Path factors and parallel knock-out schemes of almost claw-free graphs

An H₁,{H₂}-factor of a graph G is a spanning subgraph of G with exactly one component isomorphic to the graph H₁ and all other components (if there are any) isomorphic to the graph H₂. We completely characterise the class of connected almost claw-free graphs that have a P₇,{P₂}-factor, where P₇ and P₂ denote the paths on seven and two vertices, respectively. We apply this result to parallel knock-out schemes for almost claw-free graphs. These schemes proceed in rounds in each of which each surviving vertex eliminates one of its surviving neighbours. A graph is reducible if such a scheme eliminates every vertex in the graph. Using our characterisation, we are able to classify all reducible almost claw-free graphs, and we can show that every reducible almost claw-free graph is reducible in at most two rounds. This leads to a quadratic time algorithm for determining if an almost claw-free graph is reducible (which is a generalisation and improvement upon the previous strongest result that showed that there was a O(n^5.376) time algorithm for claw-free graphs on n vertices).     

Tank-Ring Factors in Supereulerian Claw-Free Graphs

A graph G has a tank-ring factor F if F is a connected spanning subgraph with all vertices of degree 2 or 4 that consists of one cycle C and disjoint triangles attaching to exactly one vertex of C such that every component of G ? C contains exactly two vertices. In this paper, we show the following results. (1) Every supereulerian claw-free graph G with 1-hourglass property contains a tank-ring factor. (2) Every supereulerian claw-free graph with 2-hourglass property is Hamiltonian.     

Circumferences of regular claw-free graphs

A known result obtained independently by Fan and Jung is that every 3-connected k-regular graph on n vertices contains a cycle of length at least min{3k,n}. This raises the question of how much can be said about the circumferences of 3-connected k-regular claw-free graphs. In this paper, we show that every 3-connected k-regular claw-free graph on n vertices contains a cycle of length at least min{6k-17,n}.     

A Note on Large Rainbow Matchings in Edge-coloured Graphs

A rainbow subgraph in an edge-coloured graph is a subgraph such that its edges have distinct colours. The minimum colour degree of a graph is the smallest number of distinct colours on the edges incident with a vertex over all vertices. Kostochka, Pfender, and Yancey showed that every edge-coloured graph on n vertices with minimum colour degree at least k contains a rainbow matching of size at least k, provided ${n\geq \frac{17}{4}k^2}$ . In this paper, we show that n ≥ 4k ? 4 is sufficient for k ≥ 4.     

On matching and total domination in graphs

A set M of edges of a graph G is a matching if no two edges in M are incident to the same vertex. A set S of vertices in G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The matching number is the maximum cardinality of a matching of G, while the total domination number of G is the minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between the matching and total domination number of a graph. We observe that the total domination number of every claw-free graph with minimum degree at least three is bounded above by its matching number, and we show that every k-regular graph with k?3 has total domination number at most its matching number. In general, we show that no minimum degree is sufficient to guarantee that the matching number and total domination number are comparable.     

On the signless Laplacian index of cacti with a given number of pendant vertices

A connected graph G is a cactus if any two of its cycles have at most one common vertex. In this article, we determine graphs with the largest signless Laplacian index among all the cacti with n vertices and k pendant vertices. As a consequence, we determine the graph with the largest signless Laplacian index among all the cacti with n vertices; we also characterize the n-vertex cacti with a perfect matching having the largest signless Laplacian index.     

Paired-Domination in Claw-Free Graphs

A paired-dominating set of a graph G is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching, while the paired-domination number, denoted by γ _pr (G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set in G. In this paper we investigate the paired-domination number in claw-free graphs. Specifically, we show that γ _pr (G) ≤ (3n ? 1)/5 if G is a connected claw-free graph of order n with minimum degree at least three and that this bound is sharp.     

