Lower bounds for the norm of the symmetric product

Suppose each of m, n, and k is a positive integer, k ? n, A is a (real-valued) symmetric n-linear function on E_m, and B is a k-linear symmetric function on E_m. The tensor and symmetric products of A and B are denoted, respectively, by A ?B and A?B. The identity

$\text{6A · B6}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{q=0}\text{n}\text{(}\text{n}\text{k}\text{)}\text{(}\text{n+k}\text{k}\text{)}\text{6A?}{}_{\mathrm{q}}\text{B6}{}^2$

is proven by Neuberger in [1]. An immediate consequence of this identity is the inequality

$\text{6A · B 6}{}^2\text{?}\text{n+k}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{6A · B 6}{}^2$

In this paper a necessary and sufficient condition for

$\text{6A · B 6}{}^2\text{=}\text{n+k}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{?}}\text{6A · B 6}{}^2$

is given. It is also shown that under certain conditions the inequality can be considerably improved. This improvement results from an analysis of the terms 6A?_qB6, 1?q?n, appearing in the identity.     

Pairs of additive equations II. Large odd degree

Let k be an odd positive integer. Davenport and Lewis have shown that the equations

$\text{a}{}_1\text{x}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{+…+a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=0}$

with integer coefficients, have a nontrivial solution in integers x₁,…, x_N provided that

$\text{N?[36klog6k]}$

Here it is shown that for any ? > 0 and k > k₀(?) the equations have a nontrivial solution provided that

$\text{N?}\text{8}\text{log 2}\text{+?}\text{k log k.}$

     

On matrix functions which commute with their derivative

We improve several results published from 1950 up to 1982 on matrix functions commuting with their derivative, and establish two results of general interest. The first one gives a condition for a finite-dimensional vector subspace E(t) of a normed space not to depend on t, when t varies in a normed space. The second one asserts that if A is a matrix function, defined on a set ?, of the form A(t)= U diag(B₁(t),…,B_p(t)) U^-1, t ∈ ?, and if each matrix function B_k has the polynomial form

$\text{B}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(t)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{ki}}\text{(t)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{, t∈ ?, k∈{1,…,p}}$

then A itself has the polynomial form

$\text{A(t)=}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{d?1}\text{f}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)C}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{,t∈?}$

, where

$\text{d=}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{p}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$

, d_k being the degree of the minimal polynomial of the matrix C_k, for every k ∈ {1,…,p}.     

On a conjecture by D. Ž. D̄okovic

It is shown that if $\text{A?Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?{J}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}$ satisfies

$\text{nkσ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(A)?(n?k+1)}{}^2\text{σ}{}_{\mathrm{k?1}}\text{(A)}$

$\text{(k=1,2,…,n)}$

, where σ_k(A) denotes the sum of all kth order subpermanent of A, then Per[λJ_n+(1?λ)A] is strictly decreasing in the interval 0<λ<1.     

Product formulas for semigroups with elliptic generators

Real constant coefficient nth order elliptic operators, Q, which generate strongly continuous semigroups on L²($\text{R}$^k) are analyzed in terms of the elementary generator,

$\text{A = (?n)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(</mtext><mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext><mtext>\; ?\; 1</mtext>}}\text{)(n!)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∑}\text{k}\text{j = 1}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$

, for n even. Integral operators are defined using the fundamental solutions p_n(x, t) to u_t = Au and using real polynomials q_l,…, q_k on $\text{R}$^m by the formula, for q = (q_l,…, q_k),

$\text{(F(t)?)(x) = ∫}$

_$\text{R}$m

$\text{?(x + q(z)) P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(z, t)dz}$

. It is determined when, strongly on L²($\text{R}$^k),

$\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{tQ}}\text{=}\text{lim}\text{j → ∞}\text{F}\text{t}\text{j}{}^{\mathrm{j}}$

. If n = 2 or k = 1, this can always be done. Otherwise the symbol of Q must have a special form.     

