Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise

Effects of sound level on auditory cortical activation are seen in neuroimaging data. However, factors such as the cortical response to the intense ambient scanner noise and to the bandwidth of the acoustic stimuli will both confound precise quantification and interpretation of such sound-level effects. The present study used temporally "sparse" imaging to reduce effects of scanner noise. To achieve control for stimulus bandwidth, three schemes were compared for sound-level matching across bandwidth: component level, root-mean-square power and loudness. The calculation of the loudness match was based on the model reported by Moore and Glasberg [Acta Acust. 82, 335-345 (1996)]. Ten normally hearing volunteers were scanned using functional magnetic resonance imaging (tMRI) while listening to a 300-Hz tone presented at six different sound levels between 66 and 91 dB SPL and a harmonic-complex tone (F0= 186 Hz) presented at 65 and 85 dB SPL. This range of sound levels encompassed all three bases of sound-level matching. Activation in the superior temporal gyrus, induced by each of the eight tone conditions relative to a quiet baseline condition, was quantified as to extent and magnitude. Sound level had a small, but significant, effect on the extent of activation for the pure tone, but not for the harmonic-complex tone, while it had a significant effect on the response magnitude for both types of stimulus. Response magnitude increased linearly as a function of sound level for the full range of levels for the pure tone. The harmonic-complex tone produced greater activation than the pure tone, irrespective of the matching scheme for sound level, indicating that bandwidth had a greater effect on the pattern of auditory activation than sound level. Nevertheless, when the data were collapsed across stimulus class, extent and magnitude were significantly correlated with the loudness scale (measured in phons), but not with the intensity scale (measured in SPL). We therefore recommend the loudness formula as the most appropriate basis of matching sound level to control for loudness effects when cortical responses to other stimulus attributes, such as stimulus class, are the principal concern.     

Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception

Hearing thresholds measured with high-frequency resolution show a quasiperiodic change in level called threshold fine structure (or microstructure). The effect of this fine structure on loudness perception over a range of stimulus levels was investigated in 12 subjects. Three different approaches were used. Individual hearing thresholds and equal loudness contours were measured in eight subjects using loudness-matching paradigms. In addition, the loudness growth of sinusoids was observed at frequencies associated with individual minima or maxima in the hearing threshold from five subjects using a loudness-matching paradigm. At low levels, loudness growth depended on the position of the test- or reference-tone frequency within the threshold fine structure. The slope of loudness growth differs by 0.2 dB/dB when an identical test tone is compared with two different reference tones, i.e., a difference in loudness growth of 2 dB per 10-dB change in stimulus. Finally, loudness growth was measured for the same five subjects using categorical loudness scaling as a direct-scaling technique with no reference tone instead of the loudness-matching procedures. Overall, an influence of hearing-threshold fine structure on loudness perception of sinusoids was observable for stimulus levels up to 40 dB SPL--independent of the procedure used. Possible implications of fine structure for loudness measurements and other psychoacoustic experiments, such as different compression within threshold minima and maxima, are discussed.     

Differences in loudness of positive and negative Schroeder-phase tone complexes as a function of the fundamental frequency

Tone complexes with positive (m+) and negative (m-) Schroeder phase show large differences in masking efficiency. This study investigated whether the different phase characteristics also affect loudness. Loudness matches between m+ and m- complexes were measured as a function of (1) the fundamental frequency (f0) for different frequency bands in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects, and (2) intensity level in normal-hearing subjects. In normal-hearing subjects, the level of the m+ stimulus was up to 10 dB higher than that of the corresponding m- stimulus at the point of equal loudness. The largest differences in loudness were found for levels between 20 and 60 dB SL. In hearing-impaired listeners, the difference was reduced, indicating the relevance of active cochlear mechanisms. Loudness matches of m+ and m- stimuli to a common noise reference (experiment 3) showed differences as a function of f0 that were in line with direct comparisons from experiment 1 and indicated additionally that the effect is mainly due to the specific internal processing of m+. The findings are roughly consistent with studies pertaining to masking efficiency and can probably not be explained by current loudness models, supporting the need for incorporating more realistic cochlea simulations in future loudness models.     

