4,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐9,9‐dimethylxanthene; BAr^F₄=[B{3,5‐(CF₃)₂C₆H₃}₄]^?) affords the η¹‐B? H bound amine–borane complexes [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₂tBu)H][BAr^F₄] ( 5 ), [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NHMe₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 6 ) and [Ru(xantphos)(PPh₃)(H₃B ? NH₃)H][BAr^F₄] ( 7 ). The X‐ray crystal structures of 5 and 7 have been determined with [BAr^F₄] and [BPh₄] anions, respectively. Treatment of 2 with H₃B ? PHPh₂ resulted in quite different behaviour, with cleavage of the B? P interaction taking place to generate the structurally characterised bis‐secondary phosphine complex [Ru(xantphos)(PHPh₂)₂H][BPh₄] ( 9 ). The xantphos complexes 2 , 5 and 9 proved to be poor precursors for the catalytic dehydrogenation of H₃B ? NHMe₂. While the dppf species (dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) [Ru(dppf)(PPh₃)HCl] ( 3 ) and [Ru(dppf)(η⁶‐C₆H₅PPh₂)H][BAr^F₄] ( 4 ) showed better, but still moderate activity, the agostic‐stabilised N‐heterocyclic carbene derivative [Ru(dppf)(ICy)HCl] ( 12 ; ICy=1,3‐dicyclohexylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) proved to be the most efficient catalyst with a turnover number of 76 h^?1 at room temperature.     

Chelation versus Binucleation: Metal Complex Formation with the Hexadentate all‐cis‐N1,N2‐Bis(2,4,6‐trihydroxy‐3,5‐diaminocyclohexyl)ethane‐1,2‐diamine

The hexadentate ligand all‐cis‐N¹,N²‐bis(2,4,6‐trihydroxy‐3,5‐diaminocyclohexyl)ethane‐1,2‐diamine (L^e) was synthesized in five steps with an overall yield of 39 % by using [Ni(taci)₂]SO₄?4 H₂O as starting material (taci=1,3,5‐triamino‐1,3,5‐trideoxy‐cis‐inositol). Crystal structures of [Na_0.5(H₆L^e)](BiCl₆)₂Cl_0.5?4 H₂O ( 1 ), [Ni(L^e)]‐ Cl₂?5 H₂O ( 2 ), [Cu(L^e)](ClO₄)₂?H₂O ( 3 ), [Zn(L^e)]CO₃?7 H₂O ( 4 ), [Co(L^e)](ClO₄)₃ ( 5 c ), and [Ga(H_?2L^e)]‐ NO₃?2 H₂O ( 6 ) are reported. The Na complex 1 exhibited a chain structure with the Na⁺ cations bonded to three hydroxy groups of one taci subunit of the fully protonated H₆(L^e)⁶⁺ ligand. In 2 , 3 , 4 , and 5 c , a mononuclear hexaamine coordination was found. In the Ga complex 6 , a mononuclear hexadentate coordination was also observed, but the metal binding occurred through four amino groups and two alkoxo groups of the doubly deprotonated H_?2(L^e)^2?. The steric strain within the molecular framework of various M(L^e) isomers was analyzed by means of molecular mechanics calculations. The formation of complexes of L^e with Mn^II, Cu^II, Zn^II, and Cd^II was investigated in aqueous solution by using potentiometric and spectrophotometric titration experiments. Extended equilibrium systems comprising a large number of species were observed, such as [M(L^e)]²⁺, protonated complexes [MH_z(L^e)]^2+z and oligonuclear aggregates. The pK_a values of H₆(L^e)⁶⁺ (25 °C, μ=0.10 m ) were found to be 2.99, 5.63, 6.72, 7.38, 8.37, and 9.07, and the determined formation constants (log β) of [M(L^e)]²⁺ were 6.13(3) (Mn^II), 20.11(2) (Cu^II), 13.60(2) (Zn^II), and 10.43(2) (Cd^II). The redox potentials (vs. NHE) of the [M(L^e)]^3+/2+ couples were elucidated for Co (?0.38 V) and Ni (+0.90 V) by cyclic voltammetry.     