Generalized Schur complements

Let A be an n×n complex matrix. For a suitable subspace $\text{M}$ of Cⁿ the Schur compression A _$\text{M}$ and the (generalized) Schur complement A_/$\text{M}$ are defined. If A is written in the form

$\text{A=}\text{B}\text{C}\text{S}\text{T}$

according to the decomposition $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{M}\text{⊕}\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{\perp }}$ and if B is invertible, then

$\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{B}\text{C}\text{S}\text{SB}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{C}$

and

$\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{=}\text{0}\text{0}\text{0}\text{T?SB}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{C}\text{·}$

The commutativity rule for Schur complements is proved:

$\text{(A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{=(A)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{·}$

This unifies Crabtree and Haynsworth's quotient formula for (classical) Schur complements and Anderson's commutativity rule for shorted operators. Further, the absorption rule for Schur compressions is proved:

$\text{(A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>/</mtext><mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{=(A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>N</mtext>}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{=A}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>M</mtext>}}\text{whenever}\text{M}\text{?}\text{N}$

.     

Construction of a recurrence relation for modified moments

In this paper we are constructing a recurrence relation of the form

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{r}\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(k)m}{}_{\mathrm{k+i}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f] = ω(k)}$

for integrals (called modified moments)

$\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{\{\lambda \}}}\text{[f]df=}\text{∫}\text{?1}\text{1}\text{f(x)C}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(\lambda )}}\text{(x)dx (k = 0,1,…)}$

in which C_k^(λ) is the k-th Gegenbauer polynomial of order $\text{λ(λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}$, and f is a function satisfying the differential equation

$\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)f}{}^{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{(x) = p(x) (?1?x?1)}$

of order n, where p₀, p₁, …, p_n ? 0 are polynomials, and m_k^〈λ〉[p] is known for every k. We give three methods of construction of such a recurrence relation. The first of them (called Method I) is optimum in a certain sense.     

Deterministic version of Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of matrix eigenvalues

It is proved that Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of eigenvalues of random matrices, which is important in the statistical theory of energy levels of heavy nuclei, possesses the following completely deterministic version. Let A_n=(a_ij), 1?i, ?n, be the nth section of an infinite Hermitian matrix, {λ⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n its eigenvalues, and {u_k⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n the corresponding (orthonormalized column) eigenvectors. Let $\text{v}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=(a}{}_{\mathrm{n1}}\text{,a}{}_{\mathrm{n2}}\text{,?,a}{}_{\mathrm{n,n?1}}\text{)}$, put

$\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)=[n(n-1)]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>-1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{[(n-1)t]}\text{|v}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{f}}{}^{\mathrm{(n-1)}}\text{|}{}^2\text{,}\text{0?t?1}$

(bookeeping function for the length of the projections of the new row v¹_n of A_n onto the eigenvectors of the preceding matrix A_n?1), and let finally

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=n}{}^{-1}\text{(}\text{number of}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{?x}\text{n}\text{,1?k?n)}$

(empirical distribution function of the eigenvalues of $\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{n}$. Suppose (i) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{nn}}\text{n}\text{=0}$, (ii) lim_nX_n(t)=Ct(0<C<∞,0?t?1). Then

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?W(·,C)}\text{(n→∞)}$

,where W is absolutely continuous with (semicircle) density

$\text{w(x,C)=}\text{(2Cπ)}{}^{-1}\text{(4C-x}{}^2{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}\text{0}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}$

     

An identity for the divisor generating function arising from sorting theory

In the present paper we prove

$\text{∑}\text{n=1}\text{∞}\text{nx}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∏}\text{j=n+I}\text{∞}\text{(1?x}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{)}$

$\text{=}\text{∑}\text{n=1}\text{∞}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n(n+1)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{(1?x)(1?x}{}^2\text{)?(1?x}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}\text{)(1?x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}{}^2$

$\text{=}\text{∑}\text{n=1}\text{∞}\text{d(n)x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$

     

Concavity of certain maps on positive definite matrices and applications to Hadamard products

If f is a positive function on (0, ∞) which is monotone of order n for every n in the sense of Löwner and if Φ₁ and Φ₂ are concave maps among positive definite matrices, then the following map involving tensor products:

$\text{(A,B)?f[Φ}{}_1\text{(A)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{?Φ}{}_2\text{(B)]·(Φ}{}_1\text{(A)?I)}$

is proved to be concave. If Φ₁ is affine, it is proved without use of positivity that the map

$\text{(A,B)?f[Φ}{}_1\text{(A)?Φ}{}_2\text{(B)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{]·(Φ}{}_1\text{(A)?I)}$

is convex. These yield the concavity of the map

$\text{(A,B)?A}{}^{\mathrm{1?p}}\text{?B}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$

(0<p?1) (Lieb's theorem) and the convexity of the map

$\text{(A,B)?A}{}^{\mathrm{1+p}}\text{?B}{}^{\mathrm{?p}}$

(0<p?1), as well as the convexity of the map

$\text{(A,B)?(A·log[A])?I?A?log[B]}$

.These concavity and convexity theorems are then applied to obtain unusual estimates, from above and below, for Hadamard products of positive definite matrices.     