Subjective loudness level measurements and equal loudness contours in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)

Loudness level measurements in human listeners are straightforward; however, it is difficult to convey the concepts of loudness matching or loudness comparison to (non-human) animals. For this reason, prior studies have relied upon objective measurements, such as response latency, to estimate equal loudness contours in animals. In this study, a bottlenose dolphin was trained to perform a loudness comparison test, where the listener indicates which of two sequential tones is louder. To enable reward of the dolphin, most trials featured tones with identical or similar frequencies, but relatively large sound pressure level differences, so that the loudness relationship was known. A relatively small percentage of trials were "probe" trials, with tone pairs whose loudness relationship was not known. Responses to the probe trials were used to construct psychometric functions describing the loudness relationship between a tone at a particular frequency and sound pressure level and that of a reference tone at 10 kHz with a sound pressure level of 90, 105, or 115 dB re 1 μPa. The loudness relationships were then used to construct equal loudness contours and auditory weighting functions that can be used to predict the frequency-dependent effects of noise on odontocetes.     

On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones

The intensity jnd is often assumed to depend on the slope of the loudness function. One way to test this assumption is to measure the jnd for a sound that falls on distinctly different loudness functions. Two such functions were generated by presenting a 1000-Hz tone in narrow-band noise (925-1080 Hz) set at 70 dB SPL and in wideband noise (75-9600 Hz) set at 80 dB SPL. Over a range from near threshold to about 75 dB SPL, the loudness function for the tone is much steeper in the narrow-band noise than in the wideband noise. At 72 dB SPL, where the two loudness curves cross, the tone's jnd was measured in each noise by a block up-down two-interval forced-choice procedure. Despite the differences in slope (and in sensation level), the jnd (delta I/I) is nearly the same in the two noises, 0.22 in narrow-band noise and 0.20 in wideband noise. The mean value of 0.21 is close to the value of 0.25 interpolated from Jesteadt et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61, 169-176 (1977)] for a 1000-Hz tone that had the same loudness in quiet as did our 72-dB tone in noise, but lay on a loudness function with a much lower slope. These and other data demonstrate that intensity discrimination for pure tones is unrelated to the slope of the loudness function.     

Near-threshold equal-loudness contours for harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) derived from reaction times during underwater audiometry: a preliminary study

Equal-loudness functions describe relationships between the frequencies of sounds and their perceived loudness. This pilot study investigated the possibility of deriving equal-loudness contours based on the assumption that sounds of equal perceived loudness elicit equal reaction times (RTs). During a psychoacoustic underwater hearing study, the responses of two young female harbor seals to tonal signals between 0.125 and 100 kHz were filmed. Frame-by-frame analysis was used to quantify RT (the time between the onset of the sound stimulus and the onset of movement of the seal away from the listening station). Near-threshold equal-latency contours, as surrogates for equal-loudness contours, were estimated from RT-level functions fitted to mean RT data. The closer the received sound pressure level was to the 50% detection hearing threshold, the more slowly the animals reacted to the signal (RT range: 188-982 ms). Equal-latency contours were calculated relative to the RTs shown by each seal at sound levels of 0, 10, and 20 dB above the detection threshold at 1 kHz. Fifty percent detection thresholds are obtained with well-trained subjects actively listening for faint familiar sounds. When calculating audibility ranges of sounds for harbor seals in nature, it may be appropriate to consider levels 20 dB above this threshold.     

Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones

The influence of the degree of envelope modulation and periodicity on the loudness and effectiveness of sounds as forward maskers was investigated. In the first experiment, listeners matched the loudness of complex tones and noise. The tones had a fundamental frequency (F0) of 62.5 or 250 Hz and were filtered into a frequency range from the 10th harmonic to 5000 Hz. The Gaussian noise was filtered in the same way. The components of the complex tones were added either in cosine phase (CPH), giving a large crest factor, or in random phase (RPH), giving a smaller crest factor. For each F0, subjects matched the loudness between all possible stimulus pairs. Six different levels of the fixed stimulus were used, ranging from about 30 dB SPL to about 80 dB SPL in 10-dB steps. Results showed that, at a given overall level, the CPH and the RPH tones were louder than the noise, and that the CPH tone was louder than the RPH tone. The difference in loudness was larger at medium than at low levels and was only slightly reduced by the addition of a noise intended to mask combination tones. The differences in loudness were slightly smaller for the higher than for the lower F0. In the second experiment, the stimuli with the lower F0s were used as forward maskers of a 20-ms sinusoid, presented at various frequencies within the spectral range of the maskers. Results showed that the CPH tone was the least effective forward masker, even though it was the loudest. The differences in effectiveness as forward maskers depended on masker level and signal frequency; in order to produce equal masking, the level of the CPH tone had to be up to 35 dB above that of the RPH tone and the noise. The implications of these results for models of loudness are discussed and a model is presented based on neural activity patterns in the auditory nerve; this predicts the general pattern of loudness matches. It is suggested that the effects observed in the experiments may have been influenced by two factors: cochlear compression and suppression.     

