d-ideals,f d-ideals and prime ideals

Abstract

Let R be a commutative ring. An ideal I of R is called a d-ideal (f d-ideal) provided that for each a ∈ I (finite subset F of I) and b ∈ R, Ann(a) ? Ann(b) (Ann(F) ? Ann(b)) implies that b ∈ I. It is shown that, the class of z⁰-ideals (hence all sz⁰-ideals), maximal ideals in an Artinian or in a Kasch ring, annihilator ideals, and minimal prime ideals over a d-ideal are some distinguished classes of d-ideals. Furthermore, we introduce the class of f d-ideals as a subclass of d-ideals in a commutative ring R. In this regard, it is proved that the ring R is a classical ring with property (A) if and only if every maximal ideal of R is an f d-ideal. The necessary and sufficient condition for which every prime f d-ideal of a ring R being a maximal or a minimal prime ideal is given. Moreover, the rings for which their prime d-ideals are z⁰-ideals are characterized. Finally, we prove that every prime f d-ideal of a ring R is a minimal prime ideal if and only if for each a ∈ R there exists a finitely generated ideal , for some n ∈ ? such that Ann(a, I) = 0. As a consequence, every prime f d-ideal in a reduced ring R is a minimal prime ideal if and only if X= Min(R) is a compact space.     

On nonregular ideals and <Emphasis Type="Italic">z</Emphasis>°-ideals in <Emphasis Type="Italic">C</Emphasis>(<Emphasis Type="Italic">X</Emphasis>)

The spaces X in which every prime z°-ideal of C(X) is either minimal or maximal are characterized. By this characterization, it turns out that for a large class of topological spaces X, such as metric spaces, basically disconnected spaces and one-point compactifications of discrete spaces, every prime z°-ideal in C(X) is either minimal or maximal. We will also answer the following questions: When is every nonregular prime ideal in C(X) a z°-ideal? When is every nonregular (prime) z-ideal in C(X) a z°-ideal? For instance, we show that every nonregular prime ideal of C(X) is a z°-ideal if and only if X is a ?-space (a space in which the boundary of any zeroset is contained in a zeroset with empty interior).     

On the Zero-Divisor Graph of a Ring

Let R be a commutative ring with identity, Z(R) its set of zero-divisors, and Nil(R) its ideal of nilpotent elements. The zero-divisor graph of R is Γ(R) = Z(R)\{0}, with distinct vertices x and y adjacent if and only if xy = 0. In this article, we study Γ(R) for rings R with nonzero zero-divisors which satisfy certain divisibility conditions between elements of R or comparability conditions between ideals or prime ideals of R. These rings include chained rings, rings R whose prime ideals contained in Z(R) are linearly ordered, and rings R such that {0} ≠ Nil(R) ? zR for all z ∈ Z(R)\Nil(R).     

√z-Ideals and √z^o-Ideals in C（X）

It is well known that every prime ideal minimal over a z-ideal is also a z-ideal. The converse is also well known in C（X）. Thus whenever I is an ideal in C（X）, then √I is a z-ideal if and only if I is, in which case √I = I. We show the same fact for z~-ideals and then it turns out that the sum of a primary ideal and a z-ideal （z^o-ideal） in C（X） which are not in a chain is a prime z-ideal （z^o-ideal）. We also show that every decomposable z-ideal （z^o-ideal） in C（X） is the intersection of a finite number of prime z-ideals （z^o-ideal）. Some counter-examples in general rings and some characterizations for the largest （smallest） z-ideal and z^o-ideal contained in （containing） an ideal are given.     

On Rings Whose Reflexive Ideals are Principal

We call a prime Noetherian maximal order R a pseudo-principal ring if every reflexive ideal of R is principal. This class of rings is a broad class properly containing both prime Noetherian pri-(pli) rings and Noetherian unique factorization rings (UFRs). We show that the class of pseudo-principal rings is closed under formation of n × n full matrix rings. Moreover, we prove that if R is a pseudo-principal ring, then the polynomial ring R[x] is also a pseudo-principal ring. We provide examples to illustrate our results.     

Generalized APP-Rings

We say a ring R is (centrally) generalized left annihilator of principal ideal is pure (APP) if the left annihilator ? _R (Ra) ⁿ is (centrally) right s-unital for every element a ∈ R and some positive integer n. The class of generalized left APP-rings includes generalized left (principally) quasi-Baer rings and left APP-rings (and hence left p.q.-Baer rings, right p.q.-Baer rings, and right PP-rings). The class of centrally generalized left APP-rings is closed under finite direct products, full matrix rings, and Morita invariance. The behavior of the (centrally) generalized left APP condition is investigated with respect to various constructions and extensions, and it is used to generalize many results on generalized PP-rings with IFP and semiprime left APP-rings. Moreover, we extend a theorem of Kist for commutative PP rings to centrally generalized left APP rings for which every prime ideal contains a unique minimal prime ideal without using topological arguments. Furthermore, we give a complete characterization of a considerably large family of centrally generalized left APP rings which have a sheaf representation.     

