Stabilizing Otherwise Unstable Anions with Halogen Bonding

Both hydrogen bonding (HB) and halogen bonding (XB) are essentially electrostatic interactions, but whereas hydrogen bonding has a well‐documented record of stabilizing unstable anions, little is known about halogen bonding's ability to do so. Herein, we present a combined anion photoelectron spectroscopic and density functional theory study of the halogen bond‐stabilization of the pyrazine (Pz) anion, an unstable anion in isolation due to its neutral counterpart having a negative electron affinity (EA). The halogen bond formed between the σ‐hole on bromobenzene (BrPh) and the lone pair(s) of Pz significantly lowers the energies of the Pz(BrPh)₁⁻ and Pz(BrPh)₂⁻ anions relative to the neutral molecule, resulting in the emergence of a positive EA for the neutral complexes. As seen through its charge distribution and electrostatic potential analyses, the negative charge on Pz⁻ is diluted due to the XB. Thermodynamics reveals that the low temperature of the supersonic expansion plays a key role in forming these complexes.     

Strong N−X⋅⋅⋅O−N Halogen Bonds: A Comprehensive Study on N‐Halosaccharin Pyridine N‐Oxide Complexes

A study of the strong N?X???^?O?N⁺ (X=I, Br) halogen bonding interactions reports 2×27 donor×acceptor complexes of N‐halosaccharins and pyridine N‐oxides (PyNO). DFT calculations were used to investigate the X???O halogen bond (XB) interaction energies in 54 complexes. A simplified computationally fast electrostatic model was developed for predicting the X???O XBs. The XB interaction energies vary from ?47.5 to ?120.3 kJ mol^?1; the strongest N?I???^?O?N⁺ XBs approaching those of 3‐center‐4‐electron [N?I?N]⁺ halogen‐bonded systems (ca. 160 kJ mol^?1). ¹H NMR association constants (K_XB) determined in CDCl₃ and [D₆]acetone vary from 2.0×10⁰ to >10⁸ m ^?1 and correlate well with the calculated donor×acceptor complexation enthalpies found between ?38.4 and ?77.5 kJ mol^?1. In X‐ray crystal structures, the N‐iodosaccharin‐PyNO complexes manifest short interaction ratios (R_XB) between 0.65–0.67 for the N?I???^?O?N⁺ halogen bond.     

Experimental and Computational Probes of the Nature of Halogen Bonding: Complexes of Bromine‐Containing Molecules with Bromide Anions

The nature of halogen bonding is examined via experimental and computational characterizations of a series of associates between electrophilic bromocarbons R? Br (R? Br=CBr₃F, CBr₃NO₂, CBr₃COCBr₃, CBr₃CONH₂, CBr₃CN, etc.) and bromide anions. The [R? Br, Br^?] complexes show intense absorption bands in the 200–350 nm range which follow the same Mulliken correlation as those observed for the charge‐transfer associates of bromide anions with common organic π‐acceptors. For a wide range of the associates, intermolecular R? Br???Br^? separations decrease and intramolecular C? Br bond lengths increase proportionally to the Br^?→R? Br charge transfer; and the energies of R? Br???Br^? bonds are correlated with the linear combination of orbital (charge‐transfer) and electrostatic interactions. On the whole, spectral, structural and thermodynamic characteristics of the [R? Br, Br^?] complexes indicate that besides electrostatics, the orbital (charge‐transfer) interactions play a vital role in the R? Br???Br^? halogen bonding. This indicates that in addition to controlling the geometries of supramolecular assemblies, halogen bonding leads to electronic coupling between interacting species, and thus affects reactivity of halogenated molecules, as well as conducting and magnetic properties of their solid‐state materials.     