Dependence of binaural loudness summation on interaural level differences, spectral distribution, and temporal distribution

Loudness of interaurally correlated narrow- and broadband noises was investigated using a loudness estimation paradigm (with two anchors) presented via headphones. Throughout the experiments (most performed by 12 subjects), the results from both anchors agreed very well. In the first experiment, third-octave-band noises centered around 250, 710, or 2000 Hz, as well as broadband red (-10 dB/oct), pink (-3 dB/oct), and blue (+10 dB/oct) noises, with interaural level differences of delta L = 0, 4, 10, 20, and infinity dB, were presented as test signals while the same sound presented monaurally or diotically served as anchor. The binaurally summed loudness at delta L = 0 dB was found to be larger than the loudness of a monaural signal of the same SPL by a factor of about 1.5 and decreased with increasing delta L. No dependence of this behavior on frequency, level, or spectral shape was found. In a second experiment, abutting frequency bands of varying width were alternately presented to the subject's left and right ears with the overall spectrum encompassing the whole audio range. The binaural loudness was larger for fewer but broader frequency bands. In a third experiment, uniform exciting noise was switched between the two ears at various speeds. Increasing the switching frequency gave rise to an increase in loudness of about 20%. All results are discussed from the viewpoint of the use of the standardized loudness meter. At this point, there is no evidence that any significant systematic errors due to single-channel evaluation (in contrast to the human two-channel processing) are made by measuring loudness using these meters.     

Constancy of loudness of pipe organ sounds at different locations in an auditorium

Pipe organ sounds, as judged by ear, tend to remain constant across different locations in an auditorium, yet the SPL of line spectra may vary by a maximum of 26 dB (mean 8.98 dB, s.d. 2.5), and the overall level may vary, typically, 10 to 12 dB from location to location. However, organs are designed, listened to, and regulated using the psychophysical units of loudness and timbre, and it is possible that the heard sound constancy exists at the psychophysical level. The present work recorded the sound of the C's and G's of pipe organ stops at three different locations in a church. The sound pressure levels were transformed to loudness. Similarity of loudness across the locations was measured two ways. First, the bass to treble distribution of loudness across the compass was measured using cross-correlation functions across pairs of locations. Second, the degree of similarity of loudness at the different locations was quantified by calculating ratios of loudness between the different locations. By these measures, the bass to treble loudness distribution and absolute loudness of the reeds were found to be nearly identical at the three locations. Two psychophysical processes were shown to be responsible for the loudness constancy. The first depended upon the power summation of harmonics within each third octave band above band 9 which contain two or more harmonics. The power summation of these harmonics greatly reduced the effect of SPL variability of the line spectra contained within these higher numbered bands. The second depended upon interharmonic loudness summation and upward masking of the first six harmonics. Greater loudness variability at the different locations was found after transforming the SPL measurements of two 8-ft diapasons to loudness compared with the reeds. The larger loudness variability was due to the smaller number of harmonics above the third of the diapasons compared with the reeds. The psychoacoustic measures indicate what a listener will hear as he/she moves among the locations.     

Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude

The present study tested whether subjects respond to unanticipated short perturbations in voice loudness feedback with compensatory responses in voice amplitude. The role of stimulus magnitude (+/- 1,3 vs 6 dB SPL), stimulus direction (up vs down), and the ongoing voice amplitude level (normal vs soft) were compared across compensations. Subjects responded to perturbations in voice loudness feedback with a compensatory change in voice amplitude 76% of the time. Mean latency of amplitude compensation was 157 ms. Mean response magnitudes were smallest for 1-dB stimulus perturbations (0.75 dB) and greatest for 6-dB conditions (0.98 dB). However, expressed as gain, responses for 1-dB perturbations were largest and almost approached 1.0. Response magnitudes were larger for the soft voice amplitude condition compared to the normal voice amplitude condition. A mathematical model of the audio-vocal system captured the main features of the compensations. Previous research has demonstrated that subjects can respond to an unanticipated perturbation in voice pitch feedback with an automatic compensatory response in voice fundamental frequency. Data from the present study suggest that voice loudness feedback can be used in a similar manner to monitor and stabilize voice amplitude around a desired loudness level.     

Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term-average spectra of speech

The overall slope of long-term-average spectrum (LTAS) decreases if vocal loudness increases. Therefore, changes of vocal loudness also affects the alpha measure, defined as the ratio of spectrum intensity above and below 1000 Hz. The effect on alpha of loudness variation was analyzed in 15 male and 16 female voices reading a text at different degrees of vocal loudness. The mean range of equivalent sound level (L(eq)) amounted to about 28 dB and the mean range of alpha to 19.0 and 11.7 dB for the female and male subjects. The L(eq) vs. alpha relationship could be approximated with a quadratic function, or by a linear equation, if softest phonation was excluded. Using such equations alpha was computed for all values of L(eq) observed for each subject and compared with observed values. The maximum and the mean absolute errors were 2.4 dB and between 0.1 and 0.6 dB. When softest phonation was disregarded and linear equations were used, the maximum error was less than 2 dB and the mean absolute errors were between 0.2 and 0.7 dB. The strong correlation between L(eq) and alpha indicates that for a voice L(eq) can be used for predicting alpha.     

An effect of temporal asymmetry on loudness

A set of experiments was conducted to examine the loudness of sounds with temporally asymmetric amplitude envelopes. Envelopes were generated with fast-attack/slow-decay characteristics to produce F-S (or "fast-slow") stimuli, while temporally reversed versions of these same envelopes produced corresponding S-F ("slow-fast") stimuli. For sinusoidal (330-6000 Hz) and broadband noise carriers, S-F stimuli were louder than F-S stimuli of equal energy. The magnitude of this effect was sensitive to stimulus order, with the largest differences between F-S and S-F loudness occurring after exposure to a preceding F-S stimulus. These results are not compatible with automatic gain control, power-spectrum models of loudness, or predictions obtained using the auditory image model [Patterson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 1890-1894 (1995)]. Rather, they are comparable to phenomena of perceptual constancy, and may be related to the parsing of auditory input into direct and reverberant sound.     

Sound quality of low-frequency and car engine noises after active noise control

The ability of active noise control (ANC) systems to achieve a more pleasant sound has been evaluated by means of sound quality analysis of a real multi-channel active noise controller. Recordings of real car engine noises had been carried out using a HeadacousticsTM binaural head simulator seated in a typical car seat, and these signals together with synthesized noise have been actively controlled in an enclosed room.The sound quality study has focused on the estimation of noise quality changes through the evaluation of the sense of comfort. Two methods have been developed: firstly, a predictive method based on psychoacoustic parameters (loudness, roughness, tonality and sharpness); and secondly, a subjective method using a jury test. Both results have been related to the spectral characteristics of the sounds before and after active control.It can be concluded from both analyses that ANC positively affects acoustic comfort. The engine noise mathematical comfort predictor is based on loudness and roughness (two psychoacoustic parameters directly influenced by ANC), and has satisfactorily predicted the improvements in the pleasantness of the sounds. As far as the subjective evaluation method is concerned, the jury test has showed that acoustic comfort is, in most cases, directly related to the sense of quietness. However, ANC has also been assessed negatively by the jury in the cases that it was unable to reduce the loudness, perhaps because of the low amplitudes of the original sounds.Finally, from what has been shown, it can be said that the subjective improvements strongly depends on the attenuation level achieved by the ANC system operation, as well as the spectral characteristics of the sounds before and after control.     

Equal autophonic level curves under different room acoustics conditions

The indirect auditory feedback from one's own voice arises from sound reflections at the room boundaries or from sound reinforcement systems. The relative variations of indirect auditory feedback are quantified through room acoustic parameters such as the room gain and the voice support, rather than the reverberation time. Fourteen subjects matched the loudness level of their own voice (the autophonic level) to that of a constant and external reference sound, under different synthesized room acoustics conditions. The matching voice levels are used to build a set of equal autophonic level curves. These curves give an indication of the amount of variation in voice level induced by the acoustic environment as a consequence of the sidetone compensation or Lombard effect. In the range of typical rooms for speech, the variations in overall voice level that result in a constant autophonic level are on the order of 2 dB, and more than 3 dB in the 4 kHz octave band. By comparison of these curves with previous studies, it is shown that talkers use acoustic cues other than loudness to adjust their voices when speaking in different rooms.     

The audibility of low-frequency sounds

Contours of equal loudness and threshold of hearing under binaural free-field conditions for the frequency range 20–15 000 Hz were standardized internationally in 1961. This paper describes an extension of the data in the low-frequency range down to 3·15 Hz, at l levels from threshold to 70 phon. The latter corresponds to nearly 140 dB sound pressure level at the lowest frequency. Direct loudness comparisons were made between tones at intervals of an octave, and the resulting contours were checked by numerical loudness estimation.     

