Howson's Property for Semidirect Products of Semilattices by Groups

An inverse semigroup S is a Howson inverse semigroup if the intersection of finitely generated inverse subsemigroups of S is finitely generated. Given a locally finite action θ of a group G on a semilattice E, it is proved that E*_θG is a Howson inverse semigroup if and only if G is a Howson group. It is also shown that this equivalence fails for arbitrary actions.     

A construction of weakly inverse semigroups

Let S° be an inverse semigroup with semilattice biordered set E° of idempotents and E a weakly inverse biordered set with a subsemilattice Ep = { e ∈ E ｜ arbieary f ∈ E, S（f , e） loheain in w（e）} isomorphic to E° by θ：Ep→E°. In this paper, it is proved that if arbieary f, g ∈E, f ←→ g→→ f°θD^s° g°θand there exists a mapping φ from Ep into the symmetric weakly inverse semigroup P J（E∪ S°） satisfying six appropriate conditions, then a weakly inverse semigroup ∑ can be constructed in P J（S°）, called the weakly inverse hull of a weakly inverse system （S°, E, θ, φ） with I（∑） ≌ S°, E（∑） ∽- E. Conversely, every weakly inverse semigroup can be constructed in this way. Furthermore, a sufficient and necessary condition for two weakly inverse hulls to be isomorphic is also given.     

A Note on Semigroup Algebras of Permutable Semigroups

Let S be a semigroup and 𝔽 be a field. For an ideal J of the semigroup algebra 𝔽[S] of S over 𝔽, let ?_J denote the restriction (to S) of the congruence on 𝔽[S] defined by the ideal J. A semigroup S is called a permutable semigroup if α ○ β = β ○ α is satisfied for all congruences α and β of S. In this paper we show that if S is a semilattice or a rectangular band then φ_{{S; 𝔽}}: J → ?_J is a homomorphism of the semigroup (Con(𝔽[S]); ○ ) into the relation semigroup (?_S; ○ ) if and only if S is a permutable semigroup.     

Zero-Semidistributive Inverse Semigroups

An inverse semigroup S is said to be 0-semidistributive if its lattice ?F (S) of full inverse subsemigroups is 0-semidistributive. We show that it is sufficient to study simple inverse semigroups which are not groups. Our main theorem states that such a simple inverse semigroup S is 0-semidistributive if and only if (1) S is E-unitary, (2) S is aperiodic, (3) for any a,b ∈ S/σ with ab ≠ 1, there exist nonzero integers n and m such that (ab) ^m  = a ⁿ or (ab) ^m  = b ⁿ , where σ is the minimum group congruence on S.     

Dense inverse subsemigroups of a topological inverse semigroup

In this paper we study dense inverse subsemigroups of topological inverse semigroups. We construct a topological inverse semigroup from a semilattice. Finally, we give two examples of the closure of B _{( −∞, ∞ )}¹, a topological inverse semigroup obtained by starting with the real numbers as a semilattice with the operation a ∨ b=sup{a,b}. The author would like to thank to the referee for useful suggestions.     

Endomorphism category of an abelian category

Let 𝒞 be an additive category. Denote by End(𝒞) the endomorphism category of 𝒞, i.e., the objects in End(𝒞) are pairs (C,c) with C∈𝒞,c∈End_𝒞(C), and a morphism f:(C,c)→(D,d) is a morphism f∈Hom_𝒞(C,D) satisfying fc?=?df. This paper is devoted to an approach of the general theory of the endomorphism category of an arbitrary additive category. It is proved that the endomorphism category of an abelian category is again abelian with an induced structure without nontrivial projective or injective objects. Furthermore, the endomorphism category of any nontrivial abelian category is nonsemisimple and of infinite representation type. As an application, we show that two unital rings are Morita equivalent if and only if the endomorphism categories of their module categories are equivalent.     