Bounds on total domination in claw-free cubic graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set, denoted by TDS, of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S (other than itself). The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G). If G does not contain K_1,3 as an induced subgraph, then G is said to be claw-free. It is shown in [D. Archdeacon, J. Ellis-Monaghan, D. Fischer, D. Froncek, P.C.B. Lam, S. Seager, B. Wei, R. Yuster, Some remarks on domination, J. Graph Theory 46 (2004) 207-210.] that if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least three, then γ_t(G)?n/2. Two infinite families of connected cubic graphs with total domination number one-half their orders are constructed in [O. Favaron, M.A. Henning, C.M. Mynhardt, J. Puech, Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three, J. Graph Theory 34(1) (2000) 9-19.] which shows that this bound of n/2 is sharp. However, every graph in these two families, except for K₄ and a cubic graph of order eight, contains a claw. It is therefore a natural question to ask whether this upper bound of n/2 can be improved if we restrict G to be a connected cubic claw-free graph of order at least 10. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative. We prove that if G is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order n?10, then γ_t(G)?5n/11.     

Flip Graphs of Bounded Degree Triangulations

We study flip graphs of triangulations whose maximum vertex degree is bounded by a constant k. In particular, we consider triangulations of sets of n points in convex position in the plane and prove that their flip graph is connected if and only if k > 6; the diameter of the flip graph is O(n ²). We also show that, for general point sets, flip graphs of pointed pseudo-triangulations can be disconnected for k ≤ 9, and flip graphs of triangulations can be disconnected for any k. Additionally, we consider a relaxed version of the original problem. We allow the violation of the degree bound k by a small constant. Any two triangulations with maximum degree at most k of a convex point set are connected in the flip graph by a path of length O(n log n), where every intermediate triangulation has maximum degree at most k + 4.     

Spanning Star Trees in Regular Graphs

For a subset W of vertices of an undirected graph G, let S(W) be the subgraph consisting of W, all edges incident to at least one vertex in W, and all vertices adjacent to at least one vertex in W. If S(W) is a tree containing all the vertices of G, then we call it a spanning star tree of G. In this case W forms a weakly connected but strongly acyclic dominating set for G. We prove that for every r ≥ 3, there exist r-regular n-vertex graphs that have spanning star trees, and there exist r-regular n-vertex graphs that do not have spanning star trees, for all n sufficiently large (in terms of r). Furthermore, the problem of determining whether a given regular graph has a spanning star tree is NP-complete.     

Total domination in claw-free graphs with minimum degree 2

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set (TDS) of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G). A graph is claw-free if it does not contain K_1,3 as an induced subgraph. It is known [M.A. Henning, Graphs with large total domination number, J. Graph Theory 35(1) (2000) 21-45] that if G is a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least two and G∉{C₃,C₅, C₆, C₁₀}, then γ_t(G)?4n/7. In this paper, we show that this upper bound can be improved if G is restricted to be a claw-free graph. We show that every connected claw-free graph G of order n and minimum degree at least two satisfies γ_t(G)?(n+2)/2 and we characterize those graphs for which γ_t(G)=⌊(n+2)/2⌋.     

Rooted Spanning Trees in Tournaments

A tournament of order n is an orientation of a complete graph with n vertices, and is specified by its vertex set V(T) and edge set E(T). A rooted tree is a directed tree such that every vertex except the root has in-degree 1, while the root has in-degree 0. A rooted k-tree is a rooted tree such that every vertex except the root has out-degree at most k; the out-degree of the root can be larger than k. It is well-known that every tournament contains a rooted spanning tree of depth at most 2; and the root of such a tree is also called a king in the literature. This result was strengthened to the following one: Every tournament contains a rooted spanning 2-tree of depth at most 2. We prove that every tournament of order n≥800 contains a spanning rooted special 2-tree in this paper, where a rooted special 2-tree is a rooted 2-tree of depth 2 such that all except possibly one, non-root, non-leaf vertices, have out-degree 2 in the tree. Revised: November 9, 1998     

Dense Arbitrarily Vertex Decomposable Graphs

A graph G of order n is said to be arbitrarily vertex decomposable if for each sequence (n ₁, . . . , n _k ) of positive integers such that n ₁ + · · · + n _k = n there exists a partition (V ₁, . . . , V _k ) of the vertex set of G such that for each ${i \in \{1,\ldots,k\}}$ , V _i induces a connected subgraph of G on n _i vertices. The main result of the paper reads as follows. Suppose that G is a connected graph on n ≥ 20 vertices that admits a perfect matching or a matching omitting exactly one vertex. If the degree sum of any pair of nonadjacent vertices is at least n ? 5, then G is arbitrarily vertex decomposable. We also describe 2-connected arbitrarily vertex decomposable graphs that satisfy a similar degree sum condition.     

