Transfer hydrogenation of ketones catalysed by half‐sandwich (η6‐p‐cymene) ruthenium(II) complexes incorporating benzoylhydrazone ligands

Neutral half‐sandwich η⁶‐p ‐cymene ruthenium(II) complexes of general formula [Ru(η⁶‐p ‐cymene)Cl(L)] (HL = monobasic O, N bidendate benzoylhydrazone ligand) have been synthesized from the reaction of [Ru(η⁶‐p ‐cymene)(μ‐Cl)Cl]₂ with acetophenone benzoylhydrazone ligands. All the complexes have been characterized using analytical and spectroscopic (Fourier transform infrared, UV–visible, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR) techniques. The molecular structures of three of the complexes have been determined using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, indicating a pseudo‐octahedral geometry around the ruthenium(II) ion. All the ruthenium(II) arene complexes were explored as catalysts for transfer hydrogenation of a wide range of aromatic, cyclic and aliphatic ketones with 2‐propanol using 0.1 mol% catalyst loading, and conversions of up to 100% were obtained. Further, the influence of other variables on the transfer hydrogenation reaction, such as base, temperature, catalyst loading and substrate scope, was also investigated.     

Ru–η6‐benzene–phosphine complex‐catalyzed transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Three Ru–η⁶‐benzene–phosphine complexes bearing tri‐(p‐methoxyphenyl)phosphine, triphenylphosphine and tri‐(p‐trifluoromethylphenyl)phosphine were synthesized and characterized by ³¹P{¹H} NMR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C{¹H} NMR and elemental analyses. Complex 1 was further identified by X‐ray crystallography. These complexes exhibit good to excellent activities for the transfer hydrogenation of ketones in refluxing 2‐propanol, and the highest turnover frequency (TOF) is up to 5940 h⁻¹. The effect of electronic factors of these complexes on the transfer hydrogenation of ketones reveals that the catalytic activity is promoted by electron‐donating phosphine and the catalyst stability is improved by electron‐withdrawing phosphine. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Ruthenium(II) complexes of hybrid 8‐hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone ligands: synthesis,characterization and catalytic applications

A series of new hexa‐coordinated ruthenium(II) hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone complexes of the type [Ru(CO)(EPh₃)(B)(L)] (E = P or As; B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py; L = hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone) were synthesized by reacting ruthenium precursor complexes [RuHCl(CO)(EPh₃)₂(B)] (E = P or As; B = PPh₃, AsPh₃ or Py) with hydroxyquinoline–thiosemicarbazone ligands in ethanol. The new complexes were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic (FT‐IR, UV–visible, NMR (¹H, ¹³C and ³¹P) and fast atom bombardment (FAB)–mass spectrometric methods. Based on the spectral results, an octahedral geometry was assigned for all the complexes. The new complexes showed good catalytic activity for the conversion of aldehydes to amides in the presence of hydroxylamine hydrochloride–sodium bicarbonate and for the oxidation of alkanes into their corresponding alcohols and ketones in the presence of m‐chloroperbenzoic acid. The complexes also catalyzed the N‐alkylation of benzylamine in the presence of KOtBu in alcohol medium. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

SBA‐15‐supported N‐coordinate ruthenium(II) materials bearing sulfonamide‐type ligands: Effect of ligand backbones on catalytic transfer hydrogenation of ketones and aldehydes

[RuLCl(p ‐cymene)] (L = N ‐arylsulfonylphenylenediamine) complexes ( 2 _{a – d} ) were synthesized from the reaction between [Ru(p ‐cymene)Cl₂]₂ and ligand. Additionally, SBA‐15–[RuLCl(p ‐cymene)] derived catalysts ( 3 _{a – d} ) were successfully immobilized onto mesoporous silica (SBA‐15) by an easily accessible approach. The structural elucidations of 2 _{a – d} and 3 _{a – d} were carried out with various methods such as ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and infrared spectroscopies, elemental analysis, thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis, nitrogen adsorption–desorption and scanning electron microscopy/energy‐dispersive X‐ray analysis. The Ru(II) complexes and materials were found to be highly active and selective catalysts for the transfer hydrogenation (TH) reaction of aldehydes and ketones. The influence of various 1,2‐phenylenediamines on the reactivity of the catalysts (complexes or materials) was studied and the catalysts ( 2 _d and 3 _d ) with a 4,5‐dichlorophenylenediamine substituent showed the best activity (the maximum turnover frequencies are 2916 and 2154 h⁻¹ for TH of 4‐fluoroacetophenone, and 6000 and 4956 h⁻¹ for TH of 4‐chlorobenzaldehyde).     

Ferrocene based chiral binuclear η6‐benzene‐Ru(II)‐phosphinite complexes: Synthesis,characterization and catalytic activity in asymmetric reduction of ketones

In the present study, a series of chiral C₂‐symmetric ferrocenyl based binuclear η⁶‐benzene‐Ru(II) complexes bearing diphenylphosphinite and diisopropylphosphinite moieties have been synthesised. The new binuclear η⁶‐benzene‐Ru(II)‐phosphinite complexes were characterised based on nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P–NMR), FT‐IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. Then, these complexes have been screened as catalytic precursors in the transfer hydrogenation of acetophenone with 2‐propanol as both the hydrogen source and solvent in the presence of KOH. The corresponding optically active secondary alcohols were obtained in excellent conversion rates between 96 and 99% and moderate to good enantioselectivities (up to 78% ee). The complex 5 was the most efficient catalyst among the four new complexes investigated herein.     

