Zur Reaktivität der Ferriophosphaalkene [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2FeP=C(NR)R2] (NR = NMe2, NC5H10, R2 = Ph,tBu) gegenüber Protonsäuren,Alkylierungsmitteln und [{(Z)‐Cycloocten}Cr(CO)5]

Transition Metal‐substituted Phosphaalkenes. 42 Reactivity of the Ferriophosphaalkenes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP=C(NR )R²] (NR = NMe₂, NC₅H₁₀, R² = Ph, t Bu) towards Protic Acids, Alkylation Reagents, and [{( Z )‐Cyclooctene}Cr(CO)₅] The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP=C(NR )R²] ( 2 a : NR = NMe₂, R² = Ph; 2 b : NMe₂. tBu; 2 c : NC₅H₁₀, Ph) and etherial HBF₄ gave rise to the formation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP(H)C(NR )R²] (BF₄) ( 3 a – c ) which were isolated as light red powders. Compounds 2 a – c were converted into [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP(Me)C(NR )R²] (SO₃CF₃) ( 4 a – c ) by treatment with methyl trifluoromethane sulfonate. In addition 2 a and Me₃SiCH₂OSO₂CF₃ afforded light red [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP(CH₂SiMe₃)C(NMe₂)Ph](SO₃CF₃) ( 5 ). The black complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP{Cr(CO)₅}C(NMe₂)Ph] ( 6 ) resulted from the combination of 2 a with [{(Z)‐cyclooctene}Cr(CO)₅]. The novel products were characterized by elemental analyses and spectra (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐ und ³¹P‐NMR).     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität des Ferrioarsaalkens [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2FeAs=C(Ph)NMe2]

Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of the Ferrioarsaalkene [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeAs=C(Ph)NMe₂] Reaction of equimolar amounts of the carbenium iodide [Me₂N(Ph)CSMe]I and LiAs(SiMe₃)₂ · 1.5 THF afforded the thermolabile arsaalkene Me₃SiAs = C(Ph)NMe₂ ( 1 ), which in situ was converted into the black crystalline ferrioarsaalkene [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeAs=C(Ph)NMe₂)] ( 2 ) by treatment with [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeCl]. Compound 2 was protonated by ethereal HBF₄ to yield [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeAs(H)C(Ph)NMe₂]BF₄ ( 3 ) and methylated by CF₃SO₃Me to give [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeAs(Me)C(Ph)NMe₂]‐ SO₃CF₃ ( 4 ). [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeAs[M(CO)_n]C(Ph)NMe₂] ( 5 : [M(CO)_n] = [Fe(CO)₄]; 6 : [Cr(CO)₅]) were isolated from the reaction of 2 with [Fe₂(CO)₉] or [{(Z)‐cyclooctene}Cr(CO)₅], respectively. Compounds 2 – 6 were characterized by means of elemental analyses and spectroscopy (IR, ¹H, ¹³C{¹H}‐NMR). The molecular structure of 2 was determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Organometallic and related imidotitanium compounds containing a pendant arm functionalised benzamidinate ligand

Chloride ligand substitution reactions of tert-butyl- and arylimido-titanium complexes supported by the pendant arm functionalised N-trimethylsilyl benzamidinate ligand Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂ are described. Reaction of previously-described [Ti(N^tBu){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}Cl] (1) with PhLi afforded thermally sensitive [Ti(N^tBu){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}Ph] (2). The corresponding reaction of 1 with MeLi afforded [Ti(N^tBu){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}Me] (3) detected by ¹H-NMR spectroscopy but this compound could not be isolated. Reaction of 1 with LiCH₂SiMe₃ gave a complex mixture, but with LiN(SiMe₃)₂ and LiO-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂ the compounds [Ti(N^tBu){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}X] (X=N(SiMe₃)₂ (4) or O-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂ (5)) were isolated. The X-ray structure of 5 was determined. Reaction of the homologous compound [Ti(N^tBu){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂NMe₂}Cl] (6) (containing a 2-carbon atom chain in the pendant arm) with MeLi or PhLi were unsuccessful although the aryloxide compound [Ti(N^tBu){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂NMe₂}(O-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂)] (7) could be isolated from the reaction of 6 with LiO-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂. Reaction of the 3-carbon pendant arm arylimido compound [Ti(N-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}Cl] (8) with MeLi afforded thermally sensitive [Ti(N-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}Me] (9), and although the analogous phenyl homologue was elusive, the aryloxide derivative [Ti(N-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂){Me₃SiNC(Ph)NCH₂CH₂CH₂NMe₂}(O-2,6-C₆H₃Me₂)] (10) was successfully isolated and structurally characterised. Comparison of the X-ray structures of 5 and 10 show unexpectedly large differences between the TiNR and TiOAr bond lengths in the two compounds.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Intramolecularly Stabilized Chiral Dimethylindium Alkoxides and their Use as Cross Coupling Reagents

