Some multicolor bipartite Ramsey numbers involving cycles and a small number of colors

For bipartite graphs $G_1,G_2,\dots ,G_k$, the bipartite Ramsey number $b(G_1,G_2,\dots ,G_k)$ is the least positive integer $b$ so that any coloring of the edges of $K_{b,b}$ with $k$ colors will result in a copy of $G_i$ in the $i$th color for some $i$. In this paper, our main focus will be to bound the following numbers: $b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2})$ and $b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2},C_{2t_3})$ for all $t_i\ge 3,$$b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2},C_{2t_3},C_{2t_4})$ for $3\le t_i\le 9,$ and $b(C_{2t_1},C_{2t_2},C_{2t_3},C_{2t_4},C_{2t_5})$ for $3\le t_i\le 5.$ Furthermore, we will also show that these mentioned bounds are generally better than the bounds obtained by using the best known Zarankiewicz-type result.     

Counting numerical semigroups by genus and even gaps

Let $n_g$ be the number of numerical semigroups of genus $g$. We present an approach to compute $n_g$ by using even gaps, and the question: Is it true that $n_{g+1}>n_g$? is investigated. Let $N_{\gamma }\left(g\right)$ be the number of numerical semigroups of genus $g$ whose number of even gaps equals $\gamma$. We show that $N_{\gamma }\left(g\right)=N_{\gamma }\left(3\gamma \right)$ for $\gamma \le ?g∕3?$ and $N_{\gamma }\left(g\right)=0$ for $\gamma >?2g∕3?$; thus the question above is true provided that $N_{\gamma }(g+1)>N_{\gamma }\left(g\right)$ for $\gamma =?g∕3?+1,\dots ,?2g∕3?$. We also show that $N_{\gamma }\left(3\gamma \right)$ coincides with $f_{\gamma }$, the number introduced by Bras-Amorós (2012) in connection with semigroup-closed sets. Finally, the stronger possibility $f_{\gamma }～{\phi }^{2\gamma }$ arises being $\phi =(1+\sqrt{5})∕2$ the golden number.     

On the sum of distinct primes or squares of primes

In 1965 Erd?s introduced $f_2(s)$: $f_2(s)$ is the smallest integer such that every $l>f_2(s)$ is the sum of s distinct primes or squares of primes where a prime and its square are not both used. We prove that for all sufficiently large s, $f_2(s)?p_2+p_3+?+p_{s+1}+3106$, and the set of s with the equality has the density 1.     

Turán number and decomposition number of intersecting odd cycles

Given a graph $H$, the Turán function $\mathrm{ex}(n,H)$ is the maximum number of edges in a graph on $n$ vertices that does not contain $H$ as a subgraph. Let $s,t$ be integers and let $H_{s,t}$ be a graph consisting of $s$ triangles and $t$ cycles of odd lengths at least 5 which intersect in exactly one common vertex. Erd?s et al. (1995) determined the Turán function $\mathrm{ex}(n,H_{s,0})$ and the corresponding extremal graphs. Recently, Hou et al. (2016) determined $\mathrm{ex}(n,H_{0,t})$ and the extremal graphs, where the $t$ cycles have the same odd length $q$ with $q?5$. In this paper, we further determine $\mathrm{ex}(n,H_{s,t})$ and the extremal graphs, where $s?0$ and $t?1$. Let $?(n,H)$ be the smallest integer such that, for all graphs $G$ on $n$ vertices, the edge set $E\left(G\right)$ can be partitioned into at most $?(n,H)$ parts, of which every part either is a single edge or forms a graph isomorphic to $H$. Pikhurko and Sousa conjectured that $?(n,H)=\mathrm{ex}(n,H)$ for $\chi \left(H\right)?3$ and all sufficiently large $n$. Liu and Sousa (2015) verified the conjecture for $H_{s,0}$. In this paper, we further verify Pikhurko and Sousa’s conjecture for $H_{s,t}$ with $s?0$ and $t?1$.     

