求解可压缩流的二维通量分裂格式

传统的一维通量分裂格式在计算界面数值通量时,只考虑网格界面法向的波系。采用传统的TV格式分别求解对流通量和压力通量。通过求解考虑了横向波系影响的角点数值通量来构造一种真正二维的TV通量分裂格式。在计算一维数值算例时,该格式与传统的TV格式具有相同的数值通量计算公式,因此其保留了传统的TV格式精确捕捉接触间断和膨胀激波的优点。在计算二维算例时,该格式比传统的TV格式具有更高的分辨率;在计算二维强激波问题时,消除了传统TV格式的非物理现象,表现出更好的鲁棒性;此外,该格式大大提高了稳定性CFL数,从而具有更高的计算效率。因此,本文方法是一种精确、高效并且具有强鲁棒性的数值方法,在可压缩流的数值模拟中具有广阔的应用前景。     

一种新型的高分辨率通量差分裂格式

传统的Roe格式不满足熵条件并且在计算激波问题时会遭遇不同形式的不稳定现象,如慢行激波的波后振荡和红玉(carbuncle)现象.基于Zha-Bilgen对流-压力通量分裂方法,构造一种新型的通量差分裂格式.利用约旦标准型理论,通过添加广义特征向量构造通量差分裂方法来计算对流子系统.压力子系统具有一组完备的线性无关特征向量,因此可以构造传统的通量差分裂格式进行计算.为了提高接触间断的分辨率,利用界面变差下降(BVD)算法来重构对流通量耗散项中的密度差.激波稳定性分析表明,新格式可以有效地衰减数值误差,从而抑制不稳定现象的发生.一系列数值实验证明了本文构造的新型通量差分裂格式比Roe格式具有更高的分辨率和更好的鲁棒性.     

一种健壮的TV通量分裂格式

随着计算流体力学的快速发展，设计精确、高效并且健壮的数值格式变得尤为重要。Toro等^[8]提出的TV通量分裂格式表现出简单、高效和精确分辨接触间断等优点，但是在计算一些多维算例时会出现数值激波不稳定现象。两波近似的HLL格式在计算中非常高效和健壮，但是不能分辨接触间断大大地限制了其应用。本文对TV通量分裂格式进行稳定性分析，据此提出一种混合格式来消除TV格式的数值激波不稳定性。数值试验表明，本文构造的混合格式不仅保留了原始TV格式的优点，而且具有更好的健壮性，在计算二维问题时不会出现数值激波不稳定现象。     

二维对流扩散方程的欧拉—拉格朗日分裂格式

本文在[1]基础上发展了一种有效的处理大P_e(R_e)数、非定常二维对流扩散方程的欧拉-拉格朗日(E-L)分裂格式,由于方法本质上与区域形状无关,且不需再分网格,因此是一种无网格的E-L方法,特别对于定常流动,E.-L.分裂格式可以导致比一阶迎风格式更精确的单调、无振荡格式,文中对于常系数、变系数和非线性的二维非定常和定常对流扩散方程的(初)边值问题进行了数值计算,数值结果与精确解的比较表明,本方法具有很好的精度,解是单调无振荡的,比通常一阶迎风格式具有较少的数值扩散,最大计算网格P-e(R-e)数可达100—500。     

一种健壮的TV通量分裂格式

随着计算流体力学的快速发展,设计精确、高效并且健壮的数值格式变得尤为重要。Toro等~([8])提出的TV通量分裂格式表现出简单、高效和精确分辨接触间断等优点,但是在计算一些多维算例时会出现数值激波不稳定现象。两波近似的HLL格式在计算中非常高效和健壮,但是不能分辨接触间断大大地限制了其应用。本文对TV通量分裂格式进行稳定性分析,据此提出一种混合格式来消除TV格式的数值激波不稳定性。数值试验表明,本文构造的混合格式不仅保留了原始TV格式的优点,而且具有更好的健壮性,在计算二维问题时不会出现数值激波不稳定现象。     

非结构混合网格化学非平衡粘性绕流数值模拟

在非结构混合网格上对化学非平衡粘性绕流进行了数值模拟。控制方程为考虑了化学非平衡效应的二维Navier-Stokes方程,化学动力学模型为7组元、7反应模型。控制方程中的对流项采用VanLeer逆风分裂格式处理,并应用MUSCL方法及Minmod限制器扩展到二阶精度,粘性项用中心差分格式处理。时间推进采用显式5步龙格-库塔方法。为了适应高超声速流场计算,对VanLeer通量分裂方法进行了改进,并引入了化学反应时间步长。对RAMC-II模型的飞行试验流场进行了数值模拟,计算结果与试验测量数据符合较好,并与参考文献中的数值模拟结果吻合。     