The enantiomerically pure dimeric N, O‐5‐chelates [Me₂In(μ‐OCH₂CH(R)NMe₂)]₂ {R = Me (S) ( 2 ); R = ⁱPr (S) ( 3 ); R = ⁱBu (S) ( 4 ); R = Bz (S) ( 5 )}, and [Me₂In‐{μ‐(1R, 2S)‐OCH(Ph)CH(Me)NMe₂}]₂ ( 6 ), as well as the achiral dimeric N, O‐6‐chelate [Me₂In(μ‐O(CH₂)₃NMe₂)]₂ ( 7 ) have been synthesized from trimethylindium and equimolar amounts of the corresponding enantiomerically pure dimethylamino alcohols or of the achiral dimethylaminopropanol by elimination of methane. Their ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and mass spectra as well as the X‐ray single crystal structure analyses of [Me₂In{μ‐O(CH₂)₂NMe₂}]₂ ( 1 ), 3, 5, 6 and 7 are described and discussed. The coordinative N→In bonds of the five‐coordinate indium complexes show dynamic dissociation/association processes. 1—6 were found to be useful reagents for the partial kinetic resolution of 2‐carbomethoxy‐1, 1′‐binaphthyl triflate.     

Hypervalent selenium compounds containing N → Se intramolecular interactions: synthesis,characterization and X‐ray structures of [2‐(Me2NCH2)C6H4]SeS(S)PR2 (R = Ph,OiPr)

[2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]Se? S(S)PR₂ [R = Ph (1), OⁱPr (2)] were prepared by reacting [2‐(Me₂NCH₂)C₆H₄]₂Se₂ with the appropriate disulfanes, [R₂P(S)S]₂. The compounds were characterized by multinuclear magnetic resonance (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P). The molecular structures of 1 and 2 were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Both compounds are monomeric and the nitrogen atom of the pendent CH₂NMe₂ arm is strongly coordinated to the selenium atom. The organophosphorus ligands are monodentate, thus resulting in a T‐shaped coordination geometry around selenium. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Mono-Phosphazenyl Phosphines (R2N)3P=N–P(NR2)2 – Strong P-Bases,P-Donors,and P-Nucleophiles for the Construction of Chelates

We present a convenient three-step synthesis of amino substituted phosphazenyl phosphines of the general formula (R₂N)₃P=N–P(NR₂)₂ [NR₂ = N(CH₂)₄, N(CH₂)₅, N(CH₂)₆]. These easily accessible mixed valent compounds display a surprisingly high proton affinity and basicity in the same range as the corresponding Schwesinger diphosphazene (Me₂N)₃P=N–P=NEt(NMe₂)₂ (Et-P₂) and Verkade's proazaphosphatrane superbases. Within the central [P^III–N=P^V] scaffold, the phosphine P^III and not the phosphazene N^III atom is the center of highest proton affinity, basicity and donor strength. As P-bases, the title compounds display calculated proton affinities between 265.8 (NR₂ = NMe₂) and 274.7 kcal · mol^–1 [NR₂ = N(CH₂)₄] and pK_BH⁺ values between 26.4 (NR₂ = NMe₂) and 31.5 [NR₂ = N(CH₂)₄] on the acetonitrile scale. As P-nucleophiles, they are key intermediates in the synthesis of hyperbasic bis(diphosphazene) proton sponges, chiral bis(diphosphazene) proton pincers, bisphosphazides, and superbasic P₂-bisylides. Their Staudinger reactions as nucleophile towards 1,8-diazidonaphthalene leading to 1,8-naphthalene-bisphosphazides is described in detail. The donor strength of the title compounds towards fragments [Se] and [Ni(CO)₃] is in the same range as that of N-heterocyclic carbenes.     

