考虑投资者风险态度的随机模糊投资组合模型及实证

考虑投资者面临证券市场随机和模糊的双重不确定性,把证券收益率视为随机模糊变量。在前景理论下考虑投资者的风险态度,建立不同的随机模糊收益率、期望收益隶属度函数和目标权重,构建考虑投资者风险态度的随机模糊投资组合模型。采用实证方法把市场分为下降和上升两个阶段,研究不同风险态度投资者的投资组合差异及模型表现。结果表明:投资者的风险态度会影响投资组合的结构;考虑投资者风险态度的随机模糊投资组合模型,能够满足不同风险态度投资者对投资收益和风险的差异需求,且在实际投资决策中具有可行性。     

基于DEA博弈交叉效率和投资者心理的模糊投资组合研究

考虑到投资者并不是完全理性的,本文结合DEA博弈交叉效率方法研究了带有投资者心理因素的多目标模糊投资组合决策问题。首先,为了充分描绘投资者的心理因素和风险感知,本文基于可能性理论推导了带有风险态度的可能性均值和半绝对偏差。其次,将候选的风险资产视为互相竞争的博弈者,采用基于熵权法的DEA博弈交叉效率模型衡量它们的综合表现,从而得到每项资产的博弈交叉效率和奇异指数,并将其分别作为额外的收益和风险决策准则。基于此,提出了更加综合的可能性均值—半绝对偏差—博弈交叉效率—奇异指数模型。最后,通过一个应用实例验证了所提出的模型的合理性和有效性,从而为不同类型的投资者提供具有个性化的投资策略。     

On agglomeration in competitive location models

In this work a fuzzy multi-criteria model for portfolio selection is proposed which includes together with the classical financial risk-return bi-objective problem a new non-financial criterion. The proposed model will allow the analyst to offer the investor not only the financially good solutions but also some alternative solutions. In fact, the investor will be allowed to introduce in the model information about how far he or she is willing to go from the financially efficient portfolios knowing about the financial cost of these alternative solutions. A numerical example is presented in order to illustrate the proposed model. The social responsibility of the portfolio is considered as an additional secondary non-financial goal in the mean-variance portfolio selection model. Social responsibility is by its nature a vague and imprecise concept and will be handled by means of fuzzy set tools.     

A Class of Chance Constrained Multi-objective Portfolio Selection Model Under Fuzzy Random Environment

This paper deals with a class of chance constrained portfolio selection problems in the fuzzy random decision making system. An integrated fuzzy random portfolio selection model with a chance constraint is proposed on the basis of the mean-variance model and the safety-first model. According to different definitions of chance, we consider two types of fuzzy random portfolio selection models: one is for the optimistic investors and the other is for the pessimistic investors. In order to deal with the fuzzy random models, we develop a few theorems on the variances of fuzzy random returns and the equivalent partitions of two types of chance constraints. We then transform the fuzzy random portfolio selection models into their equivalent crisp models. We further employ the ε-constraint method to obtain the efficient frontier. Finally, we apply the proposed models and approaches to the Chinese stock market as an illustration.     

考虑保守卖空与财务困境的背景风险投资组合模型

如何合理地考虑投资者所面临的背景风险及现实市场限制来进行有效地投资决策是人们所广泛关注的重要实际管理决策问题。本文研究投资者同时面临加性和乘性两类背景风险的前提下具有保守卖空与财务困境的投资组合选择问题。假定投资者寻求使得投资收益最大、投资风险最小及证券主体财务困境最小的最优投资组合策略,进而提出考虑保守卖空与财务困境的背景风险投资组合模型。然后,利用具有精英策略的非支配排序遗传算法对模型进行求解。最后,通过实例来阐述模型的实用性。研究结果表明:考虑保守卖空能为投资者提供更大的收益;两类背景风险的变化均导致有效前沿面的变化。     

A multi-objective evolutionary optimization approach for an integrated location-inventory distribution network problem under vendor-managed inventory systems

This paper develops a λ mean-hybrid entropy model to deal with portfolio selection problem with both random uncertainty and fuzzy uncertainty. Solving this model provides the investor a tradeoff frontier between security return and risk. We model the security return as a triangular fuzzy random variable, where the investor’s individual preference is reflected by the pessimistic-optimistic parameter λ. We measure the security risk using the hybrid entropy in this model. Algorithm is developed to solve this bi-objective portfolio selection model. Beside, a numerical example is also presented to illustrate this approach.     

