Synthesis, characterization and electrochemical studies of the heterometallic diclusters [{Fe2(μ-CO)(CO)6(μ-PPh2)Au}2(diphosphine)] (diphosphine=dppm, dppip, dppe, dppp)

Treatment of [(ClAu)₂(diphosphine)] {diphosphine=bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm), bis(diphenylphosphino)isopropane (dppip), 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe), 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp)} with two equivalents of the anion [Fe₂(μ-CO)(CO)₆(μ-PPh₂)]⁻ in the presence of TlBF₄ gives the new heterometallic diclusters [{Fe₂(μ-CO)(CO)₆(μ-PPh₂)Au}₂(diphosphine)] that have been isolated and characterized. Their ³¹P-NMR spectra show different patterns as a function of the diphosphine ligand. The electrochemical behavior of these compounds has been investigated and compared with that of the mono- [Fe₂(μ-CO)(CO)₆(μ-PPh₂)(μ-AuPPh₃)] and tricluster [{Fe₂(μ-CO)(CO)₆(μ-PPh₂)Au}₃(triphos)] derivatives.     

Electrophilic attacks on μ3-bridging acetyl in a triiron carbonyl cluster; C---O bond cleavage to give μ3-ethylidyne and μ-methoxo groups

The triiron carbonyl cluster anion, [Fe₃(CO)₉(μ₃-CH₃CO)]⁻ react with fluoroboric acid to give the neutral cluster Fe₃(CO)₉(μ-H)(μ₃-CH₃CO). Methylfluorosulphate reacts to give the compound Fe₃(CO)₉(μ₃-CCH₃) (μ₃-OCH₃) in which the μ₃-acetyl group has undergone stoichiometric C---O bond cleavage.     

The insertion of acetylene into the formal ruthenium-phosphorus bonds of closo-[Ru4(μ4-PPh)2(μ2-CO)(CO)10. Crystal structure of [Ru4(μ4-PPh){μ4-η-P(Ph)CHCH}(μ2-CO)(CO)10]

Treatment of closo-[Ru₄(μ₄-PPh)₂(μ₂-CO)(CO)₁₀] with acetylene under ambient conditions leads to the insertion of the acetylene into the skeletal framework of the cluster and the formation of [Ru₄(μ₄-PPh){μ₄-η³-P(Ph)CHCH}(μ₂-CO)(CO)₁₀], the structure of which has been determined X-ray crystallographically.     

Joint x-ray and neutron diffraction structure analysis of [(μ-H)3Re3(CO)8{(EtO)2POP(OEt)2}2]

The compound [(μ-H)₃Re₃(CO)₈{(EtO)₂POP(OEt)₂}₂] crystallises in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a 18.053(6), b 16.211(5), c 14.800(3) Å, β = 102.41(2)°, and Z = 4. Simultaneous refinement of a single parameter set to fit 3212 X-Ray (sin θ/λ) > 0.352 Å⁻¹ and 1480 neutron data has led to final weighted residuals R_w(F) of 0.096 (X-Ray) and 0.095 (neutron). The molecule exhibits noncrystallographic C₂ symmetry, with two edges of the Re₃ triangle bridged by (OEt)₂POP(OEt)₂ ligands. The hydride ligands lie close to the trimetal plane with each hydride bridging an Re---Re vector. Average molecular parameters involving the hydride ligands are Re---H 1.812(17), Re---Re 3.282(17) Å, Re---H---Re 130(3) and H---Re---H 107.6(27)/dg. All eight carbonyl ligands are terminal, the ligand polyhedron being derived from that in H₃Re₃(CO)₁₂ by substitution of four axial carbonyls by two bidentate phosphite ligands.     