The Prominent Enhancing Effect of the Cation–π Interaction on the Halogen–Hydride Halogen Bond in M1⋅⋅⋅C6H5X⋅⋅⋅HM2

We designed M¹???C₆H₅X???HM² (M¹=Li⁺, Na⁺; X=Cl, Br; M²=Li, Na, BeH, MgH) complexes to enhance halogen–hydride halogen bonding with a cation–π interaction. The interaction strength has been estimated mainly in terms of the binding distance and the interaction energy. The results show that halogen–hydride halogen bonding is strengthened greatly by a cation–π interaction. The interaction energy in the triads is two to six times as much as that in the dyads. The largest interaction energy is ?8.31 kcal mol^?1 for the halogen bond in the Li⁺???C₆H₅Br???HNa complex. The nature of the cation, the halogen donor, and the metal hydride influence the nature of the halogen bond. The enhancement effect of Li⁺ on the halogen bond is larger than that of Na⁺. The halogen bond in the Cl donor has a greater enhancement than that in the Br one. The metal hydride imposes its effect in the order HBeH<HMgH<HNa<HLi for the Cl complex and HBeH<HMgH<HLi<HNa for the Br complex. The large cooperative energy indicates that there is a strong interplay between the halogen–hydride halogen bonding and the cation–π interaction. Natural bond orbital and energy decomposition analyses indicate that the electrostatic interaction plays a dominate role in enhancing halogen bonding by a cation–π interaction.     

Mono Halogen Substituted Calix[4]pyrroles: Fine-tuning the Anion Binding Properties of Calix[4]pyrrole

Abstract

Single halogen atom (i. e. I, Br, Cl and F) substituted calix[4]pyrroles, compounds 2, 3, 4 and 5, were synthesized. Studies of these systems reveal that replacement of a single β-pyrrolic hydrogen atom can increase the anion binding ability of calix[4]pyrroles for a variety of anions (e. g. Cl^?, Br^?, H₂PO₄ ^? and HSO^? ₄) relative to normal non-halogen substituted calix[4]pyrrole 1. In the case of chloride anion, the expected relative affinity sequence of 5 > 4 > 3 > 2 was observed. This was not found to be true for Br^?, H²PO^? ₄, and HSO^? ₄. Here, the chlorine substituted calix[4]pyrrole 4 was found to display a slightly higher affinity in the case of each anion than the fluorine-bearing derivative 5. This was rationalized in terms of intermolecular NH … F hydrogen bonding interactions being present in CD₂Cl₂ solutions of 5. Support for this latter conclusion came from concentration and temperature-dependent NMR spectroscopic studies.

A matched set of mono halogen substituted calix[4]pyrroles was used to study in detail, the extent to which halogen substituents may be used to fine-tune the anion binding properties of calix[4]pyrroles.     

Cooperativity between the Halogen Bond and the Hydrogen Bond in H3N⋅⋅⋅XY⋅⋅⋅HF Complexes (X,Y=F,Cl, Br)

Ab initio calculations are used to provide information on H₃N???XY???HF triads (X, Y=F, Cl, Br) each having a halogen bond and a hydrogen bond. The investigated triads include H₃N???Br₂‐HF, H₃N???Cl₂???HF, H₃N???BrCI???HF, H₃N???BrF???HF, and H₃N???ClF???HF. To understand the properties of the systems better, the corresponding dyads are also investigated. Molecular geometries, binding energies, and infrared spectra of monomers, dyads, and triads are studied at the MP2 level of theory with the 6‐311++G(d,p) basis set. Because the primary aim of this study is to examine cooperative effects, particular attention is given to parameters such as cooperative energies, many‐body interaction energies, and cooperativity factors. The cooperative energy ranges from ?1.45 to ?4.64 kcal mol^?1, the three‐body interaction energy from ?2.17 to ?6.71 kcal mol^?1, and the cooperativity factor from 1.27 to 4.35. These results indicate significant cooperativity between the halogen and hydrogen bonds in these complexes. This cooperativity is much greater than that between hydrogen bonds. The effect of a halogen bond on a hydrogen bond is more pronounced than that of a hydrogen bond on a halogen bond.     

