Time‐linearized time‐harmonic 3‐D Navier–Stokes shock‐capturing schemes

In the present paper, a numerical method for the computation of time‐harmonic flows, using the time‐linearized compressible Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes equations is developed and validated. The method is based on the linearization of the discretized nonlinear equations. The convective fluxes are discretized using an O(Δx) MUSCL scheme with van Leer flux‐vector‐splitting. Unsteady perturbations of the turbulent stresses are linearized using a frozen‐turbulence‐Reynolds‐number hypothesis, to approximate eddy‐viscosity perturbations. The resulting linear system is solved using a pseudo‐time‐marching implicit ADI‐AF (alternating‐directions‐implicit approximate‐factorization) procedure with local pseudo‐time‐steps, corresponding to a matrix‐successive‐underrelaxation procedure. The stability issues associated with the pseudo‐time‐marching solution of the time‐linearized Navier–Stokes equations are discussed. Comparison of computations with measurements and with time‐nonlinear computations for 3‐D shock‐wave oscillation in a square duct, for various back‐pressure fluctuation frequencies (180, 80, 20 and 10 Hz), assesses the shock‐capturing capability of the time‐linearized scheme. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Performance of very‐high‐order upwind schemes for DNS of compressible wall‐turbulence

The purpose of the present paper is to evaluate very‐high‐order upwind schemes for the direct numerical simulation (DNS ) of compressible wall‐turbulence. We study upwind‐biased (UW ) and weighted essentially nonoscillatory (WENO ) schemes of increasingly higher order‐of‐accuracy (J. Comp. Phys. 2000; 160 :405–452), extended up to WENO 17 (AIAA Paper 2009‐1612, 2009). Analysis of the advection–diffusion equation, both as Δx→0 (consistency), and for fixed finite cell‐Reynolds‐number Re_Δx (grid‐resolution), indicates that the very‐high‐order upwind schemes have satisfactory resolution in terms of points‐per‐wavelength (PPW ). Computational results for compressible channel flow (Re∈[180, 230]; M?_CL ∈[0.35, 1.5]) are examined to assess the influence of the spatial order of accuracy and the computational grid‐resolution on predicted turbulence statistics, by comparison with existing compressible and incompressible DNS databases. Despite the use of baseline O(Δt²) time‐integration and O(Δx²) discretization of the viscous terms, comparative studies of various orders‐of‐accuracy for the convective terms demonstrate that very‐high‐order upwind schemes can reproduce all the DNS details obtained by pseudospectral schemes, on computational grids of only slightly higher density. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Near‐wall profiles of mean flow and turbulence quantities predicted by eddy‐viscosity turbulence models

This paper presents for the simple flow over a flat plate the near‐wall profiles of mean flow and turbulence quantities determined with seven eddy‐viscosity turbulence models: the one‐equation turbulence models of Menter and Spalart & Allmaras; the k‐ω two‐equation model proposed by Wilcox and its TNT, BSL and SST variants and the $k-\sqrt{k}L$ two‐equation model. The results are obtained at several Reynolds numbers ranging from 10⁷ to 2.5 × 10⁹. Sets of nine geometrically similar Cartesian grids are adopted to demonstrate that the numerical uncertainty of the finest grid predictions is negligible. The profiles obtained numerically have relevance for the application of so‐called ‘wall function’ boundary conditions. Such wall functions refer to assumptions about the flow in the viscous sublayer and the ‘log law’ region. It turns out that these assumptions are not always satisfied by our results, which are obtained by computing the flow with full near‐wall resolution. In particular, the solution in the ‘log‐law’ region is dependent on the turbulence model and on the Reynolds number, which is a disconcerting result for those who apply wall functions. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Implicit meanflow–multigrid algorithms for Reynolds stress model computation of 3‐D anisotropy‐driven and compressible flows