Titanacarborane mediated C-N bond forming/breaking reactions

Constrained-geometry titanacarboranes [σ:η¹:η⁵-(OCH₂)(R₂NCH₂)C₂B₉H₉]Ti(NR₂) (R = Me, Et) are synthesized via an unexpected reaction of [Me₃NH][μ-7,8-CH₂OCH₂-7,8-C₂B₉H₁₀] with Ti(NR₂)₄ (R = Me, Et), involving a C-O bond cleavage and C-N bond formation. These complexes can be readily converted to new amide species or alkoxide by reacting with amines or esters, respectively. Insertion of a series of unsaturated molecules into the Ti-N bond of the aforementioned complexes results in the formation of various half-sandwich titanacarboranes. [σ:η¹:η⁵-(OCH₂)(Me₂NCH₂)C₂B₉H₉]Ti(NMe₂) is also able to efficiently catalyze the hydroamination of carbodiimides and the transamination of guanidines. These results are summarized in this brief account.     

Chemistry of [(trimethylsilyl)methyl]carbene complexes of chromium. : Thermolysis of oxido-carbene salts

The synthesis and characterisation of the compounds (CO)₅CrC(X)CH₂SiMe₃ [X = O^?NR₄⁺ (R = Me, Et) and OEt] is reported. The ethoxy-carbene complex is highly susceptible to nucleophilic attack (water, alcohols, NH₃) leading to rupture of the SiCH₂ bond, but is not affected by HCl. The oxido-carbene complex reacts with acetyl chloride in CH₂Cl₂ and in MeCN to give Me₄N[(CO)₅CrCl] and (CO)₅CrNCMe respectively as a consequence of rupture of the CrC(carbene) bond. The formation of [Cr(CO)₅] as an intermediate in these reactions is proposed. With iodine the oxido-carbene gives Me₄N[(CO)₅CrI]. Thermolysis of the oxidocarbene salts (CO)₅CrC(ONMe₄)Y (Y = CH₂SiMe₃, 2-thienyl, cyclopropyl) results in fission of the YC(carbene) bond in each case. When Y is CH₂SiMe₃, or cyclopropyl the solid product of the reaction is a zwitterion carbene complex, (CO)₅CrC(O^?)CH₂NMe₃⁺. The mechanism of these reactions is discussed. No product could be isolated from the reaction between Cr(CO)₆ and the ylide, Me₃NCH₂.     

Intramolecularly Coordinated Gallium Sulfides: Suitable Single Source Precursors for GaS Thin Films

Our studies have been focused on the synthesis of N→Ga coordinated organogallium sulfides [L¹Ga(μ‐S)]₃ ( 1 ) and [L²Ga(μ‐S)]₂ ( 2 ) containing either N,C,N‐ or C,N‐chelating ligands L¹ or L² (L¹ is {2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}^? and L² is {2‐(Et₂NCH₂)‐4,6‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂}^?). As the result of the different ligands, compounds 1 and 2 differ mutually in their structure. To change the Ga/S ratio, unusually N→Ga coordinated organogallium tetrasulfide L¹Ga(κ²‐S₄) ( 3 ) was prepared and the unprecedented complex [{2‐[CH{(CH₂)₃CH₃}(μ‐OH)]‐6‐CH₂NMe₂}C₆H₃]GaS ( 4 ) was also isolated as the minor by‐product of the reaction. Compounds 1 – 3 were further studied as potential single‐source precursors for amorphous GaS thin film deposition by spin‐coating.     

N‐Functionalized Ferrocenes: Subvalent Group XIV Element Chlorides and tert‐Butyllithium‐Induced C−C Bond Cleavage under Mild Conditions

The ferrocene derivative (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArNCH)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} ( 1 ; Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)) reacts diastereoselectively with LiR by carbolithiation and subsequent hydrolysis to give (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArHNCHR)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} ( 3 : R=tBu; 4 : R=Ph; 5 : R=Me) in high yields. For R=tBu, the organolithium derivative (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArLiNCHR)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} ( 2 ) was isolated. Compound 2 reacts with GeCl₂?dioxane and SnCl₂ to give the metallylene amide chlorides (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArMNCHtBu)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} 6 (M=GeCl) and 7 (M=SnCl), respectively, which each contain three stereogenic centers. The potential of 7 as a ligand in transition‐metal chemistry is demonstrated by formation of its complex (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArMNCHtBu)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} [ 9 , M= Sn(Cl)W(CO)₅]. Treatment of 3 with tert‐butyllithium at room temperature causes an unprecedented carbon–carbon bond cleavage whereas under kinetic control, lithiation at the Cp‐3 position takes place, which leads to the isolation of (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArHNCHtBu)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)‐3‐SiMe₃} ( 10 ).     