On a nonlinear wave equation involving the term −∂∂x(μ(x,t,u,6ux62)ux): Linear approximation and asymptotic expansion of solution in many small parameters

In this paper, we consider the following nonlinear Kirchhoff wave equation (1)$\{\begin{array}{c}{u}_{tt}?\frac{?}{?x}\left(\mu (x,t,u,{6u_{x}6}^2)u_x\right)=f(x,t,u,u_x,u_t)\text{,}0<x<1,0<t<T\text{,}\hfill \\ u(0,t)=g_0\left(t\right)\text{,}u(1,t)=g_1\left(t\right)\text{,}\hfill \\ u(x,0)={\stackrel{?}{u}}_0\left(x\right)\text{,}{u}_t(x,0)={\stackrel{?}{u}}_1\left(x\right)\text{,}\hfill \end{array}$ where ${\stackrel{?}{u}}_0$, ${\stackrel{?}{u}}_1$, $\mu$, $f$, $g_0$, $g_1$ are given functions and ${6u_{x}6}^2={\int }_0^1{u}_x^2(x,t)dx$. First, combining the linearization method for nonlinear term, the Faedo–Galerkin method and the weak compact method, a unique weak solution of problem (1) is obtained. Next, by using Taylor’s expansion of the function $\mu (x,t,y,z)$ around the point $(x,t,y_0,z_0)$ up to order $N+1$, we establish an asymptotic expansion of high order in many small parameters of solution.     

A satellite of the grand Furuta inequality and its application

The grand Furuta inequality has the following satellite (SGF;$t\in [0\text{,}1]$), given as a mean theoretic expression:$A?B>0\text{,}t\in [0\text{,}1]?A^{-r+t}{\#}_{\frac{1-t+r}{(p-t)s+r}}(A^t{?}_s{B}^p)?B\text{for}r?t\text{;}p\text{,}s?1\text{,}$where ${\#}_{\alpha }$ is the $\alpha$-geometric mean and ${?}_s$ ($s?[0\text{,}1]$) is a formal extension of ${\#}_{\alpha }$. It is shown that (SGF; $t\in [0\text{,}1]$) has the Löwner–Heinz property, i.e. (SGF; $t=1$) implies (SGF;t) for every $t\in [0\text{,}1]$. Furthermore, we show that a recent further extension of (GFI) by Furuta himself has also the Löwner–Heinz property.     

Star-critical Ramsey numbers for large generalized fans and books

In this paper, we show that for any fixed integers $m\ge 2$ and $t\ge 2$, the star-critical Ramsey number $r_1(K_1+n{K}_t,K_{m+1})=(m?1)tn+t$ for all sufficiently large $n$. Furthermore, for any fixed integers $p\ge 2$ and $m\ge 2$, $r_1(K_p+n{K}_1,K_{m+1})=(m?1+o\left(1\right))n$ as $n\to \infty$.     

Gagliardo–Nirenberg inequalities and non-inequalities: The full story

We investigate the validity of the Gagliardo–Nirenberg type inequality

(1)${6f6}_{W^{s,p}(\mathrm{\Omega })}?{6f6}_{W^{s_1,p_1}(\mathrm{\Omega })}^{\theta }{6f6}_{W^{s_2,p_2}(\mathrm{\Omega })}^{1?\theta },$

with $\mathrm{\Omega }?{\mathbb{R}}^N$. Here, $0\le s_1\le s\le s_2$ are non negative numbers (not necessarily integers), $1\le p_1,p,p_2\le \infty$, and we assume the standard relations

$s=\theta s_1+(1?\theta )s_2,1/p=\theta /p_1+(1?\theta )/p_2\text{ for some }\theta \in (0,1).$

By the seminal contributions of E. Gagliardo and L. Nirenberg, (1) holds when $s_1,s_2,s$ are integers. It turns out that (1) holds for “most” of values of $s_1,\dots ,p_2$, but not for all of them. We present an explicit condition on $s_1,s_2,p_1,p_2$ which allows to decide whether (1) holds or fails.