Theoretical study on the interactions of halogen‐bonds and pnicogen‐bonds in phosphine derivatives with Br2, BrCl,and BrF

The MP2 ab initio quantum chemistry methods were utilized to study the halogen‐bond and pnicogen‐bond system formed between PH₂X (X = Br, CH₃, OH, CN, NO₂, CF₃) and BrY (Y = Br, Cl, F). Calculated results show that all substituent can form halogen‐bond complexes while part substituent can form pnicogen‐bond complexes. Traditional, chlorine‐shared and ion‐pair halogen‐bonds complexes have been found with the different substituent X and Y. The halogen‐bonds are stronger than the related pnicogen‐bonds. For halogen‐bonds, strongly electronegative substituents which are connected to the Lewis acid can strengthen the bonds and significantly influenced the structures and properties of the compounds. In contrast, the substituents which connected to the Lewis bases can produce opposite effects. The interaction energies of halogen‐bonds are 2.56 to 32.06 kcal·mol^?1; The strongest halogen‐bond was found in the complex of PH₂OH???BrF. The interaction energies of pnicogen‐bonds are in the range 1.20 to 2.28 kcal·mol^?1; the strongest pnicogen‐bond was found in PH₂Br???Br₂ complex. The charge transfer of lp(P) ? σ*(Br? Y), lp(F) ? σ*(Br? P), and lp(Br) ? σ*(X? P) play important roles in the formation of the halogen‐bonds and pnicogen‐bonds, which lead to polarization of the monomers. The polarization caused by the halogen‐bond is more obvious than that by the pnicogen‐bond, resulting in that some halogen‐bonds having little covalent character. The symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) energy decomposition analysis showes that the halogen‐bond and pnicogen‐bond interactions are predominantly electrostatic and dispersion, respectively.     

Halogen‐ and Hydrogen‐Bonding Catenanes for Halide‐Anion Recognition

Halogen‐bonding (XB) interactions were exploited in the solution‐phase assembly of anion‐templated pseudorotaxanes between an isophthalamide‐containing macrocycle and bromo‐ or iodo‐functionalised pyridinium threading components. ¹H NMR spectroscopic titration investigations demonstrated that such XB interpenetrated assemblies are more stable than analogous hydrogen bonding (HB) pseudorotaxanes. The stability of the anion‐templated halogen‐bonded pseudorotaxane architectures was exploited in the preparation of new halogen‐bonding interlocked catenane species through a Grubbs’ ring‐closing metathesis (RCM) clipping methodology. The catenanes’ anion recognition properties in the competitive CDCl₃/CD₃OD 1:1 solvent mixture revealed selectivity for the heavier halides iodide and bromide over chloride and acetate.     

DFT Study of the Geometrical and Electronic Structures of Geminal Dicationic Ionic Liquids 1,3‐Bis[3‐methylimidazolium‐1‐yl]hexane Halides

In this work, the geometrical and electronic properties of the mono cationic ionic liquid 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium halides ([C₆(mim)]⁺_X^?, X=Cl, Br and I) and dicationic ionic liquid 1,3‐bis[3‐methylimidazolium‐1‐yl]hexane halides ([C₆(mim)₂X₂], X=Cl, Br and I) were studied using the density functional theory (DFT). The most stable conformer of these two types ionic liquids (IL) are determined and compared with each other. Results show that in the most stable conformers, in both monocationic ILs and dicationic ILs, the Cl^? and Br^? anions prefer to locate almost in the plane of the imidazolium ring whereas the I^? anion prefers nearly vertical location respect to the imidazolium ring plan. Comparison of hydrogen bonding and ionic interactions in these two types of ionic liquids reveals that these ionic liquids can be formed hydrogen bond by Cl^? and Br^? anion. The calculated thermodynamic functions show that the interaction of cation — anion pair in the dicationic ionic liquids are more than monocationic ionic liquids and these interactions decrease with increasing the halide anion atomic weight.     