PRIME IDEALS IN RINGS WITH INVOLUTION

Abstract

Let R be a ring with involution *. We show that if R is a *-prime ring which is not a prime ring, then R is “essentially” a direct product of two prime rings. Moreover, if P is a *-prime *-ideal of R, which is not a prime ideal of R, and X is minimal among prime ideals of R containing P, then P is a prime ideal of X, P = X ∩ X* and either: (1) P is essential in X and X is essential in R; or (2) for any relative complement C of P in X, then C* is a relative complement of X in R. Further characterizations of *-primeness are provided.     

Minimal prime ideals of reduced rings

Let R be a reduced ring with Q its Martindale symmetric ring of quotients, and let B be the complete Boolean algebra of all idempotents in C, where C is the extended centroid of R. It is proved that every minimal prime ideal of R must be of the form mQ∩R for some maximal ideal m of B but the converse is in general not true. In addition, if R is centrally closed or has only finitely many minimal prime ideals, then the converse also holds. By applying the explicit expression, many properties of minimal prime ideals of reduced rings are realized more easily.     

On commutative rings which are strongly prüfer

Abstract

As defined by Nicholson [Nicholson, W. K. (1977). Lifting idempotents and exchange rings. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 229:269–278] an element of a ring R is clean if it is the sum of a unit and an idempotent, and a subset A of R is clean if every element of A is clean. It is shown that a semiprimitive Gelfand ring R is clean if and only if Max(R) is zero-dimensional; if and only if for each M ∈ Max(R), the intersection all prime ideals contained in M is generated by a set of idempotents. We also give several equivalent conditions for clean functional rings. In fact, a functional ring R is clean if and only if the set of clean elements is closed under sum; if and only if every zero-divisor is clean; if and only if; R has a clean prime ideal.     

Clean Semiprime f-Rings with Bounded Inversion

Abstract

An element in a ring is called clean if it may be written as a sum of a unit and idempotent. The ring itself is called clean if every element is clean. Recently,Anderson and Camillo (Anderson,D. D.,Camillo,V. (2002). Commutative rings whose elements are a sum of a unit and an idempotent. Comm. Algebra 30(7):3327–3336) has shown that for commutative rings every von-Neumann regular ring as well as zero-dimensional rings are clean. Moreover,every clean ring is a pm-ring,that is every prime ideal is contained in a unique maximal ideal. In the same article,the authors give an example of a commutative ring which is a pm-ring yet not clean,e.g.,C(?). It is this example which interests us. Our discussion shall take place in a more general setting. We assume that all rings are commutative with 1.     

A Classification of Commutative Reduced Filial Rings

A ring R is said to be filial when for every I, J, if I is an ideal of J and J is an ideal of R then I is an ideal of R. The classification of commutative reduced filial rings is given.     

Generalizations of Prime Ideals

Let R be a commutative ring with identity. Various generalizations of prime ideals have been studied. For example, a proper ideal I of R is weakly prime (resp., almost prime) if a, b ∈ R with ab ∈ I ? {0} (resp., ab ∈ I ? I ²) implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. Let φ:?(R) → ?(R) ∪ {?} be a function where ?(R) is the set of ideals of R. We call a proper ideal I of R a φ-prime ideal if a, b ∈ R with ab ∈ I ? φ(I) implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. So taking φ_?(J) = ? (resp., φ₀(J) = 0, φ₂(J) = J ²), a φ_?-prime ideal (resp., φ₀-prime ideal, φ₂-prime ideal) is a prime ideal (resp., weakly prime ideal, almost prime ideal). We show that φ-prime ideals enjoy analogs of many of the properties of prime ideals.     

Simple-Baer Rings and Minannihilator Modules

Let R be a ring. M is said to be a minannihilator left R-module if r _M l _R (I) = IM for any simple right ideal I of R. A right R-module N is called simple-flat if Nl _R (I) = l _N (I) for any simple right ideal I of R. R is said to be a left simple-Baer (resp., left simple-coherent) ring if the left annihilator of every simple right ideal is a direct summand of _R R (resp., finitely generated). We first obtain some properties of minannihilator and simple-flat modules. Then we characterize simple-coherent rings, simple-Baer rings, and universally mininjective rings using minannihilator and simple-flat modules.     