Synthese und Charakterisierung neuer intramolekular stickstoffstabilisierter Organoaluminium‐ und Organogalliumalkoxide

Synthesis and Characterization of New Intramolecularly Nitrogen‐stabilized Organoaluminium‐ and Organogallium Alkoxides The intramolecularly nitrogen stabilized organoaluminium alkoxides [Me₂Al{μ‐O(CH₂)₃NMe₂}]₂ ( 1a ), Me₂AlOC₆H₂(CH₂NMe₂)₃‐2,4,6 ( 2a ), [(S)‐Me₂Al{μ‐OCH₂CH(i‐Pr)NH‐i‐Pr}]₂ ( 3a ) and [(S)‐Me₂Al{μ‐OCH₂CH(i‐Pr)NHCH₂Ph}]₂ ( 4 ) are formed by reacting equimolar amounts of AlMe₃ and Me₂N(CH₂)₃OH, C₆H₂[(CH₂NMe₂)₃‐2,4,6]OH, (S)‐i‐PrNHCH(i‐Pr)CH₂OH, or (S)‐PhCH₂NHCH(i‐Pr)CH₂OH, respectively. An excess of AlMe₃ reacts with Me₂N(CH₂)₂OH, Me₂N(CH₂)₃OH, C₆H₂[(CH₂NMe₂)₃‐2,4,6]OH, and (S)‐i‐PrNHCH(i‐Pr)CH₂OH producing the “pick‐a‐back” complexes [Me₂AlO(CH₂)₂NMe₂](AlMe₃) ( 5 ), [Me₂AlO(CH₂)₃NMe₂](AlMe₃) ( 1b ), [Me₂AlOC₆H₂(CH₂NMe₂)₃‐2,4,6](AlMe₃)₂ ( 2b ), and [(S)‐Me₂AlOCH₂CH(i‐Pr)NH‐i‐Pr](AlMe₃) ( 3b ), respectively. The mixed alkyl‐ or alkenylchloroaluminium alkoxides [Me(Cl)Al{μ‐O(CH₂)₂NMe₂}]₂ ( 6 ) and [{CH₂=C(CH₃)}(Cl)Al{μ‐O(CH₂)₂NMe₂}]₂ ( 8 ) are to obtain from Me₂AlCl and Me₂N(CH₂)₂OH and from [Cl₂Al{μ‐O(CH₂)₂NMe₂}]₂ ( 7 ) and CH₂=C(CH₃)MgBr, respectively. The analogous dimethylgallium alkoxides [Me₂Ga{μ‐O(CH₂)₃NMe₂}]₂ ( 9 ), [(S)‐Me₂Ga{μ‐OCH₂CH(i‐Pr)NH‐i‐Pr}]_n ( 10 ), [(S)‐Me₂Ga{μ‐OCH₂CH(i‐Pr)NHCH₂Ph}]_n ( 11 ), [(S)‐Me₂Ga{μ‐OCH₂CH(i‐Pr)N(Me)CH₂Ph}]_n ( 12 ) and [(S)‐Me₂Ga{μ‐OCH₂(C₄H₇NHCH₂Ph)}]_n ( 13 ) result from the equimolar reactions of GaMe₃ with the corresponding alcohols. The new compounds were characterized by elemental analyses, ¹H‐, ¹³C‐ and ²⁷Al‐NMR spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry. Additionally, the structures of 1a , 1b , 2a , 2b , 3a , 5 , 6 and 8 were determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Iron‐Complex‐Catalyzed C?C Bond Cleavage of Organonitriles: Catalytic Metathesis Reaction between H?Si and R?CN Bonds to Afford R?H and Si?CN Bonds