Weakening and Leveling Effect of Solvent Polarity on Halogen Bond Strength of Diiodoperfluoroalkane with Halide

Weakening and leveling of the halogen bond (XB) between diiodoperfluoroalkane (DIPFA) and halide anions (X^?, X = Cl, Br and I) are imposed by solvent polarity. The solvents involved in this system are classified into three groups according to the acceptor number (AN) and solvent HB acidity (α) and were studied in detail. In non-competitive solvents, the strength of C–I···X^? XB is strongest, decreasing with electrostatic interaction in the order: C–I···Cl^? > C–I···Br^? > C–I···I^?. However, in weakly competitive solvents, the XB strength is largely weakened. Further, in strongly competitive solvents, the XB strength is leveled with no change occurring with X^?. This phenomenon can be attributed to the solvent effect. That is, the solvent can destabilize the DIPFA···X^? XB. This was confirmed by the experiment showing that the XB was destroyed as very small amounts of water was added into the CH₃CN solution of DIPFA and X^?.     

Halogen‐Bonded Supramolecular Capsules in the Solid State,in Solution,and in the Gas Phase

Supramolecular capsules were assembled by neutral halogen bonding (XB) and studied in the solid state, in solution, and in the gas phase. The geometry of the highly organized capsules is shown by an X‐ray crystal structure which features the assembly of two XB hemispheres, geometrically rigidified by H‐bonding to eight MeOH molecules and encapsulation of two benzene guests. To enhance capsular association strength, tuning the XB donor is more efficient than tuning the XB acceptor, due to desolvation penalties in protic solvents, as shown for a tetraquinuclidine XB acceptor hemisphere. With a tetra(iodoethynyl) XB donor and a tetralutidine XB acceptor, the association in deuterated benzene/acetone/methanol 70:30:1 at 283 K reaches K _a=(2.11±0.39)×10⁵ m ⁻¹ (ΔG =−6.9±0.1 kcal mol⁻¹). The stability of the XB capsules in the gas phase was confirmed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS). A new guest binding site was uncovered within the elongated iodoethynyl capsule.     

Negative ion chemical ionization mass spectrometry—binding of molecules to bromide and iodide anions

The analytical potential of negative ion chemical ionization (NICI) mass spectrometry utilizing dibromodifluoro-methane (CF₂Br₂) and iodomethane (CH₃I)/methane (CH₄) as reagent gases is examined. The NICI mass spectrum of CF₂Br₂ contains Br^?, [HBr₂]^? and [CF₂Br₃]^? anions. Weak acids (i.e. those acids with approximately ΔH°_(acid) values between 1674 and 1464 kJ mol^?1) react with Br^? to produce minor yields of the hydrogen?bonded bromide attachment [MH + Br]^? anion or are unreactive. Strong acids (i.e. those acids with approximately ΔH°_(acid) > 1464 kJ mol^?1) produce primarily [MH + Br]^? anions with a minor yield of proton transfer [M ? H]^? anion. The NICI spectrum of CH₃I/CH₄ is dominated by I^?. Weak acids react with I^? to yield minor amounts of [MH + 1]^? or are unreactive. Strong acids produce only [MH + l]^? anions. From a consideration of the gas-phase basicity of the halide anion and the binding energy of the hydrogen-bonded halide attachment adduct, thermochemical data are used as a potential guide to rationalize or predict the ions observed in NICI mass spectra.     