On the distance spectral radius of cacti

A cactus is a connected graph in which any two cycles have at most one common vertex. In this article, we determine the unique graph with minimal distance spectral radius in the class of all cacti with n vertices and k cycles. Also, we determine the unique graph with minimal distance spectral radius in the class of all cacti with n vertices and r pendent vertices. Moreover, we determine the class of cacti in which the maximal distance spectral radius among all cacti with n vertices and k cycles is attained.     

Even subgraphs of bridgeless graphs and 2-factors of line graphs

By Petersen's theorem, a bridgeless cubic multigraph has a 2-factor. Fleischner generalised this result to bridgeless multigraphs of minimum degree at least three by showing that every such multigraph has a spanning even subgraph. Our main result is that every bridgeless simple graph with minimum degree at least three has a spanning even subgraph in which every component has at least four vertices. We deduce that if G is a simple bridgeless graph with n vertices and minimum degree at least three, then its line graph has a 2-factor with at most max{1,(3n-4)/10} components. This upper bound is best possible.     

Spanning Trees with Few Leaves

In this paper, we prove that an m-connected graph G on n vertices has a spanning tree with at most k leaves (for k ≥ 2 and m ≥ 1) if every independent set of G with cardinality m + k contains at least one pair of vertices with degree sum at least n − k + 1. This is a common generalization of results due to Broersma and Tuinstra and to Win.     

Subgraphs with Restricted Degrees of Their Vertices in Planar 3-Connected Graphs

We have proved that every 3-connected planar graph G either contains a path on k vertices each of which has degree at most 5k or does not contain any path on k vertices; the bound 5k is the best possible. Moreover, for every connected planar graph H other than a path and for every integer m ≥ 3 there is a 3-connected planar graph G such that each copy of H in G contains a vertex of degree at least m.     

On the number of noncritical vertices in strongly connected digraphs

By definition, a vertex w of a strongly connected (or, simply, strong) digraph D is noncritical if the subgraph D — w is also strongly connected. We prove that if the minimal out (or in) degree k of D is at least 2, then there are at least k noncritical vertices in D. In contrast to the case of undirected graphs, this bound cannot be sharpened, for a given k, even for digraphs of large order. Moreover, we show that if the valency of any vertex of a strong digraph of order n is at least 3/4n, then it contains at least two noncritical vertices. The proof makes use of the results of the theory of maximal proper strong subgraphs established by Mader and developed by the present author. We also construct a counterpart of this theory for biconnected (undirected) graphs.     

Interpolation theorem for the number of pendant vertices of connected spanning subgraphs of equal size

At the 4th International Graph Theory Conference 1980, G. Chartrand posed the following problem: If a (connected) graph G contains spanning trees with m and n pendant vertices, respectively, with m < n, does G contain a spanning tree with k pendant vertices for every integer k, where m < k < n? Recently, S. Schuster showed that the answer is yes. Several variations of this interpolation theorem will be given including the following generalization: If a connected graph G contains connected spanning subgraphs of size r with m and n pendant vertices, respectively, with m < n, then G contains a connected spanning subgraph of size r with k pendant vertices for every integer k, where m < k < n.     

The Erdös-Sós conjecture for spiders

A classical result on extremal graph theory is the Erdös-Gallai theorem: if a graph on n vertices has more than edges, then it contains a path of k edges. Motivated by the result, Erdös and Sós conjectured that under the same condition, the graph should contain every tree of k edges. A spider is a rooted tree in which each vertex has degree one or two, except for the root. A leg of a spider is a path from the root to a vertex of degree one. Thus, a path is a spider of 1 or 2 legs. From the motivation, it is natural to consider spiders of 3 legs. In this paper, we prove that if a graph on n vertices has more than edges, then it contains every k-edge spider of 3 legs, and also, every k-edge spider with no leg of length more than 4, which strengthens a result of Wo?niak on spiders of diameter at most 4.