Straight Rings

A (commutative integral) domain is called a straight domain if A ? B is a prime morphism for each overring B of A; a (commutative unital) ring A is called a straight ring if A/P is a straight domain for all P ∈ Spec(A). A domain is a straight ring if and only if it is a straight domain. The class of straight rings sits properly between the class of locally divided rings and the class of going-down rings. An example is given of a two-dimensional going-down domain that is not a straight domain. The classes of straight rings, of locally divided rings, and of going-down rings coincide within the universe of seminormal weak Baer rings (for instance, seminormal domains). The class of straight rings is stable under formation of homomorphic images, rings of fractions, and direct limits. The “straight domain" property passes between domains having the same prime spectrum. Straight domains are characterized within the universe of conducive domains. If A is a domain with a nonzero ideal I and quotient field K, characterizations are given for A ? (I: _K I) to be a prime morphism. If A is a domain and P ∈ Spec(A) such that A _P is a valuation domain, then the CPI-extension C(P) := A + PA _P is a straight domain if and only if A/P is a straight domain. If A is a going-down domain and P ∈ Spec(A), characterizations are given for A ? C(P) to be a prime morphism. Consequences include divided domain-like behavior of arbitrary straight domains.     

Radically perfect prime ideals in polynomial rings

We call an ideal I of a commutative ring R radically perfect if among the ideals of R whose radical is equal to the radical of I the one with the least number of generators has this number of generators equal to the height of I. Let R be a Noetherian integral domain of Krull dimension one containing a field of characteristic zero. Then each prime ideal of the polynomial ring R[X] is radically perfect if and only if R is a Dedekind domain with torsion ideal class group. We also show that over a finite dimensional Bézout domain R, the polynomial ring R[X] has the property that each prime ideal of it is radically perfect if and only if R is of dimension one and each prime ideal of R is the radical of a principal ideal.     

Smarandache Vertices of the Graphs Associated to the Commutative Rings

Let R be a commutative ring with identity 1 ≠ 0. A nonzero element a in R is said to be a Smarandache zero-divisor if there exist three different nonzero elements x, y, and b (≠ a) in R such that ax = ab = by = 0, but xy ≠ 0. We will generalize this notion to the Smarandache vertex of an arbitrary simple graph and characterize the Smarandache zero-divisors of commutative rings (resp. with respect to an ideal) via their associated zero-divisor graphs. We illustrate them with examples and prove some interesting results about them.     

Characterizations of QF Rings

A ring R is called “left GP-injective” if for any 0 ≠ a ∈ R, there exists n > 0 such that a ⁿ  ≠ 0 and a ⁿ R = r(l(a ⁿ )). It is proved that (1) every right Noetherian left GP-injective ring such that every complement left ideal is a left annihilator is a QF ring, (2) every left GP-injective ring with ACC on left annihilators such that every complement left ideal is a left annihilator is a QF ring, and (3) every left P-injective left CS ring satisfying ACC on essential right ideals is a QF ring. Several well-known results on QF rings are obtained as corollaries.     

On n-Absorbing Ideals of Commutative Rings

Let R be a commutative ring with 1 ≠ 0 and n a positive integer. In this article, we study two generalizations of a prime ideal. A proper ideal I of R is called an n-absorbing (resp., strongly n-absorbing) ideal if whenever x ₁…x _n+1 ∈ I for x ₁,…, x _n+1 ∈ R (resp., I ₁…I _n+1 ? I for ideals I ₁,…, I _n+1 of R), then there are n of the x _i 's (resp., n of the I _i 's) whose product is in I. We investigate n-absorbing and strongly n-absorbing ideals, and we conjecture that these two concepts are equivalent. In particular, we study the stability of n-absorbing ideals with respect to various ring-theoretic constructions and study n-absorbing ideals in several classes of commutative rings. For example, in a Noetherian ring every proper ideal is an n-absorbing ideal for some positive integer n, and in a Prüfer domain, an ideal is an n-absorbing ideal for some positive integer n if and only if it is a product of prime ideals.     

On Generalized Stable Ideals

An ideal I of a ring R is generalized stable in case aR + bR = R with a ∈ I, b ∈ R implies that there exist s, t ∈ 1 + I such that s(a + by)t = 1 for a y ∈ R. We establish, in this article, necessary and sufficient conditions for an ideal of a regular ring to be generalized stable. It is shown that every regular square matrix over such ideals admits a diagonal reduction. These extend the corresponding results of generalized stable regular rings.     

Armendariz Properties Relative to a Ring Endomorphism

For an endomorphism α of a ring R, we introduce the notion of an α-Armendariz ring to investigate the relative Armendariz properties. This concept extends the class of Armendariz rings and gives us an opportunity to study Armendariz rings in a general setting. It is obvious that every Armendariz ring is an α-Armendariz ring, but we shall give an example to show that there exists a right α-Armendariz ring which is not Armendariz. A number of properties of this version are established. It is shown that if I is a reduced ideal of a ring R such that R/I is a right α-Armendariz ring, then R is right α-Armendariz. For an endomorphism α of a ring R, we show that R is right α-Armendariz if and only if R[x] is right α-Armendariz. Moreover, a weak form of α-Armendariz rings is considered in the last section. We show that in general weak α-Armendariz rings need not be α-Armendariz.