Properties of halogen atoms for representing intermolecular electrostatic interactions related to halogen bonding and their substituent effects

The electrostatic properties of halogen atoms are studied theoretically in relation to their ability of halogen bonding, which is an attractive intermolecular interaction of a covalently bonded halogen atom with a negatively charged atom of a neighboring molecule. The electric quadrupole (of electronic origin) with a positive zz component Θ_zz of a covalently bonded halogen atom, where the z axis is taken along the covalent bond involving the halogen atom, is mainly responsible for the attractive electrostatic interaction with a negatively charged atom. This positive Θ_zz is an intrinsic property of halogen atoms with the p_x²p_y²p_z configuration of the valence electronic shell, as shown by ab initio molecular orbital calculations for isolated halogen atoms with this electronic configuration, and increases in the order of F < Cl < Br < I, in parallel with the known general sequence of the strength of halogen bonding. For halogen‐containing aromatic compounds, the substituent effects on the electrostatic properties are also studied. It is shown that the magnitude of Θ_zz and the electric field originating from it are rather insensitive to the substituent effect, whereas the electric field originating from atomic partial charges has a large substituent effect. The latter electric field tends to partially cancel the former. The extent of this partial cancellation is reduced in the order of Cl < Br < I and is also reducible by proper substitution on or within the six‐membered ring of halobenzene. Perspectives on the development of potential function parameters applicable to halogen‐bonding systems are also briefly discussed. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 2010     

Kinetics of the bromine catalyzed elimination of HCl from 1,1,1-trichloroethane

The gas phase kinetics of the bromine catalyzed elimination of HCl from 1,1,1-trichloroethane has been studied over a five fold variation of (CH₃CCl₃)/(Br₂) and from 565 to 634 K. The most important reactions in the mechanism are found to be: The preferred analysis of the kinetic data results in log(k₁/M^?1 s^?1) = 11.3 ± 0.3 ? (19.9 ± 1.0) × 10³/4.575 T. From these results one calculates the C—H bond dissociation energy in CH₃CCl₃ to be 103.8 ± 2 kcal mol^?1, and the heat of formation of 2,2,2-trichloroethyl to be 17.7 ± 2 kcal mol^?1.     

Short intermolecular N—Br...O=C contacts in 1,3‐dibromo‐5,5‐dimethylimidazolidine‐2,4‐dione

In the title compound, C₅H₆Br₂N₂O₂, all atoms except for the methyl group lie on a mirror plane in the space group Pnma (No. 62). All bond lengths are normal and the five‐membered ring is planar by symmetry. Two short intermolecular N—Br...O=C contacts [Br...O = 2.787 (2) and 2.8431 (19) Å] are present, originating primarily from the O‐atom lone pairs donating electron density to the antibonding orbitals of the N—Br bonds (delocalization energy transfers 3.27 and 2.11 kcal mol⁻¹). The total stabilization energies of the Br...O interactions are 3.4828 and 2.3504 kcal mol⁻¹.     

Halogen‐bonded adduct of 1,2‐dibromo‐1,1,2,2‐tetrafluoroethane and 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane

Halogen bonding is an intermolecular interaction capable of being used to direct extended structures. Typical halogen‐bonding systems involve a noncovalent interaction between a Lewis base, such as an amine, as an acceptor and a halogen atom of a halofluorocarbon as a donor. Vapour‐phase diffusion of 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) with 1,2‐dibromotetrafluoroethane results in crystals of the 1:1 adduct, C₂Br₂F₄·C₆H₁₂N₂, which crystallizes as an infinite one‐dimensional polymeric structure linked by intermolecular N...Br halogen bonds [2.829 (3) Å], which are 0.57 Å shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii.     

Secondary interactions in 4‐bromo‐N,N‐dimethylanilinium bromide

The crystal packing of the title compound, C₈H₁₁BrN⁺·Br^?, involves three types of secondary interaction: a classical N—H?Br^? hydrogen bond, a `weak' but short C—H?Br^? interaction (normalized H?Br distance of 2.66 Å) and a cation–anion Br?Br contact of 3.6331 (4) Å. The hydrogen bonds connect two cations and two anions to form rings of graph set R(14). The Br?Br contacts link these rings to form layers parallel to the bc plane.     