On Galois Comodules

Generalizing the notion of Galois corings, Galois comodules were introduced as comodules P over an A-coring 𝒞 for which P _A is finitely generated and projective and the evaluation map μ𝒞:Hom ^𝒞 (P, 𝒞) ?  _S P → 𝒞 is an isomorphism (of corings) where S = End ^𝒞 (P). It has been observed that for such comodules the functors ? ?  _A 𝒞 and Hom _A (P, ?) ?  _S P from the category of right A-modules to the category of right 𝒞-comodules are isomorphic. In this note we use this isomorphism related to a comodule P to define Galois comodules without requiring P _A to be finitely generated and projective. This generalises the old notion with this name but we show that essential properties and relationships are maintained. Galois comodules are close to being generators and have common properties with tilting (co)modules. Some of our results also apply to generalised Hopf Galois (coalgebra Galois) extensions.     

Exceptional Pairs in Hereditary Categories

We study the category 𝒞(X, Y) generated by an exceptional pair (X, Y) in a hereditary category ?. If r = dim _k Hom(X, Y) ≥ 1 we show that there are exactly 3 possible types for 𝒞(X, Y), all derived equivalent to the category of finite dimensional modules mod(H _r ) over the r-Kronecker algebra H _r . In general 𝒞(X, Y) will not be equivalent to a module category. More specifically, if ? is the category of coherent sheaves over a weighted projective line 𝕏, then 𝒞(X, Y) is equivalent to the category of coherent sheaves on the projective line ?¹ or to mod(H _r ) and, if 𝕏 is wild, then every r ≥ 1 can occur in this way.     

SUBDIRECTLY IRREDUCIBLE LEFT SELF DISTRIBUTIVELY GENERATED ALGEBRAS

Abstract

Let F be a free profinite group of countably infinite rank and 𝒞(Δ) the class of all finite groups whose composition factors are in Δ for a non-empty class Δ of finite simple groups. Let R _Δ(F) be the intersection of all open normal subgroups N of F such that F/N is in 𝒞(Δ). Then we prove that, if 𝒩 is the class of finite groups which have no non-trivial 𝒞(Δ)-quotient, then R _Δ(F) is a pro-𝒩 group of countable rank and every finite 𝒩-embedding problem for R _Δ(F) is solvable.     

The Semilattice of Annihilator Classes in a Reduced Commutative Ring

Let R be a reduced commutative ring with 1 ≠ 0. Let R _E be the set of equivalence classes for the equivalence relation on R given by x ～ y if and only if ann _R (x) = ann _R (y). Then R _E is a (meet) semilattice with respect to the order [x] ≤ [y] if and only if ann _R (y) ? ann _R (x). In this paper, we investigate when R _E is a lattice and relate this to when R is weakly complemented or satisfies the annihilator condition. We also consider when R is a (meet) semilattice with respect to the Abian order defined by x ≤ y if and only if xy = x ².     

Chermak–Delgado Lattice Extension Theorems

If G is a finite group with subgroup H, then the Chermak–Delgado measure of H (in G) is defined as |H||C _G (H)|. The Chermak–Delgado lattice of G, denoted 𝒞𝒟(G), is the set of all subgroups with maximal Chermak–Delgado measure; this set is a moduar sublattice within the subgroup lattice of G. In this paper we provide an example of a p-group P, for any prime p, where 𝒞𝒟(P) is lattice isomorphic to 2 copies of ?₂ (a quasiantichain of width 2) that are adjoined maximum-to-minimum. We introduce terminology to describe this structure, called a 2-string of 2-diamonds, and we also give two constructions for generalizing the example. The first generalization results in a p-group with Chermak–Delgado lattice that, for any positive integers n and l, is a 2l-string of n-dimensional cubes adjoined maximum-to-minimum and the second generalization gives a construction for a p-group with Chermak–Delgado lattice that is a 2l-string of ? _p+1 (quasiantichains, each of width p + 1) adjoined maximum-to-minimum.     