Capacitance and the conformal module of quadrilaterals

Let ? be defined on T^r and have an absolutely convergent Fourier series

. Set $\text{∥?∥ = ∑ ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦}$. In this paper the problem of determining the limit of $\text{∥?}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}$, as n → ∞, is studied.     

A regularity result for singular nonlinear elliptic systems in inverse-power weighted Sobolev spaces

The compactness method to weighted spaces is extended to prove the following theorem:Let H_2,s¹(B₁) be the weighted Sobolev space on the unit ball in Rⁿ with norm

$\text{6ν6}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{2,s}}\text{=}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|ν|}{}^2\text{dx + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{(}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)|Dν|}{}^2\text{dx.}$

Let n ? 2 ? s < n. Let u? [H_2,s¹(B₁) ∩ L^∞(B₁)]^N be a solution of the nonlinear elliptic system

$\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{B1}}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x,u) D}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{D}{}^{\mathrm{j\psi }}{}_{\mathrm{K}}\text{dx=0}$

, $\text{∨}\text{ψ}\text{?}\text{¦C}{}_0{}^1\text{(B}{}_1\text{)¦}{}^{\mathrm{N}}\text{,}\text{where}\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}\text{¦ ? L, A}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}{}^{\mathrm{hk}}$ are uniformly continuous functions of their arguments and satisfy:

$\text{|η|}{}^2\text{=}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{j=1}\text{N}\text{|η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{|}{}^2\text{?}\text{∑}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{,}\text{1}\text{r}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{,}\text{∑}\text{h,K=1}\text{N}\text{A}{}^{\mathrm{hK}}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{h}}\text{η}{}^{\mathrm{i}}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{,}\text{?η?R}{}^{\mathrm{Nn}}$

. Then there exists an R₁, 0 < R₁ < 1, and an α, 0 < α < 1, along with a set $\text{Ω ? B}{}_1$ such that (1) $\text{H}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 2}}\text{(Ω) = 0}$, (2) Ω does not contain the origin; Ω does not contain B_R1, (3) $\text{B}{}_1\text{? Ω}$ is open, (4) u is $\text{Lip}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(B}{}_1\text{? Ω)}$; u is Lip_αB_R1.     

On the number of zeros of diagonal cubic forms

Let M_s, be the number of solutions of the equation

$\text{X}{}_1{}^3\text{+ X}{}_2{}^3\text{+ … + X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^3\text{=0}$

in the finite field GF(p). For a prime p ≡ 1(mod 3),

$\text{∑}\text{s=1}\text{∞}\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{X}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{=}\text{x}\text{1 ? px}\text{+}\text{x}{}^2\text{(p ? 1)(2 + dx)}\text{1 ? 3px}{}^2\text{? pdx}{}^3$

,

$\text{M}{}_3\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ d(p ? 1)}$

, and

$\text{M}{}_4\text{= p}{}^2\text{+ 6(p}{}^2\text{? p)}$

. Here d is uniquely determined by

$\text{4}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{= d}{}^2\text{+ 27b}{}^2\text{and}\text{d ≡ 1(}\text{mod}\text{3)}$

.     

Restricted plane tree representations of four Motzkin-Catalan equations

Four equations are presented relating the well-known Catalan numbers and the Motzkin numbers m_n, defined by

$\text{m(x) = 1 + xm(x) + x}{}^2\text{m}{}^2\text{(x) =}\text{∑}\text{n=0}\text{m}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{x}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{,}$

first encountered in Th. Motzkin's paper (Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.54 (1948), 352–360) in a circle chording setting.In this paper five pairs of subsets of the plane trees provide natural settings for the four equations. In these settings the equations are immediate consequences of “natural correspondences” of the plane tree families.     