Binuclear ruthenium complexes of fluorous phosphine ligands: Synthesis, properties, and biphasic catalytic activity. Crystal structure of [Ru(μ-O2CMe)(CO)2P(CH2CH2(CF2)5CF3)3]2

The fluorocarbon soluble, binuclear ruthenium(I) complexes [Ru(μ-O₂CMe)(CO)₂L^F]₂, where L^F is the perfluoroalkyl substituted tertiary phosphine, P(C₆H₄-4-CH₂CH₂(CF₂)₇CF₃)₃, or P(CH₂CH₂(CF₂)₅CF₃)₃, were synthesized and partition coefficients for the complexes in fluorocarbon/hydrocarbon biphases were determined. Catalytic hydrogenation of acetophenone to 1-phenylethanol in benzotrifluoride at 105 °C occured in the presence of either [Ru(μ-O₂CMe)(CO)₂P(C₆H₄-4-CH₂CH₂(CF₂)₇CF₃)₃]₂ (1) or [Ru(μ-O₂CMe)(CO)₂P(CH₂CH₂(CF₂)₅CF₃)₃]₂ (2). The X-ray crystal structure of [Ru(μ-O₂CMe)(CO)₂P(CH₂CH₂(CF₂)₅CF₃)₃]₂ was determined. The compound exhibited discrete regions of fluorous and non-fluorous packing.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dieisenkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diiron Complexes: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts spontaneously with dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) to give [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 c ). By thermolysis or photolysis, 2 c loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and yields the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). 3 exhibits a Fe–Fe double bond which could be confirmed by the addition of methylene to the corresponding dimetallacyclopropane [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). The reaction of 1 with dppe (Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh₂) affords [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppe)] ( 5 ). In contrast to the thermolysis of 2 c , yielding 3 , the heating of 5 in toluene leads rapidly to complete decomposition. The reaction of 1 with PPh₃ yields [Fe₂(CO)₆(H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(PPh₃)] ( 6 a ), while with ^tBu₂PH the compound [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 6 b ) is formed. The thermolysis of 6 b affords [Fe₂(CO)₅(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂] and the degradation products [Fe(CO)₃(^tBu₂PH)₂] and [Fe(CO)₄(^tBu₂PH)]. The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 6 b were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Synthesis of Co2Pt, Co2Pd and MoPd2 mixed-metal clusters with the P–N–P assembling ligands (Ph2P)2NH (dppa) and (Ph2P)2NMe (dppaMe). Crystal structure of [Co2Pt(μ3-CO)(CO)6(μ-dppa)]

Heterometallic triangular platinum–cobalt, palladium–cobalt and palladium–molybdenum clusters stabilized by one or two bridging diphosphine ligands such as Ph₂PNHPPh₂ (dppa) or (Ph₂P)₂NMe (dppaMe) or by mixed ligand sets Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂ (dppm)/dppa have been prepared with the objectives of comparing the stability and properties of the clusters as a function of the short-bite diphosphine ligand used and of the metal carbonyl fragment they contain. Ligand redistribution reactions were observed during the purification of [Co₂Pd(μ₃-CO)(CO)₄(μ-dppa)(μ-dppm)] (4) by column chromatography with the formation of [Co₂Pd(μ₃-CO)(CO)₄(μ-dppm)₂] and the dinuclear complex [(OC)₂ Cl] (5). The latter was independently prepared by reaction of [Pd(dppa-P,P′)₂](BF₄)₂ with Na[Co(CO)₄]. Attempts to directly incorporate the ligand (Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₃Si(OMe)₃ (dppaSi) into a cluster or to generate it by N-functionalization of coordinated dppa were unsuccessful, in contrast to results obtained recently with related clusters. The crystal structure of [Co₂Pt(μ₃-CO)(CO)₆(μ-dppa)] (1) has been determined by X-ray diffraction.     

A platina-allenyl ligand coordinated to a triosmium cluster: X-ray structure of the acetylide complex Os3Pt(μ-H)(μ4-η-CCPh)(CO)10(PCy3)

The spiked triangular triosmium-platinum cluster complex Os₃Pt(μ-H)(μ₄-η²-CCPh)(CO)₁₀(PCy₃) has been synthesised by treatment of the unsaturated Os₃Pt(μ-H)₂(CO)₁₀(PCy₃) with LiCCPh followed by protonation. Crystallographic analysis reveals an unusual twisted configuration of the μ₄-η²-CCPh ligand about the triosmium framework such that the complex may be regarded as a platina-allenyl moiety coordinated to an Os₃(μ-H)(CO)₉ unit.     