The first example of the catalytic C? CN bond cleavage of acetonitrile as well as Si? CN bond formation have been achieved in the photoreaction of MeCN with Et₃SiH promoted by [Cp(CO)₂FeMe]. This catalytic system is applicable to other organonitriles. Several iron complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)(CO)₂FeR′] (R₅=H₅, H₄Me, Me₅, H₄SiMe₃, H₄I, H₄P(O)(OMe)₂; R′=SiMe₃, CH₂Ph, Me, Cl, I) were examined as catalyst, and [Cp(CO)₂FeMe] was found to be the best precursor. A catalytic reaction cycle was proposed, which involves oxidative addition of Et₃SiH to [Cp(CO)FeMe], reductive elimination of CH₄ from [Cp(CO)FeMe(H)(SiEt₃)], coordination of RCN to [Cp(CO)Fe(SiEt₃)], silyl migration from Fe to N in the coordinated RCN, and dissociation of Et₃SiNC from Fe. The reaction with MeCN of [Cp(CO)Fe(py)(SiEt₃)], which was newly prepared and determined by X‐ray analysis, and the reaction of Et₃SiH with MeCN in the presence of a catalytic amount of [Cp(CO)Fe(py)(SiEt₃)] showed that the 16‐electron species [Cp(CO)Fe(SiEt₃)] is the active species in the catalytic cycle (TON up to 251).     

Über den Phosphandiyl‐Transfer von invers‐polarisierten Phosphaalkenen R1P=C(NMe2)2 (R1 = tBu,Cy, Ph,H) auf Phospheniumkomplexe [(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2M=P(R2)R3] (R2 = R3 = Ph; R2 = tBu,R3 = H; R2 = Ph,R3 = N(SiMe3)2)

Phosphanediyl Transfer from Inversely Polarized Phosphaalkenes R¹P=C(NMe₂)₂ (R¹ = tBu, Cy, Ph, H) onto Phosphenium Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂M=P(R²)R³] (R² = R³ = Ph; R² = tBu, R³ = H; R² = Ph, R³ = N(SiMe₃)₂) Reaction of the freshly prepared phosphenium tungsten complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W=PPh₂] ( 3 ) with the inversely polarized phosphaalkenes RP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1 ) ( a : R = tBu; b : Cy; c : Ph) led to the η²‐diphosphanyl complexes ( 9a‐c ) which were isolated by column chromatography as yellow crystals in 24‐30 % yield. Similarly, phosphenium complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂M=P(H)tBu] (M = W ( 6 ); Mo ( 8 )) were converted into (M = W ( 11 ); Mo ( 12 )) by the formal abstraction of the phosphanediyl [PtBu] from 1a . Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W=P(Ph)N(SiMe₃)₂] ( 4 ) with HP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1d ) gave rise to the formation of yellow crystalline ( 10 ). The products were characterized by elemental analyses and spectra (IR, ¹H, ¹³C‐, ³¹P‐NMR, MS). The molecular structure of compound 10 was elucidated by an X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

Metallsubstituierte Phosphaalkene und Acylphosphane. 31. Zur Reaktivität von (η5-C5Me5)(CO)2FeP = C(NMe2)2 gegenüber Zinndichlorid. Röntgenstrukturanalyse von {(η5-C5Me5)[η1-(Me2N)2C = P?P = C(NMe2)2](CO)2Fe}+{[Me2N)2C]2P}+(FeCl4)2−

Transition-Metal Substituted Phosphaalkenes and Acyl Phosphanes. 31 [1] Reactivity of (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂FeP = C(NMe₂)₂ towards Tin Dichloride. X-Ray Structure Analysis of {(η⁵-C₅Me₅)[η¹-(Me₂N)₂C = P? P = C(NMe₂)₂](CO)₂Fe}⁺{[Me₂N)₂C]₂P}⁺(FeCl₄)^2? Reaction of metallophosphaalkene (η⁵-C₅Me₅)(CO)₂ · FeP = C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1 ) with anhydrous tin dichloride affords the salt-like compound {(η⁵-C₅Me₅)[η¹-(Me₂N)₂C = P? P = C(NMe₂)₂] · (CO)₂Fe}⁺{[(Me₂N)₂C]₂P}⁺(FeCl₄)^2? 5 which is characterized by single crystal X-ray analysis and spectra (IR, ¹H, ³¹P-NMR).     