Kolmogorov-Landau inequalities for monotone functions

Presented in this report are two further applications of very elementary formulae of approximate differentiation. The first is a new derivation in a somewhat sharper form of the following theorem of V. M. Olovyani?nikov: LetN_n (n ? 2) be the class of functionsg(x) such thatg(x), g′(x),…, g⁽ⁿ⁾(x) are ? 0, bounded, and nondecreasing on the half-line ?∞ < x ? 0. A special element ofN_nis

$\text{g}{}_1\text{(x) = 0}\text{if}\text{?∞ < x < ?1, g}{}_1\text{(x) = (1 + x)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{if}\text{?1 ? x ? 0}$

. Ifg(x) ∈ N_nis such that

$\text{g(0) ? g}{}_1\text{(0) = 1, g}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(0) ? g}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(0) = n!}$

, then

$\text{g}{}^{\mathrm{(v)}}\text{(0) ? g}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{(v)}}\text{(0)}$

for

1$\text{v = 1,…, n ? 1}$

. Moreover, if we have equality in (1) for some value of v, then we have there equality for all v, and this happens only if $\text{g(x) = g}{}_1\text{(x)}$ in (?∞, 0].The second application gives sufficient conditions for the differentiability of asymptotic expansions (Theorem 4).     

Asymptotic results for partitions (II) and a conjecture of Bateman and Erdös

Asymptotic results are obtained for p_A^(k)(n), the kth difference of the function p_A(n) which is the number of partitions of n into integers from A. Under certain restrictions on A it is shown that

$\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{A}}{}^{\mathrm{(k+1)}}\text{(n)}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{A}}{}^{\mathrm{(k)}}\text{(n)}\text{= O(n}{}^{\mathrm{?1/2}}\text{) (n→ ∫)}$

thereby verifying for these A a conjecture of Bateman and Erdös.     

Common strict character of some sharp infinite-sequence martingale inequalities

A procedure is given for proving strictness of some sharp, infinite-sequence martingale inequalities, which arise from sharp, finite-sequence martingale inequalities attained by degenerating extremal distributions. The procedure is applied to obtain strictness of the sharp inequalities of Cox and Kemperman

$\text{P(|X}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{|?1 for some i=1, 2,…)?(ln 2)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{sup}\text{n}\text{E}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$

and of Cox (sharp form of Burkholder's inequality)

$\text{P}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{∞}\text{X}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?1}\text{? e}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{sup}\text{n}\text{E}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$

for all nontrivial martingale difference sequences X₀,X₁,….     

Canonical forms for linear systems

This paper considers canonical forms for the similarity action of Gl(n) on $\text{∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{={(A,B)∈}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{×}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{}}$:

$\text{Gl(n×∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}\text{→∑}{}_{\mathrm{n,m}}$

,

$\text{(H,(A,B))?(HAH}{}^{-1}\text{,HB)}$

Those canonical forms are obtained as an application of a more general method to select canonical elements M_c in the orbits $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$ of a matrix group G acting on a set of matrices $\text{M}\text{?}\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$. We define a total order (?) on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{l}}\text{·}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, different from the lexicographic order ^l? [0^l?x ? x <0, but $\text{0?x≠0 for x∈}\text{R}\text{]}$ and consider normalized $\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}$-elements with a minimal number of parameters:

$\text{min{}\text{M}\text{?}\text{∈}\text{O}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{:}\text{M}\text{?}\text{normalized}}$

It is shown that the row and column echelon forms, the Jordan canonical form, and “nice” control canonical forms for reachable (A,B)-pairs have a homogeneous interpretation as such (?)-minimal orbit elements. Moreover new canonical forms for the general action (?) are determined via this method.     

Binomial self-inverse sequences and tangent coefficients

This paper treats the class of sequences {a_n} that satisfy the recurrence relation

$\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{2n+1}}\text{=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k=0</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext>}}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{(}\text{n}\text{k}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{n?k}}$

between the odd and even terms of {a_n} that involves the coefficients of tan(t), namely

$\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{2n+1}}\text{=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k=0</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext>}}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{(}\text{2}\text{n}\text{+1}\text{2}\text{k}\text{+1}\text{)}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(d/2)}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{2n?2k}}$

A combinatorial setting is then provided to elucidate the appearance of the tangent coefficients in this equation.