Antiferromagnetic complexes involving metal---metal bonds IV. Synthesis, molecular structure and magnetic properties of the heterotrinuclear cluster, (C5H5Cr)2(μ-SCMe3)(μ-S)2Fe(CO)3, with direct and indirect exchange between Cr and Fe centers

The photochemical reaction between the antiferromagnetic complex (C₅H₅-CrSCMe₃)₂S (I) (containing a Cr---Cr bond 2.689 Å long) and Fe(CO)₅ results in the elimination of two carbonyl groups and one tert-butyl radical to give (C₅H₅Cr)₂(μ²-SCMe₃)(μ³-S)₂ · Fe(CO)₃ (III). As determined by X-ray diffraction, III contains a Cr---Cr bond of almost the same length as in I (2.707 Å), together with one thiolate and two sulphide bridges. The latter are also linked with the Fe atom of the Fe(CO)₃ moiety (average Fe---S bond length 2.300 Å). Fe also forms a direct bond, 2.726 Å long, with one of the Cr atoms, whereas its distance from the other Cr atom (3.110 Å) is characteristic for non-bonded interactions. Complex III is antiferromagnetic, the exchange parameter, −2J, values for Cr---Cr, Cr(1)---Fe and Cr(2)…Fe are 380, 2600 and 170 cm⁻¹, respectively. The magnetic properties of III are discussed in terms of the “exchange channel model”. The contributions from indirect interactions through bridging ligands are shown to be insignificant compared with direct exchange involving metal---metal bonds. The effects of steric factors and of the nature of the M(CO)_n fragments on the chemical transformations of (C₅H₅CrSCMe₃)₂S · M(CO)_n are discussed.     

C carbide ligand in the trigonal prismatic environment of rheniums in [Re12CS17(CN)6] complexes

The electronic state of carbon in trigonal prismatic environment in [Re₁₂CS₁₇(CN)₆]ⁿ⁻ complexes with variable redox state n = 6 ↔ 8 was studied by molecular orbital method and electron localization function. The state is characterized by sp²-hybridisation and oxidation state −4. A weak long-distance interaction between μ₆-С and μ₂-S in the group [(μ₆-С)(μ₂-S)₃] was discovered for n = 6, the interaction disappears for n = 8.     

Reactions of the cycloheptatrienyl complexes [MX(CO)2(η-C7H7)] (M=Mo, X=Br; M=W, X=I) with CNBu: X-ray crystal structure of [WI(CO)2(CNBu)2(η-C7H7)]

Reaction of [MX(CO)₂(η⁷-C₇H₇)] (M=Mo, X=Br; M=W, X=I) with two equivalents of CNBu^t in toluene affords the trihapto-bonded cycloheptatrienyl complexes [MX(CO)₂(CNBu^t)₂(η³-C₇H₇)] (1, M=Mo, X=Br; 2, M=W, X=I). The X-ray crystal structure of 2 reveals a pseudo-octahedral molecular geometry with an asymmetric ligand arrangement at tungsten in which one CNBu^t is located trans to the η³-C₇H₇ ring. Treatment of 2 with tetracyanoethene results in 1,4-cycloaddition at the η³-C₇H₇ ring to give [WI(CO)₂(CNBu^t)₂{η³-C₉H₇(CN)₄}], 3. The principal reaction type of the molybdenum complex 1 is loss of carbonyl and bromide ligands to afford substituted products [MoBr(CNBu^t)₂(η⁷-C₇H₇)] 4 or [Mo(CO)(CNBu^t)₂(η⁷-C₇H₇)]Br. Reaction of [MoBr(CO)₂(η⁷-C₇H₇)] with one equivalent of CNBu^t in toluene at 60°C affords [MoBr(CO)(CNBu^t)(η⁷-C₇H₇)], 5, which is a precursor to [Mo(CO)(CNBu^t)(NCMe)(η⁷-C₇H₇)][BF₄], 6, by reaction with Ag[BF₄] in acetonitrile. In contrast with the parent dicarbonyl systems [MoX(CO)₂(η⁷-C₇H₇)], complexes of the Mo(CO)(CNBu^t)(η⁷-C₇H₇) auxiliary, 5 and 6, do not afford observable η³-C₇H₇ products by ligand addition at the molybdenum centre.     