The application of tunable tridendate P‐based ligands for the Ru(II)‐catalysed transfer hydrogenation of various ketones

Two novel versatile tridendate aminophosphine–phosphinite and phosphinite ligands were prepared and their trinuclear neutral ruthenium(II) dichloro complexes were found to be effective catalysts for the transfer hydrogenation of various ketones in excellent conversions up to 99% in the presence of 2‐propanol/NaOH in 0.1 M isopropanol solution. Particularly, [Ru₃(PPh₂OC₂H₄)₂ N–PPh₂(η⁶‐p‐cymene)₃Cl₆] acts as an excellent catalyst giving the corresponding alcohols in excellent conversion up to 99% (turnover frequency ≤ 1176 h^?1). A comparison of the catalytic properties of the complexes is also discussed briefly. Furthermore, the structures of these ligands and their corresponding complexes have also been clarified using a combination of multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy and elemental analysis. ¹H–¹³C HETCOR or ¹H–¹H COSY correlation experiments were used to confirm the spectral assignments. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Half‐sandwich Ru (II) complexes containing (N,O) Schiff base ligands: Catalysts for base‐free transfer hydrogenation of ketones

Two new half‐sandwich Ru (II)(p‐cymene) complexes ( 1 and 2 ) containing dopamine‐based (N, O) Schiff base ligands ( L ¹ H and L ² H ) were synthesized and characterized by FT‐IR, UV–Visible and ¹H & ¹³C NMR spectral techniques, and elemental analyses. The spectroscopic and analytical data revealed monobasic bidentate coordination of the ligands with Ru ion. The molecular structures of L ¹ H , L ² H and 2 were further confirmed by single crystal X‐ray diffraction study. Complexes 1 and 2  have been employed as catalysts in the transfer hydrogenation of ketones using 2‐propanol as a hydrogen source at 85 °C under base‐free condition. Good to the excellent yield of secondary alcohols, gram scale synthesis, and high TON and TOF made this catalytic system interesting.     

Chiral η6‐Arene/N‐Tosylethylenediamine–Ruthenium(II) Complexes: Solution Behavior and Catalytic Activity for Asymmetric Hydrogenation

Aromatic ketones are enantioseletively hydrogenated in alcohols containing [RuX{(S,S)‐Tsdpen}(η⁶‐p‐cymene)] (Tsdpen=TsNCH(C₆H₅)CH(C₆H₅)NH₂; X=TfO, Cl) as precatalysts. The corresponding Ru hydride (X=H) acts as a reducing species. The solution structures and complete spectral assignment of these complexes have been determined using 2D NMR (¹H‐¹H DQF‐COSY, ¹H‐¹³C HMQC, ¹H‐¹⁵N HSQC, and ¹H‐¹⁹F HOESY). Depending on the nature of the solvents and conditions, the precatalysts exist as a covalently bound complex, tight ion pair of [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and X^?, solvent‐separated ion pair, or discrete free ions. Solvent effects on the NH₂ chemical shifts of the Ru complexes and the hydrodynamic radius and volume of the Ru⁺ and TfO^? ions elucidate the process of precatalyst activation for hydrogenation. Most notably, the Ru triflate possessing a high ionizability, substantiated by cyclic voltammetry, exists in alcoholic solvents largely as a solvent‐separated ion pair and/or free ions. Accordingly, its diffusion‐derived data in CD₃OD reflect the independent motion of [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and TfO^?. In CDCl₃, the complex largely retains the covalent structure showing similar diffusion data for the cation and anion. The Ru triflate and chloride show similar but distinct solution behavior in various solvents. Conductivity measurements and catalytic behavior demonstrate that both complexes ionize in CH₃OH to generate a common [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)] and X^?, although the extent is significantly greater for X=TfO^?. The activation of [RuX(Tsdpen)(cymene)] during catalytic hydrogenation in alcoholic solvent occurs by simple ionization to generate [Ru⁺(Tsdpen)(cymene)]. The catalytic activity is thus significantly influenced by the reaction conditions.     

Active ruthenium‐(N‐heterocyclic carbene) complexes for hydrogenation of ketones

Four ruthenium‐N‐heterocyclic carbene complexes ( 3–6 ) have been prepared and the new compounds characterized by C, H, N analyses, ¹H‐NMR and ¹³C‐NMR. The reduction of ketones to alcohols via transfer hydrogenation was achieved with catalytic amounts of complexes 3–6 in the presence of t‐BuOK. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

In situ Alkylation of 4,4′‐Vinylenedipyridine for Inorganic‐Organic Iodides/Iodidomercurates

Solvothermal reactions of HgI₂, 4,4′‐vinylenedipyridine, and HI in alcoholic solution (methanol, ethanol, or pentanol) gave rise to a family of organic‐inorganic hybrid complexes, formulated as [C₁₄H₁₆N₂][I₄]^2– ( 1 ), [C₁₆H₂₀N₂][HgI₄] ( 2 ), and [C₂₂H₃₂N₂][HgI₄]₄ ( 3 ). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction reveals that all three compounds are discrete structures, including the inorganic anion [I₄]^2– or [HgI₄]^2– and an organic cation, where the resulting organic cations were generated in situ alkylation reactions of 4,4′‐vinylenedipyridine with alcohols, with cleavage of the alcoholic C–O bond followed by a one‐step in situ N‐alkylation reaction of 4,4′‐vinylenedipyridine in acidic HI solution. X‐ray powder diffraction (XRD), ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR, energy‐dispersive X‐ray (EDS), IR, as well as UV/Vis/NIR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) were used to characterize the complexes.