Magnitude and origin of the attraction and directionality of the halogen bonds of the complexes of C6F5X and C6H5X (X = I, Br, Cl and F) with pyridine

The geometries and interaction energies of complexes of pyridine with C₆F₅X, C₆H₅X (X=I, Br, Cl, F and H) and R_FI (R_F=CF₃, C₂F₅ and C₃F₇) have been studied by ab initio molecular orbital calculations. The CCSD(T) interaction energies (E_int) for the C₆F₅X–pyridine (X=I, Br, Cl, F and H) complexes at the basis set limit were estimated to be ?5.59, ?4.06, ?2.78, ?0.19 and ?4.37 kcal mol^?1, respectively, whereas the E_int values for the C₆H₅X–pyridine (X=I, Br, Cl and H) complexes were estimated to be ?3.27, ?2.17, ?1.23 and ?1.78 kcal mol^?1, respectively. Electrostatic interactions are the cause of the halogen dependence of the interaction energies and the enhancement of the attraction by the fluorine atoms in C₆F₅X. The values of E_int estimated for the R_FI–pyridine (R_F=CF₃, C₂F₅ and C₃F₇) complexes (?5.14, ?5.38 and ?5.44 kcal mol^?1, respectively) are close to that for the C₆F₅I–pyridine complex. Electrostatic interactions are the major source of the attraction in the strong halogen bond although induction and dispersion interactions also contribute to the attraction. Short‐range (charge‐transfer) interactions do not contribute significantly to the attraction. The magnitude of the directionality of the halogen bond correlates with the magnitude of the attraction. Electrostatic interactions are mainly responsible for the directionality of the halogen bond. The directionality of halogen bonds involving iodine and bromine is high, whereas that of chlorine is low and that of fluorine is negligible. The directionality of the halogen bonds in the C₆F₅I– and C₂F₅I–pyridine complexes is higher than that in the hydrogen bonds in the water dimer and water–formaldehyde complex. The calculations suggest that the C? I and C? Br halogen bonds play an important role in controlling the structures of molecular assemblies, that the C? Cl bonds play a less important role and that C? F bonds have a negligible impact.     

An Interplay of Cooperativity between Cation⋅⋅⋅π, Anion⋅⋅⋅π and C?H⋅⋅⋅Anion Interactions

Mixed cation (Li⁺, Na⁺ and K⁺) and anion (F^?, Cl^?, Br^?) complexes of the aromatic π‐surfaces (top and bottom) are studied by using dispersion‐corrected density functional theory. The selectivity of the aromatic surface to interact with a cation or an anion can be tuned and even reversed by the electron‐donating/electron‐accepting nature of the side groups. The presence of a methyl group in the ? OCH₃, ? SCH₃, ? OC₂H₅ in the side groups of the aromatic ring leads to further cooperative stabilization of the otherwise unstable/weakly stable anion???π complexes by bending of the side groups towards the anion to facilitate C? H???anion interactions. The cooperativity among the interactions is found to be as large as 100 kcal mol^?1 quantified by dissection of the three individual forces from the total interaction energy. The crystal structures of the fluoride binding tripodal and hexapodal ligands provide experimental evidence for such cooperative interactions.     

Competitive Halide Binding by Halogen Versus Hydrogen Bonding: Bis‐triazole Pyridinium

The binding of F^?, Cl^?, Br^?, and I^? anions by bis‐triazole‐pyridine (BTP) was examined by quantum chemical calculations. There is one H atom on each of the two triazole rings that chelate the halide via H bonds. These H atoms were replaced by halogens Cl, Br, and I, thus substituting H bonds by halogen bonds. I substitution strongly enhances the binding; Br has a smaller effect, and Cl weakens the interaction. The strength of the interaction is sensitive to the overall charge on the BTP, rising as the binding agent becomes singly and then doubly positively charged. The strongest preference of a halide for halogenated as compared to unsubstituted BTP, as much as several orders of magnitude, is observed for I^?. Both unsubstituted and I‐substituted BTP could be used to selectively extract F^? from a mixture of halides.