The non-perpendicular and non-parallel alkyne bridge in W2(μ-C2H2)(μ-OCH2Bu)2(OCH2Bu)6

The bonding in the ethyne adduct W₂(μ-C₂H₂)(μ-ONp)₂(ONp)₆ (Np=CH₂^tBu) has been examined by various computational methods [Extended Hückel (EHMO), Fenske–Hall, and Gaussian 92 RHF (Restricted Hartree–Fock) and density functional (Becke-3LYP) calculations] employing the model compound W₂(μ-C₂H₂)(μ-OH)₂(OH)₆. EHMO and Fenske–Hall calculations suggest, based on total orbital energy, that a μ-parallel ethyne geometry should have the lowest energy, although traditional frontier orbital arguments agree with the observance of a skewed acetylene bridge. Gaussian 92 computations reproduce the non-perpendicular/non-parallel μ-C₂H₂ geometry in close agreement to that observed in the solid-state (X-ray) structure, which leads us to suggest that the distortion is not sterically imposed by the attendant alkoxide ligands. The observed geometry can be rationalized in terms of Jahn–Teller distortional stabilization from either the μ-parallel or μ-perpendicular mode, i.e., the geometry is favored on electronic grounds, though the potential energy surface is rather shallow. These results are discussed in terms of previous studies of the addition of alkynes to d³–d³ dinuclear complexes of tungsten and in terms of relationships between d²-W(OR)₄ and d⁸-Os(CO)₄ fragments.     

Electrochemical behaviour of [Ru(L)(CO)2Cl2] [Ru(L)(CO)Cl3][Me4N] and [Ru(L)(CO)2(CH3CN)2][CF3SO3]2 complexes (L = 2,2′- bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine)

The clectrochemical behaviour of the complexes [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂], [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ (L = 2,2′-bipyridine or 4,4′-isopropoxycarbonyl-2,2′-bipyridine) has been investigated in CH₃CN. The oxidation of [Ru(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] produces new complexes [Ru^III(L)(CO)(CH₃CN)₂Cl]²⁺ as a consequence of the instability of the electrogenerated transient Ru^III species [Ru^III(L)(CO)₂Cl₂]⁺. In contrast, the oxidation of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N] produces the stable [Ru^III(L)(CO)Cl₃] complex. In contrast [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ is not oxidized in the range up to the most positive potentials achievable. The reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂Cl₂] and [Ru^II(L)(CO)₂(CH₃CN)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂ results in the formation of identical dark blue strongly adherent electroactive films. These films exhibit the characteristics of a metal-metal bond dimer structure. No films are obtained on reduction of [Ru^II(L)(CO)Cl₃][Me₄N]. The effect of the substitution of the bipyridine ligand by electron-withdrawing carboxy ester groups on the electrochemical behaviour of all these complexes has also been investigated.     

Self-consistent-field-Xα-scattered-wave molecular orbital calculation of [CpMoS(μ-S)]2, a molecule that undergoes a photochemically induced isomerization

A self-consistent-field-Xα-scattered-wave molecular orbital calculation was carried out on the [CpMoS(μ-S)]₂(Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅) complex. The calculated results were used to rationalize the observed photochemical isomerization of the title complex to [CpMo(μ-S)][μ-S₂]. It is proposed that a terminal sulfur (S_t) → Mo charge-transfer excitation is responsible for the isomerization, which is an intramolecular redox; i.e. Mo(V) is reduced to Mo(IV) and S²⁻ is oxidized to S₂²⁻ , a result consistent with the charge-transfer character of the excitation. Specifically, the transition responsible for the isomerization is proposed to be 16b_u → 18a_g (¹A_g → ¹B_u). The 18a_g orbital is primarily Mo in character but it is also Mo---S_t π-antibonding; cleavage of the Mo---S_t π-bond facilitates the isomerization.     