(Z)‐2‐Methylbuten‐1‐yl(aryl)iodonium trifluoromethanesulfonates containing electron‐withdrawing groups on the aryl moiety

The crystal structures of [(Z)‐2‐methyl­but‐1‐en‐1‐yl]­[4‐(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl]­iodo­nium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate, C₁₂H₁₃F₃I⁺·CF₃O₃S^?, (I), (3,5‐di­chloro­phenyl)­[(Z)‐2‐methyl­but‐1‐en‐1‐yl]­iodo­nium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate, C₁₁H₁₂­Cl₂I⁺·CF₃O₃S^?, (II), and bis{[3,5‐bis­(tri­fluoro­methyl)­phenyl][(Z)‐2‐methyl­but‐1‐en‐1‐yl]­iodo­nium} bis­(tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate) di­chloro­methane solvate, 2C₁₃H₁₂F₆I⁺·­2CF₃­O₃S^?·CH₂Cl₂, (III), are described. Neither simple acyclic β,β‐di­alkyl‐substituted alkenyl­(aryl)­idonium salts nor a series containing electron‐deficient aryl rings have been described prior to this work. Compounds (I)–(III) were found to have distorted square‐planar geometries, with each I atom interacting with two tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate counter‐ions.     

Bis­[tris­(ethyl­enedi­amine)­cobalt(III)] di­chloro­bis­[μ‐(1‐hydroxy­ethyl­idene)­di­phospho­nato(4–)]­di­ruthenium(II,­III)­(Ru–Ru) chloride trihydrate

In the title compound, [Co(C₂H₈N₂)₃]₂[Ru₂(C₂H₄O₇P₂)₂Cl₂]Cl·3H₂O, the building unit contains two crystallographically independent dinuclear [Ru₂(hedp)₂Cl₂]⁵⁻ anions, where hedp [viz. (1‐hydroxy­ethyl­idene)­di­phospho­nate] serves as a bis‐chelating bridging ligand, two types of [Co(en)₃]³⁺ cations, one uncoordinated Cl⁻ anion and five water mol­ecules of crystallization. The [Ru₂(hedp)₂Cl₂]⁵⁻ anions are connected to one another, forming one‐dimensional chains along the a axis. The [Co(en)₃]³⁺ cations are located between these chains and lie across inversion centres. An extensive series of hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of a three‐dimensional supramol­ecular network structure, with channels generated along the [100] direction. The uncoordinated water mol­ecules and Cl⁻ anions reside in these channels.     

Crystal structure,thermal properties and detonation characterization of bis(5‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ium‐3‐yl)methane dichloride

Bis(5‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazol‐4‐ium‐3‐yl)methane dichloride (BATZM·Cl₂ or C₅H₁₀N₈²⁺·2Cl^?) was synthesized and crystallized, and the crystal structure was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction; it belongs to the space group C2/c (monoclinic) with Z = 4. The structure of BATZM·Cl₂ can be described as a V‐shaped molecule with reasonable chemical geometry and no disorder, and its one‐dimensional structure can be described as a rhombic helix. The specific molar heat capacity (C_p,m) of BATZM·Cl₂ was determined using the continuous C_p mode of a microcalorimeter and theoretical calculations, and the C_p,m value is 276.18 J K^?1 mol^?1 at 298.15 K. The relative deviations between the theoretical and experimental values of C_p,m, H_T – H_298.15K and S_T – S_298.15K of BATZM·Cl₂ are almost equivalent at each temperature. The detonation velocity (D) and detonation pressure (P) of BATZM·Cl₂ were estimated using the nitrogen equivalent equation according to the experimental density; BATZM·Cl₂ has a higher detonation velocity (7143.60 ± 3.66 m s^?1) and detonation pressure (21.49 ± 0.03 GPa) than TNT. The above results for BATZM·Cl₂ are compared with those of bis(5‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazol‐3‐yl)methane (BATZM) and the effect of salt formation on them is discussed.     

Tetrakis(μ‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolato)‐1:2κ4N:S2;1:2κ4S2:N‐dichloro‐1κCl,2κCl‐dirhenium(III)(Re—Re) dichloromethane solvate: a bridged complex with a long Re—Re quadruple bond

The title compound, [Re₂(C₇H₄NS₂)₄Cl₂]·CH₂Cl₂, consists of dirhenium mol­ecules with bridging N,S‐benzo­thia­zole‐2‐thiol­ate ligands, axial Cl^? ligands and intramolecular hydrogen bonding. These mol­ecules adopt somewhat staggered conformations, with a long Re—Re quadruple bond distance of 2.2716 (3) Å.     