Catalytic diversity of diene complexes of niobium and tantalum on polymerizations of ethylene,norbornene, and methyl methacrylate

Half‐metallocene diene complexes of niobium and tantalum catalyzed three‐types of polymerization: (1) the living polymerization of ethylene by niobium and tantalum complexes, MCl₂(η⁴‐1,3‐diene)(η⁵‐C₅R₅) ( 1‐4 ; M = Nb, Ta; R = H, Me) combined with an excess of methylaluminoxane; (2) the stereoselective ring opening metathesis polymerization of norbornene by bis(benzyl) tantalum complexes, Ta(CH₂Ph)₂(η⁴‐1,3‐butadiene)(η⁵‐C₅R₅) ( 11 : R = Me; 12 : R = H) and Ta(CH₂Ph)₂(η⁴‐o‐xylylene)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) ( 16 ); and (3) the polymerization of methyl methacrylate by butadiene‐diazabutadiene complexes of tantalum, Ta(η²‐RN=CHCH=NR)(η⁴‐1,3‐butadiene)(η⁵‐C₅Me₅) ( 25 : R = p‐methoxyphenyl; 26 : R = cyclohexyl) in the presence of an aluminum compound ( 24 ) as an activator of the monomer.     

Neutral and Anionic Monomeric Zirconium Imides Prepared via Selective C=N Bond Cleavage of a Multidentate and Sterically Demanding β‐Diketiminato Ligand

A sterically encumbering multidentate β‐diketiminato ligand, ^tBuL2 (^tBuL2=[ArNC(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]^?, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃), is reported in this study along with its coordination chemistry to zirconium(IV). Using the lithio salt of this ligand, Li(^tBuL2) ( 4 ), the zirconium(IV) precursor (^tBuL2)ZrCl₃ ( 6 ) could be readily prepared in 85 % yield and structurally characterized. Reduction of 6 with 2 equiv of KC₈ resulted in formation of the terminal and mononuclear zirconium imide‐chloride [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]Zr(=NAr)(Cl) ( 7 ) as the result of reductive C=N cleavage of the imino fragment in the multidentate ligand ^tBuL2 by an elusive Zr^II species (^tBuL2)ZrCl ( A ). The azabutadienyl ligand in 7 can be further reduced by 2 e^? with KC₈ to afford the anionic imide [K(THF)₂]{[CH(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂]Zr=NAr} ( 8‐2THF ) in 42 % isolated yield. Complex 8‐2THF results from the oxidative addition of an amine C?H bond followed by migration to the vinylic group of the formal [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]^? ligand in 7 . All halides in 6 can be replaced with azides to afford (^tBuL2)Zr(N₃)₃ ( 9 ) which was structurally characterized, and reduction with two equiv of KC₈ also results in C=N bond cleavage of ^tBuL2 to form [C(tBu)CHC(tBu)NCH₂CH₂N(Me)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]Zr(=NAr)(N₃) ( 10 ), instead of the expected azide disproportionation to N^3? and N₂. Solid‐state single crystal structural studies confirm the formation of mononuclear and terminal zirconium imido groups in 7 , 8‐Et₂O , and 10 with Zr=NAr distances being 1.8776(10), 1.9505(15), and 1.881(3) Å, respectively.     

The Synthesis,Characterization and Dehydrogenation of Sigma‐Complexes of BN‐Cyclohexanes

The coordination chemistry of the 1,2‐BN‐cyclohexanes 2,2‐R₂‐1,2‐B,N‐C₄H₁₀ (R₂=HH, MeH, Me₂) with Ir and Rh metal fragments has been studied. This led to the solution (NMR spectroscopy) and solid‐state (X‐ray diffraction) characterization of [Ir(PCy₃)₂(H)₂(η²η²‐H₂BNR₂C₄H₈)][BAr^F₄] (NR₂=NH₂, NMeH) and [Rh(iPr₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PiPr₂)(η²η²‐H₂BNR₂C₄H₈)][BAr^F₄] (NR₂=NH₂, NMeH, NMe₂). For NR₂=NH₂ subsequent metal‐promoted, dehydrocoupling shows the eventual formation of the cyclic tricyclic borazine [BNC₄H₈]₃, via amino‐borane and, tentatively characterized using DFT/GIAO chemical shift calculations, cycloborazane intermediates. For NR₂=NMeH the final product is the cyclic amino‐borane HBNMeC₄H₈. The mechanism of dehydrogenation of 2,2‐H,Me‐1,2‐B,N‐C₄H₁₀ using the {Rh(iPr₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PiPr₂)}⁺ catalyst has been probed. Catalytic experiments indicate the rapid formation of a dimeric species, [Rh₂(iPr₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PiPr₂)₂H₅][BAr^F₄]. Using the initial rate method starting from this dimer, a first‐order relationship to [amine‐borane], but half‐order to [Rh] is established, which is suggested to be due to a rapid dimer–monomer equilibrium operating.     