Synthesis, properties and structures of the two “electron rich” cobalt-sulphur clusters [Co6(μ3-S)8(PEt3)6]

The reaction of hydrogen sulphide with [Co(H₂O)₆](BF₄)₂ and triethylphosphine in the presence of sodium tetraphenylborate or tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate gave the paramagnetic clusters [Co₆(μ₃-S)₈(PEt₃)₆](Y) (Y = BPh₄, (1), PF₆, (2)). These compounds can be easily reduced by sodium napthalenide to the diamagnetic species [Co₆(μ₃-S)₈(PEt₃)₆] · 2C₄H₈O (3). The molecular structures of 1 and 3 have been established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods. Crystal data: (1) space group P , a = 19.481(9), b = 15.562(7), c = 12.390(b) Å, α = 92.70(8), β = 94.50(7), γ = 94.10(9)°, Z = 2, (3) space group R , a = 11.780(6) Å, α = 92.50(7)°, Z = 1. Both structures were solved by the heavy atom method and refined by full-matrix least-squares techniques to the conventional R factors values of 0.050 for 1 and 0.044 for 3 on the basis of 4251 and 1918 observed reflections, respectively. The two clusters [Co₆(μ₃-S)₈)(PEt₃)₆]^1+,0 are isostructural, the inner core consisting of an octahedron of cobalt atoms with all the faces symmetrically capped by triply bridging sulphur atoms. Each metal centre is additionally linked to a triethylphosphine group so that each cobalt atom is co-ordinated by four sulphur atoms and one phosphorus in a distorted square pyramidal environment. The addition of one electron whilst leaving unchanged the geometry of the inner framework, induces small changes in the structural parameters, the average Co---Co and Co---P distances being 2.794 (3) and 2.162 (2) Å for 1 and 2.817 (3) and 2.138 (2) Å for 3 respectively. Electrochemistry in non-aqueous solvents shows the electron-transfer sequence

Full-size image (3K)

The tricationic species is stable only in the short time of cyclic voltammetric tests.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Synthesis and molecular structure of cisoid and transoid isomers of [Re2(CO)6(1,1′-bis(indenylidene)] derived from the reaction of [Re2(CO)8(MeCN)2] and diazoindene

The compound [Re₂(CO)₈(MeCN)₂] reacts with diazoindene (C₉H₆N₂) while refluxing in THF to afford three dirhenium products in which C₉H₆N₂ is cleaved with loss of N₂ and with incorporation of the residual indenylidene group into the products. Two indenylidene groups are coupled in two diastereomers of [Re₂(CO)₆(μ,η⁵:η⁵-1,1′-C₁₈H₁₂)] where C₁₈H₁₂=bis(indenylidene). X-ray structures show that these isomers are related as RR/SS and RS isomers. These have the two Re(CO)₃ groups coordinated transoid and cisoid, respectively to a trans bis(indenylidene) bridge. The third product is the μ-indenylidene complex [Re₂(CO)₈(μ,η¹:η⁵-C₉H₆)], which was also structurally characterised by X-ray diffraction.     