Guest‐, Light‐ and Thermally‐Modulated Spin Crossover in [FeII2] Supramolecular Helicates

A new bis(pyrazolylpyridine) ligand (H₂L) has been prepared to form functional [Fe₂(H₂L)₃]⁴⁺ metallohelicates. Changes to the synthesis yield six derivatives, X@[Fe₂(H₂L)₃]X(PF₆)₂?xCH₃OH ( 1 , x=5.7 and X=Cl; 2 , x=4 and X=Br), X@[Fe₂(H₂L)₃]X(PF₆)₂?yCH₃OH?H₂O ( 1 a , y=3 and X=Cl; 2 a , y=1 and X=Br) and X@[Fe₂(H₂L)₃](I₃)₂?3 Et₂O ( 1 b , X=Cl; 2 b , X=Br). Their structure and functional properties are described in detail by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction experiments at several temperatures. Helicates 1 a and 2 a are obtained from 1 and 2 , respectively, by a single‐crystal‐to‐single‐crystal mechanism. The three possible magnetic states, [LS–LS], [LS–HS], and [HS–HS] can be accessed over large temperature ranges as a result of the structural nonequivalence of the Fe^II centers. The nature of the guest (Cl^? vs. Br^?) shifts the spin crossover (SCO) temperature by roughly 40 K. Also, metastable [LS–HS] or [HS–HS] states are generated through irradiation. All helicates (X@[Fe₂(H₂L)₃])³⁺ persist in solution.     

2(S)‐Amino‐3‐[1H‐imidazol‐4(5)‐yl]­propyl cyclo­hexylmethyl ether di­hydro­chloride and 2(S)‐amino‐3‐[1H‐imidazol‐4(5)‐yl]­propyl 4‐bromo­benzyl ether di­hydro­chloride

(Cyclo­hexyl­methyl­oxy­methyl)(1H‐imidazol‐4‐io­methyl)‐(S)‐ammonium dichloride, C₁₃H₂₅N₃O⁺·2Cl^?, and (4‐bromo­benzyl)(1H‐imidazol‐4‐io­methyl)‐(S)‐ammonium dichloride, C₁₃H₁₈BrN₃O⁺·2Cl^?, are model compounds with different biological activities for evaluation of the hist­amine H3‐receptor activation mechanism. Both title compounds occur in almost similar extended conformations.     

Reactions of Stable α‐Chlorosulfanyl Chlorides with CS‐Functionalized Compounds

The smooth reaction of 3‐chloro‐3‐(chlorosulfanyl)‐2,2,4,4‐tetramethylcyclobutanone ( 3 ) with 3,4,5‐trisubstituted 2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐imidazole‐2‐thiones 8 and 2‐thiouracil ( 10 ) in CH₂Cl₂/Et₃N at room temperature yielded the corresponding disulfanes 9 and 11 (Scheme 2), respectively, via a nucleophilic substitution of Cl^? of the sulfanyl chloride by the S‐atom of the heterocyclic thione. The analogous reaction of 3‐cyclohexyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐4,5‐diphenyl‐1H‐imidazole‐2‐thione ( 8b ) and 10 with the chlorodisulfanyl derivative 16 led to the corresponding trisulfanes 17 and 18 (Scheme 4), respectively. On the other hand, the reaction of 3 and 4,4‐dimethyl‐2‐phenyl‐1,3‐thiazole‐5(4H)‐thione ( 12 ) in CH₂Cl₂ gave only 4,4‐dimethyl‐2‐phenyl‐1,3‐thiazol‐5(4H)‐one ( 13 ) and the trithioorthoester derivative 14 , a bis‐disulfane, in low yield (Scheme 3). At ?78°, only bis(1‐chloro‐2,2,4,4‐tetramethyl‐3‐oxocyclobutyl)polysulfanes 15 were formed. Even at ?78°, a 1 : 2 mixture of 12 and 16 in CH₂Cl₂ reacted to give 13 and the symmetrical pentasulfane 19 in good yield (Scheme 5). The structures of 11, 14, 17 , and 18 have been established by X‐ray crystallography.     