空调压缩机噪声测试及其声品质客观参量分析*

针对空调压缩机辐射声场的不同场点噪声声品质的差异,采用心理学声品质参量即响度、尖锐度、总感觉噪度,对压缩机辐射声场的不同场点噪声进行声品质客观参量分析,研究压缩机场点噪声声品质客观参量值变化规律。通过特征响度研究各场点噪声响度在频域的分布,并得出压缩机各场点噪声特征响度峰值所在噪声频带。实验结果表明,对于处在压缩机不同方向上的场点,其噪声声品质客观参量值存在明显差异,但其噪声特征响度峰值却处在相同的噪声频带。研究工作为压缩机全方向降噪提供参考依据也为研究压缩机的噪声声品质探索了一种新思路。     

The loudness of sounds that increase and decrease continuously in level

A sound at a low level is heard as much softer after having decreased continuously from higher levels than if presented after a period of silence at that same low level. Canévet [Acustica 61, 256-264 (1986)] demonstrated this phenomenon for a tone that (1) decreased from 65 to 20 dB in 180 s; he also presented a tone that (2) increased from 20 dB, or (3) was presented as pairs of bursts at various levels in random order. Below about 40 dB, loudness changed most rapidly in the decreasing condition so that, at 20 dB, the tone was judged ten times softer than in conditions (2) and (3). In the present experiments, magnitude estimation was used to examine the possible role of judgmental biases and adaptation in this rapid loudness decline, which we call decruitment. Results show that decruitment did not come about because subjects made many successive loudness judgments; loudness declined as much when a tone was judged only twice, at the beginning and end of its 180-s decrease. In contrast, interrupting the decreasing tone so that it was heard only at 70 dB and 160 s later at 30 dB greatly diminished the decruitment. Similarly, pairs of 500-ms tone bursts presented at successively lower levels instead of continously decreasing did not show decruitment, suggesting that sequential biases are irrelevant. The likely cause of decruitment is sensory adaptation.     

Monaural level discrimination under dichotic conditions

The ability to make judgments about the stimulus at one ear when a stimulus is simultaneously presented to the other ear was tested. Specifically, subjects discriminated the level of a 600 Hz target tone presented at the left ear while an identical-frequency distractor was simultaneously presented at the other ear. When there was no distractor, threshold was 0.7 dB. Threshold increased to 1.1 dB when a distractor with a fixed phase and level was introduced contra-aurally to the target. Further increases in threshold were observed when an across-presentation variability was introduced into the distractor phase (threshold of 1.6 dB) or level (threshold of 5.8 dB). When both the distractor level and phase varied, the largest threshold of 7.3 dB was obtained. These increases in threshold cannot be predicted by common binaural models, which assume that a target stimulus at one ear can be processed without interference from the stimulus at the nontarget ear. The measured thresholds are consistent with a model that utilizes two binaural dimensions that roughly correspond to the loudness and the position of a fused binaural image. The results show that, with binaurally fused tonal stimuli, subjects are unable to listen to one ear.     

A test of the binaural equal-loudness-ratio hypothesis for tones

It is well known that a tone presented binaurally is louder than the same tone presented monaurally. It is less clear how this loudness ratio changes as a function of level. The present experiment was designed to directly test the Binaural Equal-Loudness-Ratio hypothesis (BELRH), which states that the loudness ratio between equal-SPL monaural and binaural tones is independent of SPL. If true, the BELRH implies that monaural and binaural loudness functions are parallel when plotted on a log scale. Cross-modality matches between string length and loudness were used to directly measure binaural and monaural loudness functions for nine normal listeners. Stimuli were 1-kHz 200-ms tones ranging in level from 5 dB SL to 100 dB SPL. A two-way ANOVA showed significant effects of level and mode (binaural or monaural) on loudness, but no interaction between the level and mode. Consequently, no significant variations were found in the binaural-to-monaural loudness ratio across the range of levels tested. This finding supports the BELRH. In addition, the present data were found to closely match loudness functions derived from binaural level differences for equal loudness using the model proposed by Whilby et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 3931-3939 (2006)].     

On the loudness of complex stimuli and its relationship to cochlear excitation

Two experiments were conducted to reexamine the relation between loudness and the bandwidth of complex stimuli. In experiment 1, experimental stimuli consisting of a 2000-Hz pure tone and ten computer-generated multitonal complexes ranging in bandwidth from 0.26-3.16 oct, logarithmically centered at 2000 Hz, were matched in loudness to a 2000-Hz comparison pure tone presented at 90, 70, and 30 dB SPL. The SPL of the experimental stimuli required for equal loudness was linearly related to bandwidth (in octaves) for each of the three comparison stimulus levels. In experiment 2, the loudness behavior of narrow-bandwidth stimuli within the previously reported critical band region was examined. The results indicated a linear relation similar to that obtained in experiment 1. These results are consistent with an auditory filter concept in which frequency is continuously encoded along the basilar membrane and in which loudness of complex stimuli is linearly related to area of excitation.