基于WENO重构的真正多维黎曼求解器

具有良好守恒性与网格适应性的有限体积格式在流体力学的数值计算中占有重要地位。其中，求解数值流通量是实施有限体积法的关键步骤。一维情形下，通过求解局部黎曼问题来获得数值流通量的相关理论已经比较成熟。但是在计算多维问题时，传统的维度分裂方法仅考虑沿界面法向传播的信息，这不仅影响格式的精度，还可能会造成数值不稳定性从而诱发非物理现象。本文基于对流-压力通量分裂方法来构造真正多维的黎曼求解器，通过求解网格顶点处的多维黎曼问题来实现格式的多维特性。采用五阶WENO重构方法来获得空间的高阶精度，时间离散采用三阶TVD龙格-库塔格式。一系列数值实验的结果表明，真正多维的黎曼求解器不仅具有更高的分辨率还能有效克服多维强激波模拟中的数值不稳定性。     

一种求解Euler方程的新型高阶精度数值方法

提出了一种求解Euler方程的新型高阶精度数值方法.该数值方法基于一种新的矢通量分裂格式,将矢通量项分裂成压力通量项和对流通量项.与传统矢通量分裂格式相比,新的矢通量分裂格式能够更好地捕捉特征场内的中间特征波,从而增强格式的分辨率.同时,为了提高这种矢通量分裂格式的空间精度,我们在近似求解压力通量项黎曼问题时对界面处的独立物理变量进行高阶插值.在时间步上,采用显式最优的三阶龙格-库塔方法进行推进.数值试验表明,与传统数值方法相比,本文提出的新方法同时具有高精度和高分辨率的优点.     

一种健壮的混合Roe黎曼求解器

使用Roe格式计算多维流动问题时,在强激波附近会出现数值激波不稳定现象。带有剪切粘性的HLLEC格式不仅可以捕捉接触间断,而且表现出很好的稳定性。混合Roe格式和HLLEC格式来消除数值激波不稳定性。在强激波附近,通过激波面法向和网格界面法向的夹角来定义开关函数,使得数值通量在激波面横向切换成HLLEC格式。在其余地方,数值通量依然使用Roe格式来计算。数值试验表明,混合格式不仅消除了Roe格式的数值激波不稳定性,还最大程度地减少了HLLEC格式所带来的剪切耗散,保留了Roe格式高分辨率的优点。     

一个高分辨率的矢通量分裂—TVD杂交新格式

本文提出了一个新的杂交格式,它将Steger-Warming的矢通量分裂与Harten的TVD格式紧密结合在一起,构造了一个高分辨率的新格式,用于计算跨声速流场和捕获激波。典型的定常跨声速叶栅流算例表明:当Courant数取6～100时,一般在90步内残差的二范数下降三个数量级,这样的收敛率要比Beam-Warming格式快得多;观察残差的收敛历史发现:收敛曲线并无大的波动;分析激波附近的数值结果,没出现“低亏,过跳”、伪振荡现象,叶盆和叶背面上激波前或激波后的参数无波动;在60×15网格下捕获的激波过渡区不超过2个网格,表明了该格式具有较高的分辨率,能在不人为附加耗散项的条件下给出高质量无数值波动的激波流场解。     

N-S方程在非结构网格下的求解

在Ｒｏｅ的矢通量差分分裂的基础上，吸收了ＮＮＤ格式的优点，提出了一种非结构网格下求解Ｅｕｌｅｒ方程和Ｎ－Ｓ方程的高分辨率高精度迎风格式．这种格式具有捕捉强激波和滑移线的良好性能．在时间方向上采用了显式和隐式两种解法．文中还给出了自适应技术．最后，成功地完成了ＧＡＭＭ超音速前台阶绕流、二维平板无粘激波反射、三维Ｈｏｂｓｏｎ叶栅流动、ＶＫＩ叶栅流动、Ｃ３Ｘ叶栅流动的数值模拟，得到了满意的结果     