A Fluorescent Chemosensor for Dihydrogen Phosphate Ion Based on 2‐[2‐Hydroxy‐4‐(diethylamino) phenyl]‐1H‐imidazo[4,5‐b]phenazine‐Fe3+ Ensemble

A long wavelength emission fluorescent (612 nm) chemosensor with high selectivity for H₂PO₄^? ions was designed and synthesized according to the excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT). The sensor can exist in two tautomeric forms ('keto' and 'enol') in the presence of Fe³⁺ ion, Fe³⁺ may bind with the 'keto' form of the sensor. Furthermore, the in situ generated GY‐Fe³⁺ ensemble could recover the quenched fluorescence upon the addition of H₂PO₄^? anion resulting in an off‐on‐type sensing with a detection limit of micromolar range in the same medium, and other anions, including F^?, Cl^?, Br^?, I^?, AcO^?, HSO₄^?, ClO₄^? and CN^? had nearly no influence on the probing behavior. The test strips based on 2‐[2‐hydroxy‐4‐(diethylamino) phenyl]‐1H‐imidazo[4,5‐b]phenazine and Fe³⁺ metal complex ( GY‐Fe³⁺ ) were fabricated, which could act as convenient and efficient H₂PO₄^? test kits.     

Cobalt(II) chloride complexes with 1,1′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyrazole featuring first‐ and second‐sphere coordination of the ligand

In catena‐poly[[dichloridocobalt(II)]‐μ‐(1,1′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyrazole‐κ²N²:N^2′)], [CoCl₂(C₈H₁₀N₄)]_n, (1), two independent bipyrazole ligands (Me₂bpz) are situated across centres of inversion and in tetraaquabis(1,1′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyrazole‐κN²)cobalt(II) dichloride–1,1′‐dimethyl‐4,4′‐bipyrazole–water (1/2/2), [Co(C₈H₁₀N₄)₂(H₂O)₄]Cl₂·2C₈H₁₀N₄·2H₂O, (2), the Co²⁺ cation lies on an inversion centre and two noncoordinated Me₂bpz molecules are also situated across centres of inversion. The compounds are the first complexes involving N,N′‐disubstituted 4,4′‐bipyrazole tectons. They reveal a relatively poor coordination ability of the ligand, resulting in a Co–pyrazole coordination ratio of only 1:2. Compound (1) adopts a zigzag chain structure with bitopic Me₂bpz links between tetrahedral Co^II ions. Interchain interactions occur by means of very weak C—H...Cl hydrogen bonding. Complex (2) comprises discrete octahedral trans‐[Co(Me₂bpz)₂(H₂O)₄]²⁺ cations formed by monodentate Me₂bpz ligands. Two equivalents of additional noncoordinated Me₂bpz tectons are important as `second‐sphere ligands' connecting the cations by means of relatively strong O—H...N hydrogen bonding with generation of doubly interpenetrated pcu (α‐Po) frameworks. Noncoordinated chloride anions and solvent water molecules afford hydrogen‐bonded [(Cl⁻)₂(H₂O)₂] rhombs, which establish topological links between the above frameworks, producing a rare eight‐coordinated uninodal net of {4²⁴.5.6³} ( ilc ) topology.     

Gas‐phase reactions of Cl atoms with propane,n‐butane,and isobutane

Using the relative kinetic method, rate coefficients have been determined for the gas‐phase reactions of chlorine atoms with propane, n‐butane, and isobutane at total pressure of 100 Torr and the temperature range of 295–469 K. The Cl₂ photolysis (λ = 420 nm) was used to generate Cl atoms in the presence of ethane as the reference compound. The experiments have been carried out using GC product analysis and the following rate constant expressions (in cm³ molecule^?1 s^?1) have been derived: (7.4 ± 0.2) × 10^?11 exp [‐(70 ± 11)/ T], Cl + C₃H₈ → HCl + CH₃CH₂CH₂; (5.1 ± 0.5) × 10^?11 exp [(104 ± 32)/ T], Cl + C₃H₈ → HCl + CH₃CHCH₃; (7.3 ± 0.2) × 10^?11 exp[?(68 ± 10)/ T], Cl + n‐C₄H₁₀ → HCl + CH₃ CH₂CH₂CH₂; (9.9 ± 2.2) × 10^?11 exp[(106 ± 75)/ T], Cl + n‐C₄H₁₀ → HCl + CH₃CH₂CHCH₃; (13.0 ± 1.8) × 10^?11 exp[?(104 ± 50)/ T], Cl + i‐C₄H₁₀ → HCl + CH₃CHCH₃CH₂; (2.9 ± 0.5) × 10^?11 exp[(155 ± 58)/ T], Cl + i‐C₄H₁₀ → HCl + CH₃CCH₃CH₃ (all error bars are ± 2σ precision). These studies provide a set of reaction rate constants allowing to determine the contribution of competing hydrogen abstractions from primary, secondary, or tertiary carbon atom in alkane molecule. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Chem Kinet 34: 651–658, 2002     

Expanded‐Ring N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes for the Stabilization of Highly Electrophilic Gold(I) Cations

Strategies for the synthesis of highly electrophilic Au^I complexes from either hydride‐ or chloride‐containing precursors have been investigated by employing sterically encumbered Dipp‐substituted expanded‐ring NHCs (Dipp=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃). Thus, complexes of the type (NHC)AuH have been synthesised (for NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) and shown to feature significantly more electron‐rich hydrides than those based on ancillary imidazolylidene donors. This finding is consistent with the stronger σ‐donor character of these NHCs, and allows for protonation of the hydride ligand. Such chemistry leads to the loss of dihydrogen and to the trapping of the [(NHC)Au]⁺ fragment within a dinuclear gold cation containing a bridging hydride. Activation of the hydride ligand in (NHC)AuH by B(C₆F₅)₃, by contrast, generates a species (at low temperatures) featuring a [HB(C₆F₅)₃]^? fragment with spectroscopic signatures similar to the “free” borate anion. Subsequent rearrangement involves B?C bond cleavage and aryl transfer to the carbophilic metal centre. Under halide abstraction conditions utilizing Na[BAr^f₄] (Ar^f=C₆H₃(CF₃)₂‐3,5), systems of the type [(NHC)AuCl] (NHC=6‐Dipp or 7‐Dipp) generate dinuclear complexes [{(NHC)Au}₂(μ‐Cl)]⁺ that are still electrophilic enough at gold to induce aryl abstraction from the [BAr^f₄]^? counterion.     

Cationic Ir/Me‐BIPAM‐Catalyzed Asymmetric Intramolecular Direct Hydroarylation of α‐Ketoamides

Asymmetric intramolecular direct hydroarylation of α‐ketoamides gives various types of optically active 3‐substituted 3‐hydroxy‐2‐oxindoles in high yields with complete regioselectivity and high enantioselectivities (84–98 % ee). This is realized by the use of the cationic iridium complex [Ir(cod)₂](BAr^F₄) and the chiral O‐linked bidentate phosphoramidite (R,R)‐Me‐BIPAM.     

Crystallographic report: The [bis(η5‐methylcyclopentadienyl)titanium(IV)‐bis(N‐methylglycine)] dichloride

The crystal network of [Cp′₂Ti(N?CH₃? Gly)₂]²⁺[Cl^?]₂ (Cp′ = (CH₃)C₅H₄) complex, which crystallizes as a solvate with CH₃OH, is built up with discrete cationic units connected through intermolecular H· · ·Cl bonds. The α‐amino acid ligands are attached through an intramolecular H· · ·O bond within one cationic unit. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

7‐{Di­phenyl­[(tri­phenyl­phos­phine)­aurio]­phos­phine(1+)‐P}‐8‐methyl‐7,8‐dicarba‐nido‐undecaborate(1–) dichloro­methane hemi­solvate

The title compound, 7‐[(Ph₂P)Au(PPh₃)]‐8‐(CH₃)‐7,8‐nido‐C₂B₉H₁₀]·­0.5CH₂Cl₂ or [Au(C₁₅H₂₃B₉P)­(C₁₈H₁₅P)]·­0.5CH₂Cl₂, is the first reported gold derivative of the ligand [7‐­(Ph₂P)‐8‐(CH₃)‐7,8‐nido‐C₂B₉H₁₀]^?. It has a mono­nuclear structure with the gold centre in an essentially linear coordination [P—Au—P 174.041 (15)°]. The open C₂B₃ face contains one H atom that is strongly bonded to the central B atom and semi‐bridging to a neighbouring B atom [B—H distances 1.070 (16) and 1.45 (3) Å].     

