Subjective, laryngoscopic, and acoustic measurements of laryngeal reflux before and after treatment with omeprazole

Laryngeal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux is felt to be prevalent in our society. In general, diagnosis has been based primarily on symptoms. Historically, additional testing included laryngoscopy, barium swallow, manometry, and more recently, single- and double-probe pH monitoring. We evaluated 68 patients who were symptomatically suggestive of having reflux laryngitis. We administered surveys grading their symptoms. All patients underwent standardized videolaryngostroboscopic evaluation and computerized acoustic analysis. Patients then underwent a uniform therapy of dietary restrictions and omeprazole, a hydrogen ion inhibitor, for 12 weeks. Patients were then retested. This regimen demonstrated an 85% success of relieving symptoms. Utilizing the new laryngoscopic grading system, improvement was found to be statistically significant in improvement of all findings except granulomas. In patients with the pretherapy complaint of hoarseness, acoustic measures of jitter, shimmer, habitual frequency, and frequency range all showed significant improvement. The authors conclude that in patients with symptomatic reflux laryngitis, standardized videolaryngoscopy and, if hoarse, acoustic analysis are useful exam techniques to aide diagnosis and monitor therapy. Anti-reflux therapy with omeprazole is effective and improvement can be objectively demonstrated with the techniques described.     

Quantitative color analysis of laryngeal erythemain chronic posterior laryngitis

The purpose of this study was to quantitatively analyze the degree of erythema visible in the larynges of normal subjects and of patients with symptoms of chronic posterior laryngitis. Video-documented examinations of laryngoscopy were digitized and then analyzed using computer image analysis software that allowed quantification of average color values, hue, saturation, and brightness from digitized color images. Documented laryngoscopic images from 7 normal subjects and 64 patients complaining of chronic laryngitis symptoms were examined, and additional patient examinations which were obtained and documented during treatment for reflux laryngitis were analyzed. Analysis was made of five different areas of each laryngeal image: the right and left vocal folds, the right and left vocal processes, and the posterior arytenoid mucosa. Data analysis showed that average color value ratings of redness for the patients with chronic laryngitis were significantly (p <0 .0561) greater than the average values for normal subjects for the vocal folds. Color values for redness of the posterior laryngeal structures and vocal folds in the patients who were treated for reflux laryngitis were significantly (p < 0.05) reduced over time and correlated with the clinical response to treatment. The data suggest that computer color analysis of documented video-laryngoscopy examinations can provide quantitative data on degree of erythema and may be useful as a quantitative means of diagnosis and documentation of treatment outcome for reflux laryngitis.     

The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: Development of a normative database

Healthy volunteers without symptoms of either gastroesophageal reflux or laryngopharyngeal reflux and without abnormalities on laryngologic examination were recruited for esophageal pH monitoring. Thirty subjects underwent ambulatory 24-hour double-channel pH probe monitoring to establish normative data for the upper probe, which was positioned just above the upper esophageal sphincter. Data were analyzed excluding meal periods plus 2 minutes of postprandial time. The mean, standard deviation, median, and 95th percentile were calculated for various reflux parameters for the following intervals: total study duration, upright time, supine time, and postprandial time. Normal subjects display physiologic reflux above the upper esophageal sphincter (median one event, 95th percentile 6.9 events), and 80.4% of these events occur in the upright position. The reflux area index (RAI) appears to be the most useful parameter to measure laryngopharyngeal reflux severity.     

Oropharyngeal pH Monitoring for the Detection of Liquid and Aerosolized Supraesophageal Gastric Reflux

