Validating absolute weight bounds in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models

The Charnes, Cooper and Rhodes (CCR) DEA model and its linear forms maximise the efficiency of the assessed decision making unit (DMU) and, at the same time, the ratio of this efficiency to the maximum efficiency taken across all the DMUs, the latter naturally always being equal to one. It has been shown recently that, in the presence of absolute weight bounds, these models may not maximise the ratio of these efficiencies, a fact that may cause problems with the interpretation and use of the optimal primal and dual solutions. For example, an inefficient DMU may have greater efficiency than its target unit for some weights. This paper investigates the problem in greater detail; it shows that, in the linear DEA model maximising the total virtual output of the assessed DMU, the problem occurs only if upper bounds are imposed on the output weights. A similar result is established for the model that minimises the total virtual input.     

Data Envelopment Analysis with Preference Structure

It is important to consider the decision making unit (DMU)'s or decision maker's preference over the potential adjustments of various inputs and outputs when data envelopment analysis (DEA) is employed. On the basis of the so-called Russell measure, this paper develops some weighted non-radial CCR models by specifying a proper set of ‘preference weights’ that reflect the relative degree of desirability of the potential adjustments of current input or output levels. These input or output adjustments can be either less or greater than one; that is, the approach enables certain inputs actually to be increased, or certain outputs actually to be decreased. It is shown that the preference structure prescribes fixed weights (virtual multiplier bounds) or regions that invalidate some virtual multipliers and hence it generates preferred (efficient) input and output targets for each DMU. In addition to providing the preferred target, the approach gives a scalar efficiency score for each DMU to secure comparability. It is also shown how specific cases of our approach handle non-controllable factors in DEA and measure allocative and technical efficiency. Finally, the methodology is applied with the industrial performance of 14 open coastal cities and four special economic zones in 1991 in China. As applied here, the DEA/preference structure model refines the original DEA model's result and eliminates apparently efficient DMUs.     

Advanced X-efficiencies for CCR- and BCC-models – towards Peer-based DEA controlling

Classical CCR and BCC DEA-models follow a general concept: they allow each DMU to evaluate its (in-) efficiency in the most favorable way, and then propose input reduction and/or output raise so as to follow its best practice units. A first step beyond this ‘self-appraisal’ is the consideration of X-efficiencies thus evaluating DMUs with optimal weights of a peer. Doing this for all possible peers yields a cross-efficiency matrix, either for CCR or for BCC models. This matrix might help to find a fair peer for the remaining DMUs. In a second step recent contributions analyze for CCR-models how such X-evaluated DMUs might improve their efficiency with respect to a peer’s weight system. In these models even free variation of inputs/outputs is possible rather than reduction and/or raise. Such models will be portrayed here and generalized for variable returns to scale. The remaining discomfort which a DMU might feel with the choice for peer among business rivals, leads to the concept of a ‘virtual peer’ VP. This paper proposes such a peer as a consensual option for all DMUs. Now for either return to scale – CCR and BCC – for an input or output oriented focus and by free variation of inputs and outputs they can meet the requirements of VP. The DMUs pay a heavy price, however: the peer controls their respective weights and even their activities; he is a dictator.     

A bi-objective generalized data envelopment analysis model and point-to-set mapping projection

This work introduces a bi-objective generalized data envelopment analysis (Bi-GDEA) model and defines its efficiency. We show the equivalence between the Bi-GDEA efficiency and the non-dominated solutions of the multi-objective programming problem defined on the production possibility set (PPS) and discuss the returns to scale under the Bi-GDEA model. The most essential contribution is that we further define a point-to-set mapping and the mapping projection of a decision making unit (DMU) on the frontier of the PPS under the Bi-GDEA model. We give an effective approach for the construction of the point-to-set-mapping projection which distinguishes our model from other non-radial models for simultaneously considering input and output. The Bi-GDEA model represents decision makers’ specific preference on input and output and the point-to-set mapping projection provides decision makers with more possibility to determine different input and output alternatives when considering efficiency improvement. Numerical examples are employed for the illustration of the procedure of point-to-set mapping.     