Rings Over which the Krull Dimension and the Noetherian Dimension of All Modules Coincide

We denote by 𝒜(R) the class of all Artinian R-modules and by 𝒩(R) the class of all Noetherian R-modules. It is shown that 𝒜(R) ? 𝒩(R) (𝒩(R) ? 𝒜(R)) if and only if 𝒜(R/P) ? 𝒩(R/P) (𝒩(R/P) ? 𝒜(R/P)), for all centrally prime ideals P (i.e., ab ∈ P, a or b in the center of R, then a ∈ P or b ∈ P). Equivalently, if and only if 𝒜(R/P) ? 𝒩(R/P) (𝒩(R/P) ? 𝒜(R/P)) for all normal prime ideals P of R (i.e., ab ∈ P, a, b normalize R, then a ∈ P or b ∈ P). We observe that finitely embedded modules and Artinian modules coincide over Noetherian duo rings. Consequently, 𝒜(R) ? 𝒩(R) implies that 𝒩(R) = 𝒜(R), where R is a duo ring. For a ring R, we prove that 𝒩(R) = 𝒜(R) if and only if the coincidence in the title occurs. Finally, if Q is the quotient field of a discrete valuation domain R, it is shown that Q is the only R-module which is both α-atomic and β-critical for some ordinals α,β ≥ 1 and in fact α = β = 1.     

Range-Inclusive Maps in Rings with Idempotents

Let 𝒜 be a ring, let ? be an 𝒜-bimodule, and let 𝒞 be the center of ?. A map F:𝒜 → ? is said to be range-inclusive if [F(x), 𝒜] ? [x, ?] for every x ∈ 𝒜. We show that if 𝒜 contains idempotents satisfying certain technical conditions (which we call wide idempotents), then every range-inclusive additive map F:𝒜 → ? is of the form F(x) = λx + μ(x) for some λ ∈ 𝒞 and μ:𝒜 → 𝒞. As a corollary we show that if 𝒜 is a prime ring containing an idempotent different from 0 and 1, then every range-inclusive additive map from 𝒜 into itself is commuting (i.e., [F(x), x] = 0 for every x ∈ 𝒜).     

Complete Congruences on the Lattice of Rees–Sushkevich Varieties

We study the lattice ?(RS_n) of subvarieties of the variety of semigroups generated by completely 0-simple semigroups over groups with exponent dividing n, with a particular focus on the lattice ??(RS_n) consisting of those varieties that are generated by completely 0-simple semigroups. The sublattice of ??(RS_n) consisting of the aperiodic varieties is described and several endomorphisms of ?(RS_n) considered. The complete congruence on ??(RS_n) that relates varieties containing the same aperiodic completely 0-simple semigroups is considered in some detail.     

On the Simplicity of Lie Algebras Associated to Leavitt Algebras

For any field 𝕂 and integer n ≥ 2, we consider the Leavitt algebra L _𝕂(n); for any integer d ≥ 1, we form the matrix ring S = M _d (L _𝕂(n)). S is an associative algebra, but we view S as a Lie algebra using the bracket [a, b] = ab ? ba for a, b ∈ S. We denote this Lie algebra as S ^?, and consider its Lie subalgebra [S ^?, S ^?]. In our main result, we show that [S ^?, S ^?] is a simple Lie algebra if and only if char(𝕂) divides n ? 1 and char(𝕂) does not divide d. In particular, when d = 1, we get that [L _𝕂(n)^?, L _𝕂(n)^?] is a simple Lie algebra if and only if char(𝕂) divides n ? 1.     

Graded automorphism group of TKK algebra

The classification of extended affine Lie algebras of type A_1 depends on the Tits-Kantor- Koecher (TKK) algebras constructed from semilattices of Euclidean spaces.One can define a unitary Jordan algebra J(S) from a semilattice S of R~v (v≥1),and then construct an extended affine Lie algebra of type A_1 from the TKK algebra T(J(S)) which is obtained from the Jordan algebra J(S) by the so-called Tits-Kantor-Koecher construction.In R~2 there are only two non-similar semilattices S and S′,where S is a lattice and S′is a non-lattice semilattice.In this paper we study the Z~2-graded automorphisms of the TKK algebra T(J(S)).