The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and extraesophageal symptoms is poorly understood and difficult to document. pH monitoring in this group of patients has resulted in conflicting data due to lack of diagnostic sensitivity. Recently, a new sensitive pH device for detection of liquid and aerosolized droplets in the oropharynx (The Dx–pH Measurement System [Dx–pH]) has become available. Our hypothesis is that we will be able to improve our ability to identify and understand this group of patients with this device. The aim of this preliminary observation study was to compare the results of this new device to the standard esophageal and pharyngeal pH probes in a small group of patients with extraesophageal symptoms. Patients with suspected extraesophageal GER symptoms underwent traditional 24-hour esophago-pharyngeal pH monitoring (24pH) simultaneous with Dx–pH monitoring in the oropharynx. Tracings were reviewed for comparison and correlation between the two probes, with an event in the Dx–pH Probe being defined as a rapid drop >3 standard deviation from baseline. Fifteen patients (10 females, 5 males) with mean age of 57.5 years (range, 25–75) were studied. The predominant chief complaint included 12/15 chronic cough, 2/15 asthma; and 1/15 throat clearing. All Dx–pH events were preceded and associated with distal esophageal pH drops in a progressive ante grade manner. Ten patients had 1–13 abnormal oropharyngeal pH events as measured by Dx–pH monitoring with a total of 48 events. The median pH of reflux events had a statistically significant increase from 3.1 at the distal esophageal probe to 5.2 at the pharynx and 5.6 at the oropharynx, the latter being 80% higher than the distal esophageal probe (P < 0.001). The percentage of acid events decreased in a cephalad manner from 66.7% at distal esophagus to 25% at the pharynx and only 6.25% at the oropharyngeal Dx–pH Probe, with the remaining events being weakly acidic. Dx–pH Probe is a new sensitive oropharyngeal pH device whose values correlate well with the gold-standard 24-hour pH device, and appears to accurately detect pH events that begin at the distal esophagus and travel upward to the oropharynx. This device suggests that supraesophageal events manifest themselves as rapid pH drops (>10%), which are likely not to be identified using the standard criteria of pH <4 due to the gradient of increasing pH from the lower esophagus to the oropharynx.     

The Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) disease is common. The incidence of newly diagnosed cases has increased substantially due to awareness and development of new diagnostic measurements. The reflux finding score (RFS) and reflux symptom index (RSI) are believed to be useful in the assessment process, including after the initiation of therapy. However, many authors have suggested concerns about the reliability and validity of the RFS.ObjectiveTo evaluate the validity and reliability of the RFS.MethodsNinety-two patients diagnosed with LPR who had undergone 24-hour pH-Impedance tests were included. All patients underwent stroboscopy and 24-Hour pH-Impedance monitoring within thirty days. Fifty-nine patients filled out a RSI prior to stroboscopic exam. The RFS was determined by four blinded observers: one otolaryngology resident, two laryngology fellows, and one laryngologist. Stroboscopic images were reviewed again one year later to assess intrarater reliability. RFS and RSI were correlated with 24-hour pH Impedance testing.ResultsThe Kappa value between reviewers was 0.479. The percent agreement of the four observers for total RFS was 74.04%.The percent agreement between reviewers for subglottic edema was 78.77%; for ventricular obliteration was 65.55%; for erythema/hyperemia was 69.62%, for vocal fold edema was 68.32%; for diffuse laryngeal edema was 66.86%, for posterior commissure hypertrophy was 73.54%; for granuloma/granulation was 96.80%; for thick endolaryngeal mucus was 72.81%. The intrarater reliability of the four observers for total RFS was 67.5% with an intrarater reliability range of 50%–90%. The intrarater reliability for subglottic edema was 85% with a range of 70%–100%; for ventricular obliteration was 77.50% with a range of 70%–90%; for erythema/hyperemia was 65.00% with a range of 50%–90%; for vocal fold edema was 52.50% with a range of 30%–70%; for diffuse laryngeal edema was 62.50% with a range of 20%–80%; for posterior commissure hypertrophy was 52.50% with a range of 10%–80%; for granuloma/granulation was 100%; for thick endolaryngeal mucus was 55.00% with a range of 10%–90%. There was no correlation between RFS and any parameter of the 24-Hr pH-Impedance Test. RSI had a significant correlation with number of upright events (r value of 0.271, R² of 0.0733 and P-value of 0.037), total symptoms experienced (r value of 0.0.267, R² of 0.0715 and P-value of 0.041), and symptom correlation score (r value of -0.297, R² of 0.0884 and P-value of 0.022).ConclusionMany authors have expressed concerns about the reliability and validity of the RFS. In our study we found a fair/substantial interrater reliability, and a modest intra-rater reliability. We found no correlation between the RFS and 24-Hr pH Impedance testing. This study suggests that the concerns about the validity and reliability of the RFS may be warranted. This widely used clinical score should be interpreted with caution and further research and refinement should be considered.     