The present paper investigates the multigrid (MG) acceleration of compressible Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes computations using Reynolds‐stress model 7‐equation turbulence closures, as well as lower‐level 2‐equation models. The basic single‐grid SG algorithm combines upwind‐biased discretization with a subiterative local‐dual‐time‐stepping time‐integration procedure. MG acceleration, using characteristic MG restriction and prolongation operators, is applied on meanflow variables only (MF–MG), turbulence variables being simply injected onto coarser grids. A previously developed non‐time‐consistent (for steady flows) full‐approximation‐multigrid (s–MG) is assessed for 3‐D anisotropy‐driven and/or separated flows, which are dominated by the convergence of turbulence variables. Even for these difficult test cases CPU‐speed‐ups r_CPUSUP∈[3, 5] are obtained. Alternative, potentially time‐consistent approaches (unsteady u–MG), where MG acceleration is applied at each subiteration, are also examined, using different subiterative strategies, MG cycles, and turbulence models. For 2‐D shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction, the fastest s–MG approach, with a V(2, 0) sawtooth cycle, systematically yields CPU‐speed‐ups of 5±½, quasi‐independent of the particular turbulence closure used. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

高超声速激波湍流边界层干扰直接数值模拟研究

高超声速激波与湍流边界层干扰会导致飞行器表面出现局部热流峰值,严重影响飞行器气动性能和飞行安全. 针对高马赫数激波干扰问题,以往数值研究多采用雷诺平均方法,而在直接数值模拟方面的相关工作较为少见. 开展高超声速激波与湍流边界层干扰的直接数值模拟研究,有助于进一步提升对其复杂流动机理认识和理解,同时也将为现有湍流模型和亚格子应力模型的改进提供理论依据. 采用直接数值模拟方法对来流马赫数6.0,34°压缩拐角内激波与湍流边界层的干扰问题进行了研究. 基于雷诺应力各向异性张量,分析了高超声速湍流边界层在压缩拐角内的演化特性. 通过对湍动能输运方程的逐项分析,系统地研究了可压缩效应对湍动能及其输运的影响机制. 采用动态模态分解方法,探讨了干扰流场的非定常运动历程. 研究结果表明,随着湍流边界层往下游发展,近壁湍流的雷诺应力状态由两组元轴对称状态逐渐演化为两组元状态,外层区域则由轴对称膨胀趋近于各向同性. 干扰流场内存在强内在压缩性效应(声效应),其对湍动能输运的影响主要体现在压力--膨胀项,而对膨胀--耗散项影响较小. 高超声速下压缩拐角内的非定常运动仍存在以分离泡膨胀/收缩为特征的低频振荡特性,其物理机制与分离泡剪切层密切相关.      

Evaluation of one‐ and two‐equation low‐Re turbulence models. Part I—Axisymmetric separating and swirling flows

This first segment of the two‐part paper systematically examines several turbulence models in the context of three flows, namely a simple flat‐plate turbulent boundary layer, an axisymmetric separating flow, and a swirling flow. The test cases are chosen on the basis of availability of high‐quality and detailed experimental data. The tested turbulence models are integrated to solid surfaces and consist of: Rodi's two‐layer k–ε model, Chien's low‐Reynolds number k–ε model, Wilcox's k–ω model, Menter's two‐equation shear‐stress‐transport model, and the one‐equation model of Spalart and Allmaras. The objective of the study is to establish the prediction accuracy of these turbulence models with respect to axisymmetric separating flows, and flows of high streamline curvature. At the same time, the study establishes the minimum spatial resolution requirements for each of these turbulence closures, and identifies the proper low‐Mach‐number preconditioning and artificial diffusion settings of a Reynolds‐averaged Navier–Stokes algorithm for optimum rate of convergence and minimum adverse impact on prediction accuracy. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

A simplified v2–f model for near‐wall turbulence

A simplified version of the v²–f model is proposed that accounts for the distinct effects of low‐Reynolds number and near‐wall turbulence. It incorporates modified C_ε(1,2) coefficients to amplify the level of dissipation in non‐equilibrium flow regions, thus reducing the kinetic energy and length scale magnitudes to improve prediction of adverse pressure gradient flows, involving flow separation and reattachment. Unlike the conventional v²–f, it requires one additional equation (i.e. the elliptic equation for the elliptic relaxation parameter f_µ) to be solved in conjunction with the k–ε model. The scaling is evaluated from k in collaboration with an anisotropic coefficient C_v and f_µ. Consequently, the model needs no boundary condition on and avoids free stream sensitivity. The model is validated against a few flow cases, yielding predictions in good agreement with the direct numerical simulation (DNS) and experimental data. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