Reaction of 3-dimethylamino-(1,1 -dimethyl) propyl magnesium chloride with tin (IV) and tin (II) chlorides. Stabilization of a SnCl+ cation in the new tin cluster [Me2NCH2CH2C(Me2)SnCl]3 · SnCl2

The reactions of the functional Grignard reagent Me₂ NCH₂CH₂C(Me₂)MgCl (4) with tin tetrachloride, dimethyltin dichloride, and tin (II) chloride are described. From the reactions the compounds bis(3-dimethylamino-1,1-dimethylpropyl) tin dichloride, [Me₂NCH₂CH₂C(Me₂)]₂SnCl₂ (5) , dimethyl(3-dimethylamino-1,1-dimethylpropyl) chlorostannane, Me₂ClSnC(Me₂)CH₂CH₂NMe₂ (6) , 1,1,2,2-tetramethyl-1,2-bis(3-dimethylamino-1,1-dimethylpropyl) distannane,[Me₂SnC(Me₂)CH₂CH₂NMe₂]₂ (7) , 3-dimethylamino-(1,1-dimethyl)propyl tin (II) chloride, Me₂NCH₂CH₂C(Me₂)SnCl (8) , hexakis(3-dimethylamino-1,1-dimethylpropyl) cyclotristannane, {[Me₂NCH₂CH₂C(Me₂)]₂Sn}₃ (9a) , and the tin cluster [Me₂NCH₂CH₂C(Me₂)SnCl]₃ · SnCl₂ (10) have been isolated and characterized by means of multinuclear NMR and Mössbauer spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. 10 crystallizes in the trigonal space group P3₁ with the unit cell dimensions a 11.938, c 21.873 Å, V 2699.6 ų Z = 3. The structure was refined to a final R value of 0.064. 10 represents a tetranuclear cluster the skeleton of which is composed out of 4 Sn and a bridging Cl. Formally, the central tin atom is a SnCl⁺ cation stabilized by three stannylene units in a Ψ-trigonal bipyramidal environment. The tin-tin bond lengths are 288.2, 287.3 and 315.6 pm. The intramolecular Sn? N interactions amount to 242.8, 247.4 and 221.0 pm.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of Diazene Adducts: Isolation of iso‐Diazene Stabilized as a Borane Adduct

This work describes the synthesis and full characterization of a series of GaCl₃ and B(C₆F₅)₃ adducts of diazenes R¹?N?N?R² (R¹=R²=Me₃Si, Ph; R¹=Me₃Si, R²=Ph). Trans‐Ph?N?N?Ph forms a stable adduct with GaCl₃, whereas no adduct, but instead a frustrated Lewis acid–base pair is formed with B(C₆F₅)₃. The cis‐Ph?N?N?Ph ? B(C₆F₅)₃ adduct could only be isolated when UV light was used, which triggers the isomerization from trans‐ to cis‐Ph?N?N?Ph, which provides more space for the bulky borane. Treatment of trans‐Ph?N?N?SiMe₃ with GaCl₃ led to the expected trans‐Ph?N?N?SiMe₃ ? GaCl₃ adduct but the reaction with B(C₆F₅)₃ triggered a 1,2‐Me₃Si shift, which resulted in the formation of a highly labile iso‐diazene, Me₃Si(Ph)N?N; stabilized as a B(C₆F₅)₃ adduct. Trans‐Me₃Si?N?N?SiMe₃ forms a labile cis‐Me₃Si?N?N?SiMe₃ ? B(C₆F₅)₃ adduct, which isomerizes to give the transient iso‐diazene species (Me₃Si)₂N?N ? B(C₆F₅)₃ upon heating. Both iso‐diazene species insert easily into one B?C bond of B(C₆F₅)₃ to afford hydrazinoboranes. All new compounds were fully characterized by means of X‐ray crystallography, vibrational spectroscopy, CHN analysis, and NMR spectroscopy. All compounds were further investigated by DFT and the bonding situation was assessed by natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis.