Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying Gaussian noise exposures: the applicability of the equal energy hypothesis

Eight groups of chinchillas (N=74) were exposed to various equivalent energy [100 or 106 dB(A) sound pressure level (SPL)] noise exposure paradigms. Six groups received an interrupted, intermittent, time varying (IITV) Gaussian noise exposure that lasted 8 h/d, 5 d/week for 3 weeks. The exposures modeled an idealized workweek. At each level, three different temporal patterns of Gaussian IITV noise were used. The 100 dB(A) IITV exposure had a dB range of 90-108 dB SPL while the range of the 106 dB(A) IITV exposure was 80-115 dB SPL. Two reference groups were exposed to a uniform 100 or 106 dB(A) SPL noise, 24 h/d for 5 days. Each reference group and the three corresponding IITV groups comprised a set of equivalent energy exposures. Evoked potentials were used to estimate hearing thresholds and surface preparation histology quantified sensory cell populations. All six groups exposed to the IITV noise showed threshold toughening effects of up to 40 dB. All IITV exposures produced hearing and sensory cell loss that was similar to their respective equivalent energy reference group. These results indicate that for Gaussian noise the equal energy hypothesis for noise-induced hearing loss is an acceptable unifying principle.     

Energy-independent factors influencing noise-induced hearing loss in the chinchilla model.

The effects on hearing and the sensory cell population of four continuous, non-Gaussian noise exposures each having an A-weighted L(eq)=100 dB SPL were compared to the effects of an energy-equivalent Gaussian noise. The non-Gaussian noise conditions were characterized by the statistical metric, kurtosis (beta), computed on the unfiltered, beta(t), and the filtered, beta(f), time-domain signals. The chinchilla (n=58) was used as the animal model. Hearing thresholds were estimated using auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) recorded from the inferior colliculus and sensory cell populations were obtained from surface preparation histology. Despite equivalent exposure energies, the four non-Gaussian conditions produced considerably greater hearing and sensory cell loss than did the Gaussian condition. The magnitude of this excess trauma produced by the non-Gaussian noise was dependent on the frequency content, but not on the average energy content of the impacts which gave the noise its non-Gaussian character. These results indicate that beta(t) is an appropriate index of the increased hazard of exposure to non-Gaussian noises and that beta(f) may be useful in the prediction of the place-specific additional outer hair cell loss produced by non-Gaussian exposures. The results also suggest that energy-based metrics, while necessary for the prediction of noise-induced hearing loss, are not sufficient.     

The kurtosis metric as an adjunct to energy in the prediction of trauma from continuous, nonGaussian noise exposures

Data from an earlier study [Hamernik et al. (2003). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114, 386-395] were consistent in showing that, for equivalent energy [Leq= 100 dB(A)] and spectra, exposure to a continuous, nonGaussian (nonG) noise could produce substantially greater hearing and sensory cell loss in the chinchilla model than a Gaussian (G) noise exposure and that the statistical metric, kurtosis, computed on the amplitude distribution of the noise could order the extent of the trauma. This paper extends these results to Leq= 90 and 110 dB(A), and to nonG noises that are generated using broadband noise bursts, and band limited impacts within a continuous G background noise. Data from nine new experimental groups with 11 or 12 chinchillas/group is presented. Evoked response audiometry established hearing thresholds and surface preparation histology quantified sensory cell loss. At the lowest level [Leq=90 dB(A)] there were no differences in the trauma produced by G and nonG exposures. For Leq >90 dB(A) nonG exposures produced increased trauma relative to equivalent G exposures. Removing energy from the impacts by limiting their bandwidth reduced trauma. The use of noise bursts to produce the nonG noise instead of impacts also reduced the amount of trauma.     

Hearing loss from interrupted, intermittent, and time varying non-Gaussian noise exposure: The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis

Sixteen groups of chinchillas (N=140) were exposed to various equivalent energy noise paradigms at 100 dB(A) or 103 dB(A) SPL. Eleven groups received an interrupted, intermittent, and time varying (IITV) non-Gaussian exposure quantified by the kurtosis statistic. The IITV exposures, which lasted for 8 hday, 5 daysweek for 3 weeks, were designed to model some of the essential features of an industrial workweek. Five equivalent energy reference groups were exposed to either a Gaussian or non-Gaussian 5 days, 24 hday continuous noise. Evoked potentials were used to estimate hearing thresholds and surface preparations of the organ of Corti quantified the sensory cell population. For IITV exposures at an equivalent energy and kurtosis, the temporal variations in level did not alter trauma and in some cases the IITV exposures produced results similar to those found for the 5 day continuous exposures. Any increase in kurtosis at a fixed energy was accompanied by an increase in noise-induced trauma. These results suggest that the equal energy hypothesis is an acceptable approach to evaluating noise exposures for hearing conservation purposes provided that the kurtosis of the amplitude distribution is taken into consideration. Temporal variations in noise levels seem to have little effect on trauma.     

Recent studies of temporary threshold shift (TTS) and permanent threshold shift (PTS) in animals

It is well known that excessive exposure to noise results in temporary and/or permanent changes in hearing sensitivity in both human and animal subjects. The purpose of this review is to describe the major findings from laboratory studies of experimentally induced hearing losses, both temporary and permanent, resulting from exposure to noise in animal subjects which have been published since the report of Kryter et al. (1966). The data reviewed support the following general statements: (1) The chinchilla is the most widely used and most appropriate animal model for studies of noise-induced hearing loss; (2) with continuous exposures to moderate-level noise, thresholds reach asymptotic levels (ATS) within 18-24 h; (3) permanent threshold shifts, however, depend upon the level, frequency, and the duration of exposure; (4) below a "critical level" of about 115 dB, permanent threshold shift (PTS) and cell loss are generally related to the total energy in continuous exposures; (5) periodic rest periods inserted in an exposure schedule are protective and result in less hearing loss and cochlear damage than equal energy continuous exposures; and (6) under some schedules of periodic exposure, threshold shifts increase over the first few days of exposure, then recover as much as 30 dB as the exposure continues.     

Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise

Changes in hearing sensitivity and cochlear damage were determined in two groups of chinchillas exposed to an octave band of noise (OBN) centered at 0.5 kHz, 95 dB SPL on two different schedules: 6 h per day for 36 days, or 15 min/h for 144 days. Hearing sensitivity was measured behaviorally at 1/4-oct frequency intervals from 0.125 to 16.0 kHz before, during, and for a period of 1 to 2 months after the exposure, at which time the animals' cochleas were fixed and prepared for microscopic examination. Cochlear damage was determined by counts of missing sensory cells. Both exposures produced an initial shift of thresholds of 35-45 dB; however, after a few days of exposure, thresholds began to decline and eventually recovered to within 10-15 dB of original baseline values even though the exposure continued. Measures of recovery made after completion of the exposures indicated minimal permanent threshold shifts in all animals. The behavioral and anatomical data indicated that these intermittent exposures produced less temporary and permanent hearing loss and less cochlear damage than continuous exposures of equal energy.     

Cochlear toughening,protection, and potentiation of noise-induced trauma by non-Gaussian noise

An interrupted noise exposure of sufficient intensity, presented on a daily repeating cycle, produces a threshold shift (TS) following the first day of exposure. TSs measured on subsequent days of the exposure sequence have been shown to decrease relative to the initial TS. This reduction of TS, despite the continuing daily exposure regime, has been called a cochlear toughening effect and the exposures referred to as toughening exposures. Four groups of chinchillas were exposed to one of four different noises presented on an interrupted (6 h/day for 20 days) or noninterrupted (24 h/day for 5 days) schedule. The exposures had equivalent total energy, an overall level of 100 dB(A) SPL, and approximately the same flat, broadband long-term spectrum. The noises differed primarily in their temporal structures; two were Gaussian and two were non-Gausssian, nonstationary. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials were used to estimate hearing thresholds and surface preparation histology was used to determine sensory cell loss. The experimental results presented here show that: (1) Exposures to interrupted high-level, non-Gaussian signals produce a toughening effect comparable to that produced by an equivalent interrupted Gaussian noise. (2) Toughening, whether produced by Gaussian or non-Gaussian noise, results in reduced trauma compared to the equivalent uninterrupted noise, and (3) that both continuous and interrupted non-Gaussian exposures produce more trauma than do energy and spectrally equivalent Gaussian noises. Over the course of the 20-day exposure, the pattern of TS following each day's exposure could exhibit a variety of configurations. These results do not support the equal energy hypothesis as a unifying principal for estimating the potential of a noise exposure to produce hearing loss.     

Sound exposures and hearing thresholds of symphony orchestra musicians

To assess the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among musicians in the Chicago Symphony Orchestra, personal dosimeters set to the 3-dB exchange rate were used to obtain 68 noise exposure measurements during rehearsals and concerts. The musicians' Leq values ranged from 79-99 dB A-weighted sound pressure level [dB(A)], with a mean of 89.9 dB(A). Based on 15 h of on-the-job exposure per week, the corresponding 8-h daily Leq (excluding off-the-job practice and playing) ranged from 75-95 dB(A) with a mean of 85.5 dB(A). Mean hearing threshold levels (HTLs) for 59 musicians were better than those for an unscreened nonindustral noise-exposed population (NINEP), and only slightly worse than the 0.50 fractile data for the ISO 7029 (1984) screened presbycusis population. However, 52.5% of individual musicians showed notched audiograms consistent with noise-induced hearing damage. Violinists and violists showed significantly poorer thresholds at 3-6 kHz in the left ear than in the right ear, consistent with the left ear's greater exposure from their instruments. After HTLs were corrected for age and sex, HTLs were found to be significantly better for both ears of musicians playing bass, cello, harp, or piano and for the right ears of violinists and violists than for their left ears or for both ears of other musicians. For 32 musicians for whom both HTLs and Leq were obtained, HTLs at 3-6 kHz were found to be correlated with the Leq measured.     

Temporary threshold shift in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) exposed to mid-frequency tones

A behavioral response paradigm was used to measure hearing thresholds in bottlenose dolphins before and after exposure to 3 kHz tones with sound exposure levels (SELs) from 100 to 203 dB re 1 microPa2 s. Experiments were conducted in a relatively quiet pool with ambient noise levels below 55 dB re 1 microPa2/Hz at frequencies above 1 kHz. Experiments 1 and 2 featured 1-s exposures with hearing tested at 4.5 and 3 kHz, respectively. Experiment 3 featured 2-, 4-, and 8-s exposures with hearing tested at 4.5 kHz. For experiment 2, there were no significant differences between control and exposure sessions. For experiments 1 and 3, exposures with SEL=197 dB re 1 microPa2 s and SEL > or = 195 dB re 1 microPa2 s, respectively, resulted in significantly higher TTS4 than control sessions. For experiment 3 at SEL= 195 dB re 1 microPa2 s, the mean TTS4 was 2.8 dB. These data are consistent with prior studies of TTS in dolphins exposed to pure tones and octave band noise and suggest that a SEL of 195 dB re 1 microPa2 s is a reasonable threshold for the onset of TTS in dolphins and white whales exposed to midfrequency tones.     

Attenuation and protection provided by ossicular removal

Behavioral studies of hearing loss produced by exposure to ototraumatic agents in experimental animals, combined with the anatomical evaluation of end-organ pathology, have provided useful information about the relation between dysfunction and pathology. However, in order to attribute a given hearing loss to some pattern of cochlear damage, it is necessary to test each ear independently. The objective of the present study was to evaluate attenuation measured behaviorally and protection to the cochlea provided by removal of the malleus and incus in noise-exposed chinchillas. Results from one behaviorally trained chinchilla with ossicular removal indicated a conductive hearing loss that varied from 41 dB at 0.125 kHz to 81 dB at 4.8 kHz and averaged 60 dB. Counts of missing sensory cells in ears of seven chinchillas with unilateral ossicular removal and exposure to noise (octave band centered at 0.5 kHz, 95 dB SPL, for durations up to 216 days, or centered at 4.0 kHz, 108 dB SPL, for 1.75 h) showed no more cell loss on the protected side than in age-matched control ears. From these data it is concluded that ossicular removal provides enough attenuation to protect the chinchilla cochlea from damage during these noise exposures, and that it will insure monaural responses behaviorally as long as the hearing loss in the test ear does not exceed that in the ear with ossicular removal by approximately 50 dB at any frequency.     

The Okinawa study: an estimation of noise-induced hearing loss on the basis of the records of aircraft noise exposure around Kadena Air Base

Aircraft noise measurements were recorded at the residential areas in the vicinity of Kadena Air Base, Okinawa in 1968 and 1972 at the time of the Vietnam war. The estimated equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level L_Aeq for 24 h was 85 dB.The time history of sound level during 24 h was estimated from the measurement conducted in 1968, and the sound level was converted into the spectrum level at the centre frequency of the critical band of temporary threshold shift (TTS) using the results of spectrum analysis of aircraft noise operated at the airfield. With the information of spectrum level and its time history, TTS was calculated as a function of time and level change. The permanent threshold shift was also calculated by means of Robinson's method and ISO's method. The results indicate the noise exposure around Kadena Air Base was hazardous to hearing and is likely to have caused hearing loss to people living in its vicinity.     

Impact noise: the importance of level, duration, and repetition rate

The applicability of the equal energy hypothesis (EEH) to impact noise exposures was studied using chinchillas. Hearing thresholds were estimated by recording the evoked potentials from a chronic electrode implanted in the inferior colliculus. The animals were exposed to broadband impacts of 200-ms duration. The study was carried out in two parts. In experiment I, six exposure levels (107, 113, 119, 125, 131, and 137 dB SPL) and three repetition rates (4/s, 1/s and 1/4s) were employed. In the second experiment, the total duration of the exposure as well as the total energy were kept constant by trading level and rate. Results indicate that hearing loss resulting from exposure to impact noise does not conform to the predictions of the EEH. The permanent threshold shift as well as the hair cell loss are more or less equal across the lower peak exposure levels. However, both the hearing loss and the hair cell damage increase for exposures with higher peak levels. Furthermore, hearing loss and cochlear damage are dependent upon the rate of exposure. Thus the amount of hearing loss and hair cell damage appears to depend on the interaction of several factors including peak level, rate, and the susceptibility of the animal.     

Industrial noise levels and annoyance in Egypt

Annoyance and increase of accident risk of workers from industrial noise levels in Egypt were studied. 683 workers from 15 Egyptian sites of industry, ranging from food to metal industry were evaluated. The goals of this study are to carry out measurements to evaluate industrial noise levels, are these levels exceeded the permissible levels set by Egyptian noise standard and policy to protect public health of workers?, to examine worker’s attitudes towards industrial noise, to know the relationship between industrial noise levels and degree of annoyance. Results showed that equivalent continuous noise levels ranged from 70 to 100 dB (A). Annoyance of respondents showed that 47.1% were highly annoyed, 5.8% their hearing were harmed. There was a strong relationship between industrial noise levels and percentage of highly annoyed respondents. By increasing industrial noise level possibility of workers to make accident was also increased. Respondents suggest less maximum daily exposure duration than those set by Egyptian law.     

A reduced-scale railway noise barrier's insertion loss and absorption coefficients: comparison of field measurements and predictions

In situ testing determined the insertion loss (IL) and absorption coefficients of a candidate absorptive noise barrier (soundwall) to abate railway noise for residents of Anaheim, CA. A 4000 m barrier is proposed south of the tracks, but residential areas to the north have expressed concerns that barrier reflections will increase their noise exposure. To address these concerns, a 3.66 m high by 14.6 m long demonstration barrier was built in the parking lot of Edison Field, Anaheim, as part of a public open house, thereby allowing for acoustical measurements.Insertion loss (IL) was measured in third-octave bands assuming 1/2-scale construction. The IL for three, scaled railway noise sub-sources (rail/wheel interface, locomotive, and train horn) was measured at six, scaled distances. The highest total, A-weighted IL, after corrections for finite-barrier and point-source speaker effects was 22 dB(A) for rail/wheel noise, 18 dB(A) for locomotive noise, and 20 dB(A) for train horn noise. These results can be compared favourably to IL predictions made using algorithms from the US Federal Rail Administration (FRA) noise assessment guidelines. For the actual barrier installation, shielded residential receivers located south of the project are expected to see their future noise exposures reduced from an unmitigated 78 CNEL to 65 CNEL.Absorption coefficients were measured using time delay spectrometry. At lower frequencies, measured absorption coefficients were notably less than the reverberation room results advertised in the manufacturer's literature, but generally conformed with impedance tube results. At higher frequencies the correspondence between measured absorption coefficients and reverberation room results was much improved. For the actual barrier installation, unshielded residential receivers to the north are expected to experience noise exposure increases of less than 1 dB(A). This factor of increase is consistent with a finding of no impact when assessed using FRA guidelines for allowable increases of noise exposure.     

Speech recognition in noise by individuals with mild hearing impairments

The study was designed to test the validity of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology's (AAOO) 26-dB average hearing threshold level at 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz as a predictor of hearing handicap. To investigate this criterion the performance of a normal-hearing group was compared with that of two groups, categorized according to the AAOO [Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthal. Otolaryng. 63, 236-238 (1959)] guidelines as having no handicap. The latter groups, however, had significant hearing losses in the frequencies above 2000 Hz. Mean hearing threshold levels for 3000, 4000, and 6000 Hz were 54 dB for group II and 63 dB for group III. Two kinds of speech stimuli were presented at an A-weighted sound level of 60 dB in quiet and in three different levels of noise. The resulting speech recognition scores were significantly lower for the hearing-impaired groups than for the normal-hearing group on both kinds of speech materials and in all three noise conditions. Mean scores for group III were significantly lower than those of the normal-hearing group, even in the quiet condition. Speech recognition scores showed significantly better correlation with hearing levels for frequency combinations including frequencies above 2000 Hz than for the 500-, 1000-, and 2000-Hz combination. On the basis of these results the author recommends that the 26-dB fence should be somewhat lower, and that frequencies above 2000 Hz should be included in any scheme for evaluating hearing handicap.     

Effects of peak pressure and energy of impulses

Peak pressure has been one of the key parameters of impulse noise used to assess the hazard to hearing. It is used in most international noise exposure limits. France uses an A-weighted energy limit. There is a rough correspondence between peak pressure and the hazard to hearing for a given type of impulse noise. However, when the effects of different types of impulses are compared, this correspondence breaks down. One of the alternate measures of impulse intensity is weighted energy. Weighted energy is appealing for a number of reasons. It does not depend on details of the pressure-time history such as the peak pressure and the more common duration measures. It should be easier to integrate with continuous or intermittent noise standards. It would make it easier to use standard hearing protector attenuation to estimate the hazard when a specific hearing protector is worn. Results of previously published articles and reports will be discussed. These reports lead to the conclusion that weighted energy is a more potent determiner of hearing hazard than peak pressure if spectral effects are controlled.     

Cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in young and aged chinchillas exposed to low-frequency noise.

The aim of this study was to examine susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in animals with and without age-related hearing loss (AHL), using cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions (CDPs) to assess the functional status of the outer hair cell (OHC) system. Subjects were young (< or = 3-yr-old) and aged (10- to 15-yr-old) chinchillas. CDP thresholds and input/output (I/O) functions were measured before and after exposure to 95 dB or 106 dB SPL low-frequency noise. The results indicate that (a) aging in the chinchilla is associated with significant elevations of CDP thresholds and depression of CDP I/O functions, (b) noise exposures cause equivalent CDP threshold elevations and amplitude reductions in young animals with normal hearing and older animals with AHL, and (c) CDP threshold and amplitude measures provide information that complements evoked potentials measured from the auditory midbrain.     

The effects of the amplitude distribution of equal energy exposures on noise-induced hearing loss: the kurtosis metric

Seventeen groups of chinchillas with 11 to 16 animals/group (sigmaN = 207) were exposed for 5 days to either a Gaussian (G) noise or 1 of 16 different non-Gaussian (non-G) noises at 100 dB(A) SPL. All exposures had the same total energy and approximately the same flat spectrum but their statistical properties were varied to yield a series of exposure conditions that varied across a continuum from G through various non-G conditions to pure impact noise exposures. The non-G character of the noise was produced by inserting high level transients (impacts or noise bursts) into the otherwise G noise. The peak SPL of the transients, their bandwidth, and the intertransient intervals were varied, as was the rms level of the G noise. The statistical metric, kurtosis (beta), computed on the unfiltered noise beta(t), was varied 3 < or = beta(t) < or = 105. Brainstem auditory evoked responses were used to estimate hearing thresholds and surface preparation histology was used to determine sensory cell loss. Trauma, as measured by asymptotic and permanent threshold shifts (ATS, PTS) and by sensory cell loss, was greater for all of the non-G exposure conditions. Permanent effects of the exposures increased as beta(t) increased and reached an asymptote at beta(t) approximately 40. For beta(t) > 40 varying the interval or peak histograms did not alter the level of trauma, suggesting that, in the chinchilla model, for beta(t) > 40 an energy metric may be effective in evaluating the potential of non-G noise environments to produce hearing loss. Reducing the probability of a transient occurring could reduce the permanent effects of the non-G exposures. These results lend support to those standards documents that use an energy metric for gauging the hazard of exposure but only after applying a "correction factor" when high level transients are present. Computing beta on the filtered noise signal [beta(f)] provides a frequency specific metric for the non-G noises that is correlated with the additional frequency specific outer hair cell loss produced by the non-G noise. The data from the abundant and varied exposure conditions show that the kurtosis of the amplitude distribution of a noise environment is an important variable in determining the hazards to hearing posed by non-Gaussian noise environments.     

Kurtosis corrected sound pressure level as a noise metric for risk assessment of occupational noises

Current noise guidelines use an energy-based noise metric to predict the risk of hearing loss, and thus ignore the effect of temporal characteristics of the noise. The practice is widely considered to underestimate the risk of a complex noise environment, where impulsive noises are embedded in a steady-state noise. A basic form for noise metrics is designed by combining the equivalent sound pressure level (SPL) and a temporal correction term defined as a function of kurtosis of the noise. Several noise metrics are developed by varying this basic form and evaluated utilizing existing chinchilla noise exposure data. It is shown that the kurtosis correction term significantly improves the correlation of the noise metric with the measured hearing losses in chinchillas. The average SPL of the frequency components of the noise that define the hearing loss with a kurtosis correction term is identified as the best noise metric among tested. One of the investigated metrics, the kurtosis-corrected A-weighted SPL, is applied to a human exposure study data as a preview of applying the metrics to human guidelines. The possibility of applying the noise metrics to human guidelines is discussed.     

Hazard from weapons impulses: histological and electrophysiological evidence

Current methods of rating the hazard of weapons impulses for the ear have recently been challenged by electrophysiological data from experiments with animal ears which indicate that the hazard from low-frequency impulses is much lower than the hazard from higher frequency impulses (Dancer et al., 1981; Price, 1986b). To supplement these data, histological data are reported here for 51 cats that were exposed on one occasion to either rifle or howitzer impulses at peak pressures from 145 to 155 dB or 153 to 166 dB, respectively. Histological procedures (scanning electron and light microscopy) were carried out over 2 months after the exposure and after electrophysiological measures had been made. For both types of impulse the losses tended to be in the middle of the cochlea in focused lesions, even though the spectral peaks of the acoustic stimuli had been at about 80 Hz (howitzer) and 1000 Hz (rifle). Outer hair cells were more susceptible than the inner hair cells and interindividual differences in effects were large. Furthermore, the two impulse sources were equally hazardous when the peak pressure of the rifle impulse was lower than the peak pressure of the howitzer impulse by about 9 dB. In terms of A-weighted energy, the exposures were equally hazardous when the rifle exposure contained about 35 times less energy than the howitzer exposure. The histological data are thus consistent with the electrophysiological data, which indicate that present standards for impulse noise exposure may overrate the hazard of low-frequency impulses relative to impulses in the midrange.