基于“零和收益”的SBM效率分配方法及应用

在松弛变量度量(slacks-based measure,SBM)效率评价方法的基础上,首先明确投入(产出)要素固定的生产系统中,投入(产出)要素在各决策单元间的竞争性关系;然后采用比例分配策略对SBM无效决策单元的投入(产出)松弛进行效率分配,以构建一个基于零和收益的SBM(zero sum gains SBM,ZSG-SBM)效率分配方法;再通过分析ZSG-SBM模型与SBM模型效率评价结果的关系,给出了比例分配策略ZSG-SBM模型的求解方法;最后应用实例研究验证了本文模型在要素存在竞争性的复杂生产系统效率评价和资源分配中的优势。     

Measurement and sources of overall and input inefficiencies: Evidences and implications in hospital services

Traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) focuses exclusively on measuring the overall efficiency of a decision making unit (DMU). Yet, variables that have explanatory power for the overall operational inefficiency of a DMU may not necessarily be the same as those that affect its individual input inefficiencies. On many occasions, variables that explain the overall inefficiency of a DMU can be inconsistent or incongruent with those that cause its individual input inefficiencies. Therefore, we conjecture that an overall inefficiency score alone may have limited value for decision making since such a process requires fine-tuning and adjustments of specific input factors of the DMU in order to maximize its overall efficiency. In this paper, the utilization and financial data of a set of hospitals in California is used to empirically test the above conjecture.Our study has several important contributions and practical implications. First, we fine-tune previous efficiency measures on hospitals by refining input and output measures. Second, with variables on organization, management, demographics, and market competition, we identify specific factors associated with a hospital's overall operational inefficiency. More importantly, by decomposing the overall DEA operational inefficiency score into different individual input inefficiencies (including slacks), we further identify specific variables that cause individual input inefficiency. Third, significant differences are observed among factors of the overall inefficiency and individual input inefficiencies. These findings have important implications for identifying congruent factors for performance standard setting and evaluation; it also provides invaluable information for guiding effective resource allocation and better decision making for improving hospital operational efficiency.     

Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information

This work exploits links between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), with decision making units (DMUs) playing the role of decision alternatives. A novel perspective is suggested on the use of the additive DEA model in order to overcome some of its shortcomings, using concepts from multiattribute utility models with imprecise information. The underlying idea is to convert input and output factors into utility functions that are aggregated using a weighted sum (additive model of multiattribute utility theory), and then let each DMU choose the weights associated with these functions that minimize the difference of utility to the best DMU. The resulting additive DEA model with oriented projections has a clear rationale for its efficiency measures, and allows meaningful introduction of constraints on factor weights.     

A generalized DEA model for inputs/outputs estimation

In this paper we discuss the question: among a group of decision making units (DMUs), if a DMU changes some of its input (output) levels, to what extent should the unit change outputs (inputs) such that its efficiency index remains unchanged? In order to solve this question we propose a solving method based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Multiple Objective Linear Programming (MOLP). In our suggested method, the increase of some inputs (outputs) and the decrease due to some of the other inputs (outputs) are taken into account at the same time, while the other offered methods do not consider the increase and the decrease of the various inputs (outputs) simultaneously. Furthermore, existing models employ a MOLP for the inefficient DMUs and a linear programming for weakly efficient DMUs, while we propose a MOLP which estimates input/output levels, regardless of the efficiency or inefficiency of the DMU. On the other hand, we show that the current models may fail in a special case, whereas our model overcomes this flaw. Our method is immediately applicable to solve practical problems.     

A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we present a new clustering method that involves data envelopment analysis (DEA). The proposed DEA-based clustering approach employs the piecewise production functions derived from the DEA method to cluster the data with input and output items. Thus, each evaluated decision-making unit (DMU) not only knows the cluster that it belongs to, but also checks the production function type that it confronts. It is important for managerial decision-making where decision-makers are interested in knowing the changes required in combining input resources so it can be classified into a desired cluster/class. In particular, we examine the fundamental CCR model to set up the DEA clustering approach. While this approach has been carried for the CCR model, the proposed approach can be easily extended to other DEA models without loss of generality. Two examples are given to explain the use and effectiveness of the proposed DEA-based clustering method.     

Variations on the theme of slacks-based measure of efficiency in DEA

In DEA, there are typically two schemes for measuring efficiency of DMUs; radial and non-radial. Radial models assume proportional change of inputs/outputs and usually remaining slacks are not directly accounted for inefficiency. On the other hand, non-radial models deal with slacks of each input/output individually and independently, and integrate them into an efficiency measure, called slacks-based measure (SBM). In this paper, we point out shortcomings of the SBM and propose four variants of the SBM model. The original SBM model evaluates efficiency of DMUs referring to the furthest frontier point within a range. This results in the hardest score for the objective DMU and the projection may go to a remote point on the efficient frontier which may be inappropriate as the reference. In an effort to overcome this shortcoming, we first investigate frontier (facet) structure of the production possibility set. Then we propose Variation I that evaluates each DMU by the nearest point on the same frontier as the SBM found. However, there exist other potential facets for evaluating DMUs. Therefore we propose Variation II that evaluates each DMU from all facets. We then employ clustering methods to classify DMUs into several groups, and apply Variation II within each cluster. This Variation III gives more reasonable efficiency scores with less effort. Lastly we propose a random search method (Variation IV) for reducing the burden of enumeration of facets. The results are approximate but practical in usage.