Electrochemical, spectroelectrochemical and theoretical studies on the reduction and deprotonation of the photovoltaic sensitizer [(H3-tctpy)Ru(NCS)3] (H3-tctpy=2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-4,4′,4′′-tricarboxylic acid)

The electrochemical reduction of the black dye photosensitizer [(H₃-tctpy)Ru^II(NCS)₃]⁻ (H₃-tctpy=2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-4,4′,4′′-tricarboxylic acid) used in photovoltaic cells has been found to be a complex process when studied in dimethylformamide. At low temperatures, fast scan rates and at a glassy carbon electrode, the chemically reversible ligand based one-electron reduction process [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻+e⁻[(H₃-tctpy√⁻)Ru(NCS)₃]²⁻ is detected. This process has a reversible half-wave potential (E^r_1/2) of −1585±20 mV versus Fc/Fc⁺ at 25°C. Under other conditions, a deprotonation reaction occurs upon reduction, which produces [(H_3−x-tctpy^x−)Ru(NCS)₃]^(1+x)− and hydrogen gas. Mechanistic pathways giving rise to the final products are discussed. The E^r_1/2-value for the ligand based reductions of the deprotonated complex is 0.70 V more negative than for [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻. Consequently, data obtained from molecular orbital calculations are consistent with the reaction [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻+e⁻→[(H₂-tctpy⁻)Ru(NCS)₃]²⁻+1/2H₂ yielding the monodeprotonated complex as the major product obtained after electrochemical reduction of [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻. The E^r_1/2-values for the metal based Ru^II/III process differ by 0.30 V when data obtained for the protonated and deprotonated forms of the black dye are compared. Electronic spectra obtained during the course of experiments in an optically transparent thin layer electrolysis configuration are consistent with the overall reaction scheme proposed on the basis of voltammetric measurements and molecular orbital calculations. Reduction studies on the free ligand, H₃-tcpy, are consistent with results obtained with [(H₃-tctpy)Ru(NCS)₃]⁻.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)5(μ‐H)2(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2){μ‐η2‐PCy2C(S)}(μ3‐S)] und [Ru3(CO)5(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐PCy2)2(μ3‐S)]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] and [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts under mild conditions with CS₂ and yields by oxidative decarbonylation and insertion of CS into one phosphido bridge the opened 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐dppm){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] ( 2 ) with only two M–M bonds. The compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; α = 84.65(3), β = 77.21(3), γ = 81.87(3)° and V = 2790.7(11) ų. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂] ( 3 ) with CS₂ in refluxing toluene affords the 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] ( 4 ). The compound cristallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/a with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; β = 104.223(16)° and V = 4570.9(10) ų. Although in the solid state structure one elongated Ru–Ru bond has been found the complex 4 can be considered by means of the ³¹P‐NMR data as an electron‐rich metal cluster.     

The synthesis, structural characterization, magnetochemistry and Mössbauer spectroscopy of [Fe3LnO2(CCl3COO)8H2O(THF)3] (Ln = Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Lu and Y)

The new tetranuclear complexes [Fe₃Ln(μ₃-O)₂(CCl₃COO)₈(H₂O)(THF)₃]·THF (Ln = Ce^III (1), Pr^III (2), Nd^III (3)) and [Fe₃Ln(μ₃-O)₂(CCl₃COO)₈(H₂O)(THF)₃]·THF·C₇H₁₆ (Ln = Sm^III (4), Eu^III (5), Gd^III (6), Tb^III (7), Dy^III (8), Ho^III (9), Lu^III (10) and Y^III (11)) have been prepared. All compounds were prepared by the reaction between [Fe₂BaO(CCl₃COO)₆(THF)₆] and the corresponding Ln^III nitrate salt. The crystal structures of 1–4, 8 and 9 have been determined; these isostructural molecules have a non-planar {Fe₃Ln(μ₃-O)₂} “butterfly” core. Magnetic susceptibility measurements show dominant intramolecular antiferromagnetic exchange interactions for all the complexes. ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy shows three different environments for the Fe^III metal ions, all in their high-spin state S = 5/2 (confirming that no electron transfer from Ce^III to Fe^III occurs in 1). At the time scale of the Mössbauer spectroscopy (about 10⁻⁷ s), evidence of magnetization blocking, i.e. slow relaxation of the magnetization, is observed below 3 K for 7, which was confirmed by ac susceptibility measurements.