Candida laryngitis appearing asleukoplakia and gerd

The symptoms and physical findings of reflux laryngopharyngitisare characteristic, but the mucosal alterations evident in the larynx are not exclusive to reflux. When conventional reflux management produces an equivocal response, other etiologic factors such as mycotic laryngitis, need consideration. The differential diagnosis of dysphonia in an immunocompromised patient always includes mycotic infections, but mycotic laryngitis can also occur in the immunocompetent host. Laryngeal candidiasis can produce physical findings, such as erythema and leukoplakia, that are similar to reflux laryngopharyngitis. Predisposing factors include previous radiation therapy, antibiotic therapy, corticosteroids, and any alteration in the mucosal barrier. Diagnosis is established by mucosal biopsy with special staining of the tissue to identify the characteristic hyphae. Treatment of mycoses can be difficult and long-term therapy is often required.     

Treatment of laryngeal contact ulcers and granulomas: A 12-year retrospective analysis

Multiple etiological factors including gastroesophageal reflux, hyperfunctional voice use, and endotracheal intubation have been implicated in the development of posterior laryngeal ulcers and granulomas. The optimal approach to treatment of these lesions remains controversial. The mainstay of treatment at Vancouver General Hospital has been aggressive medical management of gastroesophageal reflux, with complimentary voice therapy offered to patients suspected of having significant hyperfunctional phonation. The authors reserve Botulinum toxin injection or surgical excision for patients who fail initial therapy. They conducted a retrospective analysis of their voice clinic records from 1985–1997 to examine the efficacy of this approach. They identified 76 patients with the diagnosis of contact ulcer or granuloma. Fifty-two patients had follow-up data available for review. Ninety-four percent of patients were treated nonsurgically: 35 patients were treated solely by dietary and medical therapy to control gastroesphageal reflux, 10 patients were treated by a combination of medical gastroesophageal reflux control and voice therapy, 3 patients had Botox injections, 2 patients had surgical excision of granuloma, 1 patient had a Kenalog injection, and 1 patient underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. Overall, 77% of patients had complete resolution, whereas 11% had partial resolution and another 11% had no significant improvement. The data supports control of gastroesophageal reflux as a central component in treatment of posterior laryngeal ulcers and granulomas.     

Chronic dysphonia secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): Diagnosis using simultaneous dual-probe prolonged pH monitoring

The association of chronic dysphonia with gastroesophageal reflux has been reported in the otalaryngologic literature; unfortunately, these reports are primarily anecdotal. Because of the difficulty in documenting reflux, patients are often left without a definitive diagnosis or therapy. The purpose of this paper is to report on an objective method of documenting gastroesophageal reflux disease by using ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring. 70% of the subjects who underwent simultaneous dual-probe pH monitoring evidenced reflux in the hypopharynx in both an upright and supine position. All of the subjects had erythema of the arytenoid cartilages on indirect examination; so this appears to be of clinical diagnostic significance.     

Laryngopharyngeal Symptoms and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms is greater than expect. A prospective study was performed to investigate the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in patients with laryngopharyngeal symptoms. Laryngologic evaluation with nasopharyngeal and laryngeal endoscopy and gastroenterologic evaluation with esophagogastroduodenoscopy including measurement of pH value were performed in 46 patients. Therapeutic intervention included general antireflux precautions and antireflux medication, and eradication of Helicobacter pylori in selected cases. Posterior laryngitis was present in 33 patients. GERD was present in 25 patients, hiatus hernia in 4 patients, H pylori-positive gastritis in 11 patients, and Barrett's metaplasia in 2 patients. Increasing evidence shows that GERD may cause laryngopharyngeal symptoms. Otherwise laryngopharyngeal symptoms can be predictors of GERD. Medical antireflux treatment is also effective for laryngopharyngeal symptoms.     

Acoustic Analysis Findings in Objective Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the effects of objective laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) on the acoustic parameters of patients by comparing their voice samples with that of control subjects. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study in two tertiary reference hospitals. METHODS: 48 consecutive patients with symptoms related to LPR and 64 control subjects were included in the study. Suspected LPR patients underwent a 24-hour ambulatory pH monitoring, and 25 (52%) of them were shown to have objective LPR. Acoustical evaluation results of objective LPR patients were compared with that of symptomatic LPR patients and control subjects. RESULTS: All frequency perturbation values obtained from objective and symptomatic LPR patients were higher than the control subjects (P<0.01). Mean fundamental frequency, amplitude perturbation measures, and noise-to-harmonics ratio were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: LPR patients have significantly different frequency perturbation values than control subjects.