Maximum average degree and relaxed coloring

We say a graph is $(d,d,\dots ,d,0,\dots ,0)$-colorable with $a$ of $d$’s and $b$ of $0$’s if $V\left(G\right)$ may be partitioned into $b$ independent sets $O_1,O_2,\dots ,O_b$ and $a$ sets $D_1,D_2,\dots ,D_a$ whose induced graphs have maximum degree at most $d$. The maximum average degree, $mad\left(G\right)$, of a graph $G$ is the maximum average degree over all subgraphs of $G$. In this note, for nonnegative integers $a,b$, we show that if $mad\left(G\right)<\frac{4}{3}a+b$, then $G$ is $(1_1,1_2,\dots ,1_a,0_1,\dots ,0_b)$-colorable.     

Defective 2-colorings of planar graphs without 4-cycles and 5-cycles

A 2-coloring is a coloring of vertices of a graph with colors 1 and 2. Define $V_i?\{v\in V\left(G\right):c\left(v\right)=i\}$ for $i=1$ and $2.$ We say that $G$ is $(d_1,d_2)$-colorable if $G$ has a 2-coloring such that $V_i$ is an empty set or the induced subgraph $G\left[V_i\right]$ has the maximum degree at most $d_i$ for $i=1$ and $2.$ Let $G$ be a planar graph without 4-cycles and 5-cycles. We show that the problem to determine whether $G$ is $(0,k)$-colorable is NP-complete for every positive integer $k.$ Moreover, we construct non-$(1,k)$-colorable planar graphs without 4-cycles and 5-cycles for every positive integer $k.$ In contrast, we prove that $G$ is $(d_1,d_2)$-colorable where $(d_1,d_2)=(4,4),(3,5),$ and $(2,9).$     

Proper connection and size of graphs

An edge-coloured graph $G$ is called properly connected if any two vertices are connected by a path whose edges are properly coloured. The proper connection number of a connected graph $G,$ denoted by $\mathrm{pc}\left(G\right)$, is the smallest number of colours that are needed in order to make $G$ properly connected. Our main result is the following: Let $G$ be a connected graph of order $n$ and $k\ge 2$. If $\left|E\left(G\right)\right|\ge \left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n?k?1}{2}\right)+k+2$, then $\mathrm{pc}\left(G\right)\le k$ except when $k=2$ and $G\in \{G_1,G_2\},$ where $G_1=K_1\vee (2K_1+K_2)$ and $G_2=K_1\vee (K_1+2K_2).$     

Approximately locating an invisible agent in a graph with relative distance queries

In a pursuit evasion game on a finite, simple, undirected, and connected graph $G$, a first player visits vertices $m_1,m_2,\dots$ of $G$, where $m_{i+1}$ is in the closed neighborhood of $m_i$ for every $i$, and a second player probes arbitrary vertices $c_1,c_2,\dots$ of $G$, and learns whether or not the distance between $c_{i+1}$ and $m_{i+1}$ is at most the distance between $c_i$ and $m_i$. Up to what distance $d$ can the second player determine the position of the first? For trees of bounded maximum degree and grids, we show that $d$ is bounded by a constant. We conjecture that $d=O(logn)$ for every graph $G$ of order $n$, and show that $d=0$ if $m_{i+1}$ may differ from $m_i$ only if $i$ is a multiple of some sufficiently large integer.     

A note on the list vertex arboricity of toroidal graphs

The vertex arboricity $a\left(G\right)$ of a graph $G$ is the minimum number of colors required to color the vertices of $G$ such that no cycle is monochromatic. The list vertex arboricity $a_l\left(G\right)$ is the list-coloring version of this concept. In this note, we prove that if $G$ is a toroidal graph, then $a_l\left(G\right)\le 4$; and $a_l\left(G\right)=4$ if and only if $G$ contains $K_7$ as an induced subgraph.