Evaluation of Euler fluxes by a high-order CFD scheme: shock instability

The construction of Euler fluxes is an important step in shock-capturing/upwind schemes. It is well known that unsuitable fluxes are responsible for many shock anomalies, such as the carbuncle phenomenon. Three kinds of flux vector splittings (FVSs) as well as three kinds of flux difference splittings (FDSs) are evaluated for the shock instability by a fifth-order weighted compact nonlinear scheme. The three FVSs are Steger–Warming splitting, van Leer splitting and kinetic flux vector splitting (KFVS). The three FDSs are Roe's splitting, advection upstream splitting method (AUSM) type splitting and Harten–Lax–van Leer (HLL) type splitting. Numerical results indicate that FVSs and high dissipative FDSs undergo a relative lower risk on the shock instability than that of low dissipative FDSs. However, none of the fluxes evaluated in the present study can entirely avoid the shock instability. Generally, the shock instability may be caused by any of the following factors: low dissipation, high Mach number, unsuitable grid distribution, large grid aspect ratio, and the relative shock-internal flow state (or position) between upstream and downstream shock waves. It comes out that the most important factor is the relative shock-internal state. If the shock-internal state is closer to the downstream state, the computation is at higher susceptibility to the shock instability. Wall-normal grid distribution has a greater influence on the shock instability than wall-azimuthal grid distribution because wall-normal grids directly impact on the shock-internal position. High shock intensity poses a high risk on the shock instability, but its influence is not as much as the shock-internal state. Large grid aspect ratio is also a source of the shock instability. Some results of a second-order scheme and a first-order scheme are also given. The comparison between the high-order scheme and the two low-order schemes indicates that high-order schemes are at a higher risk of the shock instability. Adding an entropy fix is very helpful in suppressing the shock instability for the two low-order schemes. When the high-order scheme is used, the entropy fix still works well for Roe's flux, but its effect on the Steger–Warming flux is trivial and not much clear.     

Numerical solutions of Euler equations by using a new flux vector splitting scheme

A new flux vector splitting scheme has been suggested in this paper. This scheme uses the velocity component normal to the volume interface as the characteristic speed and yields the vanishing individual mass flux at the stagnation. The numerical dissipation for the mass and momentum equations also vanishes with the Mach number approaching zero. One of the diffusive terms of the energy equation does not vanish. But the low numerical diffusion for viscous flows may be ensured by using higher-order differencing. The scheme is very simple and easy to be implemented. The scheme has been applied to solve the one dimensional (1D) and multidimensional Euler equations. The solutions are monotone and the normal shock wave profiles are crisp. For a 1D shock tube problem with the shock and the contact discontinuities, the present scheme and Roe scheme give very similar results, which are the best compared with those from Van Leer scheme and Liou–Steffen's advection upstream splitting method (AUSM) scheme. For the multidimensional transonic flows, the sharp monotone normal shock wave profiles with mostly one transition zone are obtained. The results are compared with those from Van Leer scheme, AUSM and also with the experiment.     

A new,high-resolution shock-capturing hybrid scheme of flux vector splitting-Harten's TVD

The paper presents a new high-resolution hybrid scheme combining implicit flux vector splitting with Harten's TVD, which is proved suitable for shock-capturing calculation in gasdynamics. Fluxsplitting procedures are applied to discretize the implicit part of the Euler equations whereas Harten's numerical fluxes are used to calculate the residual of steady-state solutions. It ensures good shock-capturing properties and produces sharp numerical discontinuities without oscillations. It excludes expansion shocks and leads only to physically relevant solutions. The block-line-Gauss-Seidel relaxation procedure (block-LGS) is used to solve the resulting difference equations. The time step and the CFL number are much larger than those in the linearized block-alternating-direction-implicit approximate factorization method (block-ADI). Numerical experiments suggest that the hybrid scheme not only has a fairly rapid convergence rate, but also can generate a highly resolved approximation to the steady-state solution. Hence scheme seems to lead to an effective nonoscillatory shock capturing method for steady transonic flow. Project Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China     

An efficient upwind/relaxation algorithm for the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations

An efficient Euler and full Navier–Stokes solver based on a flux splitting scheme is presented. The original Van Leer flux vector splitting form is extended to arbitrary body-fitted co-ordinates in the physical domain so that it can be used with a finite volume scheme. The block matrix is inverted by Gauss–Seidel iteration. It is verified that the often used reflection boundary condition will produce incorrect flux crossing the wall and cause too large numerical dissipation if flux vector splitting is used. To remove such errors, an appropriate treatment of wall boundary conditions is suggested. Inviscid and viscous steady transonic internal flows are analysed, including the case of shock-induced boundary layer separation.