考虑投资者异质信念和目标优先级的投资组合问题研究

考虑证券市场的模糊不确定性及投资者的模糊决策特征,以资产收益、下方风险及流动性为模糊投资目标,构建考虑投资者异质信念和目标优先级的多目标投资组合模型。进一步,以我国主板、中小板和创业板市场为背景,采用CPT-TOPSIS交互式算法进行实证分析。研究发现:乐观、理性和悲观投资者权衡收益、风险和流动性目标时偏好的优先顺序不同,导致资产配置结构、最优决策和绩效表现存在差别。结果表明模糊多目标模型能够满足不同投资者权衡多目标的差异化投资需求,取得优于基准随机投资组合的投资效果,可作为投资者投资决策的参考依据。     

Entropic risk measures and their comparative statics in portfolio selection: Coherence vs. convexity

We conduct a decision-theoretic analysis of optimal portfolio choices and, in particular, their comparative statics under two types of entropic risk measures, the coherent entropic risk measure (CERM) and the convex entropic risk measure (ERM). Starting with the portfolio selection between a risky and a risk free asset (framework of Arrow (1965) and Pratt (1964)), we find a restrictive all-or-nothing investment decision under the CERM, while the ERM yields diversification. We then address a portfolio problem with two risky assets, and provide comparative statics with respect to the investor’s risk aversion (framework of Ross (1981)). Here, both the CERM and the ERM exhibit closely interrelated inconsistencies with respect to the interpretation of their risk parameters as a measure of risk aversion: for any two investors with different risk parameters, it may happen that the investor with the higher risk parameter invests more in the riskier one of the two assets. Finally, we analyze the portfolio problem “risky vs. risk free” in the presence of an independent background risk, and analyze the effect of changes in this background risk (framework of Gollier and Pratt (1996)). Again, we find questionable predictions: under the CERM, the optimal risky investment is always increasing instead of decreasing when a background risk is introduced, while under the ERM it remains unaffected.     

Fuzzy portfolio selection model with real features and different decision behaviors

In the ever changing financial markets, investor’s decision behaviors may change from time to time. In this paper, we consider the effect of investor’s different decision behaviors on portfolio selection in fuzzy environment. We present a possibilistic mean-semivariance model for fuzzy portfolio selection by considering some real investment features including proportional transaction cost, fixed transaction cost, cardinality constraint, investment threshold constraints, decision dependency constraints and minimum transaction lots. To describe investor’s different decision behaviors, we characterize the return rates on securities by LR fuzzy numbers with different shape parameters in the left- and right-hand reference functions. Then, we design a novel hybrid differential evolution algorithm to solve the proposed model. Finally, we provide a numerical example to illustrate the application of our model and the effectiveness of the designed algorithm.     

Portfolio-optimization models for small investors

Since 2010, the client base of online-trading service providers has grown significantly. Such companies enable small investors to access the stock market at advantageous rates. Because small investors buy and sell stocks in moderate amounts, they should consider fixed transaction costs, integral transaction units, and dividends when selecting their portfolio. In this paper, we consider the small investor’s problem of investing capital in stocks in a way that maximizes the expected portfolio return and guarantees that the portfolio risk does not exceed a prescribed risk level. Portfolio-optimization models known from the literature are in general designed for institutional investors and do not consider the specific constraints of small investors. We therefore extend four well-known portfolio-optimization models to make them applicable for small investors. We consider one nonlinear model that uses variance as a risk measure and three linear models that use the mean absolute deviation from the portfolio return, the maximum loss, and the conditional value-at-risk as risk measures. We extend all models to consider piecewise-constant transaction costs, integral transaction units, and dividends. In an out-of-sample experiment based on Swiss stock-market data and the cost structure of the online-trading service provider Swissquote, we apply both the basic models and the extended models; the former represent the perspective of an institutional investor, and the latter the perspective of a small investor. The basic models compute portfolios that yield on average a slightly higher return than the portfolios computed with the extended models. However, all generated portfolios yield on average a higher return than the Swiss performance index. There are considerable differences between the four risk measures with respect to the mean realized portfolio return and the standard deviation of the realized portfolio return.