On the performance of sudden‐expansion pipe without/with cross‐flow injection: experimental and numerical studies

The paper explores the possibilities that different turbulence closures offer, for in‐depth analysis of a complex flow. The case under investigation is steady, turbulent flow in a pipe with sudden expansion without/with normal‐to‐wall injection through jets. This is a typical geometry where generation of turbulence energy takes place, due to sudden change in boundary conditions. This study is aimed at investigating the capability of a developed computational program by the present authors with three different turbulence models to calculate the mean flow variables. Three two‐equation models are implemented, namely the standard linear k ? ε model, the low Reynolds number k ? ε model and the cubic nonlinear eddy viscosity (NLEV) k ? ε model. The performance of the chosen turbulence models is investigated with regard to the available data in the literature including velocity profiles, turbulent kinetic energy and reattachment position in a pipe expansion. In order to further assess the reliability of the turbulence models, an experimental program was conducted by the present authors also at the fluid mechanics laboratory of Menoufiya University. Preliminary measurements, including the surface pressure along the two walls of the expansion pipe and the pressure drop without and with the presence of different arrangements of wall jets produced by symmetrical or asymmetrical fluid cross‐flow injection, are introduced. The results of the present studies demonstrate the superiority of the cubic NLEV k ? ε model in predicting the flow characteristics over the entire domain. The simple low Reynolds number k ? ε model also gives good prediction, especially when the reattachment point is concerned. The evaluation of the reattachment point and the pressure‐loss coefficient is numerically addressed in the paper using the cubic NLEV k ? ε model. The results show that the injection location can control the performance of the pipe‐expansion system. It is concluded that the introduction of flow injection can increase the energy loss in the pipe expansion. The near‐field turbulence structure is also considered in the present study and it is noticed that the turbulence level is strongly affected by the cross‐flow injection and the jet location. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

High‐order 𝒞1 finite‐element interpolating schemes—Part II: Nonlinear semi‐Lagrangian shallow‐water models

The finite‐element, semi‐implicit, and semi‐Lagrangian methods are used on unstructured meshes to solve the nonlinear shallow‐water system. Several ??¹ approximation schemes are developed for an accurate treatment of the advection terms. The employed finite‐element discretization schemes are the P–P₁ and P₂–P₁ pairs. Triangular finite elements are attractive because of their flexibility for representing irregular boundaries and for local mesh refinement. By tracking the characteristics backward from both the interpolation and quadrature nodes and using ??¹ interpolating schemes, an accurate treatment of the nonlinear terms and, hence, of Rossby waves is obtained. Results of test problems to simulate slowly propagating Rossby modes illustrate the promise of the proposed approach in ocean modelling. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Structure of near wall turbulence downstream of a wall mounted protrusion: an interesting Reynolds stress suppression phenomena

A local suppression in the generation of near wall Reynolds stress is achieved by modifying the buffer region and sublayer (y ⁺ <30) of a turbulent pipe flow with a 16.4 wall unit high wall mounted protrusion. Multi-component, multi-point, time resolved laser Doppler velocimetry measurements are made in the undisturbed and modified ARL/PSU glycerin tunnel pipe flow at a Reynolds number of approximately 10000. A downstream converging flow field is produced by the divergence of the approaching mean flow around the protrusion. A pair of counter-rotating vortices, 15 wall units in diameter with common flow down, are generated by the protrusion and also contribute to the wall directed flow convergence. The convergence region is 15 wall units high and more than 100 wall units long and appears to decouple the near wall region from the outer turbulent wall layer. Locally, turbulent velocity fluctuations in the form of Reynolds stress producing events, sweeps and ejections, are retarded within this region. This results in a reduction in near wall uv Reynolds stress and local wall shear. Interestingly, the counter-rotating vortices act to increase turbulent diffusion in a manner which is uncorrelated with Reynolds stress generation.