Graphs with maximal signless Laplacian spectral radius

By the signless Laplacian of a (simple) graph G we mean the matrix Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), where A(G),D(G) denote respectively the adjacency matrix and the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees of G. It is known that connected graphs G that maximize the signless Laplacian spectral radius ρ(Q(G)) over all connected graphs with given numbers of vertices and edges are (degree) maximal. For a maximal graph G with n vertices and r distinct vertex degrees δ_r>δ_r-1>?>δ₁, it is proved that ρ(Q(G))<ρ(Q(H)) for some maximal graph H with n+1 (respectively, n) vertices and the same number of edges as G if either G has precisely two dominating vertices or there exists an integer such that δ_i+δ_r+1-i?n+1 (respectively, δ_i+δ_r+1-i?δ_l+δ_r-l+1). Graphs that maximize ρ(Q(G)) over the class of graphs with m edges and m-k vertices, for k=0,1,2,3, are completely determined.     

Graphs with certain families of spanning trees

Sufficient conditions are given in terms of δ(G) and Δ(T), for a graph G with n vertices to contain a tree T with n vertices. One of these sufficient conditions is used to calculate some of the Ramsey numbers for the pair tree-star. Also necessary conditions are given, in terms of δ(G), for a graph G with n vertices to contain all trees with n vertices.     

Connected graphs with maximal Q-index: The one-dominating-vertex case

By the signless Laplacian of a (simple) graph G we mean the matrix Q(G)=D(G)+A(G), where A(G),D(G) denote respectively the adjacency matrix and the diagonal matrix of vertex degrees of G. For every pair of positive integers n,k, it is proved that if 3?k?n-3, then H_n,k, the graph obtained from the star K_1,n-1 by joining a vertex of degree 1 to k+1 other vertices of degree 1, is the unique connected graph that maximizes the largest signless Laplacian eigenvalue over all connected graphs with n vertices and n+k edges.     

An upper bound on the domination number of a graph with minimum degree 2

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex of V(G)?S is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a dominating set of G is the domination number of G, denoted as γ(G). Let P_n and C_n denote a path and a cycle, respectively, on n vertices. Let k₁(F) and k₂(F) denote the number of components of a graph F that are isomorphic to a graph in the family {P₃,P₄,P₅,C₅} and {P₁,P₂}, respectively. Let L be the set of vertices of G of degree more than 2, and let G−L be the graph obtained from G by deleting the vertices in L and all edges incident with L. McCuaig and Shepherd [W. McCuaig, B. Shepherd, Domination in graphs with minimum degree two, J. Graph Theory 13 (1989) 749-762] showed that if G is a connected graph of order n≥8 with δ(G)≥2, then γ(G)≤2n/5, while Reed [B.A. Reed, Paths, stars and the number three, Combin. Probab. Comput. 5 (1996) 277-295] showed that if G is a graph of order n with δ(G)≥3, then γ(G)≤3n/8. As an application of Reed’s result, we show that if G is a graph of order n≥14 with δ(G)≥2, then .     

On n-Hamiltonian line graphs

With each nonempty graph G one can associate a graph L(G), called the line graph of G, with the property that there exists a one-to-one correspondence between E(G) and V(L(G)) such that two vertices of L(G) are adjacent if and only if the corresponding edges of G are adjacent. For integers m ≥ 2, the mth iterated line graph L^m(G) of G is defined to be L(L^m-1(G)). A graph G of order p ≥ 3 is n-Hamiltonian, 0 ≤ n ≤ p ? 3, if the removal of any k vertices, 0 ≤ k ≤ n, results in a Hamiltonian graph. It is shown that if G is a connected graph with δ(G) ≥ 3, where δ(G) denotes the minimum degree of G, then L²(G) is (δ(G) ? 3)-Hamiltonian. Furthermore, if G is 2-connected and δ(G) ≥ 4, then L²(G) is (2δ(G) ? 4)-Hamiltonian. For a connected graph G which is neither a path, a cycle, nor the graph K(1, 3) and for any positive integer n, the existence of an integer k such that L^m(G) is n-Hamiltonian for every m ≥ k is exhibited. Then, for the special case n = 1, bounds on (and, in some cases, the exact value of) the smallest such integer k are determined for various classes of graphs.     

Edge-connectivity and edge-superconnectivity in sequence graphs

Given an integer k?1 and any graph G, the sequence graph S_k(G) is the graph whose set of vertices is the set of all walks of length k in G. Moreover, two vertices of S_k(G) are joined by an edge if and only if their corresponding walks are adjacent in G.In this paper we prove sufficient conditions for a sequence graph S_k(G) to be maximally edge-connected and edge-superconnected depending on the parity of k and on the vertex-connectivity of the original graph G.     

Upper bounds for independent domination in regular graphs

Let G be a regular graph of order n and degree δ. The independent domination numberi(G) is defined to be the minimum cardinality among all maximal independent sets of vertices of G. We establish upper bounds, as functions of n and δ, for the sum and product of the independent domination numbers of a regular graph and its complement.     

On a classical theorem on the diameter and minimum degree of a graph

In this work, we obtain good upper bounds for the diameter of any graph in terms of its minimum degree and its order, improving a classical theorem due to Erd¨os, Pach, Pollack and Tuza.We use these bounds in order to study hyperbolic graphs(in the Gromov sense). To compute the hyperbolicity constant is an almost intractable problem, thus it is natural to try to bound it in terms of some parameters of the graph. Let H(n, δ_0) be the set of graphs G with n vertices and minimum degree δ_0, and J(n, Δ) be the set of graphs G with n vertices and maximum degree Δ. We study the four following extremal problems on graphs: a(n, δ_0) = min{δ(G) | G ∈ H(n, δ_0)}, b(n, δ_0) = max{δ(G) |G ∈ H(n, δ_0)}, α(n, Δ) = min{δ(G) | G ∈ J(n, Δ)} and β(n, Δ) = max{δ(G) | G ∈ J(n, Δ)}. In particular, we obtain bounds for b(n, δ_0) and we compute the precise value of a(n, δ_0), α(n, Δ) andβ(n, Δ) for all values of n, δ_0 and Δ, respectively.     

The non-isolated vertices in the generating graph of a direct powers of simple groups

For a finite group G let Γ(G) denote the graph defined on the non-identity elements of G in such a way that two distinct vertices are connected by an edge if and only if they generate G. Many deep results on the generation of the finite simple groups G can be equivalently stated as theorems that ensure that Γ(G) is a rich graph, with several good properties. In this paper we want to consider Γ(G ^δ ) where G is a finite non-abelian simple group and G ^δ is the largest 2-generated power of G, with the aim to investigate whether the good generation properties of G still affect the behaviour of Γ(G ^δ ). In particular we prove that the graph obtained from Γ(G ^δ ) by removing the isolated vertices is 1-arc transitive and connected and we investigate the diameter of this graph. Moreover, some intriguing open questions will be introduced and their solutions will be exemplified for $G=\operatorname{Alt}(5)$ .     

Eigenvalues and forbidden subgraphs I

Suppose a graph G have n vertices, m edges, and t triangles. Letting λ_n(G) be the largest eigenvalue of the Laplacian of G and μ_n(G) be the smallest eigenvalue of its adjacency matrix, we prove that