The Role of Ion Pairs in the Second‐Order NLO Response of 4‐X‐1‐Methylpiridinium Salts

A series of 4‐X‐1‐methylpyridinium cationic nonlinear optical (NLO) chromophores (X=(E)‐CH?CHC₆H₅; (E)‐CH?CHC₆H₄‐4′‐C(CH₃)₃; (E)‐CH?CHC₆H₄‐4′‐N(CH₃)₂; (E)‐CH?CHC₆H₄‐4′‐N(C₄H₉)₂; (E,E)‐(CH?CH)₂C₆H₄‐4′‐N(CH₃)₂) with various organic (CF₃SO₃^?, p‐CH₃C₆H₄SO₃^?), inorganic (I^?, ClO₄^?, SCN^?, [Hg₂I₆]^2?) and organometallic (cis‐[Ir(CO)₂I₂]^?) counter anions are studied with the aim of investigating the role of ion pairing and of ionic dissociation or aggregation of ion pairs in controlling their second‐order NLO response in anhydrous chloroform solution. The combined use of electronic absorption spectra, conductimetric measurements and pulsed field gradient spin echo (PGSE) NMR experiments show that the second‐order NLO response, investigated by the electric‐field‐induced second harmonic generation (EFISH) technique, of the salts of the cationic NLO chromophores strongly depends upon the nature of the counter anion and concentration. The ion pairs are the major species at concentration around 10^?3 M , and their dipole moments were determined. Generally, below 5×10^?4 M , ion pairs start to dissociate into ions with parallel increase of the second‐order NLO response, due to the increased concentration of purely cationic NLO chromophores with improved NLO response. At concentration higher than 10^?3 M , some multipolar aggregates, probably of H type, are formed, with parallel slight decrease of the second‐order NLO response. Ion pairing is dependent upon the nature of the counter anion and on the electronic structure of the cationic NLO chromophore. It is very strong for the thiocyanate anion in particular and, albeit to a lesser extent, for the sulfonated anions. The latter show increased tendency to self‐aggregate.     

A one‐dimensional ladder‐like six‐coordinate cadmium polymer: catena‐poly[bis[(S)‐2‐methylpiperazine‐1,4‐diium] [bis[trichloridocadmium(II)]‐di‐μ3‐chlorido]]

The crystal structure of the title compound {(C₅H₁₄N₂)₂[Cd₂Cl₈]}_n, (I), consists of hydrogen‐bonded 2‐methylpiperazinediium (H₂MPPA²⁺) cations in the presence of one‐dimensional polymeric {[CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)]²⁻}_n anions. The Cd^II centres are hexacoordinated by three terminal chlorides and three bridging chlorides and have a slightly distorted octahedral CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)₃ arrangement. The alternating CdCl₆ octahedra form four‐membered Cd₂Cl₂ rings by the sharing of neighbouring Cd–Cl edges to give rise to extended one‐dimensional ladder‐like chains parallel to the b axis, with a Cd...Cd distance of 4.094 (2) Å and a Cd...Cd...Cd angle of 91.264 (8)°. The H₂MPPA²⁺ cations crosslink the [CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)]_n chains by the formation of two N—H...Cl hydrogen bonds to each chain, giving rise to one‐dimensional ladder‐like H₂MPPA²⁺–Cl₂ hydrogen‐bonded chains [graph set R₄²(14)]. The [CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)]_n chains are interwoven with the H₂MPPA²⁺–Cl₂ hydrogen‐bonded chains, giving rise to a three‐dimensional supramolecular network.     

Synthesis and single crystal X‐ray determination of the Schiff base 1‐[(2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy)hydrazono] ethyl ferrocene

The reaction of acetylferrocene [Fe(η‐C₅H₅)(η‐C₅H₄COCH₃)] (1) with (2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy) acetic acid hydrazide [CH₃C₆H₃CH(CH₃)₂OCH₂CONHNH₂] (2) in refluxing ethanol gives the stable light‐orange–brown Schiff base 1‐[(2‐isopropyl‐5‐methylphenoxy)hydrazono] ethyl ferrocene, [CH₃C₆H₃CH(CH₃)₂OCH₂CONHN?C(CH₃)Fe(η‐C₅H₅)(η‐C₅H₄)] (3). Complex 3 has been characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR and single crystal X‐ray diffraction study. It crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/n, with a = 9.6965(15), b = 7.4991(12), c = 29.698(7) Å, β = 99.010(13) °, V = 2132.8(7) ų, D_calc = 1.346 Mg m^?3; absorption coefficient, 0.729 mm^?1. The crystal structure clearly shows the characteristic [N? H···O] hydrogen bonding between the two adjacent molecules of 3. This acts as a bidentale ligand, which, on treatment with [Ru(CO)₂Cl₂] _n, gives a stable bimetallic yellow–orange complex (4). Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.